https://www.theinvestigative.com/its-official-european-scientific-journal-concludes-9-11-was-a-controlled-demolition/
15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled "15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses," in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings.
The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article's disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.
The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST's official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.
A small step, perhaps; but hopefully a meaningful one.
I see nothing new, as the article has a note:
QuoteNOTE FROM THE EDITORS
This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.
Is this the Steve Jones who wants to debunk Dr Judy Woods book where did the Towers Go?
http://drjudywood.com/towers/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLxdHlkzfpY - Judy Wood "Toasted Cars theory"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb2i8R5YlRk - Judy Wood "Dustification Theory"
The toasted car, and dustification of the inner core of the Twin Towers is really interesting, I realise that there are a lot of conflicting arguments on how the Towers came down, for me it was amazing that the 3 buildings (WTC-7 and Towers 1 & 2) fell almost within their buildings foot-prints, I dont think there has been a explanation either for the rivers of molten steel that were widly reported by Firemen and others mentioned the days after when the clean up had started.
Steve Jones YT Interviews - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVwfwBewVc0 -
I seem to recall that John L was very taken with Dr Woods Theory in other interviews.
For myself, the whole 9/11 was a Flase Flag inside job, I am not sure what exactly brought down the Towers and Building 7, I am almost certain that it was a cruise missile that hit The Pentagon.
I am not sure about the planes that hit the Twin Towers, maybe they were under the control of the Thales / Boeing / Sperry Un-interruptable Auto-pilot technology talked about by Field Mcconnel -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdP3vZ06-TA
Where holograms involved ? I dont know, I wouldnt have been surprised though.
The Flight 93 crash site also has a number of anomoulous data that requires answering - by which I mean, where are parts of the downed aircraft - (liquifaction of the ground due to the impact speed of the Aircraft was an official theory)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsS-xpyqi1w
Crash site compared to the Lockerbie 747 crash site -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCH2D8WuS_c
More questions than answers -
Cheers,
Fans' :'( :(
Concerning Lockerbie, that wasn't a face plant like Flight 93. The Lockerbie 747 was blown up mid-air wasn't it? And then fell to earth?
Quote from: ArMaP on September 16, 2018, 12:26:49 PM
I see nothing new, as the article has a note:
Thanks ArMaP, that's what I thought.....a LOT of speculation if you ask me...
Quote from: fansongecho on September 16, 2018, 02:27:29 PM
Where holograms involved ? I dont know, I wouldnt have been surprised though.
I would, holograms need a directed light source to work, and even then only work when viewed from a limited area.
Agreed a directed light source - from a limited angle... but, and I am only suggesting, what if that light source was not limited to a limited angle, (and was possibly multiple light sources) by which I mean, a number of angles from the viewers stand point, is it possible that there maybe a technology that can project a coincidence waveform pattern of light/images from a vertical, horizontal and orthogonal angles, to create a optical illusion of aircraft hitting the Towers??
I just don't buy thin skin aluminium wings slicing through ferro-concrete , no matter what the velocity -
A phantom at 500 mph https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4wDqSnBJ-k
Sgt Rock :) let me do some checks, its late here, I will come back to you with some details tho - cheers Fans :)
Quote from: fansongecho on September 17, 2018, 12:55:31 AM
Agreed a directed light source - from a limited angle... but, and I am only suggesting, what if that light source was not limited to a limited angle, (and was possibly multiple light sources) by which I mean, a number of angles from the viewers stand point, is it possible that there maybe a technology that can project a coincidence waveform pattern of light/images from a vertical, horizontal and orthogonal angles, to create a optical illusion of aircraft hitting the Towers??
I don't think it's possible, as it would need to be pointing to every person/camera looking at/pointing in that direction, and the image shown should be a correct representation of a 3D model as seen from all those points of view.
Also, if it was just light it wouldn't look opaque on a sunny day.
QuoteI just don't buy thin skin aluminium wings slicing through ferro-concrete , no matter what the velocity -
A phantom at 500 mph https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4wDqSnBJ-k
In that video (I watched because it had an explosion ;D) we can see that the conditions are different, as a solid concrete block doesn't behave in the same way has a steel grid structure and we can see that the concrete block was pushed by the impact.
@ArMaP, I have some research to do before I come back on this - gimme a couple of days.
Cheers,
Fans' :)