For your viewing pleasure, here is the second part of Journal No. 4 (sorry, there is a small section in the middle apparently missing) and the first part of Journal No. 5.
I really don't think you'd find much use for the remainder of the journals, no matter what some people may say. They are primarily concerned with graphs of sensors.
If you don't mind, I'm going to also put this post in the general discussion area so everyone can take a look at them.
It's worth gold to me, chris, and to all the others, well done ;D ;D
Sure it should go into the general area, but our analyses, experiments, plans etc will be posted in the inventor's group area.
That way, we can continue to work in private, quietly, undisturbed.
There's only about 10 of us here (far as i know) and the plan is that we all get to know each other well.
Several of you are lurkers, i know that. We have spoken, and i welcome your impartial presence, and your thoughts...
Preferably that we all have each other's emails, or can all join Skype.
(I'm already on there, but i can't remember who i am there LOL)
That way, if anything (gods forbid) should happen to Thelivingmoon, we can still all communicate.
This is very important, it will enable us to communicate faster, directly, and real time.
Talking of time, i have very little of it, will look at those books ASAP.
See ya,
Luke
For those of you having difficulty in reading Brown's notes, i have transcribed a section of them:
From notebook 4 (august 26 1978)
Section 279:
Quote'The nature of Primary Radiation'
As suggested in the previous section, there is a reason to believe that the primary energy "flux" is oscillatory or wavelike.
As such, it would be classified as radiation.
The first candidate of course, would be electromagnetic radiation. But since sensors are encased in shielded containers, grounded and in some tests, even underwater, most of the radio, heat & light frequencies must be excluded as causing the observed effects.
VLF may of course, penetrate ordinary shields. X-rays and gamma rays at the high end of the electromagnetic spectrum can also penetrate shielding.
Tests already conducted in the mineshaft at UC Berkeley* seem to prove that whatever this primary is it is extremely penetrating, more than x-rays or gamma rays.
Even VLF radiation would be highly attenuated. The mineshaft observations revealed little, if any, attenuation under approx. 250 ft. of rock {unreadable}.
At this point, it seems improbable that EM radiation (at any frequency) is responsible.
However, critical tests should continue.
It is proposed in this section of the notebook to explore other possible 'radiations'.
Other possible candidates are;
1) Gravitational waves - ranging in frequency from VLF up to optical frequencies & above. The possibilities of optical frequencies is intruiging.**
This has been suggested a number of times in earlier sections of this notebook.***
2) "K" waves from cosmic sources.
This appears to be a new concept,i have never seen any reference to it in the scientific literature!
"K" waves, i.e. rapid variations in the dielectric constant (electric permittivity) of free space may, in fact, exist.
The propagation velocity may exceed that of light, reasons are as follows;
The constraints which limit the speed of light are K (dielectric constant) and u (Mu, dielectric permeability). The limitation results from the ability of successive regions of space to 'store' energy.
When a ray of light moves, it is progressively charging, storing, and discharging regions in rapid succession. The analogy might be the falling of a row of dominoes.
The rate of energy transfer depends on the step-wise storage capacity represented by K and u.
I have at this moment no idea how a 'K' wave might be generated. But the energetic processes of quasars & black holes may have many surprises.
Assuming for the present that 'K' waves might be generated in the cosmos, perhaps at the centres of galaxies, what might be their effects?
Since they would be oscillatory in nature, no net change would appear in the speed of light, but what would be the effect on a charged capacitor?
If a capacitor has a given charge, the momentary reduction in K (ambient and internal) would increase the terminal voltage. If K were increased, the voltage would drop.****Hence, if K wave is oscillatory or pulsing, the terminal voltage would engage in similar pulsations.#If the sensor circuit contained a rectifier that pulsations may cause a DC voltage which would add to the original charge.##
Another observation which may be significant in this respect is the rapid fluctuations ({unreadable} effects) which occur in extremely high capacitance capacitors.
A capacitor sensor of several farads may sometimes be seen to vary several millivolts so rapidly that it is inconcievable on the basis of charging & discharging electrical energy.
Well, i've got about 12 farads in 5.5v nanofoil caps, and 2 farads at 400v, so i could try it out. ::)
*-Spelling, i thought it was 'Berkley' or is it 'Berkely' but not 'Berkeley'..?
**- Is this a reference to 'cloaking' technology?
***-True, but why the extra emphasis?
****-See the 'battery experiment' thread started by 7RedOrbs:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=2467.0;topicseen (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=2467.0;topicseen)
#--Anyone got a Ghz scope i can borrow?
##-Ordinary diodes won't do, they won't rectify above a few MHz, you will need high-speed 'schottky' diodes ;)
Now then, where's that GHz scope?
:D
Part 2 of thomas browns notebook 5 is at www.rexresearch.com/brown5/ttbrown-J5-2strspace.pdf -dcooper
No, Rex's mistake.
That is not part of the Journals at all, but the STructure of Space II that was written when TTB was working at Vega.
Quote from: Chris Knight on September 01, 2012, 03:32:14 PM
No, Rex's mistake.
That is not part of the Journals at all, but the STructure of Space II that was written when TTB was working at Vega.
Hey Andy!
The strusture of space is a mandatory read for all here, eh?
A great work of art from a master of theory and scientific discovery.
Good stuff!
Le
Yes it is, and also that 'materials list' 8)
Sorry i don't have time yet to read it all, let alone try to understand it or leave comments.
But i will get round to it next week, i have a few days off.
Dave, you need to see that list, Chris posted it somewhere here...
Or if Chris could post it again here?
I'm just too lazy to go look for it now, but i have printed out most of it, to compare with my own (limited) data.
I think we should swap that file & see who can add what...
Have 2 go,
Keep up the brilliant work guys n gals. :-*
If it helps, I believe Andy's list was posted as an attachment in his original notebook thread.
rose
Quote from: Chris Knight on August 14, 2012, 10:08:02 PM
If you don't mind, I'm going to also put this post in the general discussion area so everyone can take a look at them.
The area that was Linda Brown's section now labeled "Electrogravitics and T.T. Brown" is open to the general members. That would be the place to put it if you want all to see it.
Thanks for adding those.
As to the rest of the members though, seems that any interested in this research are already in THIS group. Haven't had anyone else ask for access for a long time. Most new signups have been spam bots that have found a way to get past the doors and I suspect a lot that passed the spam search are still bots because they have had zero posts since they joined
The bots can register... beat the captcha and questions, but cannot beat the captcha to actually post
Thank you for clarifying Z 8)
As to that 'materials list' Thanks Rose i found it, and it's for everyone to see as far as i care.
But remember that all of you reading this are here by special invitation, and that our goal is to take this further.
That means that certain subjects, like the 'EG Communication' thread & stuff of that nature must be adressed at 2 distinct levels;
1 The public area level.
2 The secret level, where we are now.
We have to do this for many reasons, the main one being made to look stupid when our theories do not hold up to observation.
The other being that we will be subjected to intense 'scientific' debunking & trolling, be ready for it.....
Please be aware also that this site is under close scrutiny from a lot of Alphabet agencies, and some very notable institutions :o
Why are they here?
To learn something ;)
Heads up, people, i leave it up to you to post what you like, & where, but be very aware of the actions resulting from your post.
So far we have made amazing progress both in theoretical & actual, real, research, so let's not stop the ball rolling now, i beg you.
More to come....
Luke