Battle for LA - V2 UFO War: Chinese and US Navy off San Francisco
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ScreenHunter_687-Sep.-17-16.23.jpg)
Chinese Naval forces off California said to be on Joint UFO Suppression Mission
Veteran's Affairs
Joint Fleets Fend Off UFO Threat
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
This last week, reports of Chinese naval vessels off the US coast, Northern Californian in particular, have been reported but denied.
Now an Asian intelligence agencies reports that a combined fleet operation between the US and China has been going on, a full combat operation against what we are told is a "highly unfriendly extra-terrestrial threat."
Kerry Cassidy was an early source on this and should be credited. Here initial suspicions were inaccurate but her information has been confirmed.
The verifications of the fleet operations have been many, there have been no confirmation from the US side though the ships have been seen by every vessel that makes it offshore. The true nature of both the threat and the extent of the multinational military force used is beyond any imaginable classification level.
Rumors:
Extraterrestrial craft are operating from underwater bases.
Advanced US sub-orbital weapons platforms represented as "tested" have actually been deployed from Vandenburg Air Force Base. These are armed with energy weapons.
UFO tracking has been moved from conventional to nano-technology with microscopic sensors being used to detect behaviors such as dimensional rifts and distortions in time, things only discussed in TV shows like Fringe and X Files. (all Fox oddly enough)
The actual classified memo on very short distribution mentions only the following:
Opposition is extraterrestrial and extremely aggressive and unfriendly
The threat represents a "clear and present danger" and is isolated to the Pacific Basin
China is forced to carry US responsibility because our own naval capability is sitting in the Persian Gulf when America is under a very real threat.
Attempts to seek confirmations or to directly verify these operations will lead to fatal consequences.
Our confirmations limit us to this response which I have chosen to represent in a highly deniable form out of personal interest. Others in the US have better information and sources and have been silenced with warnings only.
As to this being a total "hose job," I don't see any advantage in it.
For several months earlier this year, there had been disclosures tied to the UFO issue. One real sighting had been made over South Korea.
After than, the internet had been flooded, yes, Google's "YouTube" with manufactured phony UFO videos, some of "beyond next generation" quality.
All information given on how UFO video or photos are analyed is totally false, childishly so, especially that from the UFO "networks." They are professionally "self discrediting."
About 6 weeks ago, a "study group" was appointed out of NATO and another one in Asia to look at the pattern of UFO videos. A decision was made to aggressively investigate one or more groups.
Being aggressively investigated on such an issue is not recommended.
I would love to be more entertaining, invent things, speculate or, perhaps, include some fascinating videos.
I either have to give this a 70% or reclassify a reliable official source as purposefully leaking something that makes no sense. My suggestion is that readers follow other stories for verfications or information that would help in some way, add it to the comment section and see if we can get a better grip on what may well be an extremely dangerous situation.
Reprinted by Permission for Veteran's Affairs
UFO War: Chinese and US Navy off San Francisco (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/17/ufo-war-chinese-and-us-navy-off-san-francisco/)
(http://www.cristyli.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/UFO.jpg)
Biography
Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today. His career has included extensive experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on counter insurgency, surveillance technologies, intelligence analysis,defense technologies or acting as a UN diplomat and "special consultant."
Duff currently serves on the boards of the Adamus Group, one of the world's largest energy technology firms and of a private financial institution participating in the Federal Reserve Banking group.
His most recent project adapts advanced military technologies to wildlife and land management in cooperation with the UN, USAID and International Wildlife Federation.
Gordon Duff has traveled to over 80 nations. His articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages. Duff, military affairs analyst for Press TV, is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest.
This was first brought up by Amaterasu in a secure area until we had time to investigate further
Disclosure: Adamus Board Addition
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/themes/Transcript/images/authors/gordonduff.jpg)
After Next-Gen Tech Oversight Realignment
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor/Director
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/adamus.jpg)
Please excuse any cryptic aspects of this news release.
Michael Harris has been added to the American sector of the Board of Directors of the Adamus Group. Other members are James S. Hanke, Frederick Coward and Gordon Duff.
Adamus, among other things, manages a series of organizations that oversee high security databases for national intelligence agencies, law enforcement groups and financial institutions.
Several Adamus group companies work in the area we broadly refer to as "disclosure," managing the integration of "after next-gen" technologies. Among those are energy sectors including a variety of fusion systems, advanced energy weapons and unconventional flight systems.
Adamus is privately held, quasi-governmental and operates under the authorities of several treaties and conventions.
Of interest to readers, an Adamus study group manages issues of "disclosure" related to origins of certain technologies, non-ordinary diplomatic relationships and other issues.
Reprint or Repost Permissions (http://www.veteranstoday.com/contact/legal-notice/)
You may repost a VT article on your site as long as you make sure you link back to the original article.
The Adamus Group sounded interesting, so of course I had to look into it further. The "American sector" of the Adamaus group board of directors includes a gun dealer (Hanke) and a former FBI agent (Coward), but the only Google references to such a group that I can find in a quick search are a Florida real estate company, a Perth mining company, and an Oregon ecological consulting firm, with some Wetlands advisory history.
Big talk does not a big footprint make. Of course, absence of a Google trail does not mean there is no such far-reaching organization operating.
Gordon also wrote up the Wanta story, and made a quite a case for it in a past article.
Believe if you will. I remain an agnostic.
rose
And, just to complete the record, Michael Harris, the remaining "American sector" board member is a mortgage banker and radio host.
http://activerain.com/jabber31
Kerry Cassidy tells us
Quote
Mike, a radio show host from Republic Broadcasting, is a contributor to Veteran's Today and a friend of Gordon Duff, the senior editor. And an announcement was made not long ago by Duff on Veteran's Today that Mike was tapped to join his "Adamus Group" a group which is "quaisi governmental" read agency backed.
On this radio show I am asking hard questions and giving Mike, who is a friend :-) a hard time by asking him things like "where do they get their funding"... and what is their purpose/intention etc. And you will hear him state he doesn't know yet, he just joined etc etc.
http://projectcamelotportal.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1165:everyone-wants-to-be-camelot-disclosure-this-way-comes&catid=31&Itemid=218
I'm trying real hard to see how this group might be qualified to manage the dissemination of "post disclosure" technology. Maybe I'm supposed to be sold by the implication that it is "agency-backed" but that's not doing it for me. The last "agency-backed" group I encountered was more devoted to ripping off investors than to disseminating technology.
rose
Interesting stuff, some of the members of the "Adamus" group may be floating a private agenda...False flag, Bluebeam...October suprise...ploy to get the big guns out of the middle east...Will be following closely...BTW, Quite the name ADAMUS....
Another thought...Doesn't make much sense for China to be here with Japan knocking on their front door.....Unless.....2 birds with one stone..??
Yes, Andolin, it is an interesting name and interesting times all around. I know that SecDev Leon Panetta has been speaking of a strategic realignment in Asia and he has extended an invitation to China to take part in future NATO war games. A shift is in the wind, for sure.
I can't speak to the possibility of a False Flag operation, but after reading Gordon Duff over the past couple of years I have come to believe that he is allied with one or more disgruntled groups of former military men ready and eager for the next armed American Revolution to begin. I just don't know to what extent they might be willing to go to initiate it.
rose
Quote from: rose on September 20, 2012, 11:55:03 PM
Yes, Andolin, it is an interesting name and interesting times all around. I know that SecDev Leon Panetta has been speaking of a strategic realignment in Asia and he has extended an invitation to China to take part in future NATO war games. A shift is in the wind, for sure.
I can't speak to the possibility of a False Flag operation, but after reading Gordon Duff over the past couple of years I have come to believe that he is allied with one or more disgruntled groups of former military men ready and eager for the next armed American Revolution to begin. I just don't know to what extent they might be willing to go to initiate it.
rose
Swapping Japan for China...Seems reasonable ;)
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/1226590/1/.html
US and China are doing joint naval manuevers together, in fact.
Also, if you Google the subject of undersea UFO bases off California , quite a bit from years past comes up.
Maybe it's true....
Well... My mind is sufficiently blown for the night. Like I said elsewhere, I have had discussions with Duff, and My spidy sense suggested He was not some crackpot. Didn't realize how high up He was - or rather how deeply involved with things...
He liked My End of Entropy piece...
Yeah... Battling the ET's... Mind is blown.
A while back if you all remeber there was a TV News station that filmed a plane contrail at sunset and 'sold' it as a missile off the coast of California
Now sure the terminally lame looked at t and said "Yup its a missile" without looking at the details. Fine and dandy, happens all the time
BUT the TV news anchor KNEW it was an airplane because in the full footage you see the contrail stop as the plane moves over the dry land air and the plane becomes visible as it passed over the camera
The motive was to get ratings... but the aftermath was ridiculous. One interview was with a retired NORAD officer who said 'it could be a missile launched bt a Chinese sum off the coast of LA to send a message to Obama who was in China for talks at the time"
REALLY? A Chines sub in LA waters, 5 miles from San Nicholas Island? Uh huh sure. It was an airplane and and optical illusion. I can understand web nuts making the mistake, but these news people DELIBERATELY pushed the missile angle at us so that today the debate is still unsettled on the net
WHY? Why point the finger at China?
...because the Media has its own agenda... and the gullible are easily duped
So who cares about reality ( a plane contrail at sunset" when you can sell "a Chinese missile launched from a sub in CA waters"
Which do ya think gets better ratings and pushes an agenda?
What is really ironic is most conspiracy theorists always say the media lies, but when that lie fits their belief, all of a sudden that media must be telling the truth
::)
if we were going to have underground .sub bases ,why not disney world and disneyland.it would coverup the food and other needs.no one would ever question it.and the locations are perfect on each coast,close to the equator.
the date of the missile launch was the exact day clinton said nk would have missile capable subs.they bought them from russia.it was like fifteen years ago he made that statement.
Just popped up on Rumormill:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=254998
Claim that Chinese frigate was spotted in SF harbor, unescorted
Monday, 01 October 2012 16:22
(http://www.unitednuclear.com/images/warn200.gif)
Written by Kerry Cassidy ;D
Kerry's Blog (http://projectcamelotportal.com/kerrys-blog/1308-daily-intel-report-09-20-12)
DAILY INTEL REPORT 09/20/12
Thursday, 20 September 2012 18:21
Written by Kerry Cassidy
Re: Disclosure ala ET Wars :
Word is that the Bush cabal has made deals with 5 ET races. One of those has now become disenchanted with their deal and gone rogue.
This is supposedly at least one group of Reptilians.
The Navy ships reported off the coast, in international waters off of San Francisco bay are there along with the Chinese "vessels" (read: subs) handling the situation in the Pacific where they are dealing with the undersea bases. Gordon Duff's article is alluding to this.
These are considered the 'most hostile' of the hostile races.
Note: Gordon was asked to remove my name from his Veteran's Today article because he was told I was in "danger"... However, considering Camelot's motto is "the best place to hide is out in the open" I am not sure that is the real reason and is not contributing to making me feel uh, "safer". I was told he is not being threatened over his disclosure because he is not a 'civilian' and I am... From what I am told he in theory has the weight of an intel agency behind him.
Duff's article http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/17/ufo-war-chinese-and-us-navy-off-san-francisco/ is one version of the story. From an intel pov this is like offering the crown jewels in order to placate someone for stealing the silverware.
::)
Quote from: robomont on October 01, 2012, 05:40:04 AM
if we were going to have underground .sub bases ,why not disney world and disneyland.it would coverup the food and other needs.no one would ever question it.and the locations are perfect on each coast,close to the equator.
You
are not authorized
to disclose this information.
(http://i1073.photobucket.com/albums/w400/thorfourwinds/2nd%20album%20July%202012/049-e1308250223375.jpg)
I for one see no reason for any panic if the US Navy and the Chinese are sailing around together. I hope they become good friends. Friends don't like to kill each other. besides, what would be wrong if they sailed right into the harbor for US liberty. The US does it all the time , all over the world.
I have seen US ships in a lot of harbors. Even an Engligh flat top in Hong Kong bay. Swiss subs in the caribean and so on. The more they sail together, the better it should be. As far as Japan, I would not worry. I see nothing big happening there. Too much money to lose on both sides.
So let the Navy boys sail around together and share good stories and a few hundred beers. Its all good. They should invite them in for shore leave.
Deuem
speculation needs no authorization.i have signed no gov secrecy pact.free as the wind.
there were two contrails that day.
the one i talk of was pointed towards nk as it went over horizon.
the date was exact to the day of clintons comment.
why not more contrails of missiles on the news? dont need to cover up nk missile launch.
wasnt there a russian sub in the gulf of mexico near us shore last week.
our security is lax.
Kerry's blog adds more observations about Chinese vessels off California.
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2012/10/02/kerrys-blog-chinese-frigate-in-sf-harbor-october-2012/
Something is going on. What are they doing on this side of the Pacific? The MSM seems to say that the US and China are doing joint action off the coast of Aden/Somalia but what about this stuff in the Pacific?