Quote from: petrus4 on December 22, 2012, 04:22:36 PM
Again, if you organise, what is to stop them from using the helicopter gunship against you once you have? The guns themselves might not; but what will?
The difference between a group of people with guns and a politically organised movement is obvious with reference to your comment.
If you attack the government with guns then there is a legal justification for using the military against you. If you are politically organised, with the associated media and your own press, it is very difficult for a government to attack you with the military -
ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE DELIBERATELY UNARMED AND USING LEGAL PEACEFUL METHODS TO GAIN POWER.Being peaceful and unarmed DISARMS the government. It is a statement and, paradoxically, makes you
LESS easy to attack violently.
Hard to understand that? Remember Gandhi and India? Learn your history.
Quote...commonly known as Mahatma Gandhi, was the preeminent leader of Indian nationalism in British-ruled India. Employing non-violent civil disobedience, Gandhi led India to independence and inspired movements for non-violence, civil rights and freedom across the world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH5kNcAxtKs
It is not an armed population that your overlords fear. History is my witness. It is a peaceful and politically organised movement that the Banks and Global Financial players fear most. A movement based on fundamental rights for the many, fairness, liberty and peace.
Excellent post Dan.
Only when they make peaceful revolution impossible will they make violent revolution inevitible.
I think we're scaring the life outta them.
But we're not there yet.