Pegasus Research Consortium

ETs are real (I've met several); they come from places scientists can only dream about and we're them, genetically. There...I said it.

We are light beings dumbed-down to make us cattle and chattel and slaves. Mission accomplished, except for the smallish matter of our genetic inheritance...the policy on which has just matured.

We're rich. Free energy does exist and there are literally countless ways of achieving it. My favorite involves one inch round and rectangular rare earth magnets in a v-gate configuration using a recycling arm cam, however...truth be known, the best I have yet to even draw out on paper and will be controlled by simple software, and based upon incoming load requirements clutch magnets will attenuate the torque (ie the potential) of the main opposing drive arrays embedded into inch-thick nylon disks with high speed sealed precision bearings throughout. This kind of system will power the planet.

I need to get my build on, because I know Perendev's configurations are the basis for magnet motor generators already being sold out of Australia. This stuff isn't rocket science; you give a monkey some magnets and wire and batteries and I'm sure he'll come up with a way to repel one magnet from another. He might even jump up off the planet a few feet and hover, depending on voltage.

Tesla's biggest discovery wasn't the towers of power, but the tiny experiment he did using two elemental metal poles, one was a single element different, making one pole positive, one pole negative. This aparatus draws ambient energy from the ether, which is all around us in unexaustable quantities. The fledgling scientific community grapples with various terms to describe the ether, like "dark Energy," or "The God Particle," but it's the friggin' ether...pure potential.

On the etheric side of things all you have to do is know HOW to ask for what you want, and--and it works like this--IF you're prepared to receive what it is you're asking for, you will have it, including small-matter energy, wormhole vortexes both associated and disassociated from space and time. If you came here to learn about poverty, do you really think your guides in the background of your existence on this plain would let you down by giving you wealth? No! You must first come to a sort of place where you can embrace poverty before you can break that cycle and move on.

Mankind has now been added to the list of known intergalactic beings. We are already traveling the stars and have been for roughly 350K years, give or take. We are not confined to our physicality; that was always an illusion and a lie. Stay tuned. I'm trying to round up materials so I too can have something cool for all of you to play with and disseminate. Free energy is the right of all, and it's not theory--it exists.

Peace and Love,
JD

JD..

Fascinating post !

Hope we are lucky to read more of your experiences with other ( Non Human)  ETs..!

QuoteETs are real (I've met several);

After studying this subject over the last few years..I have come across quite a lot of example from what I thought seemed respected researchers ( some on PRC) who suggest the same thing and that may have become my own conclusion..

I myself think and have done for some years thought  that there are different types of humans amongst us...Not Just in color terms or some that may look neanderthal....

When I look at the higher type executives , manager types..and other leaders...or higher professional types...they have a look about them different from the average persons..

Is it purely down to their good upbringing ? inheritied Higher IQs ?

Or is it by design !

There often seems certain type of people who you can almost read what they may be or do ! Are they designed this way..?

John Lears said it and I have asked him for more information..but I am still awaiting his reply..

QuoteETs are real (I've met several); they come from places scientists can only dream about and we're them, genetically. There...I said it.

Quote from: Anynonmouses on March 23, 2013, 12:55:47 AM
ETs are real (I've met several); they come from places scientists can only dream about

Planet Dirt, according to the NAVY is one such place. So of all these ET that you have met, did you get a photo? Maybe a little hair sample or DNA sample?

Can we get some descriptions of the place they are from? Maybe a starmap? I have heard a lot come from the Pleaides, but when asked they cannot name their planet or star. I mean if I was visiting and some creature asked me where I was from I could give them a pretty good description and location

QuoteWe are light beings dumbed-down to make us cattle and chattel and slaves. Mission accomplished,

Nope not buying that one

QuoteWe're rich. Free energy does exist and there are literally countless ways of achieving it. My favorite involves one inch round and rectangular rare earth magnets in a v-gate configuration using a recycling arm cam, however...truth be known, the best I have yet to even draw out on paper and will be controlled by simple software, and based upon incoming load requirements clutch magnets will attenuate the torque (ie the potential) of the main opposing drive arrays embedded into inch-thick nylon disks with high speed sealed precision bearings throughout. This kind of system will power the planet.

Mankind has been waiting for over 100 years since TESLA for such a device. You say there are countless... I would be happy with ONE that can power the planet. In the meantime my money is on HE3 fusion  :D

QuoteFree energy is the right of all, and it's not theory--it exists.

Summer is fast approaching I already had to turn on the AC... so lets get that theory hooked up so I don't have to face that $500 a month power bill looming  just around the corner.

Your right TESLA's power tower was simply a transmitter. You still had to generate that power to transmit it AND if the modern world beamed all our energy needs around using Tesla towers imagine the cost on health

Quote from: zorgon on March 23, 2013, 08:41:35 AM
Mankind has been waiting for over 100 years since TESLA for such a device. You say there are countless... I would be happy with ONE that can power the planet. In the meantime my money is on HE3 fusion  :D

My money is on energy harvesting.  There are a number of sources.  Solar, wave (the ocean is big and full of energy), wind and geothermal are under used and available already.  If we spent on that what we have spent on nuclear fission then we would already have solved the problem (esp in the UK where we have wind, rain in abundance and ocean around us.)

The real harvesting I refer to though, is based on what quantum field theory (my Dad's field, excuse the pun) tells us about the vacuum :

QuoteA peculiar and truly quantum mechanical feature of the quantum
fields is that they exhibit zero-point fluctuations everywhere in space, even in regions
which are otherwise 'empty' (i.e. devoid of matter and radiation). These zero-point
fluctuations of the quantum fields, as well as other 'vacuum phenomena' of quantum
field theory, give rise to an enormous vacuum energy density.

The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem (S.E. Rugh É and H. Zinkernagel) (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/398/1/cosconstant.pdf)

In other words, "space" is a massive source of energy.  The problem is, obviously, how to extract some for us to power our appliances.

If you guys want me to, I guess I can expand on this and perhaps try to do a laymen's thread on how zero point energy can be extracted using already patented techniques.  I'm not sure whether this should go in the alternate energy group private area or what.

(http://www.metanexus.net/sites/default/files/styles/page_main/public/QuantumVacFluctuations_enet.gr_.jpg?itok=DKKdh0OC)

I've been haunting free energy sites for years, looking for something that actually works.  Results: zip, zilch, nada, nothing.

Yes, free energy would change the world.  However, allow me to go one step further - a Really Good Battery would ALMOST accomplish the same thing! (and we don't have one of them, either). 

I, too, deeply wish that those freakin' aliens would just open up a little and screw the Prime Directive just long enough to give us this - and make world peace abundant.

I would be happy to answer questions pertaining to grays, a reptilian humanoid I've met (who was referred to as "drain-o," but who was called "Draco" as in Draconian) and the Sirian dude I met who looks much like we do except for slightly rearward-elongated ears and almost neon blue eyes. Sirians are from the "Big Dog" Orion region of space, same as many Dracos (Draconian reptoids).  They still maintain a presence on Earth (under Furnace Creek, CA.), our vehicle moon, Mars (subterranean) and  have a planet-sized vessel parked on the far side of our remaining sun.

As for free energy...you can put an auger into the water facing downcreek on a shaft to spin. Hook that to a generator, or motor and voila! How hard was THAT! As for Magnets and electricity, THOSE are the key to portable anywhere power, and that's going to get built when I have cash flow enough to buy supplies. Be patient; I'm broke, but smart, so it won't take long...couple of months maybe.

I don't mind skeptics, but frankly if I hand-delivered a dead specimen most in the "scientific" community would find reasons to denounce its authenticity. What is proof? Plenty already out there, if you're into proof. Science guys and gals are ALWAYS reluctant to break ranks from their predisposition toward groupthink and look into different theories from those they have been systematically chained to. Quantum literally means I DON'T HAVE A FREAKING CLUE. Quantum. LOL.

Science is evolving, and we need flexible minds, not rigid ideologies which keep us entrenched in what was. It's fine to be skeptical, but it's better to be open-minded, trust me on that--or not lol. I get that most here would love any new breakthroughs. My advice is--break AWAY from conventional thinking.

When you go from AC to DC having passed the current through a powerful coherent magnetic field, your measuring devices for output in volts and amps no longer apply in the same way. Why do you suppose it is that the more load you put on a coherent magnet motor configuration actually increased the rpm of such motors? Also, why do you suppose that instead of generating friction heat these motors run cool? Again...we're still scientific infants, so try to stay tuned for further breakthroughs. Try not being so negative.

Peace and Love,
JD

Quote from: Anynonmouses on March 23, 2013, 03:00:00 PM
Quantum literally means I DON'T HAVE A FREAKING CLUE. Quantum. LOL.

You just showed your ignorance and your true colours. ::)

Quantum physics is actually the proof that materialism is flawed.  If you don't understand it then admit it. :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEl-fTtP2tw

Quote from: Anynonmouses on March 23, 2013, 03:00:00 PM
It's fine to be skeptical, but it's better to be open-minded, trust me on that--or not lol.

Trust you?  :o

You are wrong of course.  It is best to be an open minded sceptic.  Sceptical of the mainstream and alternative ideas.  To be otherwise is just to be gullible and naive.

Go ahead and follow up on these brothers in Australia who have been selling their overunity magnet motor generators for about two years. Order one/reverse engineer it. Go ahead...I'll wait for a skeptic or two:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ-cTouvPj0

And there's always this...
...(line two)...as well...  : www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RMYo1QlvK5g

Peace and Love,
JD

Quote from: Eighthman on March 23, 2013, 01:23:34 PM
Yes, free energy would change the world.  However, allow me to go one step further - a Really Good Battery would ALMOST accomplish the same thing! (and we don't have one of them, either). 

Inventor Paul Brown, friend of Matyas, invented a battery that could charge from radiation. This battery could literally suck the radiation from radioactive waste... somewhat along the line of a solar collector.

He was snuffed with a car accident.

When I clicked to his old website it was redirected to a Washington DC link.

I will leave it at that for now (already posted this info anyway ;) )

And across YouTube others are successfully replicating Newman's Big Eureka Free Energy Device, such as this intrepid cat from wherever HE'S from:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx0rCLUe1lg

So the whole "it can't be done" thing is looking flimsy right now.

Peace and Love,
JD

Here we go.....
First of all, i partly agree with JD & i partly agree with Zorgon.
I also agree fully with Pim, of course ;)

I posted the results of 2 verified HHO (brown's gas, etc) experiments.
Water as fuel. It works.
5 people read that thread, no-one replied......

PMM's? you may want to see one of my failed experiments.This design has a geometry problem & has been shelved to make time for more promising research:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icNs4JFQHV8

There is a thread explaining the development of the perendev, and where it stands now....
So if you have some plans, JD, you are welcome to put them in the I.F. private area so we can discuss a project :)

Be aware that a lot of what you are saying has already been discussed in great detail, both in the I.F. and on the open forum.
I will send you some links ;)
Please use the 'search' window, & please read all the threads, most of them have covered your ideas in depth already ;)

Yes, free energy exists in several forms, yes, such things can work, i have the plans :P And no, as far as i know, that Oz team never sold a single motor that actually worked, although the Perendev is by no means a 'no-brainer'.

Howard Johnson among others, did it, so it can be done. And don't reach for your chequebooks just yet until such a device has been VERIFIED.
That is what we do here, LOL

Better still, send that cash to Zorgon to get his beloved sexetary ::)

Believe me, we are NOT going to take a YT film as proof of ANYTHING unless we can re-create the actual machine, or at the very least confirm it's means of operation.

This is critical. We need to filter out the BS claims from real working devices.
By all means post something, but adding rhetoric like the above won't sell it.
Certainly not to the tech-heads among us. We need PROOF.

A case in point being the 'coil & magnet' trick that Amy found.
It was certainly a darn GOOD trick, but a trick nonetheless.
(Right now i'm making a video explaining that one 8))

As Newman has been vindicated and NOT debunked, I'd say (he) was right...modern scientists know almost nothing when it comes to measuring electric output from magnetic field dynamics because the measuring instruments don't account for voltage, only amps, sos...

Anyhoo; my money's on the inner intuition that tells me (as the title of this thread alludes) WE'RE ON THE VERGE of greater understanding. Egos are going to have to be put aside and experimentation proceed. I'm beginning from the notion that scientists are in for some humbling enlightenment, except they tend to cry around about stats and figures and then base them on previously upended physics breakthroughs saying "it can't be done," you know--like the speed of sound way back when. They're top dog, these nay sayers...right up until a fellow like Newman comes along.

Thank you John Friggin' Glenn!

Peace and Love,
JD

Newman (newmann?) i have plenty of data on. Very interesting too.
Guess I'll have to post a Newman thread now...sigh....

Yes, we are on the verge of something, that's for sure.

Linda Brown called it things like 'approaching wave' & 'cosmic ha-ha'
I call it the new renaissance ;D

Yep, women are definitely aliens ;D

Do you mean us men should be more 'left brain'?

(sigh)

1) The Lutec device has been debunked as a failure to understand real vs apparent power.  In AC, you can't just multiply measured volts and amps to get real watts.  I am unaware of anyone powering a home with the Lutec device.

2) I REALLY wish the Paul Brown battery/device was real but in order for it to be real SOMEBODY would need to demonstrate that an RF field can trigger beta decay.  Physics considers this to be tested and impossible.  I do wonder if an NMR response could stimulate radioactive decay but if so, there ought to be a physics paper on it somewhere.

Gimme a clue and I'll visit the Physics LIbrary at Cornell (Clark Hall)

I am unaware of any Newman "replication" that is self looped or powering a home.  Hence, unreal.

I don't like being the skeptic here.  Normally, I berate them. That said, I think the Rossi and Marks device were (are) real but they aren't (weren't).

Read this....
http://www.free-energy.ws/lutec.html


Found here also....
http://www.overunity.com/4956/lutec-john-christie-australia/30/#.UU4vQ3H2_IU

Quote..

QuoteJust to be crystal clear, Lutec is a long running free energy investor scam. John Christie and Lou Brits
started this scam in 1998 and are still scamming people
twelve years later!

The Evergreen company in Hong Kong is run by Lutec, and is a front for the scam to make it
look independent. When Lutec first tried their scam in 2001, they used a front company in Singapore
called BANK Inc which also claimed it was 100% independent from Lutec
("BANK Inc became aware of the inventors technology and through Australian agents contacted
the inventors" An investigator contacted the website designer and found that Lutec founder
John Christie was the one who hired the designer to create the BANK website, so they are clearly
out and out liars.

Here are two complete reports on their corporate history, bogus patents and attempts
to get investors.

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/lutec1.pdf
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/lutec2.pdf


Also see http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/Company/Lutec-Australia.aspx

Quote
John Christie Electric Generator – Generates 24 Kilowatts Of Free ...
magneticfreeenergy.info/john-christie-electric-generator-generates-2...

Jan 4, 2012 – Typically the John Christie Electric Generator was shown to the world in 2001– a ...
Australian hardware engineer, John Christie, and also his electrician ... Unfortunately,
his legacy in this field did not live with after his death due to ... are a resurgence of interest
of this type, especially in the last year or two.

Relating to 1998...

QuotePublished on Mar 7, 2012 

This video was from a saved archive from 2009 . . . i suppose the original video
has been taken down, so not sure who to credit.

Note; It's now been at least 3 1/2 years from a saved archive from 2009...

Strictly speaking,, there is No such thing as a "World" or "Global Patent" as suggested in the interview !

http://www.uspto.gov/smallbusiness/patents/faq.html

Quote;

QuoteHow do I protect my patent internationally?
Since the rights granted by a U.S. patent extend only throughout the territory of the United States
and have no effect in a foreign country, an inventor who wishes patent protection in other countries
must apply for a patent in each of the other countries or in regional patent offices.

Almost every country has its own patent law, and a person desiring a patent in a particular country
must make an application for patent in that country, in accordance with the requirements
of that country.

The laws of many countries differ in various respects from the patent law of the United States.
In most foreign countries, publication of the invention before the date of the application will bar
the right to a patent. In most foreign countries maintenance fees are required. Most foreign countries
require that the patented invention must be manufactured in that country after a certain period,
usually three years. If there is no manufacture within this period, the patent may be void
in some countries, although in most countries the patent may be subject to the grant of compulsory licenses
to any person who may apply for a license.

There is a treaty relating to patents which is adhered to by 168 countries, including the United States,
and is known as the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. It provides that each country
guarantees to the citizens of the other countries the same rights in patent and trademark matters
that it gives to its own citizens. The treaty also provides for the right of priority in the case of patents,
trademarks and industrial designs (design patents). This right means that, on the basis of a regular
first application filed in one of the member countries, the applicant may, within a certain period of time,
apply for protection in all the other member countries. These later applications will then be regarded
as if they had been filed on the same day as the first application. Thus, these later applicants will have
priority over applications for the same invention that may have been filed during the same period of time
by other persons. Moreover, these later applications, being based on the first application, will not
be invalidated by any acts accomplished in the interval, such as, for example, publication or exploitation
of the invention, the sale of copies of the design, or use of the trademark. The period of time mentioned
above, within which the subsequent applications may be filed in the other countries, is 12 months
in the case of first applications for patent and six months in the case of industrial designs and trademarks.

Another treaty, known as the Patent Cooperation Treaty, was negotiated at a diplomatic conference
in Washington, D.C., in June of 1970.

The treaty came into force on January 24, 1978, and is presently (as of December 14, 2004) adhered to
by over 124 countries, including the United States. The treaty facilitates the filing of applications
for patent on the same invention in member countries by providing, among other things,
for centralized filing procedures and a standardized application format.

The timely filing of an international application affords applicants an international filing date
in each country which is designated in the international application and provides (1) a search
of the invention and (2) a later time period within which the national applications for patent
must be filed.

A number of patent attorneys specialize in obtaining patents in foreign countries.
Under U.S. law it is necessary, in the case of inventions made in the United States, to obtain
a license from the Director of the USPTO before applying for a patent in a foreign country.
Such a license is required if the foreign application is to be filed before an application is filed
in the United States or before the expiration of six months from the filing of an application
in the United States unless a filing receipt with a license grant issued earlier. The filing
of an application for patent constitutes the request for a license and the granting or denial
of such request is indicated in the filing receipt mailed to each applicant.

After six months from the U.S. filing, a license is not required unless the invention has been
ordered to be kept secret. If the invention has been ordered to be kept secret, the consent
to the filing abroad must be obtained from the Director of the USPTO during the period
the order of secrecy is in effect.

Also...

http://www.uspto.gov/smallbusiness/patents/filing.html

Thank you, Matrix!
It is vital to first find out if a particular invention was unworkable, fake, or the real Mcoy-but-got-supressed.

That is exactly what we do here at PRC. Research.
this can take all forms, historical, factual, theorizing.
Finding the most logical & (apparently real) answer.

QuoteSOMEBODY would need to demonstrate that an RF field can trigger beta decay

Yes, 8man, and we're working on it ;)

All this said......

to me, the greatest, not-recognized-by mainstream science invention is Ken Shoulders' Charge Clusters (independently confirmed by various Russians).  Provides a simple means of crashing into nuclei.
His patent clearly bespeaks an enormous volume of work.

There is a replicated device that might use the above - that seems oddly abandoned:  the VSG put together by J. Naudin and replicated by Bill Alek. 

My own theory is that we should look for free energy in transients. We might even find violations of thermodynamics in transients........  and why look there?

Because if there really was a stable source of free energy in nature that involved a constant flow, our universe wouldn't exist because everything would be glowing plasma. And I don't think transients have been investigated thoroughly as to conservation of energy.

Hi Eighthman.

Never heard of Ken shoulders, i will have to check it out.
Charge,like gravity, is one of the least understood phenomina in science.
I wrote a thread on it, but i see it's in the private area.
I'll have to post it on the open forum, soon. ::)

Quotethe VSG put together by J. Naudin and replicated by Bill Alek.

Again, you will have to refresh my memory.
Some links would be helpful ;)

QuoteBecause if there really was a stable source of free energy in nature that involved a constant flow, our universe wouldn't exist because everything would be glowing plasma

I can't see how you arrived at that conclusion.
According to classical physics, energy will always flow from a 'high' area to a 'low' one. Think temperature, electric charge etc etc.
To reach a plasma state requires a lot of energy.
Schroedinger's chaos theory (heat death of the universe) states that, eventually, all energy will eventuallly be evenly distributed across the universe, so everything would be just a few degrees above absolute zero.
Certainly not enough to sustain a plasma.

What really appears to be happening is that mass & energy are not only in constant flow, they are constantly changing places.

It is more or less certain that this is so. Particles are constantly 'appearing' & 'disappearing' all around us, trillions of times per second.
That's part of the whole Higgs experiment......
Now imagine what that means in terms of energy flow.

Mass & energy are not only interchangeable, they do so in a number of different 'dimensions', not all of which are visible (or even detectable) by us humans with our primitive instruments.

Energy from transients? Of course. Heat pumps, water wheels, windmills. They are all tapping into the 'transients' we see all around us in nature.
Tesla & many others seem to have been able to tap into electrical & magnetic transients. The radiant energy collector also.

The energy flow we don't see could well be several orders of magnitude higher than anything we have today, including nuclear fusion.