Hello all, I have been invited from twitter to make a post here. I am the author of the papers I will share but please don't post my name. I am looking for a job right now and I don't like it when weird stuff comes up when potential employers google me.
ok... much of this will have already been posted elsewhere but I will condense it here.
While doing my PhD studies at Georgia Tech I solved the major outstanding problem in physics. I was also very involved in the Occupy movement and I believe it is for those political reasons I am not being given due credit for what is plainly evident in my research. I recommend reading this entire post and then reading the links in order.
This paper is non-scientific and gives the context and a loose familiarity with my work and what is happening with it now. The truth about geometric unity (http://vixra.org/abs/1307.0075)
Here is the first paper I wrote. It is highly technical but non-mathematical and very short. If you have some familiarity with physics I hope it is understandable. Modified Spacetime Geometry Addresses Dark Energy, Penrose's Entropy Dilemma, Baryon Asymmetry, Inflation and Matter Anisotropy (http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0022)
The actual mathematical breakthrough lies in these three papers.
Tempus Edax Rerum (http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0010)
Geometric Cosmology (http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0032)
Quantum Structure (http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0037)
I see people on this forum mention the theory of sub-quantum kinetics. I am not familiar with that theory but I can explain why I believe that name also describes my theory. My key conceptual breakthrough was to hypothesize that the entire universe is one quantum of spacetime. Another way to say it is that the universe is just one elementary particle in a larger universe. In this way quantum mechanics is "bigger" than the universe and all process happening here are truly sub-quantum kinetic processes in a larger cosmological setting.
Rather that type everything now and make an absurdly long post I will be happy to answer any questions.
Here is some more interesting stuff. John Titor is an alleged time-traveller who shared a diagram of a C204 time machine on the internet around the year 2000. In this diagram you will see the outputs of "positive, null and negative time fields." This is very interesting because my model also has those time fields. I call them the future, present and past.
I had seen Titor's stuff online a long time ago and forgotten about it thinking it was a hoax. Then after my discovery when I again found the C204 schematic I became very interested. That is why I named my paper Tempus Edax Rerum. It is an expansion of an earlier paper: Derivation of the Fine Structure Constant (http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0076)
Titor said that micro-singularities would be discovered at CERN. My theory can be interpreted as saying the universe is inside a black hole. This paper explains that reasoning but I don't specifically say "inside a black hole" Dark Energy in M-Theory (http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0077)
That the universe is in a black hole follows from the idea that the "big crunch" is already out there in space time. Hopefully when the papers are read it will be clear what I mean by that. So... the universe is inside a black hole and the universe is an elementary particle. The idea of a micro-singularity follows directly.
Also, the dates at the John Titor website are all meaningful events in my life. The dates near the turn of the millennium all correspond to my military service and the two outlying dates in 2009 correspond to the lectures I attended at Georgia Tech which inspired my model. I have listed the specifics here:
What do the dates at the JT Foundation mean to you? (http://paranormalis.com/threads/what-do-the-dates-at-the-jt-foundation-mean-to-you.5019/)
Obviously my name is not Titor. However, there is John on the internet who does have my last name that is also a supposed time traveller. There used to be a site online in 2004 or so called John {mylastname}'s time travel website but it is offline now. Still that other John that does have my last name is credited with helping Steven Gibbs build the hyper-dimensional resonator.
Here is an interesting article about the Montauk Project that also mentions a John with my last name. PHOENIX UNDEAD: THE MONTAUK PROJECT AND CAMP HERO TODAY (http://www.konformist.com/1998/jquinn/phoenix.htm)
What is interesting about that article is that is says the project moved from Montauk to Robins AFB in Warner Robins, GA in 1995. I moved from Tucson to Warner Robins in 1994 and graduated from high school there in 1998. Warner Robins is a small town and many people there know me as Jon.
One more thing. There is a rumor on the internet about a free energy device called the e-cat. On May 21 of this year there was a big story that the device had been tested and confirmed by some reputable scientists. I am skeptical of the e-cat but I will explain why I believe it related to my story. (May 21 is my birthday incidentally.)
The e-cat technology allegedly uses some unknown reaction to morph a special nickel powder into copper in the presence of a helium catalyst and this releases "LENR" energy.
I briefly studied astrophysics at GT, but then I had to switch to materials science. I worked in a lab that studied how materials respond to high-speed impact events. I worked on solids but many others in the lab worked on powder compacts and nickel was by far the most popular metal powder we studied. We had a large cannon in the lab that would shoot a projectile at the sample which would be destroyed and caught in a large catch tank.
The barrel of the cannon, the sample mount and the catch tank were all sealed against the outside atmosphere. If there was air inside the system, as the high speed projectile came down the barrel, it would ionize and trip all the sample diagnostics before the impact event happened. To avoid that we created a vacuum in the system, then launched the projectile at around 1,000 m/s with compressed helium. Helium is noble gas and very resistant to ionization.
Furthermore, because impact properties (high strain-rate properties) of copper are so widely known, the thing we would shoot at the sample was usually a copper cylinder or a flat piece of copper mounted on the end of an aluminum cylinder.
With our diagnostics we would study how the shock wave of the impact travelled through the sample, and then the sample fragments would be recovered from the catch tank and inspected using various microscopy methods. Extreme impact events create a very unusual type of alloying between the sample and the impactor.
This extremely rare and unusual alloying may have been mistaken for an unknown LENR reaction when in fact it was just the copper bullet hitting the nickel target at high speed. The traces of helium are from gas we used to shoot the projectile.
While I was working in the high strain-rate lab, I had independently continued my cosmology research. If my work leads to free energy, and a time traveller came back to look at what I was working on at GT they may have dug one of our discarded samples out of the trash and not understood high-strain rate alloying. That work has zero to do with my independent research. Hopefully some engineers can develop free energy soon using the physical principles I have outlined.
I'll be around. I am not bullshitting.
(http://i.imgur.com/CLBtMzW.png)
Welcome, 7.
Interesting that You should mention Montauk. The possibility that I was there at some time back then cannot be ruled out. My family moved to Long Island about then, and Dad went way out on the island to work...and I have some weird memories....
He was one of the top electrical engineers at Convair in San Diego. They moved Him out there.
Anyway, I'm hoping someOne less mathematically challenged than am I takes a look at Your work. [smile]
Hi 7
Wow And welcome. lots of cool stuff going on here.
Again welcome.
Bless
Back
Hello, and welcome, 762 (we tend to shorten names here).
Still reading....
I will read the links with interest, it's been some time since we had some new brains & ideas here (at least on the open forum).
May i be the first to give you some golden cookie points for that well written post ;)
John Titor, well there was plenty of talk about him over at ATS, at the time i thought the same, but i have since then learned a whole lot of things that tie together,, including
geometry & how it works within nature.Titor's time machine fascinated me but we were never able to get any good diagrams or descriptions of it's operation. If you have some new info we will gladly re-open the case, we try to keep it real but we are not trolls, and we have
humour :D
Also i would like to invite you into the Inventor's Group, an apart area within PRC where we get to grips with these ideas & do actual research on them.
We definitely need more theorists & mathematicians, you are therefore MOST welcome, you will find we have plenty of data for you to look at, if you can spare the time, and you can of course post entire threads about your own research.
Our main goal is freindly co-operation, sharing info/results/ideas, and proving technology that has been supressed & hidden for FAR too long.
Another member who'se threads you may whish to read is The Matrix Traveller, deep stuff indeed.
QuoteI see people on this forum mention the theory of sub-quantum kinetics. I am not familiar with that theory but I can explain why I believe that name also describes my theory.
This is a theory from Dr. Paul LaViolette, in reference to 'electrogravitics' as defined by T.T.Brown, here is the PDF;
Paul's Book (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/files/Gravity//TTBrown/secrets-of-antigravity-propulsion-pdf-2010-11.pdf)
Amaterasu is our ambassador, her knoweledge of economics & the impact of this technology led her to the Abundance Paradigm, which she writes about in her own forum. We tend to work closely between groups, because the social, economic & other aspects of this new age of enlightenment must be considered with
great care, and Amy knows the kind of peeps we need, and she knows the impact of our work here.
PRC also stands for 'Planetary Reform Council' just don't tell anyone ;)
Official invite on the way, i will ask our Lord And Master Zorgon to enable your permissions for the group.
In the meantime, enjoy the Living Moon website in it's entirety!
P.S. I'm not a PHD but an engineer, hence the name :)
Luke, (PWM)
ETA:
QuoteHopefully some engineers can develop free energy soon using the physical principles I have outlined.
Then you have come to the right place, i am a Master Machine Builder by trade ;D
QuoteRather that type everything now and make an absurdly long post I will be happy to answer any questions.
There will be many, methinks ;)
Thanks for the interest yall. I think it is pretty widely understood that the B-B effect has something to do with the third derivative.
It is also known that the systems of differential equations which describe ideal mechanical systems can also describe ideal electrical circuits when substitutions are made such as
displacement ->charge
mass ->inductance
force -> potential
etc...
It might be a worth while endeavor to adapt my solution to anti-gravity in mechanical precession (http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0010) to the electrical system in which the BB antigravity effect is seen.
This may help us make some headway into free energy. In 1977 Prigogine won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for showing that energy is not always conserved in certain types of open systems. The thing that is important to realize about that is that it is only an assumption that the universe is a closed system.
Luckily for everyone, if my model is correct, "the universe" is an open system and there is no thermodynamic argument against free energy.
I have to emphasize that I am not an engineer and have little to no practical knowledge of these things, but this my idea for a free energy system.
It would be mechanical system coupled to an electrical system, where the equations of motion are the same when the substitutions mentioned above are made. Furthermore, the entire system should be mounted in a gimble so as to maintain the proper orientation with respect to the cosmological axis even as the Earth turns (and possibly as the solar system swings around the galaxy.)
In second order differential equations, the acceleration and the displacement will always have the same sign. Consider x=sin(t) and y=sin(-t) obeying the second order equation z''=z
Consider z=x
----------------------------------
z'=cos(t)
z''=-sin(t)
Now consider z=y
----------------------------------
z'=-cos(-t)
z''=-sin(-t)
The dynamics do not depend on the sign of t. Now consider dynamics based on the third derivative z'''=z
for z=x
----------------------------------
z'=cos(t)
z''=-sin(t)
z'''=-cos(t)
Now consider z=y
----------------------------------
z'=-cos(-t)
z''=-sin(-t)
z'''=cos(-t)
In the third derivative the dynamics do depend on the sign of t. It should be possible exploit this property to build some closed loop perpetual motion free energy thing where the negative mode of the mechanical system feeds in to the positive mode of the electrical system and vice versa and on and on.
And when I say "should" I mean "I hope." lol
I might humbly mention that I invited 7 here from twitter. [smile]
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on August 03, 2013, 12:15:41 AM
If you have some new info we will gladly re-open the case
Nothing new about the machine, it just seems consistent with my model.
welcome 762.we absolutely need your skills.if you help us out.im sure we would gladly be job references for you.you scratch our back we scratch yours.
i did not know the ionization of helium statement you made.thats one for my brain file.
it may take a little time for us to grasp your theory but dont get in a hurry.we are here to support each other.
i need some one who grasp magnetic fields if you have time and can help.please check out my thread "first pegasus".
also zorgon is a great admin.so dont worry about being censored.we are here for you.
Quote from: 7even6ix2wo on August 03, 2013, 01:25:07 AM
Welcome 7even6ix2wo, nice to have you onboard.
Now we have a mathematician to help me with Steinmetz Equations :)
QuoteIt is also known that the systems of differential equations which describe ideal mechanical systems can also describe ideal electrical circuits when substitutions are made such as
displacement ->charge
mass ->inductance
force -> potential
etc...
I have been working on something similar.. more later.
QuoteIt would be mechanical system coupled to an electrical system, where the equations of motion are the same when the substitutions mentioned above are made. Furthermore, the entire system should be mounted in a gimble so as to maintain the proper orientation with respect to the cosmological axis even as the Earth turns (and possibly as the solar system swings around the galaxy.)
Aha, some type of Mechanical --> Electrical integrator/transducer??
QuoteIn second order differential equations, the acceleration and the displacement will always have the same sign. Consider x=sin(t) and y=sin(-t) obeying the second order equation z''=z
Consider z=x
----------------------------------
z'=cos(t)
z''=-sin(t)
Now consider z=y
----------------------------------
z'=-cos(-t)
z''=-sin(-t)
The dynamics do not depend on the sign of t. Now consider dynamics based on the third derivative z'''=z
for z=x
----------------------------------
z'=cos(t)
z''=-sin(t)
z'''=-cos(t)
Now consider z=y
----------------------------------
z'=-cos(-t)
z''=-sin(-t)
z'''=cos(-t)
In the third derivative the dynamics do depend on the sign of t. It should be possible exploit this property to build some closed loop perpetual motion free energy thing where the negative mode of the mechanical system feeds in to the positive mode of the electrical system and vice versa and on and on.
Is this saying that in the 3rd derivative the time is coupled in both a forward and backward relationship?
Is this conveying something about a closed-loop feedback system in which time is the oscillating variable?
I hope I haven't over questioned. Great to have you here. :)
Lok'tar, 762.
John Titor was an interesting case, I must admit. Wikipedia came up with what seemed like a fairly compelling explanation of a potential hoax; but given the amount of channelling material that I have read over the last eight years, I am inclined to believe that even if it was a hoax in physical terms, Titor probably was genuinely inspired by someone from another timeline. While it is apparently true that some of Titor's predictions did not come to pass, an interesting point is that, given the potential degree of variance from our own timeline, it is more or less certain that they would not.
I was an abominable mathematics student at school, and after it lost almost all interest in the topic entirely, until I recently came across a videogram from Michael Schneider on YouTube, describing what he called the Egyptian binary system of mathematics.
The relevant excerpt from his video, was also included in a longer series called Magical Egypt, and from there I learned about the work of John Anthony West and R.A. Schwaller.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tshlYmX8OkI
I would strongly recommend watching the above series, if you have not already, as well as this one:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVUU3p5iHMA
The latter series ultimately talks about the mathematics behind the Egyptians' construction of the Pyramids, and also talks about Edward Leedskalnin's reproduction of said mathematics, which he was able to use to construct Coral Castle. There is a fair amount of New Age detritus that he goes through first, unfortunately; but it is worth persevering through.
After coming across the above series, however, I ended up writing another thread on the topic, which you might find interesting. It talks about the Law of Correspondence.
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=3241.msg45607#msg45607
hello, greetings, and welcome, 762; find a comfortable seat next to the fire and rest your feets. 8)
You will find a comfortable environment here in Viceroy Zorgon's sandbox plus a plethora of information, in the threads, the archives, and the data base along with some serious mental ability/skills among the membership...
all we ask is to play nicely in the sandbox ;D rude and crude behavior is frowned upon, and unlike most forums, our switch for leg striping is attached to a weed eater...
again, welcome aboard, ramblin' wreck...
seeker
Hi 7even6ix2wo,
Welcome on board.
An interesting subject. Looking forward to reading your Posts.
TMT
lol.seeker.dont scare him too much.
i read the dark energy pdf.so is there anyway to jump to the other universe?
Quote from: starwarp2000 on August 03, 2013, 07:49:52 AM
Is this saying that in the 3rd derivative the time is coupled in both a forward and backward relationship?
Is this conveying something about a closed-loop feedback system in which time is the oscillating variable?
Those were just some very simple functions to illustrate that there is a fundamental difference between third order equations and the second order equations that govern almost all of what is known. Again, I only have a loose grasp of how this could lead to free energy based on my understanding of Prigogine's work.
Prigogone in his own words: Nobel lecture (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1977/prigogine-lecture.pdf)
Prigogine's result described in a NASA report: Sec.4.2 Accessing or "Tapping" Energy from Zero Point Energy (http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050170447_2005172301.pdf)
(In that second link everything after page 41 is pretty interesting.) Prigogine showed that energy does not need to be conserved within a local system when it is out of thermodynamic equilibrium.
Here is a simple diagram of my cosmological model. It will make more sense if you read the papers but the important thing to understand is this: There are actually two kinds of time. Normal time (chronos) is up and new time (chiros) is to the right. The red square is our whole universe and the two boxes are the larger cosmological setting. If you have familiarity with relativity you will see that the red square is a Minkowski diagram.
(http://i.imgur.com/s1haXQ6.png)
Any way, I am proposing that our universe is one of Prigogine's special non-equilibrium systems and it should be possible to harvest energy from the external flow of chiros. Think of a water wheel that generates power from the flow of time rather than a stream.
Quote from: robomont on August 03, 2013, 01:27:18 PM
is there anyway to jump to the other universe?
Theoretically it is possible but from an engineering perspective I have no idea. As a physicist I can say, "Assume we had frictionless ether and infinite energy etc...", but an engineer will laugh at that.
Stories about free energy are always spotty and the machines don't work reliably. Maybe an inventor sees something but then the exact same experiment doesn't work when verifiers are there. In the case where this is not a hoax, I think it might have something to do with alignment to the cosmological axis. As the Earth spins, a stationary device will experience all alignments with the axis, but who knows what is the right one and when does that happen? For a water wheel to work, the paddles need to be pretty much perpendicular to the stream's direction.
Quote from: 7even6ix2wo on August 03, 2013, 09:42:26 PM
Those were just some very simple functions to illustrate that there is a fundamental difference between third order equations and the second order equations that govern almost all of what is known. Again, I only have a loose grasp of how this could lead to free energy based on my understanding of Prigogine's work.
Prigogone in his own words: Nobel lecture (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1977/prigogine-lecture.pdf)
Prigogine's result described in a NASA report: Sec.4.2 Accessing or "Tapping" Energy from Zero Point Energy (http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050170447_2005172301.pdf)
Ilya Prigogine: Yes, I have read his book Order out of Chaos.
Quote(In that second link everything after page 41 is pretty interesting.) Prigogine showed that energy does not need to be conserved within a local system when it is out of thermodynamic equilibrium.
He showed that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is flawed in that it 'assumes' all systems are closed. He went on to show that there are no 'closed' systems in existence, and that 'all' systems exchange energy/information with their environment.
QuoteAny way, I am proposing that our universe is one of Prigogine's special non-equilibrium systems and it should be possible to harvest energy from the external flow of chiros. Think of a water wheel that generates power from the flow of time rather than a stream.
Prigonine's Bifurcation points (Where systems either evolve to the next level or annihilate) are the start of these non-equilibrium systems. I find it refreshing that somebody has extrapolated his message to something substantial! :)
Quote from: 7even6ix2wo on August 03, 2013, 09:48:15 PM
"Assume we had frictionless ether and infinite energy etc...", but an engineer will laugh at that.
Engineers are funny people... :P
Considering the size of the Universe compared to our puny Planet,,, and considering the Universe is 90% plasma energy...
I would call that infinite energy by our standards and needs :P
A simple 100 tons of Helium 3 can power the Planet for one year with safe clean fusion fuel and there is enough of that lying on the surface of the moon to power the Planet for 10,000 years
Why not just work on that? Monsanto's Mounds Lab was doing that back in the 60's :) I have the declassified delivery slips for the HE3
(http://www.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/images/ldx_mov.gif)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BVt2gKHNBA
Well that first paper was very impressive, and i daresay it gave a few people a headache ;)
I am trying to interpret your formulas & theory as best i can, i'm not a math expert by any means, but i think i see your point, and i just loved this part:
QuoteWe have assigned a spatial 3-sphere {x1, x2, x3} to each
dimension of the temporal sphere {x+
0 , x?
0 , x?0 }. Space
serves as the radial coordinate of the temporal ball just
as time serves as the radial coordinate in the 3+1 dimensional
space of General Relativity. The distinction of
temporal and spatial spheres is mirrored in the spacelike
and timelike regions of the Minkowski diagram.
By alternating temporal and spatial spheres, diameters
are mapped to circumferences and it is clear that
the MCM is a fractal matrix theory of infinite complexity.
This embedding and reembedding is the physical
manifestation of T-duality. As such, the frequency of oscillation
in figure 2 is on the order of the Planck time
in a larger universe. The MCM is the full realization of
the Holographic Principle which states that the entirety
of the universe is contained in every piece of it. This is
shown in figure 15.
A long standing problem in quantum field theory is
that the energy density of the vacuum is infinite. In the
paradigm presented here, t? has no "volume" in the temporal
3-sphere. Thus, a finite energy density is obtained
when infinitely large energy is divided by infinitely small
"volume."
...Which i heartily agree with ;)
I would like to know your thoughts on the property known as electric charge, because it is the one thing that IMHO is the link between energy, matter, and dimensions.
Indeed some scientists argue that charge itself is a dimension, or at least should be treated as one.
I am partial to that theory, but i would appreciate your input on the subject.
I wrote a thread on it in the Inventor's group (somewhere)
OK i may feel up to reading your second paper, but it's going to use up lots of coffee. Ah, Laithwaite.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNPVzwuH5g0
I'm so glad i don't get headaches, but my old eyes get tired, which slows down my reading somewhat.....
Thanks for taking the time to read :) I have watched that video many times. Laithewaite's gyro demonstrations inspire me. I refer to his experiments in one of my papers below and show a possible solution to the anomalous motion.
Normally the fine structure constant is thought of as a combination of the charge of the electron squared and Planck's constant. In my theory the fine structure constant is the phase that separates adjacent moments in time. I don't have a great explanation for what charge is, but it seems to me that this phase between moments is the more fundamental quantity.
If you have read Dark Energy in M-Theory, I suggest going forward in the following order when you find the time.
This one is non-mathematical, covers the most physics, and is the easiest to understand.
The Truth About Geometric Unity (http://vixra.org/abs/1307.0075)
These two are moderately mathematical. The first one should still be understandable and contains the actual mathematical breakthrough. Many new theories are often only word level ideas. My theory is different because i have used unambiguous mathematics to paint the picture. TER is the one that refers to Laithewaite's work.
Tempus Edax Rerum (http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0010)
Geometric Cosmology (http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0032)
Another thing that separates my theory from others is that I have a unique prediction that can be tested experimentally. In fact, the guys at CERN are doing that now. I have predicted spin-1 for the Higgs-like particle, but if it is a Higgs, it has to have spin-0. They do not start running the machine again until 2015, so it may be that long before we know. Here is my prediction:
Quantum Structure (http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0037)
Quote
Thanks for taking the time to read I have watched that video many times.
I saw it live in '76 / '77 and i saw the later stuff, but i would love a copy of that book if you have it! (bananas & umbrellas) 8)
Quotebut it seems to me that this phase between moments is the more fundamental quantity.
Yes, for me too, read Matrix's threads for more info on that. ;)
QuoteThis one is non-mathematical, covers the most physics, and is the easiest to understand.
The Truth About Geometric Unity
Good that is exactly what we need.
If we as a group are to:
A) be taken seriously
and
B) come up with a plan for the future,
Is to understand how everything works, unilaterally, from the gardener to the president, how the world
should be working according to the Abundance Paradigm.
Well, my initial reaction to the CERN experiment ( & Higgs in particular) is that they should read more from Bearden, Tesla,T.T. Brown & many others, before following this
very expensive test... ;)
But we need someone with your mathematical brain, welcome aboard :D
I will continue reading, when i can.
Luke
The multiplication of bananas by umbrellas (http://www.gyroscopes.org/papers/The%20multiplication%20of%20bananas%20by%20umbrellas.pdf) is just a short paper. Enjoy :)
I want to read the one about gyroscopes He mentions at the end there. I am not sure of the squigglies, but I grasped most of it. [smile]
Quote(In that second link everything after page 41 is pretty interesting.) Prigogine showed that energy does not need to be conserved within a local system when it is out of thermodynamic equilibrium.
Yes, this is something i hear a lot from certain boffins & i also agree with it.
In fact it could not work any other way, it's the same basic logical flaw they use when they apply the 'work equation' to permanent magnets.....
QuoteAs a physicist I can say, "Assume we had frictionless ether and infinite energy etc...", but an engineer will laugh at that.
This one wont, i'm all ears :D
Yes i had all the classical training but when i was 11 i was diagnosed as 'gifted'
because they hadn't invented ADHD back then & the parents werent in the habit of drugging their kids to keep them dumb, like they do now....Hell if you're going to give them drugs, give them some Mary Jane, LOL
OK rant over, in any case by the time i was 16 and getting interested in particle physics rather than girls or sport, i soon saw big holes in all the theory they were feeding me.
I had the great fortune to have had great teachers, many of whom agreed with me that the 'laws of physics' were
by no means complete & also somewhat outdated :P
I built my first spark transmitter when i was about 14, & it promptly set fire to the curtains ::) but even that never stopped our dear mother from encouraging me to keep going :)
Okay, off topic i know, but we are allowed a certain personal leeway here, get to know each other etc.
We are after all humans & not robots :P
QuoteStories about free energy are always spotty and the machines don't work reliably. Maybe an inventor sees something but then the exact same experiment doesn't work when verifiers are there.
Exactly, & lets face it there's a lot of BS out there, a few of which i had to personally debunk. :(
Not an easy job, shattering someones dream, but when i see plain BS i have to respond truthfully.
OK we have extremely far reaching discussions here (have you read Matrix's stuff yet?) but at the end of the day, my job is to verify & if possible mass produce, a free energy device of some kind.
7even6ix2wo, as you know you have access to the I.G. where we can take things further, let you know what we are doing right now, & hopefully be able to do actual physical experiments based on your theories.
This is our job, the nuts & bolts as it were, and PRC is a very cool place to be :D
But if you want everyone to read it, keep the discussion going here by all means, personally i would do the latter....
Like i stated many times, i'm no PHD & my math is around 'A' level standard, but i can at this point find no faults in your theory albeit difficult to follow, i pride myself on being able to convert 'scientific' into 'layman' because i sit somewhere in between.....
Hi Starwarp :D
QuoteIlya Prigogine: Yes, I have read his book Order out of Chaos.
I haven't, did i miss something good?
QuoteHe showed that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is flawed in that it 'assumes' all systems are closed. He went on to show that there are no 'closed' systems in existence, and that 'all' systems exchange energy/information with their environment.
Eggzactly, mate :)
762;
QuoteLaithewaite's gyro demonstrations inspire me. I refer to his experiments in one of my papers below and show a possible solution to the anomalous motion.
My interpretation is that momentum & inertia are 2 different things, and that angular momentum, I.E. rotation, is of fundamental importance.
Check out my video on the subject of 'inertial translation';
Oh, i hope you like techno, because thats the kind of music i make for my silly films, it avoids copyright issues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxPjX3F5PrQ
QuoteNormally the fine structure constant is thought of as a combination of the charge of the electron squared and Planck's constant. In my theory the fine structure constant is the phase that separates adjacent moments in time. I don't have a great explanation for what charge is, but it seems to me that this phase between moments is the more fundamental quantity.
OK i see, i have a sneaking suspicion that charge is one of the key elements as it were, like rotation, or 'spin' on a smaller scale.
Some of my musings on energy & dimensions are also on the YT channel.
On a side note, Bearden repoted that Los Alamos national labs fired 2 protons having opposite spin towards each other, and the result was they went through each other, no electrical or other physical action was observed, each particle behaved as though the other one wasn't there. This as you know defies many laws of physics at once.
That report seems genuine enough.
Your thoughts?
This is what makes PRC what it is, peeps. Actual input from people who are actively persuing the subject.
I love you all :-*
On second thoughts, i will try to answer my own last question.
Could it be that the rotation caused a time shift, i.e. the particles as they approached each other were in that place but each in a shifted time fashion that the 'laws' simply didn't apply?
Bearden also talks of a time reversed virtual particle exchange, and i heard a rumour of time-forwarding electrons (use the search engine above in the TT Brown & 'Golden Ring' threads ;)
Will read the links tomorrow, i have 6 hours to rest & then i have a very poop job to do tomorrow.....
Later!
8)
@PWM, RE: Ilya Prigonine > Order out of Chaos.
Yes, you are missing a good read :)
This was the book that got me really thinking about non-equilibrium systems (which includes electrical systems).
Well worth the time to read (Here is an overview): http://www.mountainman.com.au/chaos_02.htm (http://www.mountainman.com.au/chaos_02.htm)
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0553343637 (http://www.amazon.com/dp/0553343637)