Pegasus Research Consortium

The Living Moon => Anomalies on the Moon => Topic started by: Sgt.Rocknroll on August 21, 2013, 01:07:03 AM

Title: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Sgt.Rocknroll on August 21, 2013, 01:07:03 AM
I've got a problem. While looking at my archive of previous work I wanted to re-visit an old video from Lunar Orbiter 5. I found I had more than one photo with basically the same name but from different websites. They're basically the same area, with one a little closer to the surface  and one covering a larger area.  The first is from ASU (on the left in the side by side photo) and the second (on the right) is from LPI.USRA.
This is a side by side comparison with the tower in the center of both. Neither photo has been altered.


(http://i1135.photobucket.com/albums/m623/Sgt_Rocknroll/LO-5-twotowers_zpsa32edc93.jpg) (http://s1135.photobucket.com/user/Sgt_Rocknroll/media/LO-5-twotowers_zpsa32edc93.jpg.html)





Need some input here. I know, I know the one with the better resolution should be the one, but they're both good and I don't have time to do both.

found this here:

http://ser.sese.asu.edu/LO/lo5-125-h2a.html

(http://i1135.photobucket.com/albums/m623/Sgt_Rocknroll/lo5-125-h2a_zpsac698089.jpg) (http://s1135.photobucket.com/user/Sgt_Rocknroll/media/lo5-125-h2a_zpsac698089.jpg.html)

found this here:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/images/print/5125_h2.jpg

(http://i1135.photobucket.com/albums/m623/Sgt_Rocknroll/5125_h2_zpscd07fe90.jpg) (http://s1135.photobucket.com/user/Sgt_Rocknroll/media/5125_h2_zpscd07fe90.jpg.html)


Tell me what you guys think. (this should be fun)  ::)

Rock  8)
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: ArMaP on August 21, 2013, 01:59:48 AM
I suggest you use the one with more shades of grey, theoretically it shows more detail.

That would be the one from the LPI, it has 238 shades of grey while the other has 233. Not much difference, but may be enough. :)
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Sgt.Rocknroll on August 21, 2013, 02:12:16 AM
Thanks ArMap , I was leaning towards that one too.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: LSWONE on August 21, 2013, 02:15:25 AM
Wow I see what looks like a fallen billboard and some steps of some kind. I see it after enlarging the second image almost in the middle of the far right. The sign looks like a 2 post square sign knocked on its back. It even seems to have another rectangle at the top if it.

Something like this below.
http://imgfave.com/view/2099803?c=86153

I would go with the darker image Sarge.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Amaterasu on August 22, 2013, 03:02:38 AM
Were those two pics taken at the same time?  The shadowing looks identical.  Maybe the same time of "day?"
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Sgt.Rocknroll on August 22, 2013, 03:26:58 AM
Not real sure about the time. I have info on one but not the other. Need to do some research.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Amaterasu on August 22, 2013, 05:34:58 AM
Just thought it odd that two photos from what sounds to Me to be two different sources (did I get that right?) would have such astounding correlation of shadows.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: ArMaP on August 22, 2013, 09:20:07 AM
I think that they are just two different digital versions of the same photos taken by Lunar Orbiter.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Elvis Hendrix on August 22, 2013, 09:48:59 AM
Yes They are one and the same lunar orbiter photo.
Have at it sarge :)
This collection in my opinon  show definatave evidence of past or present civilisation on our moon.

Without doubt.

cant wait to see what sarge comes up with.

Elvis.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Amaterasu on August 22, 2013, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: ArMaP on August 22, 2013, 09:20:07 AM
I think that they are just two different digital versions of the same photos taken by Lunar Orbiter.

They look more like consecutive photos.  There is a slight shift from one to the next.
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: ArMaP on August 22, 2013, 09:57:15 PM
Quote from: Amaterasu on August 22, 2013, 04:19:31 PM
They look more like consecutive photos.  There is a slight shift from one to the next.
A shift in what?

The image from ASU is one quarter of the full image, the top right corner, to be exact. :)

The four images from ASU, each in one colour.
(http://imageshack.us/a/img24/307/rque.jpg)

The four images from ASU compared with the image from the LPI. Same image, just a slight distortion between the two versions.
(http://imageshack.us/a/img42/1908/bo.gif)
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Amaterasu on August 23, 2013, 12:51:05 AM
Ok, ArMaP.  *I* see what looks like a slight shift in overhead position, giving that "distortion." If the two photos were taken relatively close together (depending on speed of craft) of the same terrain, You could easily "match it up" and call it a "distorted version of the same photo."
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: ArMaP on August 23, 2013, 01:14:51 AM
Quote from: Amaterasu on August 23, 2013, 12:51:05 AM
If the two photos were taken relatively close together (depending on speed of craft) of the same terrain, You could easily "match it up" and call it a "distorted version of the same photo."
If they were two photos taken from slightly different positions then the animation I just posted would gives a 3D view of the scene, which is not the case.

The Lunar Orbiter photos were taken 4 at a time, with a larger photo occupying most of the frame and 3 smaller , higher resolution, photos at the right, as seen here (http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/frame/?5125).
Title: Re: Lunar Two Towers
Post by: Amaterasu on August 23, 2013, 01:54:23 AM
Ok, ArMaP.  You're right.  [smile]