I thought to do a search for "solutocracy" and ran it, getting a surprising 1,610 results. The whole page was postings by Me, as i expected, but down at the bottom of the first page was this:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/SoleUtGoog.png~320x480?t=1385076714)
So... I clicked and got this:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/SoleUt.png~320x480?t=1385076716)
That link is: http://www.forgottenbooks.org/readbook_text/The_Arena_v37_1000346688/285
I clicked on page two and My results went down to 600. Page two was other sites that had picked up My article along with more of My posts, and when I clicked page 3 (of now 4 - page 1 had said I had 7 pages), the results went to 23.
Dunno. AnyOne here with a clue?
Did you use Google? Google is a lier, I have seen that many, many times.
People make a search, see millions of results and think "this Google thing is really good, they return much more results than other search engines", but when we look at the results we see that they are fake.
That's one of the reasons I hate Google.
ArMaP, the issue with the Google thing is really secondary. I'm wondering about that content on that site.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 12:49:17 AM
ArMaP, the issue with the Google thing is really secondary. I'm wondering about that content on that site.
What? This?
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/SoleUt.png~320x480?t=1385076716)
It looks like the result of bad OCR.
Well here's the thing. I coined the word, "solutocracy," as evidenced by the fact that, except for this one entry, ALL others refer to My work.
And the paragraph it resides in is rather creepy. Also, reading the content, it seems more like a stitching of many works. Add to that that the "The_Arena_v37_1000346688/285" section on that site You can't get to from the main page AND searching for words on the main site brings a null return for "solutocracy."
So I find it very bizarre.
Quote from: ArMaP on November 22, 2013, 01:37:34 AM
It looks like the result of bad OCR.
I am with ArMaP on this one, part of that
is obvioulsy not intelligble.
Google does funny things sometimes
also remember they get paid from lots
of peeps for ads, which in return skew
search results.
Same reason it shows Bill Ayers as
a writer for Obama's "Dreams from my Father".
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/google_books_lists_bill_ayers_as_author_of_dreams_from_my_father.html
Quote from: burntheships on November 22, 2013, 04:10:44 AM
I am with ArMaP on this one, part of that
is obvioulsy not intelligble.
Google does funny things sometimes
also remember they get paid from lots
of peeps for ads, which in return skew
search results.
Same reason it shows Bill Ayers as
a writer for Obama's "Dreams from my Father".
The thing is... I keep sensing it has a code in it, AND the word "solutocracy" IS in the text:
"It is not God.ra A very powerful piece of writing that reveals the recreancy of the Church in the presence of the corruption and triumphant greed of the present-day pluchild-problem that is pressing for solutocracy is found in these lines."It is FOUND in these lines...
EDIT to add... That paragraph has very little that looks like "bad OCR." The "bad OCR" starts after that point.
From: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/recreancy?s=t
rec·re·ant [rek-ree-uhnt]
adjective
1. cowardly or craven.
2. unfaithful, disloyal, or traitorous.
noun
3. a coward.
4. an apostate, traitor, or renegade.
Origin:
1300–50; Middle English < Old French, adj. and noun use of present participle of recreire to yield in a contest, equivalent to re- re- + creire < Latin cr?dere to believe
Related forms
rec·re·ance, rec·re·an·cy, noun
rec·re·ant·ly, adverb
un·rec·re·ant, adjective
Synonyms
1. dastardly, pusillanimous, base, faint-hearted, yellow. 2. faithless, untrue, apostate. 3. dastard.
Antonyms
1. brave. 2. loyal. 3. hero.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 04:32:54 AM
From: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/recreancy?s=t
rec·re·ant [rek-ree-uhnt]
Yes Amy, that word is found in many entries on
google. I also see that in a seperate google
search the other term you 'coined' is used
a lot in posts from Anonymous, also related
to the 'end of money'.
For expample:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqBN41ibCGQ
Was just verifying it was not an OCR error, that it was a real word.
And yes, You will find that the word, solutocracy, is in My comment on that vid.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 04:44:07 AM
And yes, You will find that the word, solutocracy, is in My comment on that vid.
That is what is good, and bad about Google.
Any place it has its bots crawl, they index the word... if it is
found in a google search, appears to be even in comments
on blogs, news and vids. That lone entry appears to be
related to a video game or similar type of site.
When I searched, every entry listed was either Me posting (article, comment) or someOne else picking up My work - EXCEPT that one link.
And it was on the first page. So...I am stumped. And like I said, the OCR errors begin - in SPADES - in the text that follows that paragraph - and that paragraph clearly mentions solutocracy. Why? Where did the writer get that word?
Like I said, I think there is a code in there.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 05:09:12 AM
in the text that follows that paragraph - and that paragraph clearly mentions solutocracy. Why? Where did the writer get that word?
Like I said, I think there is a code in there.
You might have some success by contacting that site,
check the date of entry on it. Also, run a check on your
term in another Google search field, you may be as shocked
and worse. Search under 'discussions'.
As it is, your term is coming up clear, what is odd that the
paragraph after is the bad OCR. It is indeed stange, but then
again google is full of wierd stuff.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 04:21:04 AM
solutocracy
Doing a search in Chinese this is the only thing that poped up and I can't even get into it [yet]
Did you ever post there?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/ (http://whatreallyhappened.com/)
Your on your own if you open that site up, I have no idea what it is.....
Deuem
Quote from: deuem on November 22, 2013, 05:36:55 AM
Doing a search in Chinese this is the only thing that poped up and I can't even get into it [yet]
Did you ever post there?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/ (http://whatreallyhappened.com/)
Your on your own if you open that site up, I have no idea what it is.....
Deuem
No, but the article was picked up by WhatReallyHappened.com. It was through My association with 12160.info that the article was picked up.
And it is a site that is dedicated to the truth of things on this planet.
Quote from: burntheships on November 22, 2013, 05:16:29 AM
You might have some success by contacting that site,
check the date of entry on it. Also, run a check on your
term in another Google search field, you may be as shocked
and worse. Search under 'discussions'.
As it is, your term is coming up clear, what is odd that the
paragraph after is the bad OCR. It is indeed stange, but then
again google is full of wierd stuff.
Google may be filled with "weird" stuff, but that specific term, coined by Me, to be showing up in that context - "pluchild-
problem?" - is beyond Google just being weird. "Triumphant greed?" "...
pressing for solutocracy...?"
I am certain there is a code there.
As for checking dates... Not sure how I would do that. I suppose I could contact Them - that might be interesting. I did look at page info to discover that the file had been modified TODAY:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/PluChild.png~320x480?t=1385142210)
[shrug] I have screen shots from yesterday, and will see what has changed - if anything...
I'm looking forward to the mystery being solved.
Well, I filled out a contact form asking about the material. We'll see.
Mystery solved! LOL!
It IS an OCR scan of a book with two columns (thus the sense that the content was from different sources). And it just worked out randomly that "solutocracy" was the result:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/SoluSolution.png~320x480?t=1385152440)
And with the OCR line-read indicated:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/SoluSolutionproc.png~320x480?t=1385152993)
I guess I'm just paranoid. [smile]
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 08:45:16 PM
It IS an OCR scan of a book with two columns (thus the sense that the content was from different sources). And it just worked out randomly that "solutocracy" was the result:
:)
QuoteI guess I'm just paranoid. [smile]
We finally agree in something. ;)
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 05:50:08 PM
I did look at page info to discover that the file had been modified TODAY:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/PluChild.png~320x480?t=1385142210)
Is that the time when you looked at the page? I think that's what Firefox shows.
Nope. I looked at about 2ish PM.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 21, 2013, 11:42:06 PM
I thought to do a search for "solutocracy" and ran it, getting a surprising 1,610 results. The whole page was postings by Me, as i expected, but down at the bottom of the first page was this:
(http://rs1156.pbsrc.com/albums/p572/AmaterasuSolar/Mobile%20Uploads/SoleUtGoog.png~320x480?t=1385076714)
Dunno. AnyOne here with a clue?
Well that article is now #6 likely because you posting that link here and everyone checking it out bumped it higher
I know that first link i clicked on gave me a wall of code .no words at all .with my droid.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 22, 2013, 08:45:16 PM
Mystery solved! LOL!
Robots LOL :P
::)
QuoteI guess I'm just paranoid. [smile]
True that but dang making up new words and spamming them I would be paranoid too :P
Quote from: zorgon on November 23, 2013, 03:03:00 AM
Robots LOL :P
::)
True that but dang making up new words and spamming them I would be paranoid too :P
It's not spam by virtue of the virtue. [smile] I seek no monetary gain, I do not sneak in malware, and I offer it from the heart. I am trying to save Humans from the NWO, which, regardless of My paranoid tendencies, is real and WILL emerge again even if We "win" this time - unless We eliminate the control mechanism once and for all.
And coming up with a governance system which We have never seen before to go with the abundance We have never seen before requires to be called SOMETHING. If I called it "peanuts," or "crustacean," or "theocracy," or any word already taken, I'm bound to have issues communicating, don't You think, z?
So... The best descriptor in the standard format is what I chose.
You see a problem in any of the above?
As for OCR ("robots"), there is a far cry from the simple, clearly defined tasks We might need robots for because not enough People want to do them, and deciphering wide-ranging text - "reading," in other words.
And I bet the "reading" skills will improve as Those of Us who love to work on such problems do so. We Humans are problem-solvers, after all...seems a solutocracy is just what the universe ordered.