http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eaj7UHWoS6c
Check this video out. I found it on Reddit, and I'm only a few minutes in. It's called, "The Future Will Not Be Centralised."
I've started to notice something interesting about Occupy, however, and all of these other "protest," movements, which they have in common with this one.
Despite them claiming to be democratic, there's consistently a single type of person speaking, as you'll see here.
This person is:-
a} Visually attractive/photogenic.
b} Well dressed/visibly wealthy. Look at the suit and tie and sunglasses, here.
c} White.
d} Not always male, but usually. If female, will invariably be blonde.
e} Generally about the same age; 27-29 or so.
This reminds me of two similar types that I knew of on YouTube; LisaNova and Mr. Safety. Then there was Aaron Schwartz, the founder of Reddit. Despite Aaron's assassination, he fit this pattern to a T as well. They're a 21st century version, of the type which we saw as antagonists in the Revenge of the Nerds movies. Remember Stan Gable?
(http://img2-1.timeinc.net/ew/i/2012/10/01/ted-mcginley.jpg)
The consistency with which you see this type as spokespeople at these things, tells me that such movements aren't really grass roots. It makes me think that if we were able to do some digging on the backgrounds of these kids, we'd find links to the usual suspects; George Soros, David Rockefeller etc. I suspect that those men are realising that playing a shell game with 28 year olds is more consistent with what the public want to see, than if said men simply got in front of the camera themselves.
This also suggests very strongly that, in reality, the supposedly "decentralised," or "democratic," nature of these events is really a complete farce. It's basically just a polite lie that everyone tells themselves, but has been hijacked and twisted with enough of a "cool/hip," image that people unquestioningly get behind it.
Is this where government is going next? Where we are still essentially tyrannised by the same people, but they recruit said 28 year old sociopaths into serving as their proxies, with the appearance that the people supposedly want?
well i'm white and blonde, and i don't know george soros or rockerfeller. believe it or not, the usa has alot of white people in it. hehe
Not seen to many whites in the USA :P lots of pinks though :P
I would bet You are spot on, Petrus!
There was already talk about Occupy being initiated by TPTB...so no surprise there.
Quote from: Amaterasu on November 26, 2013, 07:47:21 PM
I would bet You are spot on, Petrus!
There was already talk about Occupy being initiated by TPTB...so no surprise there.
that, i would believe, but i don't think the fact they are white or attractive or blonde is automatically a sign they are globalists.
Oh, surely, Beth! I would say that such is merely a suggestion that perhaps, as opposed to solid evidence.
Noo, Petrus has just been spending too much time on Reddit and watching MSM.
I watched alternative footage through out, that of Live Leak and RT - there was a REAL movement, by ALL races and creeds...
Then the psy-op's and propaganda started.
geeeeeeeeze, of course these movements are not grass roots..
what better way to find those interested in revolt than this
just like the ads to see if you are psychic
or the ads to exercise your brain
or if you talk smack at some forum
or any of those things we amuse ourselves with - where we are visible
they are hooks
hooks catch folks to be categorized and pigeon holed and see if they need to be neutralized
or maybe just watched...
opps the skeptic in me is dominate today
sigh
:'(
I have always said how easy it would be for THEM to get into groups like Occupy and Anonymous and direct the action. Most people that join these type of groups are basically sheep seeking a new shepherd and can easily be led
And now the NAZI's are buying up Rachel...
Interesting times afoot
Soros scholarship babies?
After school then they are soros puppets.
That would be my guess.
Quote from: petrus4 on November 26, 2013, 06:15:35 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eaj7UHWoS6c
Is this where government is going next? Where we are still essentially tyrannised by the same people, but they recruit said 28 year old sociopaths into serving as their proxies, with the appearance that the people supposedly want?
Well, the CIA was involved with the Free Love, Hippie
movement, it has supplied drugs for the cause,
going back earlier than that we can thank Tavistock
for similar things, like fruedian psychology influencing
modern medicine, the institutions of learning etc.
While this may not be new, it is disturbing.
I think there is a lot of truth here Petrus.
Maybe only some of them are white though,
just as many in other nationalities.
Quote from: burntheships on November 27, 2013, 01:41:53 AM
Well, the CIA was involved with the Free Love, Hippie
movement, it has supplied drugs for the cause
Timothy Leary was a CIA agent 8) :)
Before he died, he said, "The PC is the LSD of the 90s".
Straight from the horses mouth ;D
Going to restart this thread, because it's related to Ferguson at the moment.
So I've been looking through some more images of Corrine Foxx on Google images. One thing that consistently jumps out at me, is that she is a very, very light mulatto; calling her black is more or less a technicality.
(http://wac.9ebf.edgecastcdn.net/809EBF/ec-origin.philly.barstoolsports.com/wp-content/gallery/philly/corinne-bishop/jamie-foxx-corinne6.jpg)(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_GpIqc5vZK3c/TPU5ZIQqHvI/AAAAAAAB23E/sLJs31I3xy0/s400/Famous-December-birthdays-03.jpg)
Here's Corinne Foxx, side by side with Britney Spears. Am I trying to claim that they're the same person? No; but there's a haunting similarity in some respects, and that suggests to me that David Icke and Wellaware1 are right when they say that the cabal does have a genetic component, in terms of what they do. I've also read hints that Britney was a victim of the Monarch mind control program, and that she and Justin Bieber were once seen together as children. If that is true, it raises more questions.
My point here, is that I've noticed that wherever black people are involved as media figures, generally speaking they aren't that black at all, relatively speaking. They will usually be extremely light half-breeds, and I can remember a documentary a bit back called, "Dark Girls," which was actually about the amount of stigma and abuse which truly pure blood black women face in American society.
(http://files.doobybrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bush-obama-morphing.jpg)
Remember this image? It's worth more than a thousand words, in terms of the degree of similarity it represents. There is exceptionally little real change in skin tone; yet Barrack is "black."
So other than incriminating myself as a racist, what is my point here? To illustrate again that the cabal's activities have a strong genetic/eugenicist component, in terms of the people they are willing to work with. To the extent that black individuals are recruited or utilised at all, it will only be the lightest mulattos who are. Real blacks are not allowed in the club, while controllable mulattos who still visibly have the signature Caucasoid genes, are used to pander to the social justice warrior demographic.
In that sense, Obama becoming President was a classic bait and switch. People were fooled into thinking that a "black" President was going to represent huge political change, yet genetically speaking he was obviously largely identical to every other President, while appearing just different enough for the trick to work.
(http://media.thedenverchannel.com/photo/2012/12/15/robbie%20parker_1355611925366_340736_ver1.0_320_240.jpeg)(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Vj_1LOYaR7o/Syjzca1lqSI/AAAAAAAAyjk/LVs8M7n7UEU/s200/article-0-079E878D000005DC-43_468x531.jpg)
The photo on the left is Robbie Parker, the supposed father of a shooting victim at Sandy Hook, who was accused of fake crying. The photo on the right is Prince William. Notice any similarities? They are very obviously different people, but the nose, the mouth outline, and the forehead are similar. The point is that to me, Robbie Parker looks a lot more like a blue blood Englishman, than a typical American.
Hopefully I've given you something to watch out for, anyway. The next time you watch a video which is supposedly depicting some sort of protest, riot, or civil unrest, look very carefully at the faces you see. Are the "black" people in the footage really black, or essentially whites with a tan? Are you seeing unusually strong facial symmetry, or noticeably abnormal indications of wealth or physical attractiveness, to the point where you know that there is no way you would see that person at your local supermarket?
That is what I am going to be mentally using from now on, and truthfully what I've already used for a while; the Supermarket Test. I remember seeing a guy in Egypt who was supposed to be a "grass roots," activist during the Arab Spring; yet he failed the Supermarket Test. He was wearing a leather jacket and expensive looking pants, and he spoke with an Oxford English accent, while still claiming to be a native. Harmid Karzai, the man who was "elected" as the President of Afghanistan, massively failed the Supermarket Test, as well; even for a politician.
Out of place Oxford or similar bourgeois accents, strong facial symmetry, unusually expensive clothing, or having a conspicuous smell of money in general (especially in settings like Occupy, where you would expect to see the poor) are all indicators of agents of the cabal. When you see these, it's a sign that what you are looking at is fake and orchestrated, and should not be taken seriously.
But what about the Kardasians?
:o
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/97a2cdc1ed13a73b7b0b92a5f2ac9ccc/tumblr_nbkiq2Dozb1tf2284o1_500.jpg)
I see the valid point that Petrus is making, I would agree racism flows directly through the Hollywood, 'MK-Ultra' scene.
It is also true they like to put certain genetics on a pedestal.
Quote from: petrus4 on November 29, 2014, 10:12:44 AM
So I've been looking through some more images of Corrine Foxx on Google images. One thing that consistently jumps out at me, is that she is a very, very light mulatto; calling her black is more or less a technicality.
That's something I noticed in the US, they call "black" to people with a skin colour lighter than mine. :)
Quote(http://wac.9ebf.edgecastcdn.net/809EBF/ec-origin.philly.barstoolsports.com/wp-content/gallery/philly/corinne-bishop/jamie-foxx-corinne6.jpg)(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_GpIqc5vZK3c/TPU5ZIQqHvI/AAAAAAAB23E/sLJs31I3xy0/s400/Famous-December-birthdays-03.jpg)
Here's Corinne Foxx, side by side with Britney Spears. Am I trying to claim that they're the same person? No; but there's a haunting similarity in some respects, and that suggests to me that David Icke and Wellaware1 are right when they say that the cabal does have a genetic component, in terms of what they do. I've also read hints that Britney was a victim of the Monarch mind control program, and that she and Justin Bieber were once seen together as children. If that is true, it raises more questions.
I think it just shows that people in the US (is that Corinne Foxx from the US? I don't have the slightest idea of who she is) are too fixed on a specific look and change the way they look to get it. For a real comparison we would need photos of both when they were children.
Quote(http://files.doobybrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bush-obama-morphing.jpg)
Remember this image? It's worth more than a thousand words, in terms of the degree of similarity it represents. There is exceptionally little real change in skin tone; yet Barrack is "black."
Yes, there's little change because they are both from the same species. :)
QuoteIn that sense, Obama becoming President was a classic bait and switch. People were fooled into thinking that a "black" President was going to represent huge political change, yet genetically speaking he was obviously largely identical to every other President, while appearing just different enough for the trick to work.
With that I agree. :)
Quoteimg]http://media.thedenverchannel.com/photo/2012/12/15/robbie%20parker_1355611925366_340736_ver1.0_320_240.jpeg[/img](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Vj_1LOYaR7o/Syjzca1lqSI/AAAAAAAAyjk/LVs8M7n7UEU/s200/article-0-079E878D000005DC-43_468x531.jpg)
The photo on the left is Robbie Parker, the supposed father of a shooting victim at Sandy Hook, who was accused of fake crying. The photo on the right is Prince William. Notice any similarities? They are very obviously different people, but the nose, the mouth outline, and the forehead are similar. The point is that to me, Robbie Parker looks a lot more like a blue blood Englishman, than a typical American.
They are not that similar, but that's one thing I have noticed about people from the US a long time ago, even if the US is supposed to be a "melting pot", the people have less differences among themselves than a small country like Portugal, where we can find easily many "racial types", while in the US we see just some "racial types" and not that much mixing.
QuoteI remember seeing a guy in Egypt who was supposed to be a "grass roots," activist during the Arab Spring; yet he failed the Supermarket Test. He was wearing a leather jacket and expensive looking pants, and he spoke with an Oxford English accent, while still claiming to be a native.
Many people with money in the Middle East go to study in the UK, as the UK was the last "colonial presence" in that area, even if it was not a colonizing force.
I vote for Green's in Ozzie and am pretty happy we got another seat in Politicks today. :P
I'm just a normal person who vote's. I enjoy voting for a party that say's it will change the current paradigm and who have also posted result's.
Perfect? Heck no!
Oddly though... I pose a question as to whether this person is on the CT Hit List?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=my8ww31dkgg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHDJEh_y6RQ
So is he a Bad person in on the Game ? Or someone who tried to make a change and learned the game to OUR advantage ?
I have posted picture's of Tasmania on this Forum... Fecking Great Place :)
Quote from: Somamech on November 29, 2014, 05:28:31 PM
So is he a Bad person in on the Game ? Or someone who tried to make a change and learned the game to OUR advantage ?
Soma, given how tightly controlled the political community is, in the Five Eyes countries in particular, then I think we can safely say that Bob Brown would not have had a prominent position, if he was not controllable. I don't know a lot about him, but from one of those videos, and his Wikipedia page, it looks as though he was someone who was initially involved in environmental activism, (quite successfully, it seems) before getting into politics. I can also remember hearing that he was quite celebrated while he was the leader of the Greens.
I truthfully pay almost no attention to Australian politics, despite living here; virtually all of my focus is on America, as I consider the American government to have a much higher degree of overall relevance.
According to Wikipedia, Mr. Brown was the first openly gay man in the Australian Parliament. I tend to believe that the people who are really running the show, like to insert token individuals who are nominal members of certain minorities, in order to create the illusion of progress and an open political system, and to cause the public to believe that anyone can successfully run for political office.
My guess in general, therefore, is that Brown was essentially controlled opposition, or more specifically Australia's equivalent of Al Gore. In Brown's case, it was a bit more skilfully and covertly handled than in the case of Peter Garrett, as he was initially an environmental and Aboriginal rights activist as well, but sold out openly and completely on getting into politics. The cabal have a strong interest in recruiting and quietly corrupting individuals who have successfully opposed them in the past, since not only does it end that particular line of opposition, but it also allows them to gain control of said individuals' followers as well.
If you are trying to determine who to vote for during political elections, there is something vitally important to keep in mind. Because the cabal are willing to use blackmail and assassinations, in general it should be assumed that anyone who you are seeing on television, or who is otherwise in the mainstream public eye, is a controlled asset. While it is true that the level of control that they have over individuals varies, you will generally find that people who buck the system too much, either end up discredited or having their careers destroyed, (as in the case of Ron Paul in America, or Gough Whitlam in Australia) or are assassinated/disappeared. (As in the case of JFK in America, and Harold Holt in Australia)
People will tell you how vitally important it supposedly is to vote; but my own opinion is truthfully the exact opposite. The individuals who control the political process, in truth have no intention whatsoever of admitting anyone who is not vulnerable to their control. The individuals who genuinely run things have an exceptionally medieval (think feudalist) view of the world, to a large degree. The facade of democracy is used as in order to deceive the public that they have some measure of choice in what goes on, so that said public are less restive and easier to control; but it is a complete illusion. Real democracy does not exist in any major government, particularly in the Western world.
If you want to know how to change the world in a positive manner, about the only thing I can really suggest is engaging in compassionate behaviour on an individual basis. If there is someone right in front of you who needs your help, give it to them to the extent that you are able. Remember your humanity, remember your compassion, and remember your ability to look after those who need it; and to the extent that you can, encourage that behaviour in others.
Activist movements and groups of any kind should generally be avoided, as there are virtually none of them these days which have not been infiltrated or corrupted, to some degree or another. I learned that to my sorrow, after taking a Permaculture Design Course in 2011.
The three warning signs to look out for, with regards to whether or not a given individual or group have been infiltrated, are:-
a} The mainstream media are talking about them favourably, or otherwise giving them airtime.
b} They are visually attractive, although I've already covered this point above.
c} In terms of groups, your single biggest clue is the presence of money. Asking for donations on a relatively low-key basis is probably not much of an issue, as everyone needs to eat. On the other hand, you need to keep in mind the fact that a need for money is a point of vulnerability. If a group needs money, and someone like George Soros or the Koch brothers give it to them, then it is more or less certain that that group is going to be compromised very quickly.
That is not to say that homeless people are
always trustworthy either, but in my experience, 90% of the time someone you meet on the street is going to be
vastly more altruistic and human in general terms, than someone who is wealthy. We live in a society where psychopathic behaviour is almost always a prerequisite of truly large-scale wealth; and if a person uses that sort of behaviour to gain their money, they are not going to immediately give it up once they are rich. If they do, they will lose said money again very quickly. Money has its' own laws; and said laws generally do not reward compassionate or otherwise ethically positive behaviour.
The OP of this thread has a sequel, as it turns out; but first, let's set the tone with some appropriate music, given the thread's name. ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWyB447vNjg
I was innocently reading Reddit this morning, as I cusomarily do, when via /r/Rad_Decentralization I came across the following link:-
Decentralized Autonomous Progress Report (http://us5.campaign-archive2.com/?u=41ff3b5e83e66fffdf53475f0&id=2a7f4a63b7).
Remember the guy you saw in the YouTube video, in this thread's OP? It turns out his name is Gary, and he's still around. Supposedly he's the co-founder of something called "Decentralized Dance Parties," and has been to Burning Man, among other similar events.
Something else that's truly interesting about "Gary," however, is the fact that I can't find his surname. To quote Commissioner Gordon, "no name, no other alias."
(http://mattthomas.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/ledger.jpg)
Maybe Gary also wants to watch the world burn.
If anyone is willing to help out here, I'd appreciate it. I particularly want to find out who is sponsoring "Gary," as I have a feeling that the question of who is paying his bills, could have an intriguing answer.
http://www.decentralizeddanceparty.com/ - This is the DDP's web site. Interestingly, they also talk about having an "elite banana task force," populated by, "party Comrades." Oops. It seems that whoever wrote the script for these individuals did not provide quite enough subtlety. Let's see...Comrades...now where have I heard that particular word before?
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/f973ef282c80dc304b997be13b964343/tumblr_mwofkueTmI1sh95ago1_1280.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JmFa2Q40lg
It's a shame we can't resurrect Joseph McCarthy; because I suspect that at this point, the world perhaps still needs him. ;)
Quote from: petrus4 on January 01, 2015, 06:45:58 PM
Remember the guy you saw in the YouTube video, in this thread's OP? It turns out his name is Gary, and he's still around. Supposedly he's the co-founder of something called "Decentralized Dance Parties," and has been to Burning Man, among other similar events.
Something else that's truly interesting about "Gary," however, is the fact that I can't find his surname.
I don't know if it's his real name or not, but he uses "Lachance" after "Gary", he is from Canada and is connected in some way to a band called "HORSE the band".
Quotehttp://www.decentralizeddanceparty.com/ - This is the DDP's web site. Interestingly, they also talk about having an "elite banana task force," populated by, "party Comrades." Oops. It seems that whoever wrote the script for these individuals did not provide quite enough subtlety. Let's see...Comrades...now where have I heard that particular word before?
The word "comrade" is used by many people in Portugal in its original meaning of "chamber mate", used by people that were together in the army, in a boarding school, etc.
QuoteIt's a shame we can't resurrect Joseph McCarthy; because I suspect that at this point, the world perhaps still needs him.
No, it's not, and the world never needed him.
Quote from: ArMaP on January 01, 2015, 08:31:39 PM
I don't know if it's his real name or not, but he uses "Lachance" after "Gary", he is from Canada and is connected in some way to a band called "HORSE the band".
Thank you for this, Armap.
http://www.decentralizeddanceparty.com/the-party-manifesto/ - This is, "the Party Manifesto," the title of which makes me cringe; as does the phrase, "the Party Revolution."
I understand what you are saying about use of the same words being a coincidence; but I don't tend to believe in those sorts of coincidences, to be honest. I think there's probably a genuine connection with Communism here somewhere.
The other things that bother me are the Power Glove and those glasses. He just looks extremely
fake. It might be innocent, but there's something about it that is just giving me the willies, and has for a long time.
Such is the life of the self-described "twentysomething" who declines to name his suburban Ontario hometown and instead claims to have travelled from the future to change the world, one decentralized dance party at a time.
This is a quote from here (http://www.macleans.ca/culture/the-street-party-that-really-moves/). He really does not seem to like giving out information about himself.
Quote from: petrus4 on January 01, 2015, 08:47:21 PM
I think there's probably a genuine connection with Communism here somewhere.
So what, do you think Communists eat little children? ::)
Quote from: ArMaP on January 01, 2015, 08:53:51 PM
So what, do you think Communists eat little children? ::)
Not exactly; but Communism's historical track record hasn't been all that great. As I've said before, I'm more worried that Gary is being used as a means of manipulating young people in ways that they are unlikely to recognise.
Quote from: petrus4 on January 01, 2015, 08:56:25 PM
Not exactly; but Communism's historical track record hasn't been all that great.
True, in some cases.
QuoteAs I've said before, I'm more worried that Gary is being used as a means of manipulating young people in ways that they are unlikely to recognise.
How, do you think they will be recruited by the KGB? :P
Communism should be recognised for what it is, and that's the 'Boleshevic/Zionist agenda'.
No surprises here..