(http://i1284.photobucket.com/albums/a572/paparumbo/image_zps1efe2c1d.jpg)
http://www.universetoday.com/101180/first-ever-submillimeter-radio-images-of-supernova-1987a/#at_pco=smlre-1.0&at_tot=4&at_ab=per-13&at_pos=3
Maybe Nancy Atkinson is a Deuem fan and figured it out. Deuemlings are everywhere. I will give it a go and see what comes out. I noticed that she has an overlay shown. That's why the dots are not processed. See the world Deuemed here and now the universe on the Web. I started a monster!
Deuem
Super Nova off the linked site for EH both Day Time
(http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/aa458/deuem/SuperNova2.jpg) (http://s1198.photobucket.com/user/deuem/media/SuperNova2.jpg.html)
(http://i1198.photobucket.com/albums/aa458/deuem/SuperNova.jpg) (http://s1198.photobucket.com/user/deuem/media/SuperNova.jpg.html)
The Real Deuem. lol
Real Deuem Rules.
(http://i1284.photobucket.com/albums/a572/paparumbo/image_zps59334c94.jpg)
;)
In some ways they almost look like geodes.im surprised z hasnt mentioned it.i wonder if they are fractal patterns and if the two are similar.
Quote from: robomont on December 28, 2013, 11:12:16 AM
In some ways they almost look like geodes.im surprised z hasnt mentioned it.i wonder if they are fractal patterns and if the two are similar.
They are common contour lines, so if the original is a fractal the contour lines will probably be also fractal.
Quote from: ArMaP on December 28, 2013, 02:48:24 PM
They are common contour lines, so if the original is a fractal the contour lines will probably be also fractal.
ArMaP uses the word "CONTOUR" as in a topo map. thank you!
Besides, aren't fractals repedative?
Deuem
Quote from: deuem on December 28, 2013, 05:00:43 PM
ArMaP uses the word "CONTOUR" as in a topo map. thank you!
Yes, as in a topographic map. :)
QuoteBesides, aren't fractals repedative?
Not necessarily, and when they are they may be at a level that is not noticeable, like seeing the same shapes in details zoomed in 1000%.
Who doesn't love a fractal.
Natures probing last chance to emulate and live.
(http://i1284.photobucket.com/albums/a572/paparumbo/image_zps31775f0f.jpg)
So if I say that the Deuem process shows a flat version of topo contour lines you should agree now. The missing value is Z" of depth. As light hits an object it tends to wrap around it and show gradients. When it hits a perfect flat area it produces just one color, tilt it a little and the gradients form from distance. After all isn't that the sam way sun light changes our temp from morning to mid day. In reverse looking straight on into a source we see a blinding light and as it spreads out so does the heat and the gradients along with it.
So when looking at light either direct or reflective we are seeing a "light" topo map? Once processed.
Deuem
Quote from: deuem on December 29, 2013, 01:10:22 AM
So if I say that the Deuem process shows a flat version of topo contour lines you should agree now. The missing value is Z" of depth.
No. :)
QuoteAs light hits an object it tends to wrap around it and show gradients.
Yes, but we cannot know if the gradients are a result of the shape of the object, the colour(s) of the object, the colour of the light or of any mix of these.
QuoteWhen it hits a perfect flat area it produces just one color, tilt it a little and the gradients form from distance. After all isn't that the sam way sun light changes our temp from morning to mid day. In reverse looking straight on into a source we see a blinding light and as it spreads out so does the heat and the gradients along with it.
Yes, if the object has a constant colour all over it the colours it will reflect are dependent just on the shape and on the colour of the light.
QuoteSo when looking at light either direct or reflective we are seeing a "light" topo map? Once processed.
No, we are looking at the processed colours, that's the only thing we can say about it.
It's the same thing as in a topographic map but with one difference: instead of height the lines show areas with the same colour.