In all my searching for videos regarding the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11/01, I do not remember seeing this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RlRSPpdCnw
It is 13 minutes long and looks like someone is right there on top of the scene. Is this a lost / forgotten or never before scene?
This compilation along with the message at the end is very strange indeed. I do not believe I have come across this before.
you should make sure to DL it before it goes away. I can't see it otherwise I would.
Quote from: deuem on January 23, 2014, 11:08:37 AM
you should make sure to DL it before it goes away. I can't see it otherwise I would.
Done. :)
Who is this dude on the what looks like a Segway at around 7 minutes into the video demonstrating less motion than a rock on mar's these days ;D
(http://img.acianetmedia.com/i/tACnD.png)
I think you'll find that's the front landing gear of the plane, or at least it's supposed to be ::)
For a start, we would have to believe that a 747 completely disintegrated, but these wheels simply 'broke off' and came neatly to rest against the wall.
Then there was the 'engine' that they showed us, which was tiny only about 2 feet across, while anyone who ever stood near one of these planes knows the turbines are 6 feet across.
What they showed us as 'evidence' is actually an APU or Auxilliary power unit, it's a turbine-powered electic genny that can be stuck outside in emergencies to get power to start the engines etc.
Both these items are of course inside the plane, i doubt very much if the 'terrorist' had the landing gear down or had the APU deployed, in fact i doubt he could even find the controls for them ::)
But it would certainly fool the sheeple who will point & say 'oh look, bits of 747 all over the place, how terrible' and not even stop to think about what they were being shown.
And then ther'es all those lamp posts, traffic lights, trees etc.
Heck the camera view is sometimes blocked there are so many of them :P
Yet we are supposed to believe that some crazy arab flew a 747 exactly between them, to hit the building at low level.
And all that without there being a shred of evidence on film, nothing, zip.
All we get to see is a thin white trail just before the explosion.
Now jets at ground level leave no trails at all, you only get contrails up high where it's cold.
What DOES leave a white trail however, is a solid fuel rocket, like a missile
Add to that there were very few casualties because that side of the building was evacuated for 'refurbishment'-oh how convenient :P
They refurbished allright, how d'you like it, chaps?
;D
PWM, when I saw this video I saw all those light posts up and that set of wheels in the video looked like it was for a small set of landing gears. I worked for a division of Colt Industries out in Ft. Worth, well anyway it was near Arlington Texas. The company was called Menasco Manufacturing at the time. (no longer in business). We were a division of Colt and made landing gears from raw castings. That does not look like a gear for a large aircraft. Even a nose gear for a 757 would be a lot larger than that. We made gears for the C-5, C 141, L1011, F4, crusader, C130's, B52 etc...I was an engine lathe machinist working on them. By their look I would say nose gear for smaller aircraft.
It could be wheels for something else but I don't know what. I was also a reservist with the USAF at Carswell as a munitions maintenance technician and worked the flight line placing the munitions near the aircraft where the loaders would place them on the aircraft. (301st Tactical Fighter Wing) Both now decommissioned. I saw the engines used to start the aircraft and it might be a set of wheels for such an engine, but it looks like a small landing gear. (I could be wrong)
I'm sorry I did not put the link in for our Apple / Mac users so here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RlRSPpdCnw&feature=player_embedded
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on January 23, 2014, 06:16:02 PM
I think you'll find that's the front landing gear of the plane, or at least it's supposed to be ::)
Thanks mate, your comment almost gave this planet enough propulsion to through my LOL to take us anywhere we desire :D
Oddly i watched the footage again and the person in mention appears stagnant when some airport looking transport comes into screen :D
:) I have to say I agree with PlaysWithMachines, not likely a set of tires would survive the crash and they are way to small to be
from a 747. In fact after watching the video it looks as though it could even be a large truck of some type that is burning. It
resembles a Trash Truck that caught fire. In the very start of the video there is a shot of what looks to clearly be a good sized
vehicle close to the building, in a garage or that has crashed into the building. Maybe it was a truck bomb that was used and not largely reported on.
whatthehey
QuoteEven a nose gear for a 757 would be a lot larger than that.
yes i thought so, too :D
And what happened to the several tons of hard steel & titanium that real engines would have.
Vaporised also? I doubt it.
In fact theres very litle (if any) evidence of a plane at all.............
QuoteOddly i watched the footage again and the person in mention appears stagnant when some airport looking transport comes into screen
OK it's not the best quality, i did not see that thing move, what i thought may have been the 'man' on the 'sedgeway' looked more like insulation & cables etc to me. In fact the whole scene looked just like that other one that crashed in the field, sorry forgot the number.
'just like somebody dug a hole & tipped a truckload of debris in there' was the comment of one witness, i remember.
So how come they had an 'airport type' transport so quick on the scene?
Just so happens they had one parked out back?
We can keep picking at bones, but i think we can safely agree there was no plane, certainly not a 757 :P
They could have thrown a couple of singed passports on the lawn though ::) it worked in New York ;)
The Pentagon has a heliport and they would have fire equipment right there. This whole video seems to be pieces clipped together. Like I said before. I have never seen this particular video through all the videos I have watched. I have been going through the newsreels from the Internet Archive and had not run across this one at all. Makes you go hmmmmm.
http://911review.com/attack/pentagon/
Take a look at this picture here. You will find the heliport for the Pentagon right next to the damaged area. This would account for the airfield fire vehicle. You will notice a small control tower there also. I am sure right around that same area would be a way of fueling the helicopters. That area would various types of equipment present for use in servicing helicopters.
Another picture:
http://911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttackVideos.shtml
http://pentagon.spacelist.org/
Yeppers, , looks like a fire fighting rig to me, , the so called segeway thingy, ,
, , anddddddddd, , where is any part of a plane?!? FOCLMAO
check out the French satilite pics of this incident, , 8)
Quote from: Norval on January 23, 2014, 08:44:55 PM
Yeppers, , looks like a fire fighting rig to me, , the so called segeway thingy, ,
, , anddddddddd, , where is any part of a plane?!? FOCLMAO
check out the French satilite pics of this incident, , 8)
Pics from Ikonos?
??? With all the security cameras around they must have got video of the plane crashing into the building wouldn't you think so!
Well I looked into some info about eye witnesses and here it is...
about 89 The amount of eye witnesses I gathered who stated they saw an object crash into the Pentagon. The vast majority of the still available ones.
at least 45... The amount of eye witnesses who reported seeing a plane and described it with words like: 'airliner', 'big', 'silver', 'roaring', etc.
at least 23... The amount of eye witnesses who specifically said they saw an American Airlines jet. In all cases a large jet.
at least 22... The amount of witnesses who reported the noise of the plane was very loud to deafening.
at least 17... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a plane running down light poles when crossing the highways.
at least 12... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw and heard the plane increase its throttle at the last seconds.
at least 11... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a C-130H flying 30 seconds behind a jetliner.
at least 5... The amount of eye witnesses who specifically stated they saw the plane had its gear up.
at least 2 ... The amount of eye witnesses who stated that they saw a small corporate jet, without doing any creative interpreting [sic] of the witness accounts.
at least 0... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a missile. What the person thought he heard isn't relevant!
at least 0... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a military jet fighter at the time of the crash.
at least 0 ... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a Global Hawk at the time of the crash.
at least 3... The amount of witnesses who reported the sound of the plane was quite noiseless. (One of them acknowledged it was the shock)
at least 1... The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw the plane had it's gear down. (Indirect, said a wheel hit a pole)
at least 25... The amount of witnesses who have said something that might point to the use of explosives or incendiaries. (White flash, powerful blast waves which blew people through the air, molten glass, burning aluminum, [sic] spreading debris over hundreds of yards back to where the plane came from, including 2 engines, the missing plane itself, etc.)
Here is the page... http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/witnesses.html interesting info.
whatthehey
That is indication reality of the situation is questionable and if it happened exactly as claimed by our suspect tv's where all witnesses should have seen the same thing and any video should be available to back that up. But we have none of that meeting eye witness accounts matching the events timeline.
Than we have the witness who have died mysteriously or disappeared. Can you be sure that reality you think you are in is really how its happening
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on January 23, 2014, 06:16:02 PM
And then ther'es all those lamp posts, traffic lights, trees etc.
Heck the camera view is sometimes blocked there are so many of them :P
The first time I saw this video (or at least the first part) one of the things they showed was the fallen lamp posts.
Quote from: LSWONE on January 23, 2014, 09:49:07 PM
Pics from Ikonos?
Not sure, , and it was over a decade ago, , and on an old hard drive in storage.
I tried to download this video last night.
Using Youtube Downloader, it kept failing at 97%, so i watched the stream using an analyser. Just before the finish, Youtube sends a finalise code that stops YTD from downloading it. This then causes YTD to end and the result is no encoded video on disk. Frustrated I switched to a Firefox plugin and monitored the download, same pulse at 97% but Firefox ignores it.
Deliberate Youtube tactic to stop downloading, or more sinister?
Quote from: starwarp2000 on January 24, 2014, 01:05:43 PM
Deliberate Youtube tactic to stop downloading, or more sinister?
Or something else. :)
I didn't have any problems downloading the video by using this link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RlRSPpdCnw).
Quote from: starwarp2000 on January 24, 2014, 01:05:43 PM
I tried to download this video last night.
Using Youtube Downloader, it kept failing at 97%, so i watched the stream using an analyser. Just before the finish, Youtube sends a finalise code that stops YTD from downloading it. This then causes YTD to end and the result is no encoded video on disk. Frustrated I switched to a Firefox plugin and monitored the download, same pulse at 97% but Firefox ignores it.
Deliberate Youtube tactic to stop downloading, or more sinister?
This is what I use and it hasn't failed me yet:
http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch001002.htm
No program installed on computer. All you do is insert url. Doesn't have accelerated speed but it does the job and hasn't failed yet and I have IE 11.
I have a big problem with the glide path aspect.
I mean how high is that building.. And an airliner would have to be coming in well over its glide speed to be effectively maneuverable right?
That's a small wall to hit with or without power.
So I reckon ( guess ) a 757 needs prob 120 ish nots to rotate?
So he's coming in at let's say 200 knots minimum and trying to steer and hold altitude and hit that wall.
I don't see it.
As an ex flight instructor in helicopters i can tell you when we were doing power off landings into fields etc, you never hit your mark . And that's doing 60 knots in an extremely turnable little machine.
So unless it was baron Von Richthofen flying that beast, I would expect either tail or nose marks on the ground going in, from a fair distance ,
Or an overshoot.
Your never gonna hit that wall. It's too hard.
Ask john Lear if he could have done it in his hay day.
He maybe could have, but he knew exactly what he was doing in a big aeroplane.
This supposed terrorist was not a seasoned pilot.
It was a missile.
Elvis.
Quote from: Elvis Hendrix on January 24, 2014, 08:24:56 PM
Ask john Lear if he could have done it in his hay day.
He maybe could have, but he knew exactly what he was doing in a big aeroplane.
This supposed terrorist was not a seasoned pilot.
It was a missile.
Elvis.
I was in Las Vegas on Halloween in 2012; went with Zorgon to see John Lear, and asked him about 9/11; he stated that even with all his expertise that he couldn't fly a 757 thru the streets of Manhattan and hit the WTC...
seeker
Quote from: the seeker on January 24, 2014, 11:52:22 PM
I was in Las Vegas on Halloween in 2012; went with Zorgon to see John Lear, and asked him about 9/11; he stated that even with all his expertise that he couldn't fly a 757 thru the streets of Manhattan and hit the WTC...
Nobody flew a 757 through the streets of Manhattan.
I remember in our country the 1st reports reported the explosion was from a truck containing explosives,
which was parked next to the building ? ? ?
The original footage showed Bush being interrupted by an intelligence officer in a primary school,
then leaving the class.
It was reported that a truck containing explosives was parked outside the Pentagon.
I have never seen aircraft tragedies leave so little damage ?
Usually damage is over a much larger area, unless the aircraft has crashed from of a vertical decent !
Or has all this, to do with.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U84edjljNE
A "Cover Up" involving "Decision Blunders" with others, we have
NOT been told about ?
Great find Space Maverick!
I have not seen this before,
....where is de plane, de plane?
Quote from: burntheships on January 25, 2014, 04:41:51 AM
Great find Space Maverick!
I have not seen this before,
....where is de plane, de plane?
I had not seen this before either. It looks like these videos were spliced together but they sure are very close to what was happening. I am really curious about this subject again. I am going to hit the Internet Archive during my time off and see if I can find anything I may have missed. I kind of got away from it. I just happened across this and was flabbergasted.
Quote from: spacemaverick on January 25, 2014, 05:08:53 AM
I just happened across this and was flabbergasted.
Same here!
Took me many years to be able to even
look at this event, then when I did it was The Pentagon
that first had me convinced the OS was full of holes.
Hope your search turns up more to examine.
http://coyoteprime-runningcauseicantfly.blogspot.com/2014/01/never-aired-pentagon-911-video.html
Traced the video to the source that put it up on a conspiracy site beforeitnews. I don't believe a lot of what is put on the site but I guess I was lucky to find a nugget.
Check out a book by Dr. Judy Wood, , ,
Where Did The Towers Go?
Now THAT is an eye opener. ;D
Quote from: Norval on January 25, 2014, 03:26:45 PM
Check out a book by Dr. Judy Wood, , ,
Where Did The Towers Go?
Now THAT is an eye opener. ;D
Checked out Dr. Judy Wood and her ideas. Not sure of her conclusions but certainly I will not rule them out totally. I am sure (in my mind) that such things may exist in the black world but no proof they actually exist to take down a building of that size. I could be wrong.
I realize this thread is about a lost video but I found something else. This particular site is just a repository of information from different sources and these sources cannot really be verified. The information is certainly information I have not encountered before and deals with missiles being fired from atop the Woolworth building which had a direct line of sight view on the North tower. And it deals with orbs also. You be the judge...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_41.htm
I believe this is what happen in this case. Sure looks like it with the pattern of damage and lack of plane parts.
Quote"I remember in our country the 1st reports reported the explosion was from a truck containing explosives,
which was parked next to the building ? ? ?"
And then there is the truck in the beginning of the video too.
I just wish there was more we could do about things like this. Such a shame that people are still stuck in this competition mode......... Share and share alike........ But oh dear!!! :'(