Are we living 'underwater'? Researchers believe the universe might be a 'liquid superfluid' ...
What is 'space'? Is it empty, or is it full of stuff that provides a medium through which photons, electromagnetic waves and everything else more can move?
That's a question scientists have yet to find an answer to, but a new theory suggests spacetime itself might be a 'liquid superfluid'.
And, if proven true, it could force us to take another look at the Standard Model of physics.
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/25/article-2612949-1D51B26800000578-784_634x461.jpg)
Consider how waves move through water, for example – the wave propagates through the water, using it as a 'medium' through which to move.
As far as we know, a transfer of energy of this sort requires a medium, like how sound passes through air or heat through metal.
How, then do electromagnetic waves, photons and so on move through space, where there is believed to be nothing?
The supposed existence of a medium in space is more commonly known as an ether, but proving or disproving its existence has been a struggle.
In Liberati and Maccione's research, they suggest that this ether is in fact a superfluid.
They say to us, the spacetime just appears as one 'classical' object, something that is whole.
But instead we should consider it as being merely the 'visible' aspect of a fluid.
'One cannot imagine a more exciting time to be working on gravity.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2612949/Are-living-underwater-Researchers-believe-universe-liquid-superfluid.html
This pleases me! ;D Like waves on the ocean...
It is nice to see this being considered in the "scientific" world.
The ETHER IS a superfuid and the matter and energy we can observe is just the visible portion of this fluid. When in a placid state, it's only observable effect is gravity...dark energy, the ZPF.
Gravity is a flow, enertia is a wave...every force of nature is a different type of movement IN the ETHER, as is "information" or "memory", movement OF the ETHER is superluminal...it is the energetic dimension of time ala Bearden!
Cosmo
Space is hydrogen.super fluids are highly condensed gasses.now if your talking about the stuff in the spaces between the stuff.all we know so far is there are higgs bosons.unless I missed something somewhere.
But even these higgs are so small they are hard to hit.which means there is still more stuff between each higgs boson.I personally believe it goes on into infinity.probably in a Fibonacci sequence.
Quote from: robomont on April 25, 2014, 06:01:07 PM
Space is hydrogen.super fluids are highly condensed gasses.now if your talking about the stuff in the spaces between the stuff.all we know so far is there are higgs bosons.unless I missed something somewhere.
But even these higgs are so small they are hard to hit.which means there is still more stuff between each higgs boson.I personally believe it goes on into infinity.probably in a Fibonacci sequence.
Space is hydrogen....hmmmm
(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4039081216/hE71B66D2/)
Cosmo
Prove me wrong?
Lol .you notice how the title of the thread has superfuid not superfluid as it should be spelled.I screw up titles sometimes too.
A vacuum like space doesn't destroy hydrogen atoms unless they are hit with ionizing radiation.then they transition back to hydrogen.
Quote from: robomont on April 25, 2014, 07:33:23 PM
Prove me wrong?
Lol .you notice how the title of the thread has superfuid not superfluid as it should be spelled.I screw up titles sometimes too.
A vacuum like space doesn't destroy hydrogen atoms unless they are hit with ionizing radiation.then they transition back to hydrogen.
OK, convince me. How much gas is there in a vacuum?
Cosmo
How strong a vacuum and how large a volume.
There is no such thing as an absolute vaccuum.
Science has shaded the truth of what a vacuum really is.you can never empty a vessel.no matter how strong a vacuum you pull.the gas molecules diameter just gets bigger.
Quote from: robomont on April 25, 2014, 08:35:32 PM
How strong a vacuum and how large a volume.
There is no such thing as an absolute vaccuum.
Science has shaded the truth of what a vacuum really is.you can never empty a vessel.no matter how strong a vacuum you pull.the gas molecules diameter just gets bigger.
The point is that Hydrogen is an atom, not vacuum. The scale of the ETHER is smaller than subatomic particles that makes up atoms. There is an incredibly small amount of hydrogen in space, but atoms are not vacuum, gasses are not the vacuum. The vacuum is commonly called space/time or the quantum vacuum. It is also the source of zero point energy, not to be confused with any gas.
That is the ETHER.
Cosmo
Quote from: robomont on April 25, 2014, 08:35:32 PM
There is no such thing as an absolute vaccuum.
yes there is...
...the space between any particles atom or boson
Re WAVES
Everything in the Universe exists in waves, which include vibration, frequency and resonance
So it is likely that the Aether also follows this Univeral principle
I bet you are right that the aether is a super fluid... we just haven't found the 'material' yet
Once a long time ago we discovered that everthing that is made of matter in the Universe is made of only 115 different particles (give or take a few at the top end of stability)
Then later we discovered that these 115 particles were in turn made of only THREE particles
Then again later we discovered these three were made of even smaller particles
Who knows what we will learn tomorrow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obsXQ74QYzQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obsXQ74QYzQ
Then prove there is a absolute vacuum z.I have seen no report of such.to say there is ,is to say there is nothing in that space.how do we not know there isn't a smaller particle in it.we just haven't got the power high enough to find it yet.I think the highs boson was found at 40 billion volts and I also think I heard they were shooting for 400 billion volts.they may have to go into the trillions before they find the next one.
Because of my theory of Fibonacci.It may even be a higher voltage.
Thank you Z 8)
The whole problem with the ether is proving it exists. It cant be measured any more than electrons can be seen running up & down wires.
Touch the wire & you can feel it, but you need instruments to tell you it's there, if it's AC or DC & how many volts etc.
yes a superfluid fits the description exactly, a normal fluid has all the properties of fluid but cannot be compressed or expanded.
A gas is more like a super fluid, it can be compressed & expanded, but there are limits to that.
A superfluid can be expanded & compressed almost infinitely.
The Higgs is not just a very small particle, they say it is the one responsible for giving mass it's massiveness.
I disagree with that view, the Higgs shows that 'particles' of 'matter' spontaneously come into existence, affect other particles, and then spontaneously disappear again.
IMO ALL mass does this ALL the time, only on such a small scale & happening so fast that we just don't see it.
This would explain just about everything, time, gravity etc etc.
Like Matrix says, the 'program' is continually being 'updated' ;)
The complex interplay between mass & energy gets simpler, since they both originate in that primordial soup called the Aether.
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on April 27, 2014, 10:39:06 AM
The Higgs is not just a very small particle, they say it is the one responsible for giving mass it's massiveness.
I disagree with that view, the Higgs shows that 'particles' of 'matter' spontaneously come into existence, affect other particles, and then spontaneously disappear again.
IMO ALL mass does this ALL the time, only on such a small scale & happening so fast that we just don't see it.
This would explain just about everything, time, gravity etc etc.
Like Matrix says, the 'program' is continually being 'updated' ;)
The complex interplay between mass & energy gets simpler, since they both originate in that primordial soup called the Aether.
Yes! Exactly Luke...totally agree. Au
All mass does this all the time. So fast...the wave collapse happens BEFORE we CAN see it. Everything connected in the universal medium. Never separate, the true unification.
There is the higgs boson and there is the higgs field. A boson has wave and particle duality. I just see it as the measurable point where matter has it's connection to the higgs field...or the ETHER. The measureable energy that link represents. The higgs field does so much more than give particles their mass imho. It is really the classical ETHER, the medium that EM energies propagate in AND the medium from which all matter and energy arise, from subatomic particles, to atoms to molecules, and it is responsible for gravity and is the ENERGETIC DIMENSION OF TIME.
Master it and we master gravity and time...the very fabric of creation.
Now if we could only master comedy! :D
Cosmo
Have We Been Interpreting Quantum Mechanics Wrong This Whole Time?
Some interesting points and questions...
Many of the fluid dynamicists involved in or familiar with the new research have become convinced that there is a classical, fluid explanation of quantum mechanics. "I think it's all too much of a coincidence," said Bush, who led a June workshop on the topic in Rio de Janeiro and is writing a review paper on the experiments for the Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.
Some enthusiasts think the fluid approach could indeed be the key to resolving the long-standing conflict between quantum mechanics and Einstein's theory of gravity, which clash at infinitesimal scales.
"The possibility exists that we can look for a unified theory of the Standard Model and gravity in terms of an underlying, superfluid substrate of reality," said Ross Anderson, a computer scientist and mathematician at the University of Cambridge in England, and the co-author of a recent paper on the fluid-quantum analogy. In the future, Anderson and his collaborators plan to study the behavior of "rotons" (particle-like excitations) in superfluid helium as an even closer analog of this possible "superfluid model of reality."
(http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/bouncing-droplet.jpeg)
http://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-new-quantum-reality/
Thought I'd drop this here too:
Subatomic particles...
We are really talking about black holes at the subatomic scale.
And let's talk about black holes at the cosmic scale.
Let's talk about scale. Here is the model of the universe.
Subatomic particles are actually subatomic black holes.
Gravity is the flow of space/time/ETHER into these subatomic black holes(vortices) and this is the source of "subatomic rotation". Gravity sustains the universe!
We are seeing this pattern of black holes and flows of space time out to the universal scale and that is the pattern of creation, space/time/ETHER flow into black holes, from the subatomic to the cosmic.
Bubbles creating bubbles creating bubbles, a flow of the common, source medium, creating gravity and driving the expansion of even more bubbles, from one bubble to the next, blossoming into the true vacuum as fractal regions of space time on and on and on.
(http://exper.3drecursions.com/apo/bubble-j_2.jpg)
It's just natural, it's the creator's way!
Or maybe I've been up too long... lol
Cosmo
...................................BUMPED....................for later..................
Guess i'm going to have to get up earlier each day as each deep thread gets posted, LOL
This is very interesting stuff, a short answer would be that the aether is a state of possibilities, where energy is constant overall, mass appears when that energy density reaches a certain point, and time is an illusion created by us.......
Later 8)
Trio of physicists create computer simulation of dark matter using an empirical function:
Three physicists affiliated with several universities in the U.S. and France have built a computer simulation of the bubble-like voids that exist in dark matter which offers better density information. In their paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters, the researchers describe how their simulation showed that such voids have a wide range of sizes and ages with highest densities occurring in boundary areas.
The new simulation showed voids of various sizes and shapes as has been seen with other simulations—what was new with this simulation was that the team showed that the average density of dark matter reached its maximum in the walls that formed the borders between the voids. They also found that the spherical densities believed to exist at the center of the voids, applies not only to voids of all shapes and sizes, but to those that existed in earlier cosmic history. Interestingly, the researchers found they could fit the profiles empirically using just two parameters in a single formula.
Some theories suggest that such structures gave rise to the parts of the universe we are able to see. In this new effort, the research trio has created a new simulation that provides a better perspective on the size and shapes of the voids—focusing specifically on density profiles.
This provides a powerful framework to match theory and simulations with observational data, opening up promising perspectives to constrain competing models of cosmology and gravity.
(http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/2014/trioofphysic.png)
http://phys.org/news/2014-07-trio-physicists-simulation-dark-empirical.html#jCp
density of dark matter reached its maximum in the walls that formed the borders between the voids. They also found that the spherical densities believed to exist at the center of the voids...
Cosmo
Reinterpreting dark matter: Could dark matter be regarded as a very cold quantum fluid?
As the Ikerbasque researcher explained, "guided by the initial simulations of the formation of galaxies in this context, we have reinterpreted cold dark matter as a Bose-Einstein condensate." So, "the ultra-light bosons forming the condensate share the same quantum wave function, so disturbance patterns are formed on astronomic scales in the form of large-scale waves."
The results are very promising as they open up the possibility that dark matter could be regarded as a very cold quantum fluid that governs the formation of the structure across the whole Universe.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140702092358.htm
(http://images.sciencedaily.com/2014/07/140702092358-large.jpg)
"governs the formation of the structure across the whole universe"...
(http://2012rising.com/images/144.jpg)
and the subatomic realm!
The ETHER is a superfluid...
Cosmo
This article shows promise for science for sure, Cosmo.
Modern science is dying to revert back to before when Einstein and many others theorized various concepts of the universe from a hamfisted viewpoint of mechanical minded science.
They are starting to see the forest through the trees.
"Discovery after discovery" is showing science they took a wrong turn centuries ago, and now they are finding the "superfluid", or what have you, of all that exists to be one thing, with varying densities of itself, defined by differing densities within that one sentient mind.
The universe and all that we perceive is one thing, as a bubble bath which foams over the edge of the tub is, even as it appears to human eyes and brains that the bubbles are separate, they are just differing densities of the same thing, seemingly divided into those bubbles by pressure differentials....but all connected and singular in actual physical makeup, formed into perfectly packed geometrical polygonal fields, determined by mind and sentience of the universe.
Once they realize they have been woefully and failingly attempting to find a separate nature to a singular entity, then we can get back on track...this article shows a shift towards that aspect of reality, so I hope soon they will stop postulating particles and begin rediscovering what the science minds of the 18th and 19th centuries already knew, proposed, and shared through the many classical works of science literature which outline this lost knowledge.
Funny how in the first few lines they state that "dark matter" doesnt interact with light.....perhaps if they realized it cannot interact with itself, and light occurs within "dark matter"(god I hate using that terminology) as a result of resistance to field interactions within that sentient mind of the universe.
Cheers!
Bubbles and more bubbles...a frothy universe!
Are we living in a multiverse? Researchers claim our universe could be just 'one bubble in a frothy sea of bubbles'
Researchers at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada say the theory of multiple universes stems from the idea of there being a vacuum in the beginning of time.
'The vacuum simmered with energy (variously called dark energy, vacuum energy, the inflation field, or the Higgs field).
'Like water in a pot, this high energy began to evaporate – bubbles formed,' they explain.
Each bubble contained another vacuum, whose energy was lower, but still not nothing.
This energy drove the bubbles to expand.
Inevitably, some bubbles bumped into each other. It's possible some produced secondary bubbles.
Each of these bubbles was a universe.
'In this picture, our universe is one bubble in a frothy sea of bubble universes,' the team say.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2698010/Are-living-multiverse-Researchers-claim-universe-one-bubble-frothy-sea-bubbles.html
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/05/19/article-2326869-19DE24B5000005DC-734_634x370.jpg)
Bubbles, this is the way of the universe, from the subatomic to the cosmic. A super fluid flow of ether into black holes, from the subatomic to the universal scale, a repeating pattern over and over. New universes blossoming into the true vacuum and unfolding fractally, like a living thing. Creating gravity, driving subatomic rotation and universal expansion. It's all around us. It's the way of the creator.
Cosmo
i can go along with your last post cosmo.these bubbles could be interacting like sound waves and and water ripples,with peaks and valleys of energy densities .adding greater possibilities of randomness as the bubble matrix expands.as magnetic polarities and differences in charge occur,more randomness forms.just a one volt difference can create chaos.
Cosmo, Robo, how I wish we could meet over some cold ones someday and discuss this all into the wee hours. Even with my near non existent math skills and lack of standard physics training, these things Ive come to see somehow....and its awesome.
Cheers!
thats why i think we are trapped in between two laws or functions of sorts.
otherwise why arent we consumed by the law of thermo dynamics.it seems to me to be similar to a seesaw. or a skate board halfpipe.with blackholes being the destroyer and creator.
Hey LE
If you are going to have a party what about PWM, Fruit Bat, Flux and myself 8) I still plan to get to Coral Castle some day.
Bless
Back
Quote from: Back on July 19, 2014, 03:33:05 PM
Hey LE
If you are going to have a party what about PWM, Fruit Bat, Flux and myself 8) I still plan to get to Coral Castle some day.
Bless
Back
You know,Back, if we cioud harness the quantum oneness of the ether, we could basically all be in the same place at once for such a party! :)
Everytime I try to make a plan to go to CC, somethng comes up....perhaps Ill just have to sneak off in the night and go there!
If we ever meet up there, instead of beer, we could see about having the barkeep name a drink for Pegasus...the Superfluid!
Cheers!
Quote from: Littleenki on July 19, 2014, 03:43:37 PM
You know,Back, if we cioud harness the quantum oneness of the ether, we could basically all be in the same place at once for such a party! :)
Everytime I try to make a plan to go to CC, somethng comes up....perhaps Ill just have to sneak off in the night and go there!
If we ever meet up there, instead of beer, we could see about having the barkeep name a drink for Pegasus...the Superfluid!
Cheers!
Count me in guys ;D
As you know, my 130 mile walk got extended, and we also lost almost 200 of my adopted countrymen to the Russians; i am not a happy bunny right now >:(
BUT i agree 100% with the OP and all the replies so far...we have to do a meet-up sometime! ;)
More urgent business keeps me occupied, but i will return here shortly, keep it going guys n gals ;D
Did you say 'superfluid' ?
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/inventors_group/images/ODD/vacat/va23.JPG)
-PWM-
(http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx134/slemeron/geometryNEW_zpsf4ae85ef.jpg) (http://s749.photobucket.com/user/slemeron/media/geometryNEW_zpsf4ae85ef.jpg.html)
Spherical densities...bubbles....universes to their constituents.
It is all a fluid of some sort....hence attraction of mass, seen in petri dishes around the world....and yes, gravity is the tie that binds, but is still an effect.
Irony, oh how you tease the mind!
Le
Quote from: Back on July 20, 2014, 08:26:58 PM
(http://i749.photobucket.com/albums/xx134/slemeron/geometryNEW_zpsf4ae85ef.jpg) (http://s749.photobucket.com/user/slemeron/media/geometryNEW_zpsf4ae85ef.jpg.html)
I like that!
I have been wanting to post something on unparticle physics and since we have been talking about fractals...
I believe it is evidence for the fractal nature of space/time...the ETHER. It indicates that the part of our universe that is not particle in nature is actually fractal in nature.
Weird Physics Theory: Unparticle Stuff
At some level, all types of matter that we usually deal with have at least one thing in common - they're made of particles. The solids, liquids, gases and plasmas that surround us are built of atoms, which are made of electrons, protons and neutrons. Protons and neutrons in turn are made of quarks. According to Harvard University's Howard Georgi, however, there's at least the theoretical possibility that some matter in the universe is not made of particles at all.
At some level, all types of matter that we usually deal with have at least one thing in common - they're made of particles. The solids, liquids, gases and plasmas that surround us are built of atoms, which are made of electrons, protons and neutrons. Protons and neutrons in turn are made of quarks.
According to Harvard University's Howard Georgi, however, there's at least the theoretical possibility that some matter in the universe is not made of particles at all. Georgi has dubbed the mind-bending matter "unparticle stuff," and hopes that we may see signs of it at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a super high energy proton collider due to come online in Europe later this year.
The odds of any unparticle stuff turning up at the LHC are extraordinarily slim, but if it does, we'll know it by an unusual signature. It will appear as though some of the energy from the collider's high energy experiments is carried away by a fractional number of otherwise invisible particles. So if LHC experimentalists happen to see signs of 3.34 ghostly particles, for example, they could be on the track of unparticle matter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unparticle_physics
All particles exist in states that may be characterized by a certain energy, momentum and mass. In most of the Standard Model of particle physics, particles of the same type cannot exist in another state with all these properties scaled up or down by a common factor – electrons, for example, always have the same mass regardless of their energy or momentum. But this is not always the case: massless particles, such as photons, can exist with their properties scaled equally. This immunity to scaling is called "scale invariance".
The idea of unparticles comes from conjecturing that there may be "stuff" that does not necessarily have zero mass but is still scale-invariant, with the same physics regardless of a change of length (or equivalently energy). This stuff is unlike particles, and described as unparticle.
Key to superconductivity?
https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/unparticles-may-hold-the-key-to-superconductivity-say-physicists-fa50cac115eb
The ETHER is a FRACTAL superfluid.
Cosmo
Here's an interesting youtube video about space time as a superfluid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAZgWjKKmgk
Gravity is a flow of ETHER, inertia is a wave in the ETHER.
Cosmo
This is interesting new research...
Tiny Twisters Whirl Around Inside Drops of Helium
(http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/Dv2NdWB5lVZLeIX30jIdHQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTMyNDtweW9mZj0wO3E9NzU7dz01NzU-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_US/News/LiveScience.com/quantum-tornadoes.jpg1408714808)
Inside a single wheel-shaped droplet of liquid helium rotating 2 million times per second, scientists have spotted a storm of dozens of tiny tornadoes whirling around.
The droplets of liquid helium spun 100,000 times faster than in any previous experiments. The grid of quantum tornadoes inside the droplets could reveal interesting information on the bizarre nature of "superfluid" liquid helium and the nature of quantum rotation, say the international team of scientists involved in the study.
"The quest for quantum vortices in superfluid droplets has stretched for decades," Andrey Vilesov, a professor of chemistry at the University of Southern California, said in a statement. "But this is the first time they have been seen in superfluid droplets."
A superfluid state happens when a substance behaves like a liquid with zero viscosity — a measure of a liquid's thickness, or its resistance to flow. For example, honey has a much higher viscosity than water. The particles in superfluid liquid lose all friction and instead move around in unison like one supersize particle.
The fact that this happens in a superfluid suggests the findings may have implications for much more far-out ideas. "Some speculate that studying superfluids could help [scientists] understand the origins of the universe," Vilesov told Live Science in an email. "In the moments following the Big Bang, the universe was uniform in density and similar to a superfluid. The creation of density fluctuations in the form of quantum vortices may be what led to the early formation of galaxies."
Scientists have been unable to closely observe individual droplets moving at such breakneck speeds — until now.The researchers used the world's first X-ray free-electron laser at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory's Linac Coherent Light Source facility at the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science to spy on the quantum tornadoes. The laser sends out pulses of light particles, each of which lasts just ten-trillionths of a second. Light from the ultrafast laser diffracted off the droplets and revealed patterns in individual droplets as they flew past.
The tiny twisters raging inside each droplet are actually invisible to the electron-free laser. The researchers had to add xenon atoms to the liquid helium to get a clear picture of the tornadoes. The forces inside each drop pulled the xenon atoms into swirling columns. [Dazzling Droplets: Photos Reveal Mini Worlds]
"It's similar to pulling the plug in a bathtub and watching the kids' toys gather in the vortex," Oliver Gessner, senior scientist in the chemical sciences division at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, said in the statement.
http://news.yahoo.com/tiny-twisters-whirl-around-inside-drops-helium-125351506.html
Scientists have been unable to closely observe individual droplets moving at such breakneck speeds — until now.
Like water going down the drain!
Vortices, from quantum to cosmic...
Cosmo
Is space/time 2 dimensional?
The machine that could spot a missing dimension: US Government begins mind bending experiment to find out if our universe is a 2D HOLOGRAM
Experiment probes the limits of the universe's ability to store information
Information about everything in our universe could be encoded in tiny packets in two dimensions
Results could 'completely change ideas about space'
The information about everything in our universe could actually be encoded in tiny packets in two dimensions, the researchers say.
'We want to find out whether space-time is a quantum system just like matter is,' said Craig Hogan, director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics and the developer of the holographic noise theory.
Get close enough to your TV screen and you'll see pixels, small points of data that make a seamless image if you stand back.
Scientists think that the universe's information may be contained in the same way - as pixels in a TV screen.
The natural 'pixel size' of space is roughly 10 trillion trillion times smaller than an atom, a distance that physicists refer to as the Planck scale.
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/08/26/1409090366067_wps_3_A_close_up_of_the_Holomet.jpg)
The Holometer is testing a frequency so high – millions of cycles per second – that motions of normal matter are not likely to cause problems. Rather, the dominant background noise is more often due to radio waves emitted by nearby electronics.
The Holometer experiment is designed to identify and eliminate noise from such conventional sources.
'If we find a noise we can't get rid of, we might be detecting something fundamental about nature – a noise that is intrinsic to space-time,' said Fermilab physicist Aaron Chou, lead scientist and project manager for the Holometer.
'It's an exciting moment for physics.
'A positive result will open a whole new avenue of questioning about how space works.'
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2735102/Do-live-HOLOGRAM-US-Government-begins-mind-bending-experiment-3D-world-illusion.html#ixzz3BasGc19b
Testing a frequency of millions of cycles per second. Resonance frequency... ;)
This may produce evidence that the ETHER is 2D. I think it is like the surface of the ocean, with all matter and dimensions of space being energetic distortions of this 2D medium. Everything takes place within the energetic dimension of time...the ETHER. The results of this experiment will be fascinating.
Cosmo
(Phys.org)—A team of researchers working at the University of Hawaii using data from the Kepler space telescope, has found that the oscillations made by a star conform closely to the golden mean—further study showed that it also behaves in a fractal pattern. In their paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters, the team describes their analysis of data from the pulsating star KIC 5520878, captured over a period of several years, and why what they found is cause for excitement.
n studying the Kepler data, the team was able to track the pulses that emanated from the star over a period of four years—taken at 30 minute intervals. They found that two of star KIC 5520878's pulsating frequencies occurred at 4.05 and a 6.41 hour cycles—which the team noted had a ratio of 1.58, which is close to 1.618, aka the Golden Ratio—famously found in nature and sometimes artistic renderings. Intrigued, they looked deeper and found that the frequencies conformed to fractal patterns—separating the oscillations into their constituent parts revealed additional weaker frequencies, similar to the way, the team points out, that images of shorelines display craggy lines regardless of how close or far away they are viewed from.
Counting bumps on converted plots which had heights greater than a certain threshold revealed a power law dependence—one of the accepted signs of fractal behavior. The difference here of course is that with traditional fractal systems, the behavior is seen visually—here it was seen as factor of time. The group suggests that their finding appears to be the first example of a "strange nonchaotic attractor" which is a system that displays a fractal structure but does not have the sensitivity to beginning conditions of other known chaotic systems, such as the weather.
The team looked at five other pulsating stars to see if they could spot a pattern and found mixed results, three of them had near golden ratios and fractal patterns, while two others had neither. What is still unclear at this point is whether the behavior of the stars that do show fractal structure is something that happens for a reason, which could perhaps offer new clues about stellar physics, or if the ratios found by the team are merely coincidence.
(http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/2015/2-researchersf.png)
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-evidence-fractal-behavior-pulsating-stars.html#jCp
Does it happen for a reason? Consider the invisible, fractal, suprfluid ETHER, the primary medium, the primary ingredient, the foundation of creation, the source of all matter and energy, it's responsible for the rate at which time passes and produces gravity...and everything is connected in that ocean. It's the realm of skyfishes. lol
Cosmo
In physical terms, the model describes the universe as being filled with a quantum fluid. The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitons—hypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html#jCp
(https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/sites/www6.slac.stanford.edu/files/styles/lightbox_large_image/public/images/quantum_whirlpools_final_highres.jpg)
A quantum superfluid, the universal ocean of creation...
A universe created by torsion and sustained by ETHER flow from the subatomic to the cosmic. Gravity is a flow of ETHER into subatomic black holes. It's nature's model and it's all around us.
(http://invinciblemedia.com/Graphics/Blogs/pisces3.jpg)
Cosmo
I noticed some similarities between an old theory and a new theory...
Physicists offer a solution to the puzzle of the origin of matter in the universe
Most of the laws of nature treat particles and antiparticles equally, but stars and planets are made of particles, or matter, and not antiparticles, or antimatter. That asymmetry, which favors matter to a very small degree, has puzzled scientists for many years.
Specifically, the UCLA researchers write, the asymmetry may have been produced as a result of the motion of the Higgs field, which is associated with the Higgs boson, and which could have made the masses of particles and antiparticles in the universe temporarily unequal, allowing for a small excess of matter particles over antiparticles.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-physicists-solution-puzzle-universe.html#jCp
Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity
* That the luminiferous ether fills all space
* That the ether is acted upon by the life-giving creative force
* That the ether is thrown into "infinitesimal whirls" ("micro helices") at near the speed of light, becoming ponderable matter
* That when the force subsides and motion ceases, matter reverts to the ether (a form of "atomic decay")
http://netowne.com/technology/important/
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y3qO9QZmv6Q/maxresdefault.jpg)
Gravity is a flow OF ETHER, Inertia is a wave in the ETHER, Matter is a vortex in the ETHER. The ETHER is a superfluid.
Cosmo
Higgs Discovery Rehabilitating Despised Einstein Ether
Why is the Higgs boson and its associated Higgs field such bad news for many? In a nutshell: Orthodoxy about Einstein's general relativity has for about a whole century now academically lynched anybody for mentioning the evil ether. The ether, also "Einstein-Aether", is the idea that relativity emerges inside a fluid like space-substance that lives through time. This is very much disliked by all those who almost religiously believe in the dogma of abstract geometrical space-time. The Higgs boson is an excitation of the Higgs field, and that Higgs field is what gives some of the more fundamental particles like electrons their mass. This is why the Higgs field is also called Higgs-ether!
As I pointed out before (but you still cannot publish such if not already famous), the ether has long been back with a vengeance in all of modern physics. It does not imply that Einstein was wrong, although orthodoxy still often holds that the Michelson-Morley Ether-drift experiments supposedly disproved the ether and therefore proved Einstein correct. Now with firm evidence for the Higgs ether, perhaps one can finally come out of the closet and say the forbidden taboo word again?
Let me quote what I wrote before [1] in order to explain some more:
Abstract: Modern physics, via standard model with Higgs and string theory for example, has supplied ether-like models and emergent gravity scenarios that substantially weaken the usual defense of orthodox relativity and abstract, relational space-time in general ...
Mass in general relativity (GR) is simply inertia. Gravity is not a force but curvature of space-time. On the other hand, the Higgs mechanism derives the rest mass of some of the standard model's fundamental particles as an interaction with a 'sticky' background Higgs field through which the particles move. Orthodox relativity almost vilifies such ether-like concepts, while modern physics reintroduced them for about half a century now. In GR, space-time is 'dynamic', which means that it interacts with the energy-momentum distribution. Nevertheless, orthodox GR can be described as a "relativity is kinematics" position (Janssen 2009; Padmanabhan 2008) , i.e. an abstract-view (relationism, structuralism) where the dynamics emerges from symmetries (consistency) rather than from any concrete mechanism. The idea that relativistic kinematics arises from the dynamics of objects interacting with their background space is disfavored by orthodox GR, because such an interpretation treats the background as too "substantiated"; ...
GR's geodesics through curved space-time had abolished gravitational forces. Rest mass in the standard model, that includes even pure inertia against gravitational acceleration, is described as a permanently ongoing interaction with a Higgs background. ..., the dynamics leading to kinematics concept is deeply rooted in modern physics, so deeply that Richard Feynman abandoned his catchiest motto: "The vacuum is empty" (Wilczek 1999) .
http://www.science20.com/alpha_meme/higgs_discovery_rehabilitating_despised_einstein_ether-85497
Yes, the Higgs Boson is validation for the Higgs ETHER. It gives particles their mass. It is also more than that. The ETHER is the universal ocean of creation with all energy and matter arising from it. All points in space and time are connected in it. Flow of ETHER into subatomic vortices creates gravity. We are rooted in it, never separate, always connected for all of time. It IS the energetic dimension of time and a direct experience of it is Samadhi.
Cosmo
Non particle? A fluid? ;) ;D
Is dark matter a FLUID? Mystery 'particles' are mapped in galaxy clusters - but results suggest they may not be particles at all
Researchers have mapped dark matter in several colliding galaxy clusters more than a billion light-years away.
And one outcome of the research is that dark matter might not actually be composed of particles, as previously thought.
Instead, a number of theories ranging from it being a fluid, to not existing at all, have been presented by researchers - who also say it is likely 'weirder than we first thought.'
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/03/26/17/2704BF3700000578-3013284-Researchers_in_Switzerland_and_the_UK_mapped_dark_matter_in_clus-a-90_1427392535206.jpg)
Researchers in Switzerland and the UK mapped dark matter in clusters (shown in blue), and discovered that dark matter might be 'weirder than we thought'. Clockwise from top left, the galaxy clusters are: MACS J0416.1+2403, MACS J0152.5+2852, MACS J0717.5+3745, ZwCl 1358+62, Abell 2744 and Abell 370
The research was carried out by scientists from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland, the University of Edinburgh and Durham University.
They used data from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory to measure galaxy clusters - collections of hundreds of galaxies.
Surprisingly, the study discovered that dark matter 'particles' may simply pass through each other when galaxy clusters collide.
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/03/26/17/2704BC3200000578-3013284-image-a-68_1427391942930.jpg)
The fascinating conclusion was that dark matter does not interact with itself - or, perhaps, even other matter - in ways we would think possible. Shown is the galaxy cluster MACS J0416.1+2403 and its dark matter distribution, shown in blue, based on its gravitational interactions
Although it accounts for 90 per cent of all matter in the universe and more than a quarter of its energy, scientists still know very little about dark matter.
WILL THE LHC FIND DARK MATTER?
After a two-year shutdown and upgrade, the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is about to ramp up for its second three-year run.
Scientists are promising nearly twice the energy and far more violent particle crashes this time around - and hope to get a glimpse of dark matter.
The team at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research, or Cern, say if nature cooperates, the more powerful beam crashes will give them a peek into the unseen dark universe.
Beams should start running through the giant machine later this month, with the first high energy crashes probably coming in May, accelerator director Frederick Bordry said in a news conference in Geneva.
Scientists hope to see all sorts of new physics, including a first ever glimpse of dark matter, one of the chief focuses of the experiment.
'I want to see the first light in the dark universe,' said Cern General Director Rolf Heuer.
'If I see that, then nature is kind to me.'
One major idea among astronomers is that dark matter consists of a new subatomic particle that we haven't discovered yet.
More exotic theories want dark matter to be a quantum defect from the birth of the universe, extra-dimensional mass, or even a modified form of gravity.
What we do know is that dark matter interacts with cosmic structures through gravity, shaping and molding them.
For example, dark matter bends light that passes through it, distorting images of distant space objects.
In addition, dark matter speeds up the motion of galaxies inside galaxy clusters, which are collections of hundreds of galaxies, containing literally astronomical amounts of stars, planets, and gases.
Galaxy clusters are also 90 per cent dark matter, which makes them ideal for studying it, especially when they collide into each other and force their respective dark matters to interact.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3013284/Is-dark-matter-FLUID-Mystery-particles-mapped-galaxy-clusters-results-suggest-not-particles-all.html
A fluid? We can only observe it's gravitational influence? Maybe it's a super fluid. Maybe it's the primary medium, the foundation of creation, the ETHER.
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/15/0b/3f/150b3f744706abe07dc2a506fb9bb3a5.jpg)
Cosmo
Seeing is Believing: Constructing the Higgs Boson
The Higgs Boson Is an Invisible Field
On the press preview day of the Collider exhibition in the Science Museum London, a journalist asked Peter Higgs about how he himself visualizes the Higgs boson. Higgs responded that he doesn't visualize it at all.
That's because the Higgs boson isn't really a 'thing' in the way that a non-particle physicist might understand the term. Rather, it is a perturbation, a ripple in an energy field. In 1964, Peter Higgs proposed that fundamental particles get their mass by interacting with an ever-present energy field. To prove the existence of the Higgs field, it has to be excited to create detectable ripples. If the Higgs field is an invisible sea, the Higgs boson is a wave on the surface that requires very expensive equipment to be able to 'see'.
It took almost fifty years and many billions of dollars to prove that this field and this mass-giving mechanism exist, because it's extremely difficult to produce these ripples—the Higgs boson—inside the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). And once it appears, it decays immediately, so particle physicists can only record the footprint of the collision. By analyzing the decay of this footprint, the physicists were able to infer that the Higgs field exists.
(http://www.methodquarterly.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/eemm_run195099_evt137440354_ispy_3d-nologo-1024x655.png)
http://www.methodquarterly.com/2015/02/seeing-is-believing-constructing-the-image-of-the-higgs-boson/#ixzz3VxH0aOzh
A ripple on an invisible sea. Yes. A super fluidic sea. All matter and energy are perturbations in that field. It is the ETHER, the universal ocean of creation.
Cosmo
Here's some good stuff on space time as a super fluid.
Is Space-Time Actually a Super Fluid?
It's a radical suggestion, but it would certainly solve one of cosmology's greatest mysteries - the problem of establishing a universal time.
LOOK up at the sky. Almost everything out there is spinning around: stars, galaxies, planets, moons - they are all rotating. Yet physicists believe that the universe itself is not revolving. Why?
It's a question that Pawel Mazur can't answer. Mazur, a physicist at the University of South Carolina in Columbia, is one of a number who think it is entirely possible that our universe is spinning on an axis. If these people are right, it could make understanding the universe a whole lot simpler. You could stop worrying about the big problems in cosmology: the origin of the big bang, the nature of dark energy and maybe dark matter too. You could get rid of the strange idea that the universe went through a superfast period of expansion known as inflation. You might even be able to halt the attempt to find a theory that marries together quantum theory ...
The way time breaks down around a rotating cosmic string has given Mazur and Chapline a clue to resolving this issue. The CTCs form in regions close to the cosmic string's axis, which means relativity breaks down in the cores of tiny "gravitational vortices" while continuing to apply everywhere else. "This is very suggestive of a vortex in a superfluid," says Mazur.
Superfluids, such as ultra-cold liquid helium, have very strange properties. They can flow uphill, for example, and without friction. One crucial property of superfluids is that they cannot be made to rotate in the way a bucketful of water will swirl around when stirred. Stir a vat of superfluid and you'll produce an array of vortices: the superfluidity breaks down within each vortex, but everywhere else the fluid remains still - and superfluid.
Mazur published the analogy between vortices in superfluid helium and the way time breaks down near rotating cosmic strings 20 years ago in Physical Review Letters (vol 57, p 929). Ever since then he has been thinking about what it might mean.
Now Mazur and Chapline think they might have the answer: what if this similarity between space-time and superfluids is no accident? What if space-time actually is a superfluid?
Mazur says the superfluid universe idea makes inflation redundant because one object, the collapsing star, contained all of space-time.
That means all the matter within the gravastar had already been in contact for a significant length of time.
"In our picture, there is a long pre-big-bang period - there is plenty of time for everything to come to the same temperature," he says.
This explanation of our universe seems radical - implausible, even - but Mazur thinks it makes a lot of sense: the recipe, a small amount of matter and a whole lot of energy, fits the observed facts.
"Only 4 per cent of the mass-energy of the universe is in the form of the ordinary, light-emitting matter, and 73 per cent is dark energy," he says.
It's worth pointing out that the remaining 23 per cent of unaccounted-for matter in our universe - what cosmologists refer to as dark matter - is also unaccounted for in the superfluid universe scenario. However, Mazur and Chapline think it curious that dark matter is always found near ordinary matter.
Perhaps, they say, the dark matter may not be matter at all, but the result of some interaction of ordinary matter with dark energy.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/time_travel/esp_ciencia_timetravel12.htm
Gravity is the flow of space-time/ETHER into the vortices of subatomic particles. Inertia is a wave in the primary medium, the super fluidic ETHER. All matter and energy are distortions in the all pervasive field and our very consciousness springs from it. Everything is connected.
(http://alexgrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Cosmic-Artist.jpg)
oohhh nice pic!
Cosmo
When I ping the dream like realm with quantum brain waves, the reply is, this is not real. It's a waking state of dream like reality where the quantum matrix projection becomes fluid, like a dream, where it goes in many illusive directions. Something has our consciousness and holds us prisoner as it feeds a state of being.
Quote from: Gigas on September 19, 2015, 08:25:54 PM
When I ping the dream like realm with quantum brain waves, the reply is, this is not real. It's a waking state of dream like reality where the quantum matrix projection becomes fluid, like a dream, where it goes in many illusive directions. Something has our consciousness and holds us prisoner as it feeds a state of being.
What we observe is an instant removed from the act of physical creation, the quantum wave collapse into particles, into atoms, into molecules and so on. The instant of "observation" and wave collapse is faster than light and we cannot perceive it with our mental machinery that is all in a post collapse state, crystallized in time, always an instant in the past, downstream from the moment of creation. Maya.
Halt the mental machinery, rein in the horses of the five senses and experience the state of being that precedes the material universe, Brahman, the source of all.
Vortex Physics - The Superfluid Universe
Vortex physics as a model for the nature of reality, by Hakan Egne. The father of 19th century atomic vortex theory is Sir William Thomson a.k.a. Lord Kelvin. Vortex atomism was not adopted by mainstream science because the aether was apparently disproved at the beginning of the 20th century. This however was a mistake due to a wrong understanding of the relationship between aether and physical matter. Einstein later in 1920 reaffirmed the existence of aether, but his aether-free theories had already a following, so that until now the aether is a medium of spacetime, yet to be rediscovered again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdxr3PpErjg
Very nice video. Namaste!
Cosmo
Stumbled across this...
Sheldon and Leonard co-author a paper on superfluid vacuum theory
In the latest episode of The Big Bang Theory, Leonard Hofstadter had an interesting idea while he was talking to Penny: the spacetime is a surface of the superfluid. The surface tension could even explain the negative pressure of the positive cosmological constant which is a constant positive contribution to the vacuum energy density (they incorrectly talk about the negative energy). Sheldon completed the maths and wrote their joint paper quickly. It was a source of pride for much of the episode.
http://motls.blogspot.com/2015/02/sheldon-and-leonard-co-author-paper-on.html
So funny. But I hope the writers understand that a superfluid theory of space time invalidates the big bang theory!!! As explained in this thread and here:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=6829.0
And if the BIG BANG THEORY is wrong(which it most definitely is!)...then the title of the show is invalid also! haha
And now we all know why I can't watch the show! It's based on a false premise. I know, I know.... lol
(http://barfblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/inconceivable.jpg)
haha
There was NO big bang. It was the big space time extension into another universe via TORSION! The big flow!!! It IS a superfluid afterall!
Cosmo
Gravity's Most Extreme Effects Can Now Be Tested In A Laboratory
This analogy between gravity and fluids with varying speed is much more than a simple metaphor; it can be made mathematically precise.
In the area of analogue gravity, theory has long been ahead of experiment, but recently experimentalists have caught up, and they are now able to also test quantum behavior. For the fluid-gravity analogy, one uses an approximation for fluids of low viscosity, which means that superfluids with near-zero viscosity are ideal systems test quantum effects. For the superfluids, physicists use condensates of a few billion atoms that are trapped and put in motion by lasers. But the technology is still experimentally challenging. It has only been in the last few years that physicists have been able to use superfluid condensates to investigate the most interesting case of analogue gravity: black hole evaporation.
It is intriguing that this relation between gravity and fluid dynamics can be made mathematically precise. It seems to suggest that gravity itself might arise from the interaction of many constituents. Perhaps space-time isn't as immaterial as we thought.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/12/gravitys-most-extreme-effects-can-now-be-tested-in-a-laboratory/
(http://blogs-images.forbes.com/startswithabang/files/2015/11/dn26366-1_800.jpg)
The ETHER is a superfluid and gravity is a flow. If it looks like a supfluid and sounds like a superfluid then it must be a duck. lol
Cosmo
Space time is a fluid...not a "rubber sheet". doh!!!
QUANTUM WEIRDNESS REPLACED BY CLASSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS
Couder and Fort demonstrate in a simple experiment that fluid dynamics may be the classical underlying mechanism of quantum particles apparent strange behaviors without resorting to the need for a mysterious and seemingly magical interpretation of modern quantum theory.
http://resonance.is/news/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics/
Bubble Universe...fractal...it's also fractal in nature...that is natures way...
(http://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/fractal-bubble-universe-tony-craddock.jpg)
The linkage of gravity and inertia are demonstrated in this super fluid.
Cosmo
Liquid-like graphene could be the key to understanding black holes
(http://img-3.gizmag.com/liquid-graphene-dirac-fluid-1.jpg?auto=format&ch=Width%2CDPR&fit=crop&h=394&q=60&rect=0%2C236%2C700%2C394&w=700&s=140e8df417871b0a33218fd09273c99c)
Scientists at Harvard and Raytheon BBN Technology have made a breakthrough in our understanding of graphene's basic properties, observing for the first time electrons in a metal behaving like a fluid (Credit: Peter Allen/Harvard SEAS)
Researchers at Harvard University and Raytheon BBN Technology have discovered that the charged particles inside high-purity graphene behave as a fluid with relativistic properties. This find could lead to devices that efficiently convert heat into electricity, as well as graphene-based chips that can accurately model the behavior of faraway celestial objects like supernovas and black holes.
Kim and colleagues first isolated a sample of pure graphene by protecting it between layers of hexagonal boron nitride, an insulating, transparent crystal also known as "white graphene" for its similar properties and atomic structure. The scientists then covered the (still exposed) ends of the graphene sheet with charged particles and observed how charge flowed as they applied both thermal and electric currents.
When most materials are subjected to an electric field, their negatively charged electrons and positively charged "electron holes" are driven in opposite directions; by contrast, a difference in temperature causes both types of charges to move in the same direction. In either case, the charged particles hardly ever interact with each other.
As Kim and colleagues found out, however, things are very different inside high-purity graphene. The two-dimensional nature and honeycomb structure of the material forces the charged particles to travel along the same paths and collide very often, forming a strongly interacting, quasi-relativistic plasma known as a Dirac fluid.
"Physics we discovered by studying black holes and string theory, we're seeing in graphene," said Andrew Lucas, co-author of the study. "This is the first model system of relativistic hydrodynamics in a metal."
I think that graphene's 2 dimensional structure mirrors the basic unit of space time.
I've posted in a thread elsewhere that space time is 2 dimensional. That is why graphene has the amazing properties it does.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/420717/why-spacetime-on-the-tiniest-scale-may-be-two-dimensional/
(http://i1254.photobucket.com/albums/hh605/subatomic_dude/grapheneHomer-Simpson-006.jpg?1455574854678&1455574855255)
Cosmo
The ETHER is a superfluid...
Superfluid Black Holes
We present what we believe is the first example of a "
?-line" phase transition in black hole thermodynamics. This is a line of (continuous) second order phase transitions which in the case of liquid 4He
marks the onset of superfluidity. T
http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.021301
The ETHER pervades the entire universe at varying densities and states of motion...and gravity is the result of it's motion...
C
That orange print is hard to read! The Etheric is all around the solar system. It exists & is a threat to NASA because it has it's own science. That is demonstrated by the UFOs easy movement of UFOs in low earth orbit, all the way down to the ground. This Etheric energy represents an invisible biosphere in which living creatures openly thrive! The more I fly in space with each mission, the more I am certain that other living creatures are out there!
Quote from: Martyn Stubbs on January 26, 2017, 11:11:30 PM
That orange print is hard to read! The Etheric is all around the solar system. It exists & is a threat to NASA because it has it's own science. That is demonstrated by the UFOs easy movement of UFOs in low earth orbit, all the way down to the ground. This Etheric energy represents an invisible biosphere in which living creatures openly thrive! The more I fly in space with each mission, the more I am certain that other living creatures are out there!
You aren't the only one convinced of that, Martyn; see here:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?board=84.0 (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?board=84.0)
Seeker
Good to see some past posters return...Seekers newsletter emails has brought back many past posters.
Not seen you post for some time Cosmo....But I could understand maybe why...maybe not too many of us can always relate to some of the indepth topics you post at times..as interesting as they are..
Quote from: COSMO on January 24, 2017, 06:15:43 PM
The ETHER is a superfluid...
Superfluid Black Holes
We present what we believe is the first example of a "
?-line" phase transition in black hole thermodynamics. This is a line of (continuous) second order phase transitions which in the case of liquid 4He
marks the onset of superfluidity. T
http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.021301
The ETHER pervades the entire universe at varying densities and states of motion...and gravity is the result of it's motion...
C
Can I ask who does your comment relate to Martyn.. in ref to " The More I fly in Space"
I recall some of your past posts with Ref to Nasa , UFOs and Jim Oberg , but was not really to sure of your background.
I was just checking that you were not an ex astronaut or an E.T ! :)
https://www.youtube.com/user/secretnasaman
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1296488/
Martyn Stubbs
QuoteThat orange print is hard to read! The Etheric is all around the solar system. It exists & is a threat to NASA because it has it's own science. That is demonstrated by the UFOs easy movement of UFOs in low earth orbit, all the way down to the ground. This Etheric energy represents an invisible biosphere in which living creatures openly thrive! The more I fly in space with each mis!sion, the more I am certain that other living creatures are out there
Astro, click this link and you will find out about Martyn Stubbs...http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?board=98.0 (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?board=98.0)
The ETHER pervades the entire universe at varying densities and states of motion...and gravity is the result of it's motion...space time is not static, it is dynamic.
(http://www.sciencealert.com/images/articles/processed/dipole_1024.jpg)
http://www.sciencealert.com/an-unexplained-void-is-pushing-the-milky-way-through-the-universe-at-2-million-km-h
C
Quote from: COSMO on February 06, 2017, 01:14:39 PM
The ETHER pervades the entire universe at varying densities and states of motion...and gravity is the result of it's motion...space time is not static, it is dynamic.
(http://www.sciencealert.com/images/articles/processed/dipole_1024.jpg)
http://www.sciencealert.com/an-unexplained-void-is-pushing-the-milky-way-through-the-universe-at-2-million-km-h
C
Hey COSMO, glad to see you bud!
Well...our galaxy is just another cold front, rushing into the void left by a denser region which has moved on ahead of us...like weather here, pressure, and density hold the keys to understanding it all..can a superfluid be compressed, or decreased in density?
Is dark matter just a low density segment of the oneness?
How does water factor in, as it does in nearly every mystery regarding our past?
Does the red blood cell realize it is part of a whole, that of which it is immersed in?
Electromagnetism is a feature of our universe, a result, not a reason...light, the result of field interactions between differing densities within self same mass, a result, not a feature...but... fluid and resultant form, which water tries to show us in nature, holds all the answers.
A fluid organizes that which is immersed within itself.
So we must look beyond the ham fisted human ideas regarding gravity, mass, matter and density as being defining factors of what appears solid, and what does not.
Seems to me, the human eye needs to be set aside, replaced by far more intense scrutinies in terms of the things that go on beyond our own earthly senses...and realize we are just like that red blood cell, which whether the mind wishes it to go or stay, can only do as nature demands, and go with the flow of the whole oneness we are a part of.
Beans in the broth, thats us...
Hi Dave,
Water IS important, but it is not a superfluid. When an object is in motion in water there is a constant drag which is not present in a spuerfluid. Here is something very interesting. A superfluid with negative mass!
Physicists Say They've Created a Fluid With 'Negative Mass'
https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-say-they-ve-created-a-fluid-with-negative-mass
While the superfluid remained contained in that space it had regular mass and, as far as Bose-Einstein condensates go, was pretty normal. But then the team forced the superfluid to escape.
Using a second set of lasers, they kicked the atoms back and forth to change their spin, breaking the 'bowl' and allowing the rubidium to come rushing out so fast that it behaved as if it had negative mass.
"Once you push, it accelerates backwards," said Forbes. "It looks like the rubidium hits an invisible wall."
Negamass...hmmmmmm
Cosmo
If you push it, it accelerates backwards.....
Is this a propulsion methodology? Is this related to how the EM drive works?
Cosmo
Maybe this is why gravity is a push...
The ETHER is a superfluid...
Physicist theorizes that dark matter is a superfluid
...a new theory proposed by physicist Justin Khoury, a professor in the School of Arts and Sciences, and his former postdoctoral researcher Lasha Berezhiani, now at the Max Planck Institute for Physics, stands to shake up how scientists consider dark matter. Their hypothesis that dark matter is a liquid has the potential to explain cosmological mysteries that have previously eluded researchers.
https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/physicist-theorizes-dark-matter-superfluid
The signature of a superfluid is written across the cosmos...
(https://penntoday.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/2018-09/176699main_image_feature_827_ys_full.jpg)
The ETHER is a superfluid.
COSMO