The end?
If astronomers are right, all life on this planet could be extinguished in less than 30 years from now. Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory have detected a large object the size of Manhattan possibly on a collision course with Earth. Using their Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE), the 10-mile wide object was found approximately 51 million miles from Earth. Scientists believe that during a close encounter with Mars, the asteroid was nudged slightly off its usual orbit and may currently be on a high speed collision course with our fragile planet.
The asteroid is calculated to have a potentially lethal encounter with the Earth on March 35, 2041. Astronomers have placed the odds of an impact at 1 in 2.04, which is by far the most unprecedented risk ever faced to humanity, let alone from asteroids. Such an impact could potentially end civilization as we know it.
(http://i.cdn.turner.com/ireport/sm/prod/2014/05/25/WE01111605/3282463/Asteroidjpg-3282463_p9.jpg)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1137095
10 miles wide. Can anything be done? That's 27 years to do something. ???
Cosmo
Quote from: COSMO on May 26, 2014, 06:09:28 PM
10 miles wide. Can anything be done? That's 27 years to do something. ???
27 years or more, as March 35 may not yet exist 27 years from now. :)
I was wondering about that; March 35th? Who changed the calender? Damn, I been missing out on four days in March...
seeker
At last.
A chance for the military to do something useful and beneficial, AND get to drop the biggest bomb(s) ever...
I'm off to find some young people to share some shadenfreude... :c)
FB.
Now this is weird; I just tried to search on Yahoo for asteriod info and no matter what I tried it came back that the server closed the connection-WTF? Wouldn't even let me open Google...
thoughts?
seeker
I thought that 35 was probably a typo and meant 3-5, but on "another forum" they are saying it is a hoax. I will not be around in 27 years, but do hope it is a hoax.
Cosmo
Quote from: the seeker on May 26, 2014, 11:03:15 PM
Now this is weird; I just tried to search on Yahoo for asteriod info and no matter what I tried it came back that the server closed the connection-WTF? Wouldn't even let me open Google...
thoughts?
I have noticed some problems with some sites in the last two weeks.
Quote from: COSMO on May 26, 2014, 11:46:19 PM
I thought that 35 was probably a typo and meant 3-5, but on "another forum" they are saying it is a hoax. I will not be around in 27 years, but do hope it is a hoax.
It's probably a hoax.
If you look at the "article" (not really an article, as it's on one of those media-related sites where any member can post any thing, real or not) you will see that there aren't any names, either for the asteroid (all have names) or for the astronomers or scientists that the article talks about, and I don't think anyone would give such high odds of impact for something that is supposed to happen 27 years from now, as any other "nudge" from a planet or other asteroid could change it's orbit.
cosmo, if i make it 27 more years i will be 83, so, who knows?
@armap, i agree, no name or any intel on this rock at all...
makes me think of carol rosin and von brauns' list of false flags...
seeker
Quote from: ArMaP on May 26, 2014, 11:52:53 PM
I have noticed some problems with some sites in the last two weeks.
Ok I just fired up the backup laptop and did a search on Yahoo and it loaded; tried again on this machine and same error message, server closed the connection; considering I use an aircard from sprint and both machines are connected to it via wifi this really makes me wonder...
seeker
eta:switched machines and running a full system scan on the toshiba...perhaps that will help...
well it does say not vetted by cnn
but i have new criteria for judging if this stuff is going to happen or not
if nasa says it will happen you can figure it won't
any one else i'll give a 50 - 50 shot at true..
but by the date mentioned i won't care either way ::)
CNN Removes Story About Giant Asteroid Colliding With Earth
A recent CNN report stating that a "giant asteroid" capable of destroying all life on Earth after a collision in 30 years has been taken down from the network's website after NASA informed the outlet the story was "false."
Before the post was removed it went viral with more than 200,000 views and said "the asteroid is calculated to have a potentially lethal encounter with the earth on March 35, 2041."
In the story's place is an official statement from CNN retracting the report.
"NASA has confirmed via email that this story is false," the statement said. "A spokewoman for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory says that the largest object detected by NEOWISE [Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer] measures 3 km in diameter and poses no risk to Earth. The iReport has been removed."
Well, that is good news! lol
But what if that story was true? What could be done about it?
10 miles wide. Would atomic weapons be sufficient to neutralize it?
Cosmo
Quote from: COSMO on May 28, 2014, 04:28:32 PM
CNN Removes Story About Giant Asteroid Colliding With Earth
A recent CNN report stating that a "giant asteroid" capable of destroying all life on Earth after a collision in 30 years has been taken down from the network's website after NASA informed the outlet the story was "false."
Before the post was removed it went viral with more than 200,000 views and said "the asteroid is calculated to have a potentially lethal encounter with the earth on March 35, 2041."
In the story's place is an official statement from CNN retracting the report.
"NASA has confirmed via email that this story is false," the statement said. "A spokewoman for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory says that the largest object detected by NEOWISE [Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer] measures 3 km in diameter and poses no risk to Earth. The iReport has been removed."
Well, that is good news! lol
But what if that story was true? What could be done about it?
10 miles wide. Would atomic weapons be sufficient to neutralize it?
Cosmo
I wonder it trying to destroy it is actually the best way to deal with such?? The article said "10 miles wide", so if we assume 10 miles high and 10 miles deep, that would yield us 1000 cubic miles asteroid - or however large, just to emphasize that the volume size is the "critical mass" to be dealt with. Breaking such a thing up into some number of pieces could still result in many smaller but still dangerous "asteroids".
Could some level of charge/force be applied to an asteroid that would move it directionally enough to take it out of Earth's harms way, without splitting it to pieces. If we can just "figger out" how to effectively create gravitational forces, and apply them, we could use such to simply push an asteroid into another direction! :)) But then, I suppose a "tractor beam" could do the trick too!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/01/27/scientists-build-a-working-tractor-beam/
Even better than a tractor beam!
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSSazMmMhc0M1xkhrw8QznwHwvpzMF0noEzDpUc5ni0uf0g-iw6)
A Podkletnov gravity gun with an impulse that travels at 64c... 8)
Cosmo
Quote from: ArMaP on May 26, 2014, 11:57:51 PM
It's probably a hoax.
It is.
QuoteCNN PRODUCER NOTE NASA has confirmed via email that this story is false. A spokewoman for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory says that the largest object detected by NEOWISE measures 3 km in diameter and poses no risk to Earth. The iReport has been removed.
- davidw, CNN iReport producer
QuoteThis iReport has been removed because it was flagged by the community and found to be in violation of the iReport Community Guidelines andTerms of Use.
Actually, rdunk, destroying it would be a bad idea unless the PTB can come up with a way to totally vaporize it; just blowing it up or apart would still generate a tremendous mass of smaller pieces that would more than likely still strike earth...
if some sort of propulsion system could be attached to it and used to steer it out of a collision course would be the way to deal with objects like this...
personally I hope that the future generations here do not have to deal with that scenario...
seeker
Seeker said, "Actually, rdunk, destroying it would be a bad idea unless the PTB can come up with a way to totally vaporize it; just blowing it up or apart would still generate a tremendous mass of smaller pieces that would more than likely still strike earth..."
Yes, that is precisely I what I was trying to convey with my use of a "for example" of a possible 1000 cubic miles of an asteroid to deal with before and after blowing it up. And using gravitational forces, + or -, would seem to be a good way to handle the such like - if something like and non-hoax were to come along. :))
Then again, , ,
Maybe, just maybe that "someone" already figured out a way to protect this jewel of a planet,, , , and it's inhabitants.
the Moon is our "friend", , , and one hell of a mobile shield.
Check out how many times in ships logs the moon hasn't been where it was supposed to be and strange odd tides too. 8)
Quote from: Norval on May 29, 2014, 01:13:07 AM
Then again, , ,
Maybe, just maybe that "someone" already figured out a way to protect this jewel of a planet,, , , and it's inhabitants.
the Moon is our "friend", , , and one hell of a mobile shield.
Check out how many times in ships logs the moon hasn't been where it was supposed to be and strange odd tides too. 8)
Absolutely!!
Quote from: the seeker on May 28, 2014, 10:40:34 PM
Actually, rdunk, destroying it would be a bad idea unless the PTB can come up with a way to totally vaporize it; just blowing it up or apart would still generate a tremendous mass of smaller pieces that would more than likely still strike earth...[snip]
seeker
From my point of view it would depend on how far out it was when exploded. The futher the better. Parts would go in a thousand directions and maybe we would only get a few a year of small rain. If very close like the Earth to Moon then I would say we would get hit like a shotgun shell Or a thousand bullets. If nothing was done then like an Elephant shell and we're done for.
Also nuclear weapons unless they are inside it are worthless. No Air. Would be just a blast of light and a lot of radiation and EMP field. Need the big conventional weapons on this one. They would work in space because they create their own gases on explosion. So attach some huge new explosives to it and let it rip.
Deuem
Let's contact Dr Judy Wood and fire up the weapon that brought down the WTC' s and dustify amy incoming unwanted guest.