Alex Jones suggest that another part of the globalist plan was to corrupt & destroy family life...with use of feminism advertising campaigns..
I think that I can see some possibilities behind his theory.
I don't think that I have ever had anyone else suggest such things that could be going on that often I am sure many do not even consider...until its explained...
This is part of the depopulation plan..to try to weaken family members or put some off from considering having children.
If this is true I am sure there are many who wish this would have been explained some years ago...for those who may have been effected...
--------------------------------------------------
Feminism Used To Corrupt The Family
Alex Jones breaks down how the Super Bowl commercials are being used to push the feminist agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEgyNzG-DGM
Feminism Exposed
Alex covers the political and social agenda pushed during the Super Bowl as the elite continue to undermine the family with an overt homosexual, pedophilia and sexist anti-male agenda.
If Alex says that then he is a cretin. Family units are easier to control. People without families are more politically active, have more free time and are generally more disruptive etc.
alex's only way to make money is to create controversy
how many groups has he tried to turn against another group?
this is just another foray into stirring the pot
the more the pot gets stirred the longer he keeps his job
and
the longer it takes for humans to accept that the difference between us are good things not attack things
the harder it will be to pull the curtain aside and see the little man shouting into a megaphone
because we will be too suspicious of each other..
it's called divide and conquer
so you have to ask yourself.. just WHO"S side is HE on...??????
That is the big problem I have..not really knowing...
I can see two sides to the argument..
and at one time I may not have agreed with somethings he says..then later I may think he seems right...
another time I may agree with him initially, then later think he is wrong...
Sometimes age and experience can effect upon what we may think is right, BUT NOT ALWAYS...
even the experts and cleverest are not always right..!
so sometimes its a catch 22..and I suppose for many its just an individual opinion..
BUT it may be good to see the two or more sides of things..
something he talks about I had never even considered or was aware about...
All I am saying is I think he touches on certain subjects or topics that no one else I know has ever told me about...and maybe never will...
Other times until we may feel or think that we have had such experiences or familiarity with certain things....only then may we see something in a different way...
That seems the ups and downs of trying to determine what may be or not..
Quote
so you have to ask yourself.. just WHO"S side is HE on...??????
I think what he was trying to suggest was that the Globalists are trying to use a form of mind control thru their advertising to make effects upon families or maybe more the younger members who may be deciding not to consider having children down to some of the things that the TV and media etc are trying to suggest to them, maybe subliminally..
QuoteIf Alex says that then he is a cretin. Family units are easier to control. People without families are more politically active, have more free time and are generally more disruptive etc.
Read this.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/origin_family.pdf
Yeah I say get rid of the Feminist Movement :P
Lets go back to the good old days like Medieval times when women knew their place :D
::)
That will take some reading time and thought to absorb,
I just wonder briefly how it may compare to A.Js videos assuming that you have read and absorbed it.
If there a brief description..!
Is this a type of Marxist or overall type of World Wide suggestion wrote back in the 1880s.
That the state owns us / you ! or our Families..
That may not be quite what A.J was referring to..
or if it was, it was to do with the state maybe suggesting that it wants to control the population, or reduce it on this occasion !
Origin of the Family,
Private Property, and the
State..
Quote from: Pimander on February 04, 2015, 05:55:29 PM
Read this.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/origin_family.pdf
I'm not suggesting you buy into the whole of Marxist thought (it was wrong about certain things like most philosophies) but the analysis of the family explains why the family unit is easier for the state to control.
Alex Jones is not that clever basically if he thinks someone wanting to govern and control would wish to erode the family. He is an idiot!
Hmmm well I dont know about Jones. He could be an
agent of some sort, but I did find his infiltration of the
Bohemian Grove quite illuminating. ;)
Maybe he has gone the way of Hal Turner? Its hard to say,
although I have found his material to be less and less of
substance as a continuing trend...downwards.
In any case, I do agree that Feminism offers nothing for
the real woman...it is a social engineering movement as far
as my research has shown. This is not to say that we should go
back to the days when women could not vote, or the Burqa.
And it is kind of embarrasing to women...as a general rule those
loudest in the movement seem to resort to the use of sensationalist
antics linked with sexualization to gain fame and fortune.
;D
Quote from: Pimander on February 04, 2015, 12:25:36 PM
If Alex says that then he is a cretin. Family units are easier to control. People without families are more politically active, have more free time and are generally more disruptive etc.
It is gratifying to see you back with us, Pimander.
As for this point, I have both agreement and disagreement. It is true that family units have much less time, and families can have their members used against them. The point that I think Alex is trying to make, however, is not regarding activism, as much as the viable long term survival of the species as a whole. It is, I believe, a matter of statistical record that children from single parent families generally have much less desirable outcomes in life than those where both parents are present.
As for feminism, I am fairly certain that I have expressed my perspective on this subject before, but I will recap, briefly. I view feminism as most immediately being a product of Trotskyite/revolutionary cultural Marxism on the one hand, and seperatist lesbianism (which is usually extremely pathological in its' own right) on the other. The modern Left think neither critically nor with emotional control or detachment; their intermediate handlers beneath the cabal have made very certain of that. So they are pawns, but of what they have no knowledge.
As many of you are probably aware, I believe that the central, unifying point of human history, is an intergenerational conspiracy of individuals who (not necessarily consciously) serve negative entropy, and whose ultimate long term goal is first the subjugation, and then the extermination of all carbon based life on this planet.
This conspiracy is the proverbial hub of the wheel. It is at the center of everything. Once you have accepted the conspiracy's existence, virtually nothing else becomes impossible, or even terribly difficult to explain. All of the shootings, all of the supposed "terrorist incidents," go from being inexplicable to boringly mundane, once the conspiracy is taken into account.
To the extent that feminism is related to this conspiracy, it is for the purpose of creating a sufficient degree of resentment and hatred between the sexes, that men and women become unwilling to come together in order to reproduce. Before you accuse me of being entirely insane, recognise that this element of the campaign has already been largely successful in Japan, where the national birthrate has apparently fallen by something like 45% within recent years. This is the phenomenon known as "grass eating," or "herbivorous," men.
Hence, if Alex is insane, then this at least is one instance where I share his insanity myself.
I'm really sorry I can't take this seriously
but dang... someone has just added feminism to the touch stone emotional words
like...Nazi's and kkk and McCarthyism and shhhhhhhhh aliens in the bible
do you feel threatened ..... do you feel the need to emote about it.? ;)
then yep your buttons have been pushed....again
bwahahahahahahahahah
if you haven't figured out that YOU are being proded by this then it's too late for me to warn you
BUT
I just had to toss this little tidbit on the bonfire
Marvel Comics has gathered an all-female team of Avengers, who will begin saving the world this May
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/06/marvel-all-female-avengers_n_6629418.html
bwahaahahahahahahahahahah
and on a more quiet note..until we can ALL look at each other in acceptance that we are ALL the same product in different wrappings...ain't none of us getting out whole
::)
Quote from: burntheships on February 05, 2015, 07:46:32 PM
In any case, I do agree that Feminism offers nothing for
the real woman...it is a social engineering movement as far
as my research has shown. This is not to say that we should go
back to the days when women could not vote, or the Burqa.
I wholeheartedly agree with both points.
Quote from: petrus4 on February 06, 2015, 09:25:31 AM
It is gratifying to see you back with us, Pimander.
Thanks
QuoteAs many of you are probably aware, I believe that the central, unifying point of human history, is an intergenerational conspiracy of individuals who (not necessarily consciously) serve negative entropy, and whose ultimate long term goal is first the subjugation, and then the extermination of all carbon based life on this planet.
What if they serve a form of vampire like entities who feed on chaos, suffering and fear? Then it is not in their interest to destroy all life but instead keep humanity from freeing itself from this hellish existence.....
Quote from: space otter on February 06, 2015, 07:48:50 PM
and on a more quiet note..until we can ALL look at each other in acceptance that we are ALL the same product in different wrappings...ain't none of us getting out whole
Yep. :)
I really shouldn't bring this back up
but
I found where Alex got the whole idea....
seriously dude..this why it even started
.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/saudi-historian-us-women-drive-because-they-dont-care-if-theyre-raped/ar-AA9cEOj
Saudi Historian: U.S. Women Drive Because They Don't Care If They're Raped
A Saudi Arabian historian trying to justify the nation's ban on female drivers says women who drive in other countries such as the United States don't care if they're raped and that sexual violence "is no big deal" to them."
Saleh Al-Saadoon claimed in a recent TV interview that women can be raped when a car breaks down, but unlike other countries, Saudi Arabia protects its women from that risk by not allowing them to drive in the first place, according to a translation posted online by the Middle East Media Research Institute.
"They don't care if they are raped on the roadside, but we do," Al-Saadoon said on Saudi Rotana Khalijiyya TV.
"Hold on. Who told you they don't care about getting raped on the roadside?" asked the host, a woman who is not named in the transcript.
"It's no big deal for them beyond the damage to their morale," Al-Saadoon replied. "In our case, however, the problem is of a social and religious nature."
Two other guests on the show -- a man and a woman -- appeared to be in shock over his comments. Al-Saadoon said they were out of touch.
"They should listen to me and get used to what society thinks," Al-Saadoon said.
Since the rape argument didn't seem to be convincing anyone, Al-Saadoon tried another approach, claiming that women are treated "like queens" in Saudi Arabia because they are driven around by the men of the family and male chauffeurs. That led the host to ask if he wasn't afraid that women might be raped by their chauffeurs.
Al-Saadoon agreed.
"There is a solution, but the government officials and the clerics refuse to hear of it," he said. "The solution is to bring in female foreign chauffeurs to drive our wives."
That caused the female host to laugh and cover her face with her palm.
"Female foreign chauffeurs?" she said. "Seriously?"
Saudi women face serious penalties if they are caught driving, including lashing. Two women who defied the ban on driving last year, Loujain al-Hathloul and Maysa al-Amoudi, are being tried in a court that handles terror cases.
if you ever wanted to know how a time warp worked..t here's an example
::)