This was posted on Facebook - seems this may be more reason to believe something fishy has happened in the NASA Moon operations, if they actually did get there! There are several photos involved in this release. I am posting a screenshot for a piece of it, and will post a link for the complete story. (could not "copy" the written words for paste)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3Ut5V8JVvTxcjVwdzBmZUxybVU/edit?pli=1
(http://s10.postimg.org/ypqndckh5/Screen_Shot_2015_05_04_at_1_33_09_AM.jpg)
A "raw, unaltered digital copy of an authentic photo print" is not the same thing as a "Raw NASA Lunar Photo", as they call it.
A funny thing about that the text (besides the fact that it talks about a "Bret Colin Sheppard" and the PDF itself shows that it was created by a "bret") is the selective "structures highlight", as it shows things that do not appear when we enhance the brightness of the image (or, as I did, change the levels, as that's less of a "brute force" approach), as you can see below.
(http://www.thelivingmoon.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10002/Bret_Colin_Sheppard_1.png)
Yes ArMaP, but your pic pretty much confirms that the dark background seen in the NASA photo is not "sky", as it is made to appear, but rather is crater walls, doesn't it?? :)
What the image I posted shows is that we are looking at the scanned version of a printed photo that was in bad shape (according to the story because of being crumpled and thrown in the garbage, although a crumpled up photo would look much worse).
And it doesn't look like a crater wall to me, there aren't any signs of geological features, only many signs of a photo in a bad situation.
PS: as the sensitive layers of the paper break when the paper is crumpled, scratched or folded and we see the white paper beneath it, it only shows in the darker areas, and the darker areas like the sky are the ones that show of those marks.