There's some interesting reading in the articles below from Australian researcher Paul Dean about UFOs and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) - mainly concerning their seemingly contradictory claims that they have 'no present activity in investigating UFOs' or that 'no formal documentation' is created by them.
Quote(http://images.vector-images.com/217/north_american_aerospace_defense_cmd_ssi_n12699.gif)
Continuing on from my last blog post, "NORAD And The UFO Smokescreen: Part 1", I will carry on presenting evidence, in the form of declassified documents, that the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) has been heavily involved in significant, inexplicable and unexplainable UFO events since its formation in 1957..
Also brought up are the subjects of JANAP 146 procedures and CIRVIS reports as well as info taken from official government documentation involved in cases such as the Flight
JAL 1628 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdT_5eCZaRo) incident, the
SAC Base (http://www.nicap.org/waves/1975_overflights.htm) flyovers and other historical cases - according to Mr Dean the documents '
establish that NORAD, even so long ago, was very much concerning itself with serious UFO sightings made by US or Canadian forces, and any claims to the contrary are absolute nonsense'.
QuoteThis blogpost is the third in a series which aims to link, through official and documented record, the UFO matter with the huge North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD). For over 50 years, NORAD's stance on so-called "UFOs" – and I don't mean merely stray aircraft – is that they know nothing, see nothing and hold nothing on record. However, myriad US military documents prove that NORAD has not been entirely honest. In this post I will highlight two especially unusual occasions where they were certainly involved. But, beforehand, if my readers need to catch up, Part 1 and 2 of this series can be seen here:
NORAD And The UFO Smokescreen (http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2015/07/norad-year-ago-i-took-plunge-andbegun.html)
NORAD And The UFO Smokescreen Part 2 (http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-2.html)
NORAD And The UFO Smokescreen Part 3 (http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2015/09/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-3-this.html)
The infamous Bolender memo also gets a mention (which really
does seem to fly in the face of the US Goverment's claims that 'No UFO reported, investigated and evaluated by the Air Force was ever an indication of threat to our national security') and for those that are interested then
this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKN4eHgIMv4) video featuring researcher John Greenewald Junior is also a classic and basically shows NORAD are lying through their teeth just by citing their own documents (the part where he nails NORAD about CIRVIS Military pilot UFO reports is around
0:15:00).
Bolender / NORAD?
Quote(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gLrWnb9KVsg/VcHHNstuIxI/AAAAAAAAAPA/bOxeA4egFKs/s640/BLOG%2B10%2BBolender%2BMemo%2B%2528Large%2529.png)
"Moreover, reports of unidentified flying objects which could affect national security are made in accordance with JANAP 146 or Air Force Manual 55-11, and are not part of the Blue Book system."
"However, as already stated, reports of UFOs which could affect national security would continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedures designed for this purpose."
Part 4:
QuoteNORAD And The UFO Smokescreen - Part 4 (http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.au/2015/11/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-4-in.html)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TxGIx7-h5yQ/VjdWKqZDXOI/AAAAAAAAAWk/V_gP--pRKiE/s1600/BLOG%2B10%2BMissile%2BWarning%2BScreen.jpg)
In recent months I have established that the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) have been, despite claims to the contrary, involved in the core "UFO phenomenon". I have highlighted over a dozen pages of legally declassified and officially released US and Canadian military documents that show – in undeniable black and white – that real UFO events have come to the attention of, if not plagued, the staff and systems that make up the formidable NORAD behemoth.
Part 5 is up.
Quote(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EkMUdDeBzcY/VkzyfRPYIsI/AAAAAAAAAYI/esOyMb-zrxw/s640/BLOG%2B10%2BNI15.png)
NORAD And The UFO Smokescreen Part 5 (http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2015/11/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-5-this.html)
Part 6:
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2016/03/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-6.html
Part 7:
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2016/04/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-7-in.html
Part 8:
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2016/05/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-8-in.html
Part 9 is up
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2016_07_01_archive.html
THANK YOU.
Excellent collection by paul Dean
Seems the parts from 6 onwards are more about the Space Command and the NAVY running it than UFO's :D
Lots of material in there that fits my Naval Space Command work but in a lot more detail. And old letters that are now coming to light from researchers
In part 9 he says this
""Fast Walkers"
The UFO community have, for some time now, latched on to a curious term. That term is "Fast Walker", and UFO enthusiasts have variously claimed that Fast Walkers are either alien spacecraft zooming around Earth, and, that they are detected in space by American reconnaissance satellites. Another claim is that the topic is very highly classified. Interestingly, there is actually some truth to these fantastic assertions. Firstly, "Fast Walker" is an official term. It wasn't just made–up by enthusiastic UFO buffs. Secondly, it does indeed refer to objects in space whose identity may not, at least initially, be known. Thirdly, the topic is actually very highly classified. Almost no documentation has ever been released, and no public statements have ever been made. In fact, there appears to be a whole "Fast Walker Program". Beyond those points, nothing I can verify supports the more outlandish claims that these detections are other-worldly spacecraft."
Most interesting indeed
I have copied the entire blog to the website (well I will upload it shortly. I see Frank Warren and others have copied it with credit and I see no copyright labels on Paul Dean's Blog perhaps an official request though would be in order as well
There are a lot of documents he has that he only shows a page or two I need to see if I can pull those from our sources I know FAS.org and Cryptome have a huge database of those
So they stopped calling them UFO's after Blue Book closed and now have different terms :D
Col John Alexander did say in Las vegas that "BTW we track them by satelite" :P
Also income space rocks were made "Classified" in 2008
So ...entries therein pertaining to Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), Fireballs, Meteors, Unknown Event Reports (UER), and Uncorrelated Targets (UCT)... is the new term :D
I was surprized to learn that the Optics telescopes can only pick up objects out to 23,000 miles Hmmmmm intersting indeed
He does point out a few sites that I didn't have yet though
(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yDc71lkvXI4/V4N_NxoQ0_I/AAAAAAAAA24/Jy03v-LAcE8reS6Z-e5BATrX0R-ENTW4ACLcB/s640/BLOG%2B10%2B-%2BUER%2B1.png)
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/Delta_UFO_Ascent.jpeg)
Delta UFO, " The Ascent", ©1996, 1997, Dave Kauble.
A UFO the military tracked
MAY 5, 1984
Article by Dave Kauble
(Based on the Discovery Channel Segment, "Fast Walker")
posted on Deb's UFO Research Information Clearinghouse, January 10, 1997
Recovered from the Wayback Machine Archive, original site no longer exists (https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/FastWalker.html)
MAY 5, 1984, an alert was triggered at the North America Air Defense Command. Moving at 22,000 miles per hour, it was heading toward Earth and had been determined to NOT be incoming ballistic missles, or any other type of conventionally explainable object. Once tracked, it was code-named "Fast Walker".
This object was first spotted by the ultra-sensitive orbiting USDSP satellites our county uses for detailed surveillance and air defense. These satellites have the infra-red capability to spot small heat sources on the surface of the earth and are time-proven as effective monitoring devices.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/USDSPSat1.jpeg)
USDSP Satellite in orbit (depiction)
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/USDSPSat2.jpeg)
USDSP Satellite (depiction of ) initial encounter as "Fast Walker" passed from left to right, headed Earthward.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/USDSPSat3.jpeg)
USDSP Satellite (depiction of ) reversal of course by"Fast Walker" as it headed back toward open space.
At 1400 hours zulu time, an object was spotted by a USDSP satellite and tracked as it sped first directly toward the Earth and passed if front and within 15 miles of the USDSP satellite. It suddenly and without impact or contact with other devices or obstructions curved outward, away from the Earth. It was tracked for another 9 minutes until it then disappeared.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/FastWalker_Trajectory.jpeg)
Trajectory of "Fast Walker"
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/USDSP_TOPSECRETFILE.jpeg)
A Top-Secret summary of the incident reveals the time and place. Top Secret file, incident underlined
What the data resolved was that it was a hot, fast, solid object that swept in from outer space. This information would probably have been totally kept from public view, but it was leaked to UFO Researcher Joe Stefula.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/Images/Joe_Stefula.jpeg)Joe Stefula
Joe's statement was "Where it appeared in the (satellite's) sensor field would indicate that the object came into the sensor field from outer-space, went in front of the sensor, and left, departing back into deep space. It would indicate that it was some type of craft that had the ability to maneuver. And there you have hard evidence. You have telemetry from that satellite, you have information, you have systems, you have data that you can go back and investigate and check and verify. In the past, usually UFO events are of just eye-witness testimony... There you have a very sensitive defense system that sent you information to the ground. I don't even know if you can solve it... maybe it's one of those enigmas that's just gonna be with us forever. What type of craft would have that ability? Some people might say, 'A UFO'."
If "Fast Walker" had been a meteorite, it would have burned up in the Earth's atmosphere. The fact that it changed trajectory so dramatically when it was headed directly toward the Earth at such a high speed, indicates emphatically that it was not a natural phenomenon. No natural object could've overcome the gravitational force of the Earth, especially when its speed and trajectory would compound the effect of the Earth's gravitational pull. To have reversed course so drastically with these natural forces in place is truly astounding. Only intelligently controlled objects would be capable of such a maneuver.
SOURCE:
https://web.archive.org/web/20040225055544/http:/www.debshome.com/FastWalker.html
Well looking at the trajectory map I see no 'intelligent course correctio" I see an object that was on curved trajectory bouncing off the atmospher :D
But it's a good tracking. Got this from a comment on Segment 6
Recorded on NICAP as well but they just copied the same article
http://www.nicap.org/reports/840505orbit_report.htm
Okay so... I finally started on karl's section.
Will try to add a page per day as time allows
Link is on the new front page of Livingmoon and on the UFO menu
Karl 12's Collection
(Edited and Additions by Pegasus)
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/46Karl12/index.html
ArMap if you could copy Karl's ATS threads into a post it would help Not the entire thread but merely the link and title to each page. Then I could add them to the list (see the menu on Karl's page under ATS threads)
I copied the Paul Dean collection to here and will split the page and add to it later (like links to full documents and pictures etc) The page takes a while to load but my setup loads from the top down so as you are reading the top the rest loads below so no real delay time
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/46Karl12/03files/Norad_Reports.html
Fastwalker article is here
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/46Karl12/03files/Fastwalker_001.html
Quote from: zorgon on July 13, 2016, 10:11:35 AM
ArMap if you could copy Karl's ATS threads into a post it would help Not the entire thread but merely the link and title to each page. Then I could add them to the list (see the menu on Karl's page under ATS threads)
Look at the Thread Work Shop board. :)
Quote from: karl 12 on May 03, 2016, 08:56:34 PM
Part 6:
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com.es/2016/03/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-6.html
Quote
Despite the breath-taking capabilities of the SSN and NORAD in the 1960's and 1970's, and the significant publicly available information around these capabilities, there is not a lot of evidence that NORAD was actively or deliberately pursuing UFO's in space, unlike their much more terrestrial air defence role.
Having said that, I am quite sure that had NORAD, or anyone else for that matter, watched a really anomalous, unexplainable event play out on the fringes of space – it would have been be immediately considered very highly classified, and there is nothing whatsoever to assume we would be openly able to study it now.
Indeed, Fawcett and Greenwood, and also Richard Hall were some of the first to provide us with official documentation of government interest in, and tracking of, UFO's.
All while denying they had any interest in, or ongoing tracking of them.
This behaviour has been ongoing from the start.
Karl has always done a bang up job in the fine tradition of the above mentioned gentlemen in always keeping us abreast in the latest releases of previously classified official documentation, proving official lying about public statements regarding the UFO situation.
The lid was shut tight on this subject in the Roswell era and remains so to this day, 'it would have been be immediately considered very highly classified, and there is nothing whatsoever to assume we would be openly able to study it now.'
Take for example all the 'really anomalous, unexplainable events' that were reported to Project Blue Book and then removed and siphoned off and sent to higher headquarters, never to be seen again in Blue Book files and anywhere else.
Flying saucers are serious business, and have always been considered as such by TPTB.
Quote from: A51Watcher on July 14, 2016, 05:29:02 AM
Flying saucers are serious business, and have always been considered as such by TPTB.
Yes exactly but they leave us with the UFO reports because they are harmless :P
Its the Flying Saucers I want not the MUFON reported flying triangle garbage bag UFO's :P
JKROG08's Collection is up and updated
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/46jkrog08/index.html
Thanks for the replies guys and really do appreciate the efforts put in by everyone here - don,t really have the time and means to post much these days but I think it goes without saying a huge hats off to Mr Dean, his OPREP3 and FAA research is also definitely worth a look (have had brief contact so will send him a link to this thread).
Cheers!
Quote from: A51Watcher
Indeed, Fawcett and Greenwood, and also Richard Hall were some of the first to provide us with official documentation of government interest in, and tracking of, UFO's.
All while denying they had any interest in, or ongoing tracking of them.
Hey bud I know most of us have seen it before but have never forgot USAF Radar controller Michael Smith"s testimony - apparently standard USAF operating procedure when you see a UFO on radar screen is to notify NORAD, not to write anything down and to keep it to yourself on a strictly need to know basis (could be wrong but I don't think this guy is making it up).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yuigIp5Wdw
Cheers!
Quote from: zorgon on July 13, 2016, 06:33:51 AM
Excellent collection by paul Dean
Seems the parts from 6 onwards are more about the Space Command and the NAVY running it than UFO's :D
Ha thought you"d like that mate :D
Quote from: karl 12 on July 15, 2016, 09:38:55 AM
Hey bud I know most of us have seen it before but have never forgot USAF Radar controller Michael Smith"s testimony - apparently standard USAF operating procedure when you see a UFO on radar screen is to notify NORAD, not to write anything down and to keep it to yourself on a strictly need to know basis (could be wrong but I don't think this guy is making it up).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yuigIp5Wdw
Cheers!
Exactly
Just like the White House Air Force liaison officer who revealed that his weekly UFO briefing meetings with Truman were conducted exclusively on a verbal basis.
No written record = No evidence to hide.
Also the AF officer that was tasked with removing and destroying all paper trail records relating to Roswell, and bragged later about how comprehensive the results had been.
Now a certain subset of reports may have not been recorded purposefully due to them being new military technology being tested.
What percentage these represent of sightings is unknown.
But the clear dividing line between ET tech and Terrestrial tech sightings is the 15k-90d barrier.
Unless the sighting displays these characteristics we just don't know.
Yes indeedy mate and you make some very pertinent points there -am not in the position to fully reply to them at the mo but thought you'd find this video interesting (if you've not seen it already) - it features folks like Paul Dean, Lee Speigel and John Greenewald Junior discussing non public military UFO reporting procedures and also brings up the subject of 'OPREP3'.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k3d3KJbD1zw
Cheers!