I recently had a note from some one who stated that there is a "Lack of New Material" pretaining to science and research. How can this be? We are on the cusp, or already way into a "Technological Revolution"?
Evidently a Russian Reseacher agrees. *
*I could not find this information on" Main Stream" sites, perhaps you will be able to?
Quote:
A researcher in Russia has made more than 48 million journal articles - almost every single peer-reviewed paper every published - freely available online. And she's now refusing to shut the site down, despite a court injunction and a lawsuit from Elsevier, one of the world's biggest publishers.
For those of you who aren't already using it, the site in question is Sci-Hub, and it's sort of like a Pirate Bay of the science world. It was established in 2011 by neuroscientist Alexandra Elbakyan, who was frustrated that she couldn't afford to access the articles needed for her research, and it's since gone viral, with hundreds of thousands of papers being downloaded daily. But at the end of last year, the site was ordered to be taken down by a New York district court - a ruling that Elbakyan has decided to fight, triggering a debate over who really owns science.
The Rest of This Story Here
http://www.sciencealert.com/this-woman-has-illegally-uploaded-millions-of-journal-articles-in-an-attempt-to-open-up-science (http://www.sciencealert.com/this-woman-has-illegally-uploaded-millions-of-journal-articles-in-an-attempt-to-open-up-science)
Apologise if this has been posted before, please move or discard as necessary
There is a small group of folks who know how it all goes down and she is trying to save us.
Im one of them and i suspect members on here know too.
I dont want to step on any toes but to those that dont know.yellowstone will vent or erupt by july forth.ive done the research and provide the evidence.
I will not supply links or hints to site without admins blessing.
This evidence is not woo or religion,just facts and my speculations.
There are several reasons that this is happening
1) RESTRICTED TECHNOLOGY
The government has an embargo on discoveries that they deem of national security interest They have TWO LISTS
Critical Technologies Monitoring DoD Lists
To access the restricted distribution MCTL you must be registered for Private STINET.
Developing Science and Technologies List (DSTL)
The Developing Science and Technologies List (DSTL) is a compendium of scientific and technological capabilities being developed worldwide that have the potential to significantly enhance or degrade US military capabilities in the future. It includes basic research, applied research and advanced technology development.
Militarily Critical Technologies List (MCTL)
The Militarily Critical Technologies List (MCTL) is a compendium of existing goods and technologies that DOD assesses would permit significant advances in the development, production and use of military capabilities of potential adversaries.
These are accessable only at the DTIC.MIL site so I won't post a link I do have the lists in PDF
2) COPYRIGHT
Most scientific papers are sold to fund the reseaerchers Usually around $30-40.00 per copy. So taking copies from research paper sites and posting them for free on the internet will violate copyright the same way any book author has that right.
You may not agree with copyright protection, but why would you do the work if others can just snag it?
I have found that bywriting a letter to these scientists I can usually get a FREE COPY for myself but in most cases the ABSTRACT is enough to get the idea No one reads the full paper anyway so why bother? And those that DO can easily get a copy
3) NOFORN Security restrictions
While we may be able to get certain information via Freedom of Information Act... this does NOT mean that someone in Iran or North Korea can get that info So if I get it and post it worldwide I could be nailed under that NOFORN issue (NOFORN is a classification that no foreign nation can view it)
I DO take care to post only 'unlimited distribution' classification papers
4) EMBARGO
THIS is the one that is a pain in the ass What this means is that a discovery is EMBARGOED for a certain amount of time. Usually it is because they don't want to make an announcement only to have to retract it later (like NASA does all the time :P ) but sometimes it is used to cover up info
One recent one that just came up.. I had found an article on HAARP and EISCAT to be used to create a planetary shield. I posted that years ago. The SPINOFF on that is that it can also provide shields for spacecraft I posted the article here
Shields for the Starship Enterprise: A Reality? (http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/04images/EISCAT/image002a.jpg)
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/EISCAT_Artificial_Magnetic_Shield.html
But then the original info VANISHED Just went POOF
Well as it happens I reached that section in the website revamp a few days ago so took another look
And I found THIS
QuoteNEWS & PRESS
RAS PN 07/25 (NAM 21): SHIELDS FOR THE STARSHIP ENTERPRISE - A REALITY?
Last Updated on Wednesday, 07 April 2010 18:09
Published on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:00
Travel beyond the immediate vicinity of the Earth carries significant risks for astronauts, not the least of which is the exposure to sometimes high levels of radiation. Now a team of scientists at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory are set to construct an experimental magnetic shield that would protect explorers in their journeys between the planets. Dr Ruth Bamford will present this idea in her talk on Wednesday 18 April at the Royal Astronomical Society National Astronomy Meeting in Preston...
ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY PRESS INFORMATION NOTE
EMBARGOED FOR 00:01 BST, WEDNESDAY 18 APRIL 2007
Ref.: PN 07/ 25 (NAM 21)
Issued by RAS Press Officers:
Robert Massey
http://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/148-news2007/1199-ras-pn-0725-nam-21-shields-for-the-starship-enterprise-a-reality
So the story is TRUE but I can't get access At least now I have proof :P and some names and phone numbers to call
Quote from: Phedre on February 15, 2016, 09:17:22 PM
Evidently a Russian Reseacher agrees. *
*I could not find this information on" Main Stream" sites, perhaps you will be able to?
Well that is not quite true for an American :P We have access to main stream sites that do not allow Russians to snoop
On the other hand I had a NASA historian send me to a Russian site to get a better copy of a document I had requested
When he says "Main Stream" Well I avoid "Main Stream" news sources like the plague. I will look at BBC and PBS but mostly I use RT Russian Times as they are honest and let you copy/paste all their stories free.
The 'good stuff' is found on sites like DTIC (Defense Technical Information Center) NASA Science library (need a password to access but the info is public) Los Alamos National Labs archives and other similar sources
But most of those do NOT allow access to other countries Europe has similar sites like the European Patent Office
So I can sympathize with a Russian researcher :P but they were the "Enemy" afterall :P And do you really want to have FREE SHARING of technology with nations like North Korea and the Islamic states wanting to wipe us off the face of the earth?
But a last note
99.9% of people DO NOT CARE to even read one of those documents
I have over 6000 processed and available,, and maybe anothe 6000 not processed yet Ellirium and a couple others have helped process a few small batches (Thanks :D) but since I started Pegasus only a small handful of people have EVER asked to get access to them
I do not have them online at the moment because of robot downloading issues of large files to create those DOS attacks we had but no one has noticed they are gone nor asked to read any of them
So putting up a million free copies to restricted or copyright files and getting in trouble is silly No one save a few dedicated researchers care and those few can get a copy anyway
There is no way I can even read all the 12,000 hand picked files I already have and put the info into a usefull order TOO NUCH information... it becomes like that Indiana Jones Smithsonian Warehouse The info is there but still lost "in plain sight"
Quote from: zorgon on February 15, 2016, 10:08:54 PM
I will look at BBC and PBS but mostly I use RT Russian Times as they are honest and let you copy/paste all their stories free.
RT = Russia Today.