James Carrions newer version is now available @ http://historydeceived.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/blog-post.html#more
His old blogs have been removed... I'll be back after I've read it.
Just finished the book.
I too noticed the removal of all his blog material some time ago.
Interesting read, even more interesting is the complete lack of any reference to Roswell, which used to be a common element in his tirades.
Perhaps he is reserving that chapter for another book.
Or perhaps further research into 1947 has shown him that his current theory does not apply to the sightings of that year.
My own research into that era shows that sentiment to be the case.
Rosetta psyops do not fit the database of sightings as they did for ghost rockets.
His writing style has improved compared to his previous ramblings, perhaps motivated by comments from readers that his style was a bit hysterical and sophomoric.
I'm not a fan of his writing style either to be honest.
He's tried to make it digestible for people new to the subject, but I wouldn't have bothered dumbing down the language.
Maury Island, Kenneth Arnold & Roswell will all be part of a separate book.
I'm most interested in what part the Telegraph Companies had to play at that time, as it crosses over with a number of other illegal activities they were up too which I'm reading up on atm.
I still don't know why you hold him in such disdain, he has stated several time's that his theory isn't the whole story... But does account for some of it. I'm happy with that, I don't know why any one wouldn't be.
Oh probably because I'm not big on whiny snots, but hey that's just me. Perhaps in looking over his old posts it dawned on him he was projecting an image it was hard to take serious, as he so badly wanted and he decided to delete the evidence of such.
As for the rest fair enough.
Anyway as I mentioned his writing style has vastly improved and it's a good read.
The only improvement I would suggest, was this version was a little thin on illustrations. Perhaps in future printings he could add a few more like this to illustrate his point -
(http://i1125.photobucket.com/albums/l595/A51Watcher/0253_zpsxo8iz1h2.jpg)
Of course we can see where he is heading with all this, but for 1947 the same evidence does not hold true for the same theory.
All those reports that year are not from mystery men but real people, as verified by Dr. James McDonald and myself.
Perhaps like many, he is only aware of the Roswell incident and Arnold's sighting and that's it.
That would certainly explain his blind spot on this issue.