Pegasus Research Consortium

QuoteThe problem with videos like those is that we only see what the camera sees, we don't see what people were seeing and what happened if they moved to a different place.

Quote from: space otter on January 12, 2024, 03:55:52 PM
like this from years ago........ just sayin

Amazing Must See Technology 7D hologram Shown in Dubai, Poland and Japan

Quotewho's is it ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??

Quote'Unlikely' that object in UAP 'jellyfish' video is camera smudge:

    Footage of purported UFO released by journalist Jeremy Corbell
    Physics professor: Appears to be physical object, not 'camera artifact'
    The object was filmed over a joint operations base in Iraq in 2018

Quote from: ArMaP on January 10, 2024, 10:33:51 PM
First of all, I only watched the first video.

And no, I don't have an explanation, but some times it does look "flat" and translucent, like something on a glass.
It also doesn't appear to change shape or size, as if it was always at the same distance and was always showing the same side to the camera, which helps give the 2D idea many people are talking about.

It could be any thing.

from r/aliens

from r/UFOs

Quote
  All camera lenses have a minimum focus distance. For a lens to focus on something extremely close to the lens itself they would need to have a macro type of lens and even in that case, the higher the zoom, the further the object needs to be from the lens to be in focus.

  People here keep mentioning a dome or casing over the lens, even in that situation how thick or far do you think this case is from the lens? It is normally mounted almost immediately over it (look at camera and lens cases people use for underwater photography/video) or extremely close regardless (maybe 5-10cm away based off how thick it is). So now going back to the first point, notice how in the video they switch the lens for a longer focal length and focus doesn't change? Yes that means the object is not close or touching the case/lens mounted on the platform

Like another user mentioned in a post here, and assuming this video was recorded at night time, in order to produce high quality recording and while maintaining a decent shutter speed (otherwise the movement will be shown as blurry, you can look various youtube videos that show this, some even use this technique for their videos because it produces a somewhat unique look) while still allowing most things to be in focus, they'd need to use a certain combination of lens aperture and ISO. The higher the aperture, the more blurry objects in the background appear(when one specific object is in focus, if the object is further though than the range of background blur also gets further, if the object is closer than the background blur is higher) and the more light comes into the sensor of said camera. Looking at the footage you can still make out shapes in the background with a decent amount of definition which means the equipment uses a fairly small aperture which doesn't allow enough light to get to the sensor and to counter that they need to increase the amount of ISO, which means digitally enhancing the amount of light that gets to the sensor and this creates the grain you notice. I can't tell you exactly the aperture used to record this footage but my guess based off the footage itself is that the aperture of the lens is somewhat average (probably anywhere from f4-5.6 to f8-9)

  In the video, there is moments where you can clearly notice how, whoever is tracking the object, slows down their panning movement, in some cases almost coming to a full stop (this happens when they almost get the object out of the frame) and the object still catches up.

Quote from: space otter on January 11, 2024, 11:56:07 PM

who's is it ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??

Quote from: RUSSO on January 10, 2024, 07:39:47 AM
Hey ArMaP, please don't try the bird shit, balloons, paralax or whatever Metabunk is pushing, alright? I am all ears if you have a good explanation for this, though.

from r/UFOs

from r/UFOs

from r/UFOs

QuoteThe good ones are going to be scooped up and transferred?