argon and dark matter

[IRCyborg]

(not in the ratios they say it does anyway).

What I meant by that is that it is possible/probable/ or even likely that non-atomic (hadron, electrons) matter exists out there floating around in the Cosmic soup.  A better term for this would be 'exotic matter'.

When it comes to black holes, I don't view them as dark or black. I view them also as Light.  Just because we cannot 'see' it does not mean it is without Light.

[Amaterasu]

I agree, IRC.  Just because We cannot "see" it does not mean it is without light.  EVERYTHING is light/Consciousness.

Back to My second question:  What is Your opinion of LaViolette's Subquantum Kinetics (SQK)?  In His view, "particles" are standing waves of the aether.

[IRCyborg]

Back to My second question:  What is Your opinion of LaViolette's Subquantum Kinetics (SQK)?  In His view, "particles" are standing waves of the aether.

Never heard of it. 

I view mass somewhat similarly to how one sees bubbles in 7-up.  There is more to it than that, but that is how I see it in its most basic form.

[Pimander]

I view mass somewhat similarly to how one sees bubbles in 7-up.  There is more to it than that, but that is how I see it in its most basic form.

That's my take on matter/aether.

[Amaterasu]

Never heard of it. 

I view mass somewhat similarly to how one sees bubbles in 7-up.  There is more to it than that, but that is how I see it in its most basic form.

That's my take on matter/aether.

And that is basically what SQK offers.  I do recommend looking into LaViolette's work.

[IRCyborg]

And that is basically what SQK offers.  I do recommend looking into LaViolette's work.

It isn't LaViolette's work.  He is merely reiterating prior art.

I do like that the idea that Tired Light is being explored once again and that it seems to be showing itself as a closer fit to observation.  Instinctively I knew this, but when I was in the thick of my own research there was very little data from the mainstream that supported it.

On Laviolette's site, etheric.com, he directs the interested to buy his books...and I am flat broke.

It seems that everybody has a book to sell, but they didn't notice the bookstores are going out of business and the libraries are thinning their book selection.

[robomont]

think of fine dust nothing can move through it.if dark matter exist it has to someway  become fluid or the planets and such would have no motion.if its fluid then there is a gap between the atoms.if theres a gap then there is something even smaller.n

[Amaterasu]

It isn't LaViolette's work.  He is merely reiterating prior art.

I do believe that SQK is His own work.  He started with chemical kinetics and dropped it down to the subquantum level, discovering an intimate link between EM and gravity and, though He did not know it initially, a prediction of the Biefeld-Brown Effect.  He struggled with that prediction until He encountered Brown's work and found that SQK predicted exactly what Brown was showing experimentally.

Yes, other of His work is a reiteration.  But I am quite positive SQK is His.