God theory with a twist

[undo11]

This is  in ancient civs because I think that's what the thread is about, even though it's titled "God theory with a twist"

You know how when you read the text of the old testament "god" appears to say and do things that are not consistent with other things "god" has said and done?  well, i think  i have discovered the answer:

god in the old testament is not just jehovah god, or enki or enlil or anu, god is also pharaoh.  now i'm not saying we should consider ancient egyptian pharaohs to be god, although i do believe the first one was and the last one was, but the ones in between, that's a whole 'nother thing (perhaps nephilim related)

so let's revisit abraham's visit at the tent, right before his visitors depart to sodom and gomorrah, seemingly to wipe it out of existence. yes friends, the smoking gun of ancient technology is embedded in the abraham story.

the guys that came to visit abraham were not elohim in the supernatural sense, they were the "god" pharaoh and 2 of his body guards.  why do i say that?  well, first of all, the text calls them men.  secondly, the text states that the visitor and his entourage are going to sodom and gomorrah to see if the information is true about the decrepit state of the citizens there, and they are stopping along the way to inform abe that his wifey is gonna get preggers at the age of 90 something.   the wifey has a chuckle at hearing it. 

now  ask yourself:  if that was god, why would he have to travel to sodom and gomorrah to find out if the rumors were true?   wouldn't he know automatically and if not, wouldn't he be able to look from on high and draw the conclusion?   
secondly, wouldn't sarah realize, as abe supposedly  did, that this was god and entourage and therefore, if god said you're gonna become a mom and said so in person, you wouldn't laugh.  you'd be like, oh no, morning sickness or some variation thereof.

furthermore, the bible and the jews, claimed that no one had seen god, that even the presence of god in the holy of holies was only shown from the waist down because to look at god directly, would kill the person: "no one has seen god and lived."
so either abe is "no one" or abe did not see god. 

something is wrong with the definition of god in the old testament, and i think data from other ancient civs, proves that.

as far as ancient high technology, review the description of the destruction of sodom and gomorrah and the end of lot's wife. that has nuclear detonation written all over it.

[Littleenki]

Ahhh Undo, always wearing that thinking cap!

Im sure your familiar with the Mahabarata and the Bhagavad Gita, not to mention numerous site in the Middle East which show evidence of some sort of catclysm in the vein of nuclear events.

Ive read this a thousand times..always with a cringe towards how accurate it describes nuclear war...

single projectile charged with all the power of the Universe. An incandescent column of smoke and flame As bright as the thousand suns Rose in all its splendour... a perpendicular explosion with its billowing smoke clouds... ...the cloud of smoke rising after its first explosion formed into expanding round circles like the opening of giant parasols... ..it was an unknown weapon, an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death, which reduced to ashes The entire race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas. ...The corpses were so burned as to be unrecognizable. The hair and nails fell out; Pottery broke without apparent cause, And the birds turned white. After a few hours All foodstuffs were infected... ...to escape from this fire, the soldiers threw themselves in streams to wash themselves and their equipment.

Mohenjo Daro  has vitrification all around it in a circular pattern, defining an actual epicenter near the edge of town, and the story of Lot really bolsters the alternative historical belief that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by a nuclear device or two.

Several sites in India have been found to have extreme layers of radioactive ash covering them deep in the desert.

Of course the Sodom and Gomorrah were said to have been befallen with fire and brimstone, and Lot's wife was said to be turned to a pillar of salt...or ashes as it may really have been.

And, of course it couldve been the a God who heaped all this destruction upon these characters of the bible, too. Or both...Egyptian "god" and Hebrew "god"

Personally I have pondered whether the story of Lot was also the story of the current "God" of the times..which indeed couldve been a Pharaoh or a Khemite King, and that leaves us with the question...what was the weapon?

The ark clearly has a well known history of being a very dangerous device, definitely not a gold plated box with two stone tablets in it..thats for sure.

So, we ask, what would be kept in a box, covered with a thick layer of gold, able to make men who witness its contents loose hair and die soon thereafter with massive unexplainable diseases and injuries?

And, where in Africa was the origin of the Khemites and the Egyptians?

So we look to the West, and the ancient land of North Africa, we find the Egyptians going back from the predynastic Naqada, to the paleolithic Wadi Halfa.
There is a definite link between the ancient people of the desert and Pharaohnic Egypt....

As we head into the desert to look for answers we find the ubiquitous desert glass of the Libyan desert. Sheets the size of towns which were vitrified by some massive event of high heat. So to the west we have evidence of some great flash of instantaneous heat occuring. Were the pharaohs aware of this technology, or was it just an airbursted comet or asteroid?

Then we look to the Southwest in Central Africa, where we find the Oklo Mines, rich with naturally occuring deposits of Uranium which has been dated to 2.2 billion years. Uranium which was clearly mined in some areas by someone a very long time ago. In Oklo are chambers underground which show evidence of digging, and the oxidized Uranium which lines the walls of these chambers shows that they once were thick veins of the radioactive material sometime in the past.

And then we reach the second smoking gun...not an explosion or event for the people who suffered from its actual occurence, but an aftereffect of it.

The kingdom of Sumeria, who may have been at their end, the victim of fallout and wind driven radioactive particulates from some source to their  South and West. As these prevailing winds brought doom and death to the great society, one ponders...how did radioactive fallout exist three millenia ago. This theory presented by Sitchin is a long shot but it cant be ruled out, either.

Then of all things we look back to the ancient Indian writings, and the name of the weapon which brings such fire and devastation..the Brahma weapon.

Do I need to point out the similarity in that name to a certain person said to exist in biblical times, Abraham?

Were he and the pharaohs privy to the same technology, and did one get the jump on the other back then resulting in the use of whatever technology was at hand?

And this isnt even delving into what the pyramids really were as devices or machines, as so many pose they were.

Nuclear enrichment plants, perhaps? Could that be why they are built so huge and thick, and the chambers in them show clear evidence of high heat and chemical reactions? Are the pyramids and their ability to once have enriched Uranium from Gabon or some other source into Plutonium or other element, the real smoking gun?

Remember that shifted stone in the King's chamber? Is that when the pyramids went offline, and were retired from service? An oops! of too great a magnitude to keep the GP from continuing its making of high density radioactive elements?

Well Beth, this theorizing could go on for years...shall we?

Cheers!
Le

[undo11]

little enki

well if abraham was a pharaoh, and there's a small trail of evidence to suggest he was,  and if we also take into consideration that historically, most pharaohs had been the offspring of the anunnaki, it all kinda fits and continues to fit, right down to today.  explains the entire history of the planet.

[Littleenki]

As much as I would love to believe Abraham was a pharaoh, or even a predynastic figure whose name was carried forth through history into dynastic times, I also have to ppnder the possibility that he was a mere metaphor for whatever power held court over the people of the times...first the Indus Valley people, all the way through Zep Tepi and into Hebrew writingsas their big man on campus.

For me the etymology of the name Abraham is a dead giveaway that Abraham was a name which was used over several thousand years, and stems from the need for a human saviour or half deity.

Brahma/Abraham..I get chills thinking about the similarities from the obvious to obscure regarding his name.
Taurus, and on to the Bull which perplexed the Sumerians throughout their rule.

I personally think there may have been several people down through time named Abraham, if someone did exist at all of that moniker...perhaps dozens of Abraham, resulting in an all encompassing series of men who adopted the name..sort of like Elohim is more than one....so could Abraham been a badge of leadership..just like our pharaohs.

So, with that said...Ill check the etymology a bit more of him, and see if theres more circumstances of similarities and likenesses in the spellings of other gods.

So many crucified saviours, so little evidence of who and what these named persons were!

[undo11]

watch this (i don't agree with her that the ark of the covenant was a canopic chest. i think it was a royal litter, that could generate static electricity. if it was radioactive as well, that would explain the phillistines developing "hemmoroids" from handling it)

[The Matrix Traveller]

Why is it that people can't distinguish the difference between the Species and LIFE.

Or is it simply people refuse to recognise LIFE and want to pretend that the Species is Life, or somehow alive ?

There are 2 things involved !

a.      The Experience i.e. those things of the world (including flesh)
and
b.      The "LIVING One" i.e. LIFE Experiencing the flesh and the world.

The Writings are a Parable for "The LIVING One" and Not the Flesh.

The "LIVING One" is the Real You, and NOT the Flesh !

But for some reason those experiencing the Earth want to follow after The BEAST i.e. the flesh.

The "Answers" are NOT in the "Story" or Universe ! (on purpose)

But rather, WHAT this world (Story or experience) does to the "Inner Mind".
(Absolute Center of the True Mind i.e. LIFE)

It doesn't mater what one believes about who was who !

It is the Question that affects the Absolute Center of "The True Mind" !

We should target the Outer "True Mind" for the Answers rather than the human brain,
which has "Double Logic" within its Analytical systems and can't know the Truth !