A puzzle for anyone who wants it

[petrus4]

http://guerrillaskepticismonwikipedia.blogspot.com.au/

I think most of us know, at this point, that Wikipedia was overtaken by a particularly vicious gang of fundamentalist materialists and pseudoskeptics some years ago, now.  These people are Randian enforcers.  Not only do they delete articles outright, but they make sure that no articles about contentious issues such as 9/11 or the Port Arthur Massacre, contain anything other than governmental versions of events.

These people must be stopped.  As many of you know, we are currently living in a society which is progressively becoming less and less economically and politically free.  We have Western governments who regularly commit attrocities against their own citizens and get away with it; and one of the main reasons why they get away with it, is because anyone who would even remotely consider bringing the real truth about these events to the public, is consistently prevented from doing so.

The group are calling themselves the Guerilla Skeptics.  They have a domain, guerillaskeptics.com, which redirects back to the blog above.  Apparently they are led by a woman named Susan Gerbic.  Many of you have vastly superior datamining and research skills to myself, so I am asking for your help.  I want to know who is behind Ms. Gerbic and this group.  I would like to know if they have ties to the American government, or any other special interest or lobby group, and if so, I want to expose them.

I think Wikipedia is most likely, well and truly beyond saving at this point.  The fundamentalist materialist infestation of the site is now at an advanced and entrenched stage, and as mentioned, began many years ago.  If Wikipedia can not be salvaged, however, then the next best thing is to warn people as best we can; and also to discover as much as possible about who is behind the pseudoskeptics, and what is motivating their actions.

I've been angry about the behaviour of such people for a very long time, but I always assumed that I was powerless to do anything about them.  If you are willing to help me, I'd like to see if I can prove that that is not the case.

Rupert Sheldrake has offered more information here about the group and their activities, after the hijacking of his own bio page:-

    This summer, soon after the TED controversy, a commando squad of skeptics captured the Wikipedia page about me. They have occupied and controlled it ever since, rewriting my biography with as much negative bias as possible, to the point of defamation. At the beginning of the "Talk" page, on which editorial changes are discussed, they have posted a warning to editors who do not share their biases: "A common objection made by new arrivals is that the article presents Sheldrake's work in an unsympathetic light and that criticism of it is too extensive or violates Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy." Several new arrivals have indeed attempted to restore a more balanced picture, but have had a bewildering variety of rules thrown at them, and warned that they will be banned if they persist in opposing the skeptics.

    ...The Guerrilla Skeptics are well trained, highly motivated, have an ideological agenda, and operate in teams, contrary to Wikipedia rules... They have already seized control of many Wikipedia pages, deleted entries on subjects they disapprove of, and boosted the biographies of atheists.

    As the Guerrilla Skeptics have demonstrated, Wikipedia can easily be subverted by determined groups of activists, despite its well-intentioned policies and mediation procedures. Perhaps one solution would be for experienced editors to visit the talk pages of sites where editing wars are taking place, rather like UN Peacekeeping Forces, and try to re-establish a neutral point of view. But this would not help in cases where there are no editors to oppose the Guerrilla Skeptics, or where they have been silenced.

    If nothing is done, Wikipedia will lose its credibility, and its financial backers will withdraw their support. I hope the noble aims of Wikipedia will prevail.

[Norval]

The TRUTH in information wars was lost before it got started. Sorry.

The only truth to be found is in sites like this one and a few others.

Even so, there are posters that are still doing their "jobs" at these forums to try and disrupt the flow of truth as much as they can. We are trying though to get the truth out. 

[Amaterasu]

Petrus, somehow I missed this thread - well, though I was reading ALL the threads here, recently undo and I started working on a browser-based game and it usurped My time.  I have EIGHT PAGES of unread threads!  OMG!

So glad to see You back on Peggy!  Wish I had any info on this character, Gerbic.  Would love to help.