NSA says it has 'lost' its non-redacted UFO files.

[karl 12]

BTW Karl I love reading your UFO report's mate! 

Ha thanks very much mate - always thought this was a freaky one and as it happened at 'the home to the National Security Agency in Australia' I wonder if some of the lost non-redacted files mentioned it (seems the RAAF Department of Defence were very interested in it).


UFO Hovers Over NSA Base - Australia, October, 1973.


Also, when it comes to telling porkies the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency did send the NSA a copy of the Tehran UFO documents in 1976 which described the case as "an outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon" .. even though the US Government completely denies having any interest whatsoever in the UFO subject since 1969.

Likewise the NSA also received UFO documents from the US Department of Defense in 1980 concerning the Peruvian Air Force trying to intercept and destroy a UFO ('but the vehicle's origin remains unknown' link) ..even though the US Government completely denies having any interest whatsoever in the UFO subject since 1969.

I suppose if this kind of blatant misrepresentation was about any other subject then everyone would be up in arms about it.

Cheers.


Relevant thread:

NSA UFO Documents Index

[zorgon]

What we NEED is a copy of the DoD dictionary...

CANCELLED due to lack of funds = Went black ops

Lost = buried



Funny thing the other day watching NCIS   Gibbs was looking at a Top Secret files of an active case... it was heavily reacted...

It seems the story writers FORGOT that the people at the TOP would see those files UNREDACTED

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

What we NEED is a copy of the DoD dictionary...

CANCELLED due to lack of funds = Went black ops

Lost = buried



Funny thing the other day watching NCIS   Gibbs was looking at a Top Secret files of an active case... it was heavily reacted...

It seems the story writers FORGOT that the people at the TOP would see those files UNREDACTED

Having actually generated/handled DIA docs, it all depends on ACCESS & Need to Know. My clearance was pretty damn high and I know there were things that I didn't see.
Not much mind you because I had to proof read and edit docs for the higher ups to read.

[ArMaP]

Funny thing the other day watching NCIS   Gibbs was looking at a Top Secret files of an active case... it was heavily reacted...

It seems the story writers FORGOT that the people at the TOP would see those files UNREDACTED

Gibbs is not at the TOP.