The Rise of the Class Presidents

[ArMaP]

So I've been looking through some more images of Corrine Foxx on Google images.  One thing that consistently jumps out at me, is that she is a very, very light mulatto; calling her black is more or less a technicality.

That's something I noticed in the US, they call "black" to people with a skin colour lighter than mine.

Here's Corinne Foxx, side by side with Britney Spears.  Am I trying to claim that they're the same person?  No; but there's a haunting similarity in some respects, and that suggests to me that David Icke and Wellaware1 are right when they say that the cabal does have a genetic component, in terms of what they do.  I've also read hints that Britney was a victim of the Monarch mind control program, and that she and Justin Bieber were once seen together as children.  If that is true, it raises more questions.

I think it just shows that people in the US (is that Corinne Foxx from the US? I don't have the slightest idea of who she is) are too fixed on a specific look and change the way they look to get it. For a real comparison we would need photos of both when they were children.

Remember this image?  It's worth more than a thousand words, in terms of the degree of similarity it represents.  There is exceptionally little real change in skin tone; yet Barrack is "black."

Yes, there's little change because they are both from the same species.

In that sense, Obama becoming President was a classic bait and switch.  People were fooled into thinking that a "black" President was going to represent huge political change, yet genetically speaking he was obviously largely identical to every other President, while appearing just different enough for the trick to work.

With that I agree.

img]http://media.thedenverchannel.com/photo/2012/12/15/robbie%20parker_1355611925366_340736_ver1.0_320_240.jpeg[/img]

The photo on the left is Robbie Parker, the supposed father of a shooting victim at Sandy Hook, who was accused of fake crying.  The photo on the right is Prince William.  Notice any similarities?  They are very obviously different people, but the nose, the mouth outline, and the forehead are similar.  The point is that to me, Robbie Parker looks a lot more like a blue blood Englishman, than a typical American.

They are not that similar, but that's one thing I have noticed about people from the US a long time ago, even if the US is supposed to be a "melting pot", the people have less differences among themselves than a small country like Portugal, where we can find easily many "racial types", while in the US we see just some "racial types" and not that much mixing.

I remember seeing a guy in Egypt who was supposed to be a "grass roots," activist during the Arab Spring; yet he failed the Supermarket Test.  He was wearing a leather jacket and expensive looking pants, and he spoke with an Oxford English accent, while still claiming to be a native.

Many people with money in the Middle East go to study in the UK, as the UK was the last "colonial presence" in that area, even if it was not a colonizing force.

[Somamech]

I vote for Green's in Ozzie and am pretty happy we got another seat in Politicks today.

I'm just a normal person who vote's.  I enjoy voting for a party that say's it will change the current paradigm and who have also posted result's.

Perfect?  Heck no! 

Oddly though... I pose a question as to whether this person is on the CT Hit List?:





So is he a Bad person in on the Game ?  Or someone who tried to make a change and learned the game to OUR advantage ?

I have posted picture's of Tasmania on this Forum... Fecking Great Place






   

[petrus4]

So is he a Bad person in on the Game ?  Or someone who tried to make a change and learned the game to OUR advantage ?

Soma, given how tightly controlled the political community is, in the Five Eyes countries in particular, then I think we can safely say that Bob Brown would not have had a prominent position, if he was not controllable.  I don't know a lot about him, but from one of those videos, and his Wikipedia page, it looks as though he was someone who was initially involved in environmental activism, (quite successfully, it seems) before getting into politics.  I can also remember hearing that he was quite celebrated while he was the leader of the Greens. 

I truthfully pay almost no attention to Australian politics, despite living here; virtually all of my focus is on America, as I consider the American government to have a much higher degree of overall relevance.

According to Wikipedia, Mr. Brown was the first openly gay man in the Australian Parliament.  I tend to believe that the people who are really running the show, like to insert token individuals who are nominal members of certain minorities, in order to create the illusion of progress and an open political system, and to cause the public to believe that anyone can successfully run for political office.

My guess in general, therefore, is that Brown was essentially controlled opposition, or more specifically Australia's equivalent of Al Gore.  In Brown's case, it was a bit more skilfully and covertly handled than in the case of Peter Garrett, as he was initially an environmental and Aboriginal rights activist as well, but sold out openly and completely on getting into politics.  The cabal have a strong interest in recruiting and quietly corrupting individuals who have successfully opposed them in the past, since not only does it end that particular line of opposition, but it also allows them to gain control of said individuals' followers as well.

If you are trying to determine who to vote for during political elections, there is something vitally important to keep in mind.  Because the cabal are willing to use blackmail and assassinations, in general it should be assumed that anyone who you are seeing on television, or who is otherwise in the mainstream public eye, is a controlled asset.  While it is true that the level of control that they have over individuals varies, you will generally find that people who buck the system too much, either end up discredited or having their careers destroyed, (as in the case of Ron Paul in America, or Gough Whitlam in Australia) or are assassinated/disappeared.  (As in the case of JFK in America, and Harold Holt in Australia)

People will tell you how vitally important it supposedly is to vote; but my own opinion is truthfully the exact opposite.  The individuals who control the political process, in truth have no intention whatsoever of admitting anyone who is not vulnerable to their control.  The individuals who genuinely run things have an exceptionally medieval (think feudalist) view of the world, to a large degree.  The facade of democracy is used as in order to deceive the public that they have some measure of choice in what goes on, so that said public are less restive and easier to control; but it is a complete illusion.  Real democracy does not exist in any major government, particularly in the Western world.

If you want to know how to change the world in a positive manner, about the only thing I can really suggest is engaging in compassionate behaviour on an individual basis.  If there is someone right in front of you who needs your help, give it to them to the extent that you are able.  Remember your humanity, remember your compassion, and remember your ability to look after those who need it; and to the extent that you can, encourage that behaviour in others.

Activist movements and groups of any kind should generally be avoided, as there are virtually none of them these days which have not been infiltrated or corrupted, to some degree or another.  I learned that to my sorrow, after taking a Permaculture Design Course in 2011.

The three warning signs to look out for, with regards to whether or not a given individual or group have been infiltrated, are:-

a}  The mainstream media are talking about them favourably, or otherwise giving them airtime.

b}  They are visually attractive, although I've already covered this point above. 

c}  In terms of groups, your single biggest clue is the presence of money.  Asking for donations on a relatively low-key basis is probably not much of an issue, as everyone needs to eat.  On the other hand, you need to keep in mind the fact that a need for money is a point of vulnerability.  If a group needs money, and someone like George Soros or the Koch brothers give it to them, then it is more or less certain that that group is going to be compromised very quickly.

That is not to say that homeless people are always trustworthy either, but in my experience, 90% of the time someone you meet on the street is going to be vastly more altruistic and human in general terms, than someone who is wealthy.  We live in a society where psychopathic behaviour is almost always a prerequisite of truly large-scale wealth; and if a person uses that sort of behaviour to gain their money, they are not going to immediately give it up once they are rich.  If they do, they will lose said money again very quickly.  Money has its' own laws; and said laws generally do not reward compassionate or otherwise ethically positive behaviour.

[petrus4]

The OP of this thread has a sequel, as it turns out; but first, let's set the tone with some appropriate music, given the thread's name.



I was innocently reading Reddit this morning, as I cusomarily do, when via /r/Rad_Decentralization I came across the following link:-

Decentralized Autonomous Progress Report.

Remember the guy you saw in the YouTube video, in this thread's OP?  It turns out his name is Gary, and he's still around.  Supposedly he's the co-founder of something called "Decentralized Dance Parties," and has been to Burning Man, among other similar events.

Something else that's truly interesting about "Gary," however, is the fact that I can't find his surname.  To quote Commissioner Gordon, "no name, no other alias."



Maybe Gary also wants to watch the world burn.

If anyone is willing to help out here, I'd appreciate it.  I particularly want to find out who is sponsoring "Gary," as I have a feeling that the question of who is paying his bills, could have an intriguing answer.

http://www.decentralizeddanceparty.com/ - This is the DDP's web site.  Interestingly, they also talk about having an "elite banana task force," populated by, "party Comrades."  Oops.  It seems that whoever wrote the script for these individuals did not provide quite enough subtlety.  Let's see...Comrades...now where have I heard that particular word before?





It's a shame we can't resurrect Joseph McCarthy; because I suspect that at this point, the world perhaps still needs him.

[ArMaP]

Remember the guy you saw in the YouTube video, in this thread's OP?  It turns out his name is Gary, and he's still around.  Supposedly he's the co-founder of something called "Decentralized Dance Parties," and has been to Burning Man, among other similar events.

Something else that's truly interesting about "Gary," however, is the fact that I can't find his surname.

I don't know if it's his real name or not, but he uses "Lachance" after "Gary", he is from Canada and is connected in some way to a band called "HORSE the band".

http://www.decentralizeddanceparty.com/ - This is the DDP's web site.  Interestingly, they also talk about having an "elite banana task force," populated by, "party Comrades."  Oops.  It seems that whoever wrote the script for these individuals did not provide quite enough subtlety.  Let's see...Comrades...now where have I heard that particular word before?

The word "comrade" is used by many people in Portugal in its original meaning of "chamber mate", used by people that were together in the army, in a boarding school, etc.

It's a shame we can't resurrect Joseph McCarthy; because I suspect that at this point, the world perhaps still needs him.

No, it's not, and the world never needed him.

[petrus4]

I don't know if it's his real name or not, but he uses "Lachance" after "Gary", he is from Canada and is connected in some way to a band called "HORSE the band".

Thank you for this, Armap. 

http://www.decentralizeddanceparty.com/the-party-manifesto/ - This is, "the Party Manifesto," the title of which makes me cringe; as does the phrase, "the Party Revolution."

I understand what you are saying about use of the same words being a coincidence; but I don't tend to believe in those sorts of coincidences, to be honest.  I think there's probably a genuine connection with Communism here somewhere.

The other things that bother me are the Power Glove and those glasses.  He just looks extremely fake.  It might be innocent, but there's something about it that is just giving me the willies, and has for a long time.

Such is the life of the self-described "twentysomething" who declines to name his suburban Ontario hometown and instead claims to have travelled from the future to change the world, one decentralized dance party at a time.

This is a quote from here.  He really does not seem to like giving out information about himself.

[ArMaP]

I think there's probably a genuine connection with Communism here somewhere.

So what, do you think Communists eat little children? 

[petrus4]

So what, do you think Communists eat little children? 

Not exactly; but Communism's historical track record hasn't been all that great.  As I've said before, I'm more worried that Gary is being used as a means of manipulating young people in ways that they are unlikely to recognise.

[ArMaP]

Not exactly; but Communism's historical track record hasn't been all that great.

True, in some cases.

As I've said before, I'm more worried that Gary is being used as a means of manipulating young people in ways that they are unlikely to recognise.

How, do you think they will be recruited by the KGB? 

[Sinny]

Communism should be recognised for what it is, and that's the 'Boleshevic/Zionist agenda'.

No surprises here..