Analysis of Face on Mars & Possible Blast

[Amaterasu]

I don't know how to find it but it may help to look at it here.

http://www.uahirise.org/ESP_038646_1805

That is not the Face...  Or did I miss a link to the face?

[Pimander]

That is not the Face...  Or did I miss a link to the face?

You could look up the face on that site.

I would imagine, to hide the fact that there was a face on Mars.  Who knows when it was delivered.  Could even have been after the first images were returned, and perhaps someOne thought that would have to be removed for clearer images.

I'm not so sure there was a blast there.  It is so hard to say because the original "face" shots were such poor quality.


The problem you have Amy is that you have done what NASA have been accused of - altering images to match peoples pre-conceived ideas about what they expect to see.  Some people will agree and disagree.  On a personal level a lot of people will agree that it is or could be a face.  From a scientific position, it has no value, but I imagine that was not your purpose for doing the GIF.


It is a good face though.

[ArMaP]

Think as You wish.

I always do.

PS: I started writing an answer to the whole post, but several things got in the way, so, many hours after, I decided to answer when I have the time.

[Amaterasu]

The problem you have Amy is that you have done what NASA have been accused of - altering images to match peoples pre-conceived ideas about what they expect to see. 

Lest You missed it, the only altering I did was rotation.  Period.  This was the image z posted in another thread.  I'm working on a high-res version straight from NASA.  It's still looking the same, though.  More detail that looks like what it looked like.  Then I did what I specifically said was My conception.  Hardly comparable to what NASA is accused of.  Geez.

Some people will agree and disagree.  On a personal level a lot of people will agree that it is or could be a face.  From a scientific position, it has no value, but I imagine that was not your purpose for doing the GIF.

From a scientific point, it is data.  Unconfirmed, yes.  But We can give probabilities.  The probability of it's being a blasted face is very high by My reckoning.

It is a good face though.

It's likely exactly that (though My rendition may be wrong on some points).