Time Lines A Glitch in the Matrix Something funny happened on MARS

[Irene]

Regarding Robert Duncan, he is absolutely on-target. I can corroborate some of the stuff he talks about. 

[simon_alex0327]

Ok.... excuse my ramblings...
I can remember the Disney show shown in the the Uk I think on a Sunday afternoon. Looked forward to watching this each week, hoping for cartoons, but also loved the shows about nature etc. I can always remember Tinker Bell dotting the "I"  with her wand at the start of each show. Now its being said that this never happened. My wife whos American ( where we live now ) can also remember the same thing.
Tonight... while watching "Wheel of Fortune"  ( I know im sad !! ) the whole week is based around Disney world and trips that can be won here.
Each night on the opening credits and also interlaced into the show.... Tinker Bell flies in and waves her wand over what is being featured with a "poof" of stardust/fairy dust....
My question is... why would this be shown now?... if the "old" Tinker Bell didn't dot the "I" why is this same "clip" as I remember it being shown now placed in a different context. Are we having our noses rubbed into what we thought was correct??? This whole subject is doing my head in!!
Heres something I just found.... isn't this what we all remember??

[Amaterasu]

"Making memories..."  Hmmmmm....  Quien sabe?

[biggles]

Simon I remember exactly how it was in your clip above.

I've had it up to my back teeth now, let it come.  Pfffft. xxoo

[space otter]

My question is... why would this be shown now?

Simon   maybe it is so we can ask ourselves..
what else do i see differently?

[zorgon]

Heres something I just found.... isn't this what we all remember??

Thank you Simon

That is awesome! Yes that is what 'we' remember  Thank you for providing that clip. This is exactly what i was looking for in this thread  some hard evidence

  Saving this and will add it to the web page tonight

[ArMaP]

I don't get it, is Tinker Bell supposed to be dotting the "i" in the videos above?

[space otter]

just another log to the fire...



http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20161021-why-there-could-be-many-copies-of-you

Why there could be many identical copies of you
We ask one of the hardest questions in the Universe, is there another you out there and if so, can we find our cosmic twin?

By Melissa Hogenboom and Pierangelo Pirak
24 October 2016
This story is nominated for a Webby Award for Best Film & Video. Vote here.
BBC Earth is also nominated for a Webby, for Best Science Website. Vote here.

In theory this is not the only Universe that might exist, and in many others, identical copies of us can be found.

The question is, how do we get there?
BBC Earth's Melissa Hogenboom goes on the hunt for her cosmic twin.
Melissa Hogenboom is BBC Earth's feature writer. She is @melissasuzanneh on Twitter. Video produced by Pierangelo Pirak; he is @ppirak on twitter.

video is at link

...............................................



http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160318-why-there-might-be-many-more-universes-besides-our-own

The idea of parallel universes may seem bizarre, but physics has found all sorts of reasons why they should exist
By Philip Ball
21 March 2016
Is our Universe one of many?
The idea of parallel universes, once consigned to science fiction, is now becoming respectable among scientists – at least, among physicists, who have a tendency to push ideas to the limits of what is conceivable.

In fact there are almost too many other potential universes. Physicists have proposed several candidate forms of "multiverse", each made possible by a different aspect of the laws of physics.

The trouble is, virtually by definition we probably cannot ever visit these other universes to confirm that they exist. So the question is, can we devise other ways to test for the existence of entire universes that we cannot see or touch?

Worlds within worlds
In at least some of these alternative universes, it has been suggested, we have doppelgängers living lives much like – perhaps almost identical to – our own.
Giordano Bruno speculated that the Universe might be infinite

That idea tickles our ego and awakens our fantasies, which is doubtless why the multiverse theories, however far-out they seem, enjoy so much popularity. We have embraced alternative universes in works of fiction ranging from Philip K. Dick's The Man in the High Castle to movies like Sliding Doors.

Indeed, there is nothing new about the idea of a multiverse, as philosopher of religion Mary-Jane Rubenstein explains in her 2014 book Worlds Without End.
In the mid-16th century, Copernicus argued that the Earth is not the centre of the Universe. Several decades later, Galileo's telescope showed him stars beyond measure: a glimpse of the vastness of the cosmos.

So at the end of the 16th century, the Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno speculated that the Universe might be infinite, populated by an infinite number of inhabited worlds.


long article go to the link for the rest

[The Seeker]

How many times have we heard that truth is often stranger than fiction?  Or that it is amazing that today's science fiction becomes tomorrow's reality?

Roger Zelazny wrote the "Chronicles of Amber" about the true Earth, that cast innumerable shadows (timelines) thruout the multi-verse; does it not stand to reason that if there are many timelines, that in each one there would numerous copies of us, too?

Altho I wonder about the different personas we would encounter...

Seeker

[micjer]

....but why are we in this particular timeline?

....did we all shift at once, or just some of us and joined others that were already here. Hence the different memories in the Mandela effect theory.

....will we shift again?

[biggles]

How many times have we heard that truth is often stranger than fiction?  Or that it is amazing that today's science fiction becomes tomorrow's reality?

Roger Zelazny wrote the "Chronicles of Amber" about the true Earth, that cast innumerable shadows (timelines) thruout the multi-verse; does it not stand to reason that if there are many timelines, that in each one there would numerous copies of us, too?

Altho I wonder about the different personas we would encounter...

Seeker

I'll try and see if I can track down that book Chronicles of Amber, sounds like a very interesting read.

[The Seeker]

....but why are we in this particular timeline?

It appears that some catastrophic event did occur; whether it was in 2012 or just recently remains to be seen;I didn't start noticing major changes until approximately early last fall...

....did we all shift at once, or just some of us and joined others that were already here. Hence the different memories in the Mandela effect theory.

From what I have been able to gather, examine, and deduce, not all of us made the transition to here; on the surface it would seem that those of us that remember JC Penny instead of Penney and the Ford blue oval without the tail on the crossbar are from timeline A...

People like Delores Cannon state that many of us volunteered to be here for upcoming changes...

....will we shift again?

That remains to be seen;  did we jump to a different timeline, or are two lines becoming one?



Seeker

[biggles]

Well, when a catastrophe happened and we were then moved, we wouldn't be merging with that timeline.

[The Seeker]

I'll try and see if I can track down that book Chronicles of Amber, sounds like a very interesting read.

It is, biggsy; the first book will get your attention, titled "Nine Princes in Amber"

Enjoy 

Seeker

[The Seeker]

Well, when a catastrophe happened and we were then moved, we wouldn't be merging with that timeline.

It is hard to say, since this is all speculation at this time; all we know for certain is that things appear different than remembered to a lot of us...

Seeker