News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

A Reply From Bob Lazar!

Started by A51Watcher, April 25, 2019, 05:45:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

A51Watcher

#15
Well it appears everyone has placed their bets so here we go.

What was NOT discovered inside the craft was any wiring of any kind or anything connecting the various components.

All components were stand alone self sufficient units.

They had managed to disassemble at least one craft and in Bob's office they had the various components of the propulsion system lying around on desks and benches and they all functioned fine with no wires or connections between them. In fact you could move them around and place them elsewhere and they continued to function.

So apparently they were all connected in a wireless network. And whereas our primitive wireless networks only transmit zeros and ones, advanced Alien wireless transmits billions of volts from the reactor to components all without frying the occupants inside.

So what Bob said the other day is there are several ways to shut down the reactor, but the way they most commonly used in the lab was - turn one of of the emitters to an 80 degree angle and the reactor shuts itself down (Apparently emitters are normally in a horizontal position).

So apparently the reactor is programmed to do that if one (or any) of the emitters is seen to go offline. An 80 degree angle must be out of phase enough to qualify for this status I am guessing.



WhatTheHey

  ;D   Very cool A51, thanks for the fun!    ;D
WhatTheHey

space otter

#17

hey A51  this is a test-your-patience post because i is confused and not trying to stir any pots here

question was
QuoteFor instance - the question has been asked before around here - If the anti matter reactor has a force field around it while it is running (they bounced a golf ball off it), how do they manage to get their hands inside there to shut the reactor off?

the answer was
QuoteSo what Bob said the other day is there are several ways to shut down the reactor, but the way they most commonly used in the lab was - turn one of of the emitters to an 80 degree angle and the reactor shuts itself down (Apparently emitters are normally in a horizontal position).

So apparently the reactor is programmed to do that if one (or any) of the emitters is seen to go offline. An 80 degree angle must be out of phase enough to qualify for this status I am guessing.



see  now you have confused me and why I don't get into these threads...so I hope I can ask some questions for clarity  and not get yelled at (the way armap does when just asking for clarity)

I assumed.. and yeah I know that's a no-no  anyway  I assumed from your question of
how do they manage to get their hands inside there to shut the reactor off?

that they were outside of the craft and  these emmitters were inside
protected by this anti matter thing.. is that a correct assumption?

but from your answer it sounds like everything was outside the craft and lined up and all they had to do to turn of the one of the units 20 degrees and it all shut down
it that a correct reading of your answer?

so if they can't actually touch it ..how do they turn it enough to get the reactor to shut off?   use a pole?  toss a brick?
and how did they get it to work outside of a 'contained' area? anyway

but if that is the answer..to askew an emitter  the question is still how do they get their hands inside at all?

???

if these are all dumb questions just tell me to not ask anymore..
you know I have no problem with that  51..none at all 



A51Watcher

#18
Quote from: space otter on May 21, 2019, 10:44:30 PM
hey A51  this is a test-your-patience post because i is confused and not trying to stir any pots here

question was
the answer was


see  now you have confused me and why I don't get into these threads...so I hope I can ask some questions for clarity  and not get yelled at (the way armap does when just asking for clarity)

Of course, shoot.

I assumed.. and yeah I know that's a no-no  anyway  I assumed from your question of
how do they manage to get their hands inside there to shut the reactor off?

that they were outside of the craft and  these emmitters were inside
protected by this anti matter thing.. is that a correct assumption?

My understanding is that the force field only surrounded the reactor for a fairly short distance, a small bubble if you will, which was located in the center of the craft. All the other components were located in various areas of the craft, either in the main cabin or the lower compartment where the gravity amplifiers are located.

but from your answer it sounds like everything was outside the craft and lined up and all they had to do to turn of the one of the units 20 degrees and it all shut down
it that a correct reading of your answer?

No, see above.

so if they can't actually touch it ..how do they turn it enough to get the reactor to shut off?   use a pole?  toss a brick?
and how did they get it to work outside of a 'contained' area? anyway

but if that is the answer..to askew an emitter  the question is still how do they get their hands inside at all?

???

if these are all dumb questions just tell me to not ask anymore..
you know I have no problem with that  51..none at all

No, all good questions based on unfamiliarity with the layout of the craft.












The field you see enveloping the craft in the above image is not a force field, but a gravity distortion field.






Also I believe WhatTheHey was commenting on various components he thought were visible in the OP video.

Yes quite often we see components and gravity distortion fields visible in the shape and direction Bob described, from various filtering and the Shades Of Black process.

Most often we see the reactor and gravity amplifiers.

In one image see what appears to be the pilot sitting in one of the seats.

We have a draft version video completed on this type of evidence and have more images ready for a V2.0 film on the subject.

Hope this clarifies.

eta: I'm not sure if the force field around the reactor is a natural byproduct of it's operation, or just a wise precaution.


A51Watcher

#19
...And speaking of the gravity distortion field, I mentioned to Bob that his footage shows extreme distortion of the shape of the craft that changes radically from frame to frame, and asked if that was due to the gravity distortion field creating a gravity lensing effect like astronomers see in Hubble photos.

He smiled and said "Exactly! When the 3 gravity amplifiers power up they create spinning prism's that distort our view."

He seemed to be pleased that somebody was actually 'getting it'.  ;D



A51Watcher



And speaking of transmitting voltage on a wireless network, it is said Tesla was working on such a project -






space otter



thanks  51 for your answer
while I follow your posts with interest it is not always with understanding..and
ufo tech is not a strong suit for me so I appreciate your explanation
and I do understand more than I did

now tesla and that pic of Wardenclyffe Tower has me seeing all kinds of orbs of varying sizes in it and wondering  about them

zorgon

Quote from: A51Watcher on May 22, 2019, 12:25:43 AM

And speaking of transmitting voltage on a wireless network, it is said Tesla was working on such a project -



Just imagine the gazillions of mega watts those things would need to put out to meet today's needs... And you thought 5G will fry your brains :P

zorgon

Quote from: space otter on May 22, 2019, 12:57:04 AM
now tesla and that pic of Wardenclyffe Tower has me seeing all kinds of orbs of varying sizes in it and wondering  about them

Orbs FEED off of thunderstorms, nuclear stations, powerlines, space tethers and yes  Tesla towers :P

space otter

#24
  not to derail  A51's topic but

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=2669.msg148154;topicseen#new

pssst  does this look at all familiar?  dang aliens...bhahahahahahah
i should have said sneaky aliens..but Tesla did say he  had spoken to them..hummmmmmmmmmmm



Tesla's Magnifying "Apparatus for transmitting electrical energy" U.S. Patent 1,119,732 covered the basic function of the device used at Wardenclyffe






bigpappy51

Quote from: A51Watcher on May 19, 2019, 08:04:17 AM
Speaking of replies, this thread certainly illustrates the reason my videos are produced under the name Tumbleweed Films.

Nothing for replies but tumbleweeds and crickets around here. LOL


Anyway, I spoke with Bob for about 20 minutes today and he answered some questions with never before revealed information.

For instance - the question has been asked before around here - If the anti matter reactor has a force field around it while it is running (they bounced a golf ball off it), how do they manage to get their hands inside there to shut the reactor off?


Well Bob answered that question today, and what I would like to do is see if any members here can guess how this was accomplished since we have some pretty sharp cookies around here.

It will probably be difficult to hazard a guess for most members since no one has been able to guess up till now since the problem seems insurmountable.

So here's a hint for you -

Once I heard what the answer was, I though about it and it makes perfect sense now based on what we already know about the interior of the craft told to us.

Please post your guesses/answers here in this thread.

8)

Here's what I am sure Bob told you " Barry Turned the emitter to stop the reaction correct ?? I will await your answer...
BigPappy51

bigpappy51

The reason I know this I talked to Bob and asked him a simple question that he deemed to be one of the greatest question never asked.. I asked Bob int her tuned tube and gaseous target that antimatter(AntiHydrogen) Collides with Hydrogen what material is the came and the tuned tube and region of the gaseous target made up of? remember this tiny containment device can hold the equivalent to 20 hydrogen bombs yet not explode ??

That material would have to be something far beyond anything imaginable yet Bob and Barry were playing games with the emitter torn out of the Sport Model. So the drawings are inaccurate as well . Bob has stated on recent video that the Sport model that he worked on only ever had 2 emitters which is exactly opposite of what he told when old gene Huff sat next to him and coached him thru there story..

So lets take a look at Bob lazar talking about the Sport Model having only 2 emitters aka Gravity Amplifiers which also leads to another question. Bob will tell you int this video that these emitters were the size of 55 gallon drums. Well if one was removed why did he have to lean his half torso down in the bottom of the craft when he could have simply gone thru where the amplifier was taken from. He claims it had been removed before he became part of the project.

Years ago when coached by Huff the Emitter gravity Amplifier was taken from another craftone of the 9 and that's how Bob theorized they all had the same power plants and I'm going to prove this below. How could bobs memory be so bad ?? I think I know why..

I would star at about 10 minutes of this video and you can hear Bob talk about the so called Pipe which went to the the Gravity Amplifier bend which means the following in the lab they had the gravity amplifier taken from the Sprt Model  which Bob states after 13:30 "This flew with 2 amplifiers this was removed." The fact that the amplifier was operational in the lab is laughable guys this means it was putting off Bobs so called gravity wave and should had pushed everything away its ridiculous and also like I sia she completely contradicts himself from what he said in the beginning of this story Now the Sport Model was Missing a Gravity Amplifier when it was tested.. I would sure love to know how he could make this mistake.

LINK PLEASE WATCH the COntradictions!!


I have show a major person on here the email between myself and Bob as well about barry moving the emitter to stop the so called Annihilation but what baffles me is simple what powers the protons to be bombarded agianstthe E115 slice ?? Wheres that happen and how ? Shutting down the annihilation by moving the emitter is ridiculous considering Bob claims one was missing.......



BigPappy51

A51Watcher

Quote from: bigpappy51 on May 22, 2019, 03:47:18 AM
Here's what I am sure Bob told you " Barry Turned the emitter to stop the reaction correct ?? I will await your answer...

No he did not mention Barry what Bob said the other day is there are several ways to shut down the reactor, but the way they most commonly used in the lab was - turn one of of the emitters to an 80 degree angle and the reactor shuts itself down.


bigpappy51

Quote from: A51Watcher on May 22, 2019, 04:50:17 AM
No he did not mention Barry what Bob said the other day is there are several ways to shut down the reactor, but the way they most commonly used in the lab was - turn one of of the emitters to an 80 degree angle and the reactor shuts itself down.

I had this conversation with Bob lazar on August 14 , 2018. Im going to post it typically I wouldnt do this . Anothewr major pwerson on here knows about these emails.. The more technical I got Bob shut down he did however compliment me on questuions he had never been asked before so let me show Bobs response .


Hello *****,

We knew of one way to power down the reactor - but there are almost certainly others.
Rotating an emitter on it axis shuts the reactor off immediately. We did this by hand and I'm sure this is not the normal power-down sequence. It seems to be more of a fault sensing shutdown as there should be no reason for the cylindrical emitter to ever rotate in that fashion. Barry, my co-worker, discovered this long before I arrived on the project.
I don't recall ever mentioning (or anyone ever asking) about the shutdown procedure, so this might be the first time I've described it.
The reactor itself also was clearly load sensing, adjusting its power level depending on the emitter configuration.
How this was sensed (where the feedback loop was and how it functioned) was never found during my time there.
- Bob
United Nuclear Scientific
205 E. Grand River Rd.
Box 523
Laingsburg, MI. 48848
517-919-6019
BigPappy51

A51Watcher

Quote from: bigpappy51 on May 22, 2019, 04:12:49 AM
The reason I know this I talked to Bob and asked him a simple question that he deemed to be one of the greatest question never asked.. I asked Bob int her tuned tube and gaseous target that antimatter(AntiHydrogen) Collides with Hydrogen what material is the came and the tuned tube and region of the gaseous target made up of?

"I asked Bob int her tuned tube" Could you retype this please? I do not know what you mean.
Also "Hydrogen what material is the came and the tuned tube" is baffling and needs a retype.



remember this tiny containment device can hold the equivalent to 20 hydrogen bombs yet not explode ??

That material would have to be something far beyond anything imaginable

Yes it would

yet Bob and Barry were playing games with the emitter torn out of the Sport Model.

Yes but the emitter is not explosive like the reactor so your comparison makes no sense.

So the drawings are inaccurate as well . Bob has stated on recent video that the Sport model that he worked on only ever had 2 emitters which is exactly opposite of what he told when old gene Huff sat next to him and coached him thru there story..

Well obviously he was referring to the original configuration of the craft, not it's current state in the lab.

So lets take a look at Bob lazar talking about the Sport Model having only 2 emitters aka Gravity Amplifiers which also leads to another question. Bob will tell you int this video that these emitters were the size of 55 gallon drums. Well if one was removed why did he have to lean his half torso down in the bottom of the craft when he could have simply gone thru where the amplifier was taken from. He claims it had been removed before he became part of the project.


I think you are confusing emitters with amplifiers. they are not aka as you stated. They are 2 different components. The test where he saw the sports model lift up a short ways then sit back down could easily be accomplished with only 1 amplifier let alone 2.

Years ago when coached by Huff the Emitter gravity Amplifier was taken from another craftone of the 9 and that's how Bob theorized they all had the same power plants and I'm going to prove this below. How could bobs memory be so bad ?? I think I know why..

YYou are assuming there would be a hole in the floor to look through. Do we know this to be fact?

I would star at about 10 minutes of this video and you can hear Bob talk about the so called Pipe which went to the the Gravity Amplifier bend which means the following in the lab they had the gravity amplifier taken from the Sprt Model  which Bob states after 13:30 "This flew with 2 amplifiers this was removed." The fact that the amplifier was operational in the lab is laughable guys this means it was putting off Bobs so called gravity wave and should had pushed everything away its ridiculous and also like I sia she completely contradicts himself from what he said in the beginning of this story Now the Sport Model was Missing a Gravity Amplifier when it was tested.. I would sure love to know how he could make this mistake.

See above. I'm sure he would explain your mistaken assumptions if you would ask nicely. He is a very approachable nice person if you are polite and ask nicely.

LINK PLEASE WATCH the COntradictions!!


I have show a major person on here the email between myself and Bob as well about barry moving the emitter to stop the so called Annihilation but what baffles me is simple what powers the protons to be bombarded agianstthe E115 slice ?? Wheres that happen and how ? Shutting down the annihilation by moving the emitter is ridiculous considering Bob claims one was missing.......

Being baffled by this technology is a common reaction by primitives like ourselves. I'm sure your perceived contradictions are mistaken and easily explained.