News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Climate Change

Started by astr0144, May 05, 2021, 06:16:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

astr0144

In ref to some of the Conspiracy Theories going around... Along with some relating to the Present Corona Virus / and its Vaccination program...

Some well known theorist also make similar conspiracies connected to references to Agenda 21 and Climate Change or Environment concerns.

This is some posts I came across recently..in ref to Climate Change.. and I wonder how they may compare with any updates over the last 20 years , since year 2000 to present 2020/2021.

This makes a ref to Greenland Ice Core temperatures over 10,000 years since year 2000.
and the chart shows how the Temperature has varied and how things were of year 2000 AD.



https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/nature/climate-change-history-the-fall-of-empires-come-when-warming-turns-of-cooling/

This shows a ref to How WORLD Global Temperatures have been over a 4,500 year period.
(This could be seen as different to just Ice Core Temperatures from Greenland)



There is a ref on this website that shows almost  the same chart that suggests its fake data
...

https://medium.com/big-picture/talking-to-climate-deniers-514177e31888



https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/are-we-headed-into-another-ice-age/

Since year 2000... I think I had seen suggestions that in the last 20 years... upto 2020... that there has been quite a severe increase in temperatures both from Greenlands Ice Cores and Globally

Then this website shows some further charts...that maybe slightly more updated. such as this..
but initially I thought that maybe it seems to still show only upto about year 2000... but maybe at a Higher temperature than other charts that show upto year 2000.

However on a closer look...I think it does go past the year 2000..
but I am NOT sure if they are suggesting the Charts Increase in Temperature is suggested as real or just estimated..

There are references to year 2009 and 2018..but its hard to say if the charts rapid increase in Temperature is actuall relating to any of those data..


But I dont think It shows actual more  real time temperatures  upto 2020/21

Unless you may think different !



https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-what-greenland-ice-cores-say-about-past-and-present-climate-change

I cannot seem to find any updated data so far that shows what the 2020 / 2021 temperatures may now be showing so that we can try to compare what may have actually occurred in the last 20 years.

I just thought I would create this and see if we can find some updated data to compare what the reality maybe..


kevin

The village I live in had a reenactment of a civil war battle in the mid 1600s some years ago, I can remember asking why they were wearing such thick and heavy wool clothes in june ( when the battle was), they had to keep it authentic due to it been a mini ice age then.
I have some great photos of the pike men queuing for ice creams as they were nearly passing out

The global warming crap is all part of the menticide fear tactics, that is leading to zer great reset where You vill obey.

The present lull in covid is to suit the elections taking place and to then come back strong in the autumn, then the fear will really hit everyone and they will clamour for booster injections  like little obedient slaves.

All hail the great reset.

Kevin

kevin

What actually creates heat and cold??????

It is very similar to how a fridge works with compression and de compression involved.

You are indoctrinated with the tale that the sun is a great big ball of heat , but space is hardly hot?????

The heat and cold actually are consequences of the ratio between compression and de compression, heat and light are not BEAMING from the sun, light and heat occur relative to the balance between the compression and de compression of consciousness, and this is why the polar regions are cold and the equator region hot.

Kevin

astr0144

#3
There are previous various related posts or past similar threads  made over the years that are posted on the Forum..

But I am not sure I had noticed any more updated ones that I took note off...or may had missed..


But whether its all a Hoax or Not..


I think some of the material we find online could be valid and genuine.... but no doubt some could be False.
Whether we can determine which may be the question ?

But I would like to try to be able to make a more valid judgement...
Ive seen a few main theories that oppose each other...as to what the Future of the Earths Climate may do...

Dr Coleman made a recent post that showed how some of the past prior theories from so called expert Scientists over the last 20 years...have now been shown to be well and truely incorrect...
They have been doing this over and over for some time now...and proven wrong so far..

I have not researched to see if these statements may had been really made or not...but this is what he claims has been said by certain Organisations we are maybe led to believe or expected or  supposed to trust...

Quote
`Predictions and forecasts made by climate change `scientists' have been woefully inaccurate – consistently.

Back in 2007, the WWF told us that we had five years to save the world. The Climate Change Hysterics told us that the English county of Cornwall would be a desert by 2010. In 2011, the International Energy Agency said we had five years to avoid Armageddon. In 2017, the United Nations said we had three years left and in that same year the International Energy Agency also said we had three years left.

In 2013, a Cambridge professor called Peter Wadhams said that we had until 2015 before all the Arctic ice disappeared. Mind you, he was optimistic compared to Gordon Brown who, in 2009, taking a tea-break from buggering up the British economy, told us that we had just 50 days to save the planet. And in 2004, the readers of The Observer were warned that by 2020, Britons would be living in a Siberian climate, though I'm not sure how they fitted that into the `global warming' theory. Eleven years ago Prince Charles said that we had eight years left to save the planet.


Quote

The global warming enthusiasts like to pretend that they are supporting a `science'. But they aren't. There is no proof that global warming is happening or, if it does, that it is man-made.

Global warming is the deliberately invented hoax upon which the myth of the covid-19 pandemic was built.

(Enthusiasts changed the name of the fraud from `global warming' to `climate change' when it became apparent that global warming simply wasn't happening. When `global cooling' proved to be equally unlikely they settled on the middle of the road phrase `climate change'.)

The following material is taken from Greta's Homework by Zina Cohen and published here with permission.

`Predictions and forecasts made by climate change `scientists' have been woefully inaccurate – consistently.

Back in 2007, the WWF told us that we had five years to save the world. The Climate Change Hysterics told us that the English county of Cornwall would be a desert by 2010. In 2011, the International Energy Agency said we had five years to avoid Armageddon. In 2017, the United Nations said we had three years left and in that same year the International Energy Agency also said we had three years left.

Some of these merry doomsters are relatively cautious and merely claim that our planet will be unliveable within a generation. Others are far more specific. Greta Thunberg recently announced that we had eight years left to save the planet. I don't think she explained why it was eight and not seven or nine years before the Four Horsemen would ride into view in their electric cars. It seems to me bizarre that a relatively uneducated girl with no scientific background feels able to be so dogmatic. Is it at all possible that someone is feeding her opinions, I wonder? An American politician called Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is more optimistic. Last year she said we have twelve years left before something will happen. In 2013, a Cambridge professor called Peter Wadhams said that we had until 2015 before all the Arctic ice disappeared. Mind you, he was optimistic compared to Gordon Brown who, in 2009, taking a tea-break from buggering up the British economy, told us that we had just 50 days to save the planet. And in 2004, the readers of The Observer were warned that by 2020, Britons would be living in a Siberian climate, though I'm not sure how they fitted that into the `global warming' theory. Eleven years ago Prince Charles said that we had eight years left to save the planet so you might imagine that the heir to the throne would be hiding in a cupboard feeling rather embarrassed since there is clearly now no point whatsoever in doing anything to oppose the terror which awaits. However, Charles is made of sterner stuff than most of us and he is continuing with his scaremongering without allowing his past predictions to interfere with his latest prosetylizing.

All this wild, scary stuff merely proves that the whole global warming/climate change thing is a hoax, an international scam of Brobdingnagian proportions. Despite the evidence, the Mythmakers will doubtless keep going with their predictions. And, of course, making a prediction about the end of the world is a great way to get publicity and pick up more Twitter, Instagram and Facebook followers. The trick, it seems, is to pick a date a few years ahead and then hope that by the time we get there everyone will have forgotten what you said.'

Taken from Greta's Homework by Zina Cohen.

astr0144

#4
There are some things that can seem questionable or maybe hard to understand in ref to how the Sun heats up the Earth... when we have 93 Million Miles worth of Very Cold Space and partial vaccuum  in between the Sun and Earth.

But also the Sun is like one huge type of Nuclear Fusion reaction...that I assume sends out forms of severe radiation  heat to warm up the inbetween space somehow..

I had thought also maybe Suggested Solar activity... forms of light and Radiation... infared, ultra violet , etc .
or when certain types of radiation hits our Earths atmosphere... It heats up our planet..

when the Nuclear Fusion of the Sun Occurs and form radiation activity... that then travels at the Speed of Light and has NO resitance in space to slow it down in any way due to the vaccum in space.. so  the radiation is part of the Electo magnetic spectrum and maybe seen as a form of a Light wave (or partical). and it reaches the Earth within about 8 minutes..where it hits the Earths atmosphere and this is then a form of resistance towards the radiation where it heats up the Molecules within the Earths atmosphere.

QuoteThe sun heats the earth through radiation. Since there is no medium (like the gas in our atmosphere) in space, radiation is the primary way that heat travels in space. When the heat reaches the earth it warms the molecules of the atmosphere, and they warm other molecules and so on. This heat transfer is called conduction.


QuoteThe Sun is the star at the center of the Solar System. It is a nearly perfect sphere of hot plasma,[18][19] heated to incandescence by nuclear fusion reactions in its core, radiating the energy mainly as visible light and infrared radiation. It is by far the most important source of energy for life on Earth. Its diameter is about 1.39 million kilometres (864,000 miles), or 109 times that of Earth. Its mass is about 330,000 times that of Earth, and accounts for about 99.86% of the total mass of the Solar System.[20] Roughly three quarters of the Sun's mass consists of hydrogen (~73%); the rest is mostly helium (~25%), with much smaller quantities of heavier elements, including oxygen, carbon, neon, and iron.[21]

The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][14][22] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process.


but you maybe also be right in relation to forms of Compression.

Quote from: kevin on May 05, 2021, 06:40:08 PM
What actually creates heat and cold??????

It is very similar to how a fridge works with compression and de compression involved.

You are indoctrinated with the tale that the sun is a great big ball of heat , but space is hardly hot?????

The heat and cold actually are consequences of the ratio between compression and de compression, heat and light are not BEAMING from the sun, light and heat occur relative to the balance between the compression and de compression of consciousness, and this is why the polar regions are cold and the equator region hot.

Kevin

kevin

#5
Everything spirals.
The sun is on a spiral pathway, as are all the planets.
The consequences of this is a cyclic wave of compression and de compression.
In our instance it forms light and darkness, but the variations form out over vast time spans.

Nikola tesla knew that light and heat occur, and that We could interact with this but He was silenced.

The present garbage about global warming is to instill guilt upon everyone, to add into agenda of total control over humans.

Don't buy this lie.

Try to learn about Walter Russell..

https://www.philosophy.org/store/p1/The_Universal_One.html#/



Kevin

astr0144

#6
In ref to what you said below Kevin,
Do you see anything in the form of Radiation from the Sun as what aids to heating the Earth ?
You say both heat and Light ae NOT beaming from the Sun. and you refer to a form of Compression / de - Compression of Consciousness.

Can you explain more what you mean by Consciousness....
Are you referring it as a form of consciousness in relation from the Sun... or Our Human form of Consciousness ?

Would the Earths equator not be warmer as its closer to the Sun than what the Poles tend to be..if the Poles are on a 23 degree axis.. and dependent upon the time of the year as to how the poles postions maybe if the Earth is on some form of Horizonal orbit around the Sun.

QuoteThe heat and cold actually are consequences of the ratio between compression and de compression, heat and light are not BEAMING from the sun, light and heat occur relative to the balance between the compression and de compression of consciousness, and this is why the polar regions are cold and the equator region hot.


You make a good point about the Sun / Earth / planets and Solar system on a spiral pathway

I only posted a video on that a few weeks ago if you recall...  But I will admitt I overlooked referring to that in what I posted on this thread topic so far...

Are we or you  sort of referring to Yin and Yan , light and dark or opposites..in terms of the Cyclic waves..

I dont think I am buying the Lie as such...as I am aware of the various theories.. which I think you now would consider..after many other questionable things that we had prior discussed... but wanting to try to research into it... and to clarify with facts to question all the things we are being bombarded with by Govts and So called Scientists...

The Walter Russel Link you posted at a quick browse so far looks very interesting..
I have to ask or assume that you have the book or have read it ?

I found another link to another book he wrote on "The Secret Of Light".. that offers a Free Chapter from the book.

where on a very quick browse I have seen so far.. may well explain some of the things that you refer to..

The Problem maybe that it may well be only those of the highest Intellect would understand it...if the Likes of Tesla said
he should hide the Information for a 1000 years as mankind was not ready for it.

It makes certain references...that may take some study to try to understand... such as

Light Does Not Travel.
The sunlight we feel upon our bodies is not actual light from the sun.
The light and heat that appear to come from the star or sun have never left the star or sun.
The rate of vibration in a wave field depends upon its volume. Vibration in a wave field means the pulse of interchange between its compressed core and the space surrounding that core.

Does he make other referrences to Gravity I wonder ?

This statement I find very interesting..

"All Matter is Constructed by Light Rings "
Electricity records mind Thoughts in rings of Light which spin around a magnetic centre of invisible light.
All Motion in the Universe spins around mind centres which becomes shafts as motion extends.


From The Secret of Light – Chapter XII
https://www.philosophy.org/light.html#/

Quote from: kevin on May 05, 2021, 08:59:40 PM
Everything spirals.
The sun is on a spiral pathway, as are all the planets.
The consequences of this is a cyclic wave of compression and de compression.
In our instance it forms light and darkness, but the variations form out over vast time spans.

Nikola tesla knew that light and heat occur, and that We could interact with this but He was silenced.

The present garbage about global warming is to instill guilt upon everyone, to add into agenda of total control over humans.

Don't buy this lie.
Try to learn about Walter Russell..

https://www.philosophy.org/store/p1/The_Universal_One.html#/
Kevin

kevin

#7
I have studied Russell for years trying to come to terms with my dowsing abilities, and it is all in the link You provided.

"Light upon light, God guides whom He will to his light."
http://www.mquran.org/content/view/2826/4/

Lots of ways of saying that quote, and multiple interpretations.

I saw that quote in the British museum and simply froze, and knew so much.

This is an electric universe in a sea of consciousness.

All is one.

Kevin

ArMaP

Global warming (or climate change, for those that appear to be offended by the expression "global warming", usually the ones that think locally and ignore the "global") has been happening for many years.

The first time I read about it was around 30 years ago, when it wasn't "fashionable" to talk about global warming. In recent years we have see in Europe several examples of how the weather, in general is getting warmer (or milder), we tropical plant diseases reaching the south of Europe (Italy) and the northern regions with better (or starting to have) production of grapes, for example (like in the south of England).

As usual, some people saw in it a way of making money, so they started, as we say in Portugal, to "put the fire under their sardine", bending the facts according to what was best for them.

Is global warming a result of man's actions? I doubt, but not doing a thing doesn't appear to be a good solution. Sure, for most people global warming means just some changes in local weather (some getting colder, as strange as it may sound), but for those living on the areas that may be more affected it may make a big difference.

ArMaP

Quote from: kevin on May 05, 2021, 06:40:08 PM
You are indoctrinated with the tale that the sun is a great big ball of heat , but space is hardly hot?????
Vacuum does not get hot, that's how thermos bottles work.

QuoteThe heat and cold actually are consequences of the ratio between compression and de compression, heat and light are not BEAMING from the sun, light and heat occur relative to the balance between the compression and de compression of consciousness, and this is why the polar regions are cold and the equator region hot.
What creates that supposed "compression of consciousness"?

kevin

#10
Quote from: ArMaP on May 06, 2021, 12:43:11 AM
Vacuum does not get hot, that's how thermos bottles work.
What creates that supposed "compression of consciousness"?

A vacuum is not nothing as assumed, it is a lack of 3D creation.
The outside of a thermos bottle does not heat up, as the surface of the Earth does.

SPIN creates the compression at all scale, it's an inward spiral that also outrushes upon a spiral route.
The central zone is what is termed as a black hole.
Viktor schauberger knew this.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=vikto+schauberger&docid=607991077987291365&mid=CE0045DCED16D207D4ACCE0045DCED16D207D4AC&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

There is no gravity involved, as so called gravity is a consequence of the ratio between implosion over outrush, so is light and so is heat.

I can follow all of this via dowsing locally at geometric compression locations, here our megalithic ancestors located their dolmens etc, and later churches were built over the same locations.

You can feel a chill at some of these locations.

Kevin

astr0144

#11
I agree that at least in the western World, and much of Europe... that there certainly has been several mild winters over the last 20 years.

and I dont disagree that the NOW Much higher World Populations could be seen as causes for higher levels of Industrial Production that creates more pollution.

So there is that arguement for concern...which no doubt many people are probably considering when considering if its a much as a concern as we are being informed about.

Environment Pollution no doubt is a huge concern.. in terms of things like Plastics and contamination of  Land and water.
and effects on All living species on the planet .
But that does not nessessarily mean its Climate or Global Warming related to the extent we are being subjected to from the likes of the media and Governments.

Also if they have removed a lot of  likes of the Amazon Rain Forest and other forseted and tree areas and not replaced those or other areas for new trees to regrow for the future... then that certainly could be an extra arguement for further concerns..

When you look at past Hisory and the type of Charts I posted anywhere from 1000 to 10,000 years.

I wonder now where the average real temperatures may be on those charts for 2020/21.
Are those past History Temperature  Charts likely to be correct or do they show false data  ?
IF they are correct within reason... then unless I can see evidence that the temperature now is shown as being higher than some of the past high peaks... then I do not as yet see it as a concern.

I have seen charts (inc one I posted ) that suggest in the last 20 years that the Average temperatures have soared.
but I am not aware that they have reached past peaks from the last 3000 to 10,000 years.

If it was say  Astronomical related... say due to Earth being closer to the Sun...
that may had been the case for past peaks... then they may have  seemed to be relatively short term.

There was a theory that if the North Pole Ice caps melt... that it will effect or destroy the Gulf Stream.. and alter it..
that may then put Europe back into an Ice age...(As they say that the Gulf Stream is what has kept Europe mild with winds or seas coming from the Gulf of Mexico around Florida USA area) that was suggested maybe back before year 2000... in which they thought we may have an ice age in Europe by 2020 if I recall correctly..

The theory does seem feasable or possible IMO.. but at the same time Im not sure that they can really predict what would happen to the Gulf Stream. or if it may disappear entirely or just alter how it relates to Europe.


QuoteArMaP
Is global warming a result of man's actions? I doubt, but not doing a thing doesn't appear to be a good solution. Sure, for most people global warming means just some changes in local weather (some getting colder, as strange as it may sound), but for those living on the areas that may be more affected it may make a big difference.

astr0144

#12
From what some of the Comments that you make Kevin,
Would you say that Walter Russel was relating his theories with Religion ?

Its very early days for me at the moment to have tried to study or understand his work or ideas.
but from some of the things that I have observed so far...

I think I am curious of the Idea of Various forms of matter..or light Rings.. be it Atoms or Photons of Light..or even human or even maybe Animal Mind  thoughts if seen as a form of Light Rings ... being effected by forms of magnetism ( maybe the Earths or would it be a form of the Universe Magnetism) where you can relate also to atom type Spin effects...or an Electric Universe.

Suggesting things like.. Light does not travel... and maybe that our Human Conciousness may make us think that it may travel.. or somehow see the effects of what we think could had been the effects of say radiation or heat travel say from the Sun to the Earth... YET that in relality that may not be the case.. and that the outcome is from Our Minds or Conciousness..

Then that is seeming quite hard to comprehend at the moment for me.
BUT I am also aware the Consciousness maybe one of the Biggest Mysteries that we have been trying to understand.


Quote from: kevin on May 05, 2021, 10:32:36 PM
I have studied Russell for years trying to come to terms with my dowsing abilities, and it is all in the link You provided.

"Light upon light, God guides whom He will to his light."
http://www.mquran.org/content/view/2826/4/

Lots of ways of saying that quote, and multiple interpretations.

I saw that quote in the British museum and simply froze, and knew so much.

This is an electric universe in a sea of consciousness.

All is one.

Kevin

kevin

I recognise in Walter russell principles of yin/yang that which is detectable via dowsing.
I am therefore relaying My own findings , but do not have the wordsmith skills.

It is very difficult to think in a multi dimensional manner, and here I have the ultimate advantage of been able to detect the very matrix that the multiverse operates upon.

This is IMHO a super high frequency carrier system that consciousness spins about in both directions ( yin/yang)
We are part of the 3D compression of multiple dimensions all in the same location, but We assume it is the only dimension and base all our science on this, this is the great flaw.

We have no need for the current so called energy devices, they are not energy devices, this is an electric universe of boundless potential of yin/yang spin.

Our flawed science has led us into a dead end, with all our industries built to make profits for the few.

We need to operate as nature does, instead We operate against it.
http://www.rexresearch.com/russellcoil/russellcoil.htm


Kevin



ArMaP

Quote from: kevin on May 06, 2021, 06:21:03 PM
We are part of the 3D compression of multiple dimensions all in the same location, but We assume it is the only dimension and base all our science on this, this is the great flaw.
Science doesn't assume it is only one dimension.