A Reason I Received Why Electrogravitics is "Dangerous"

[Linda Brown]

And no Mikado I was not the one who complained. Linda

[Mikado]

And no Mikado I was not the one who complained. Linda

sure....sure...


wanna buy a bridge? <g>

Mikado

[Linda Brown]

We were talking about Paul going back and finally publishing the book. He " threw up his hands in January of 09.... made arrangements to publish the manuscript unedited a few weeks later.... don't know when that finally happened.

But he had FINISHED the book which he had been posting on line, chapter at a time.... nearly a year earlier. I foolishly thought that he was just taking the time to sort of decompress and totally believed him when he repeated that he was getting ready for the rewrite and that we could address some of the issues that I was worried about then.

One of my concerns was that he had ( after we signed our contract) actually taken it upon himself to write about "Morgan " and me.... drawing from what I had told him and from my journal notes.... this was not part of our agreement .... and I was uncomfortable with alot of that private information going out there like that. For other reasons too.... Paul had no contract with me to tell MY story. The agreement that he had with me was ONLY to tell Dads..... so yes... I was not exceptionally happy with the intrusion into my personal life and was counting on him removing much of it.

That's my side of it. I am wondering what spin you will have on that Mikado since you seem to think that the book should have had a better " due diligence" I totally agree with you here. Those sections that spoke of the love affair that I had going with Morgan had no business in a biography of Thomas Townsend Brown.

Linda

[hobbit]

Here:

I see no point in claiming something is a consequence of something that You cannot explain.
hobbit

By saying that I cannot explain something is the prelude to an argument and I will not begin any conversation with you for you are VERY argumentative.

Mikado

<<<SNIPPED>>>

I merely wanted to debate what is involved with the thread subject....electrogravitics and it's dangers.
If We don't fully understand what voltage is, and what gravity is, then how stupid could one be to start playing about with the very basic building blocks of LIFE.
hobbit

[Linda Brown]

"then how stupid could one be to start playing about with the very basic building blocks of LIFE.
hobbit"

Pretty dumb Hobbit. But I am sure that there are those out there willing to do it.... and so sure of themselves that they think that they can get away without any consequences. I am not so sure. And I don't think that you are either. I will stick with the cautious Hobbit. <g>  Linda

[hobbit]

"then how stupid could one be to start playing about with the very basic building blocks of LIFE.
hobbit"

Pretty dumb Hobbit. But I am sure that there are those out there willing to do it.... and so sure of themselves that they think that they can get away without any consequences. I am not so sure. And I don't think that you are either. I will stick with the cautious Hobbit. <g>  Linda

We may be been given a very clear demonstration of how anyone stupid enough to throw a switch on something without comprehending the local consequences.... is affected by such??

I know I keep blathering on about memory, but just suppose that a persons personal memory field could be jepordised and corrupted by been exposed to the local affects of an electrogravitic device???

They may become paranoid in the extreme??
And You know that ...paranoia will always annoy ya.

If segments of their memory become erased, and infilled with differing information, they may begin to think even those closest to them are aginst them??

They may begin to see shadows in the brightest of rooms?
hobbit

[Linda Brown]

And enemies where once loving friends stood. I gotcha.  Linda

[Littleenki]

Hobbit said

"They may begin to see shadows in the brightest of rooms?"

Maybe the gigantic ego of someone blocking the light?

Cheers, Hobbit
Le

[zorgon]

well erm.  i have 300 pages of data on the subject in a thread on ats,called "stargates are real" but it's very hard to read because as time goes on, i learn new info and change some of my theories, other people chime in and either add to it, or try to debunk it, arguments ensue, i throw temper tantrums, so by the end of the thread (if you make it that far) you'd feel like you need a vacation or something.  it's emotionally exhausting and very frustrating to read.

I know the feeling well. My Roswell thread on there is like 27 pages what with all the nonsense that interrupts the topic.

The exact same thread I posted here in which I simply deleted all the exterraneous bs is only like 8 pages. lol

Ah yes  I am doing the same with many of my old threads and locking them with a sticky for that same reason.

We have ALL worked hard on those threads for years and the info just gets lost and buried. My stargate material is 42 pages just my posts alone in that "Stargates are Real" thread and Russo already moved 25 pages to the workshop here. Many of those posts though are chit chat and repeated info.

What we need is someone to do an outline and summary of that thread like someone did with Sleeper's mega thread Perhaps I can pay someone to do that professionally and then we can keep it as a reference PDF

But while we are at it... the same thing is happening here... 

Somehow we are talking Sumerians in the electrogravitic threads

This topic is already getting so huge that members are having real issues following the information. And the ongoing Hatfields vs McCoys feud is not helping. In fact it is having the effect of people focusing more on the soap opera aspect than the research and data on the topic.  (you should see my emails and PMs)

We may need to hire someone to do a summary of facts in this area as well

I know its a conspiracy forum and I know that because of that things can get heated... but other members are just seeing the fight and losing sight of the topic

[zorgon]

It is not dangerous except as We choose to misuse it.

uh huh  and since when has mankind ever been able to resist using new technology as a weapon first?

We discovered fire... we found that we could use it to burn our enemies

We discovered Oil Tars  Long before we dreamed of it as fuel we used it to pour burning hot oil on people attacking our castles

We created atomic energy, the first thing we did was nuke two cities

Beside you tell me EG can provide unlimited free power...

History tells us that unlimited power corrupts absolutely 90% of the human race at this time cannot be trusted to handle such immense power 'for the good of all'

That doesn't mean we shouldn't try, but we can't just drop it on joe public without safeguurds either

Secret Societies were originally set up NOT to hide knowledge but to TEACH it wisely... and to protect it from the then current PTB

Unfortunately some (but not all) went to the Dark Side

[Linda Brown]

Ah yes  I am doing the same with many of my old threads and locking them with a sticky for that same reason.

We have ALL worked hard on those threads for years and the info just gets lost and buried. My stargate material is 42 pages just my posts alone in that "Stargates are Real" thread and Russo already moved 25 pages to the workshop here. Many of those posts though are chit chat and repeated info.

What we need is someone to do an outline and summary of that thread like someone did with Sleeper's mega thread Perhaps I can pay someone to do that professionally and then we can keep it as a reference PDF

But while we are at it... the same thing is happening here... 

Somehow we are talking Sumerians in the electrogravitic threads

This topic is already getting so huge that members are having real issues following the information.

Zorgon you said.....And the ongoing Hatfields vs McCoys feud is not helping. In fact it is having the effect of people focusing more on the soap opera aspect than the research and data on the topic.  (you should see my emails and PMs)



I have to say something  because I think that it is possible that you folks are missing what may be actually happening here....I agree that a certain amount of " stick to the topic" is important. I have had it happen before when I thought that we were talking about electrogravitational stuff and suddenly we were baking pies!.... but there is an odd sort of thing going on here that we have to be careful not to thwart just because we don't recognize it when it is happening. One person on a long ago thread likened it to us all being windchimes and having this special mystical wind blowing through.... invisibile of course but certainly there.... if you make those windchimes stationary... or lock them down and don't allow them the freedom to swing in WHAT LOOKS LIKE A RANDOM PATTERN then you lose the sound that they make when the wind hits them and I think we are all a little bit like this wonderful orchestra..... anyway.... trying to get enough wisdom to realize what is happening here....and I would ask that we all be a little careful about what we might be inhibiting . We don't know what this communication is yet folks.... it would be a shame to slam a door in its face because we don't understand.

Zorgon if you feel the " Hatfield and McCoy" drama is NOT helping to uncover some interesting facts and fruitful facts about the dangers of electrogravitics and where it has been and where it is going then please point me to a discussion that is closer to the heart of the matter? Do you really feel that the discussion here is not helping to explore the dangers of electrogravitics to the world? I am just following the rules and dealing with the situation the best way that I can.... show me how I can improve. Our so called " feud:" is more on topic than most here. Feuding as we may be Mikado and I are right in the middle of some important work here... and it is the topic.

We may need to hire someone to do a summary of facts in this area as well

I know its a conspiracy forum and I know that because of that things can get heated... but other members are just seeing the fight and losing sight of the topic

The fight IS the topic......One way of looking at it. If you have developed or are developing such a force where are your respponsibilities? Could it be possible that this Forum is becoming an instrument to work all of that out? You can call it all drama if you want but are you actually seeing what may be going on here. I may be dense sometimes but I am not entirely stupid and I think that these are important conversations.  Linda

[zorgon]

Why? So I will get another warning? I am at 25% now and I don't want anymore. I don't even know what I did to get it in the first place but I can bet it was YOU that complained.
Not taking the bait.

It stands as it stands. IP's Linda, IP's don't lie, especially over time and across to another forum.

IP   means unless you are using a proxy server, your IP leaves a trace where ever you go. Its how forums can ban and block people. Its also how we check new members if they are spammers or otherwise naughty around the net

[Linda Brown]

If Mikado were specific about what IPs worry him so much perhaps there are simple explanations.... or if not simple at least might clarify his concerns. As it is right now I only see him declaring broadcast inuendo... which is aimed at somehow clouding my credibility.

This latest was a near threat that he could expose me somehow because a poster by the name of JD Barrett happened to have the same IP as this. I am assuming thats what he was saying but of course he never actually came out with that charge. He is very good at not being specific so that he does not have to answer specifically himself.

His actions surprise me because Mikado I thought was was an engineer well versed in Internet stuff.... and as such I would think that there may be other explanations for someone posting from the same address. Lets see how many of them could there be?

GEE.... sorry if I sound a bit simplistic but wouldn't that include the possibility that this JDBarrett was sitting right here at my desk when he posted that?  Just asking .

Its just ONE of the many possibilities and I am not even sure which one is Mikados favorite! But the scenarios that he favors are always derogatory in my direction. WHY IS THAT?

Linda

[hobbit]

Keeping totally on topic.

Given that electrogravitics may be dangerous, and possibly the ultimate of secrets upon this planet, and maybe much further afield also?
Could it possibly be that such as the fictional named JDBarrett when posting upon the hut ,  had the ability to route via Lindas Ip address, as others involved may have also .

That this then been noted by I assume Fred???
led to the suspicion that Linda was all of these people all at once??

Paranoia runs riot.

hobbit

[Mikado]

If Mikado were specific about what IPs worry him so much perhaps there are simple explanations.... or if not simple at least might clarify his concerns. As it is right now I only see him declaring broadcast inuendo... which is aimed at somehow clouding my credibility.

This latest was a near threat that he could expose me somehow because a poster by the name of JD Barrett happened to have the same IP as this. I am assuming thats what he was saying but of course he never actually came out with that charge. He is very good at not being specific so that he does not have to answer specifically himself.

His actions surprise me because Mikado I thought was was an engineer well versed in Internet stuff.... and as such I would think that there may be other explanations for someone posting from the same address. Lets see how many of them could there be?

GEE.... sorry if I sound a bit simplistic but wouldn't that include the possibility that this JDBarrett was sitting right here at my desk when he posted that?  Just asking .

Its just ONE of the many possibilities and I am not even sure which one is Mikados favorite! But the scenarios that he favors are always derogatory in my direction. WHY IS THAT?

Linda

That excuse is getting really old Linda.

Ask yourself, why would the PTB want to route so many different individuals through your IP? It makes no common sense for it would draw unwanted attention to you and disclose your location which at time, you were using a pseudonym to remain anonymous. They would have been doing you no favors for they would have been exposing you.

This is getting old and is NOT on topic regardless of what another poster has said. And to bring up Fred in a forum where he isn't and where it has no bearing on the topic is just casting aspersions and not nice ones.

Mikado