A Reason I Received Why Electrogravitics is "Dangerous"

[Mikado]

Don't think EMP might disrupt EG In Townsend Brown Electrogravitic communication it Said it can penetrate throw every thing (also some articles, which is at the thomastownsendbrown website), plus he showed it can pass through EM shield. if they penetrate throw objects like a "g"wave then it should go throw EMP as well as solar wind.

I have to disagree with you Mikado, if that's not enough for you then fine, But I disagree

You missed the point.

The electronics to generate the frequency are still EM based. EMP will destroy them and thus you will not have a transmitter.

Disagree. It is what it is. The difference between EG and EM is the propagation of the wave. And that is determined by the final transmitter. Prior to that, the electronics are the same.

Mikado

[dcooper]

OH Mikado can you read and reply on Electrogravitics & UFO propulsion 1/3 on page two my reply #22, I would love to hear from you, Thanks dcooper

[SarK0Y]

Disagree. It is what it is. The difference between EG and EM is the propagation of the wave. And that is determined by the final transmitter. Prior to that, the electronics are the same.

Mikado

Mikado, do ye really think that so-called EG is something different than EM effects?

[Amaterasu]

SarK, it definitely IS different, though there is a relationship.  Electromagnetogravitics...  All three are intimately connected, but each expresses in separate ways. 

[Littleenki]

Does anyone else smell cheesesteak farts?

[SarK0Y]

SarK, it definitely IS different, though there is a relationship.  Electromagnetogravitics...  All three are intimately connected, but each expresses in separate ways.

Amaterasu, what is reason to think so??? where ever were experiments on the LEO to measure forces precisely? no magic to use magnetic field of the Earth to repulse Gravity.

[dcooper]

There is a relationship/coupling between electricity and Gravity & charge - mass, so yes it does have a relation between EG and EM but also with gravity
But Townsend Brown never went or discovered how magnetic and Electromagnetic might be coupled to Gravity but it is obvious that there is.

[Amaterasu]

Amaterasu, what is reason to think so??? where ever were experiments on the LEO to measure forces precisely? no magic to use magnetic field of the Earth to repulse Gravity.

I highly recommend reading Dr. Paul A. LaViolette's Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion...  Unless You are not mathematically challenged like I am - in which case, read His Subquantum Kinetics.  (Too many squigglies for Me in that last work...)

Also read My thread, Electrogravitics - A Simplified Description here:  http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=1308.0

That last is My own based on LaViolette's work.

[Linda Brown]

Dad was never able to have some of his work verified and published... especially.... the stuff that you are probably most interested in

but I do recall him spending thousands of dollars having SRI run back up tests on things that we had already done.

I found that discouraging but he said that it was necessary. Where are those reports now.... I have never seen them. Who has those reports and the math to back them up. I don't know. I saw a check once made out to them for One Hundred Thousand Dollars.... Drawn on his account in Nassau.... never heard anything more about that.   

If you find out where all that went please let me know.   Linda

[SarK0Y]

Amaterasu,  Biefeld - Brown's experiments didn't exclude interactions with Earth's M-field, thus claims about Gravity have remained non-proven  thus far i only've seen the effects related to regular M-glider conceptions. apparatus of this kind is useful thinge to really advance Cosmonautics ahead, but actually too far to be put amongst AG stories 

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

sARKOY;
The B-B effect is real, it's been confirmed by several groups already.
I do not believe the earth's magnetic field would react with this experiment enough to be measured, the local EM field is 10,000 times (if not millions) more dense.

[SarK0Y]

sARKOY;
The B-B effect is real, it's been confirmed by several groups already.
I do not believe the earth's magnetic field would react with this experiment enough to be measured, the local EM field is 10,000 times (if not millions) more dense.

PLAYSWITHMACHINES, i no've ever said effect unreal, but its very roots've been remained  a little bit vague. EM Force is much stronger than Gravity, to be saying softly, so i no see any reason to put Gravity as the very top culprit    seems many humans have been charmed with Gravity's spells & are about to see Her elusive figure everywhere  i'm damned sure there're EM's stories. 

[Amaterasu]

PLAYSWITHMACHINES, i no've ever said effect unreal, but its very roots've been remained  a little bit vague. EM Force is much stronger than Gravity, to be saying softly, so i no see any reason to put Gravity as the very top culprit    seems many humans have been charmed with Gravity's spells & are about to see Her elusive figure everywhere  i'm damned sure there're EM's stories. 

According to LaViolette's subquantum kinetics (SQK), gravity is only APPARENTLY weak.  If You read My electrogravitics post You would see that it is a very strong force that, because of virtually equal numbers of positive gravity particles being (nearly) cancelled out by negative gravity particles (the positive gravity (PG) of a PG particle is ever so slightly greater than an NG particle), the NET gravity is slight and positive.  Positively charged particles have PG, negatively charged particles have NG.

By separating positive and negative particles, a gravity field is created in which matter will "fall" towards the positive particles and away from the negative.  Attach the whole to the matter "falling" and the fall drags the field along, creating perpetual movement in the positive direction.  Thus, if the positive is "up" relative to the earth, what is within this independent field will appear to have "antigravity" as it "falls" upward.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

sarKOY I agree with you

I think charge is the culprit here.
What people call 'static' electricity, is linked to very powerful forces, i see charge being a dimension in itself.
This would explain a lot of things, IMO...

[Linda Brown]

Nicely put PWM

"What people call 'static' electricity, is linked to very powerful forces, i see charge being a dimension in itself."

I haven't seen others express it that way.

Linda