News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Electrogravitics – A Simplified Description

Started by Amaterasu, May 13, 2012, 11:56:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SarK0Y

Quote from: Amaterasu on July 02, 2012, 07:41:32 PM
OHHH.  Right right right.  Long day, rather tired.

So You're saying that the greater speed makes the greater mass, and this fact too contradicts such conjecture of LaViolette's work or...?
why particle's charge doesn't increase with greater velocity?
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Amaterasu

I had not read anything one way or the other.  LaViolette does not address the charge relative to velocity in Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion (I am squiggly-challenged, so have not read the more challenging book), but I am unsure how it might be expected to...
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

SarK0Y

unless theory has no clear explanation about that collision, it'd be too gloomy to bet on such a horsey.
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Amaterasu

#138
Don't know if it does or not, Sar.  Maybe You have the squiggly skills to get though Subquantum Kinetics (by LaViolette, of course).

Report back on whether it addresses that or not.  Secrets only was a quick overview in with discussions of things using the Biefeld-Brown Effect - which SQK predicts (and relativity does not) - and other interesting and related stuff.

I would be most interested to hear.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

SarK0Y

Synchrotron has to intensify magnetic field to hold beam on within proper radius because particle's mass goes wild as much as gets closer to c - velocity. so this example doesn't & cannot show the direct relation of mass with charge.
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Linda Brown

#140
All due respect Sarkoy

I don't understand a word that you just said.

Was that my fault or are you intentionally doing that?

Linda

SarK0Y

Quote from: Linda Brown on July 02, 2012, 10:16:12 PM
All due respect Sarkov

I don't understand a word that you just said.

Was that my fault or are you intentionally doing that?

Linda

Linda, example, please. + it'd be helpful, if you re-write parts (that were unclear  4 you) in the way ye understood'em. thanks in Advance  :)   
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

dcooper

#142
SorKOY if you want examples go to the www.thomastownsendbrown.com the go to Library then the best place go to Stress in dielectric.  and also www.thomastownsendbrown.com/forum  the click Thomas T. Brown tech. and click my post Elecrogravitic diff from Electromagnetic and you will get examples, Linda you Know you dad found and could not dismiss that there was a strong mass - charge & electricity- and gravity coupling

and by the way the coupling of charge has nothing to do with V because charge does not increase with v has nothing to do with the EG coupling between mass-charge that's OBVISE

Linda Brown

When I said that I didn't understand a word that you said I meant exactly that. Not a combination.... not a part there of. Nothing. When I am dense. I am surprisingly densel

Linda

SarK0Y

well, Amici, i wanna see this effect in the kinda vacuum chamber, shielded against Earth magnetic field  ::)

P.S.

Linda, at least, post's number, please. i hella am  not a remote viewer cuz Ancient Bro cruelly did turn my f*King telepathy off  ;)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

Linda Brown

Sarkov.... we are still having a failure to communicate. You keep on talking to others and when I finally get it I will chime in on the conversation. Don't worry/   Linda

SarK0Y

Quote from: Linda Brown on July 03, 2012, 12:37:23 AM
Sarkov.... we are still having a failure to communicate. You keep on talking to others and when I finally get it I will chime in on the conversation. Don't worry/   Linda

good idea, Linda  :) + i'm already not worried.  8)
I do What Me'n'Universum  want :-)

arc

#147
Quote from: SarK0Y on July 02, 2012, 07:12:09 PM
what about colliders?  ::) the greater speed makes the greater mass. this fact too contradicts such conjecture  :)

Greater "speed"/velocity results in higher "Impact Energy". But  remember the "particles" are being accelerated by using a strong magnetic field supplied by the superconducting magnetic torus. Each particle is effectively being pumped up to higher energy levels.. hence apparent mass increase.  Their energy is related to the intrinsic relativistic effects.

So is the TTB effect...


if it is raining and you want to walk outside, do you fire up a 100Billion watt giant fan heater to blow the clouds away... and expend 5 years worth of energy in 10 minutes.. or do you simply take an umbrella, and use your simple but subtle diversion shield  ...

arc

Linda Brown

" your simple but subtle diversion shield  ...

The.... KISS Principle............a diversion shield.

Linda

deuem

Sarkoy, if I may ask?  Is English your mother language or are you translating?
Thanks