News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Russia Has Just Tested A ICBM

Started by Amaterasu, June 08, 2012, 12:19:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Amaterasu

Russia Has Just Tested A ICBM



From:  http://yeoldefalseflag.com/thread-russia-has-just-tested-a-icbm

QuoteTranslation:

Russia has successfully tested an of intercontinental ballistic missile low with nuclear warheads.This was announced by the speaker of the strategic rocket forces of Russia, Colonel Vadim Kowal on Thursday of journalists in Moscow. The rocket of the Topol RS 12 m type (NATO code: SS-25 sickle) took off from the Kapustin Yar launch site in the area of Astrakhan in southern of Russia without problems at 19.39 UTC and set at the given place at the Sary-Schagan test site in the Central Asian Republic of Kazakhstan, it said.First, more no occurred regarding the test.

of: http://de.rian.ru/security_and_military/20120607/263747061.html
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

zorgon

Medvedev Goes Ballistic: Russian missiles in West's backyard?



QuoteResponding to Washington's failure to bring Russia on board the European missile defense system, President Dmitry Medvedev announces sweeping plans to address what Moscow deems to be a threat to national security.

zorgon

Cold War Phase II

Russia may target US missile defense sites




Russia Threatens to Target U.S. Missile Shield - Obama, Neocons bent on starting WW3 nuclear war



Russia warns US.....WW3 COMING SOON


zorgon

"China will not hesitate to protect Iran even with a third World War" Major General Zhang Zhaozhong

QuoteOn November 21st, America, UK and Canada
announced more sanctions against Iran. France also proposed to adopt new sanctions to force Tehran to stop it's nuclear project. On Nov 23rd, the spokesman of Chinese Communist Party
(CCP)'s Foreign Ministry said in a regular press conference held in Beijing that China is opposed to unilateral sanctions against Iran.

Scholars believe that, being isolated, China and Iran need mutual support. Meanwhile, the CCP government, with internal and external difficulties, may express an even tougher diplomatic "voice".

"Reuters" reported on Nov 23rd: "The United States, UK and Canada have announced new sanctions against Iran in the areas of energy and finance. France proposed 'unprecedented' new sanctions, including freezing the assets of the Central Bank of Iran and suspending the purchase of Iran's oil.

Earlier, the "International Atomic Energy Agency" (IAEA) had issued a report that Iran may be secretly developing nuclear weapons.

On Nov 23rd, the CCP's Foreign Ministry expressed opposition to the imposition of unilateral sanctions against Iran.

In this regard, Xia Ming, a political professor from "City University of New York" in America, believes that since the Cold War, the United States and Western society's biggest challenges have been seen as being from China and Iran. They are both isolated by the United States and the West. Therefore, China's policy is foreseeable.

Xia Ming says: "China and Iran are facing strong Western challenges within politics, economy and culture. So these two countries basically have a kind of coordination on the international stage, to support each other. So we can see that China and Iran coordinate a lot, with a lot of cooperation in matters of energy, arms and so on."

"Associated Press" also reported on Nov 23rd: "Since 2006, the United Nations have carried out 4 rounds of sanctions against Iran. But with export of energy, Iran has not been severely
affected by the sanctions."

"AFP" said: "China supports Iran and purchases large quantities of oil from Iran. Meanwhile, China is Iran's biggest trading partner  Their bilateral trade totals up to $ 30 billion.

"Voice of America" reported, according to Chinese customs' data, this year (2011) Iran could become China's second largest crude oil supplier.

However, Iran disdains the new round of sanctions. Israel and Washington said in the event that other efforts were not effective, the possibility of military action would not be ruled out.

It's puzzling to some that Major General Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor from the Chinese National Defense University, said China will not hesitate to protect Iran even with a third World War.

Professor Xia Ming: "Zhang Zhaozhong said that not hesitating to fight a third world war would be entirely for domestic political needs. To some extent though, this would be completely
ridiculous to encourage"

Professor Xia Ming pointed out that the United States and Western societies may deal with Iran by a method of "Jasmine Revolution", similar to what happened in Libya. From the perspective of the Libya model, NATO could not possibly involve itself in large-scale military action, and it would be impossible to start a new war.

In fact, a senior European diplomat with anonymity in Tehran said that the Iranian government was actually very worried about a military strike. Analysts also say that ordinary people don't worship their leaders so much any more.

But Professor Xia Ming said that the CCP regime itself is facing a much bigger crisis than Iran.
The CCP regime not only faces challenges from Southeast Asia, the South China Sea, South Asia countries and so on, but also faces the pressure from America for the RMB exchange rate, export, and human rights issues, as well as the pressure of domestic issues meanwhile.

Professor Xia Ming says : "China is facing pressure from America. Meanwhile, current domestic pressure is also very considerable. In particular, we can see in civil society, the challenge to the Chinese government and resistance forces are growing. Therefore, the Chinese government is indeed facing the arrival of a big power shift in the 18th session. So, China may express a tougher diplomatic voice. On the one hand, it is a reaction to pressure from America. On the other hand, it needs to meet the demand of domestic nationalist groups.

Russia is another ally of Iran, with similar policy to that of China. Toward Iran.


zorgon

Saber-rattling as Russia meets NATO in Sochi



QuoteAs a Russia-NATO summit begins in Sochi, Moscow has threatened to beef up its European forces, if talks between the alliance and the Kremlin fail to resolve sticky missile defense issues.
Missiles superimposed over a Russian and US flag

Russia's NATO ambassador, Dmitri Rogozin, referring to alliance plans to erect a missile defense system in eastern Europe, said Moscow views the West's intentions as a direct threat to the homeland.

"This is the red line, which we must not and will not abandon. No Russian leader can ever question the strategic potential of Russia or reduce it to zero," Rogozin said.

NATO has been planning the system - to be deployed in Poland and the Czech Republic - as a way to protect the continent against missiles from rogue Middle Eastern states.

Moscow, however, argues that the system could too easily be used to target its own missiles and is dangerously close to its territory.

Saber-rattling as Russia meets NATO

zorgon

Time to get out the really BIG guns :D


Amaterasu

Oh, and all the petty machismo goes on.  Yup.  They're doing it for show before They launch into WWIII as planned amongst Them.

And We get to stand by and weep.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

zorgon

Quote from: Amaterasu on June 08, 2012, 12:47:32 AM
And We get to stand by and weep.

Well I live right in the middle of Nellis, Tonopah, Area 51, Edward, Nine Palms and a bucket load of other top military installations :D  Its gonna be interesting

But we do have the beam weapons control shack here at Indians Springs :P

Amaterasu

It just breaks My heart that We are pawns at best in this depop horror They are constructing.  May We succeed before They do.
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

astr0144

After the Bilderberg meeting that took place in Virginia last week where Alex Jones suggest the world elites are planning our futures...

This is another video by him that refers to what the Globalists have planned for us.

Its being suggested the start maybe that the London Olympics may see 13,000 deaths... followed by other gradual deliberate setups to kill of more of the population...and may give us 10 or 15 years before he believes that there will be mass killings..be it from Nukes, wars or virus / vaccines...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6JwIs-mwo8&feature=plcp

They now claims to have come across past Bilderberg data from their 1966 agenda

Seems unbelievable that he seems to know so much..and is able to expose so much and still survive..one has to question at times is he working for some of them and telling us to our face....or is he really a true hero to the masses.

Amaterasu

I've asked Myself the same question, astro.  I have tried five times now to join the infowars forum, writing and even calling - and I am ignored, and not approved.  I get the impression They too (along with Alpha Tango Spookz) don't want solutions...
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

astr0144








Hi Amaturasu,

I have not as yet tried to join his forum, but it is of interest what you have said...and It does seem strange if you have not been able to join.

As much as I have valued and respected A.J for what he appears to be doing for us all over the last few years...ie exposing what he claims is really going on...

A.J to me is very clever at what he does overall...he puts things over quite well and seems overall very quick to understand things.

But There are times when I wonder if there may be more to it...

Like is he a type of double agent..secretly working for the NWO....but at the same time appearing totally or as straight up as  we would believe.

Maybe I am going through a paronoid spell...

For most It may be almost impossible to tell...and when you look at the Top elites in the Secret service military M16 etc at the top, there are spies double agents etc that even they find it hard to tell who is legit...

It will be interesting to see what happens for anyone trying to sign up to his forum...and how long it takes to be accepted etc.


---------------------------------------------------
I've asked Myself the same question, astro.  I have tried five times now to join the infowars forum, writing and even calling - and I am ignored, and not approved.  I get the impression They too (along with Alpha Tango Spookz) don't want solutions...


Amaterasu

I'm pretty sure that, like David Wilcock, He is a gatekeeper.  Rile the People up - but give Them no solution.  It's interesting that these both are People One would think would embrace My solution - and both have kept Their distance, even though I have given it to one personally and offered it to the other through the website.

Odd, don't You think?
"If the universe is made of mostly Dark Energy...can We use it to run Our cars?"

"If You want peace, take the profit out of war."

astr0144

It is hard to say,

But my thoughts are from my life experience so far...not as much as some....if someone does come along with an ideal solution which you may well have, there will always someone who it will effect in a negative way to their present livelihood...and change is often if not nearly always slow.

Also many of these people may not be science related or top thinkers.
or it could just be they need more time to consider it.

A.J no doubt will be making a good living from his own business...and his business as bad as it seems relies on bad news..

Bad news for A.J sells his services be it for real or hoax.

I would HOPE however that he is for real and not someone working on behalf of the NWO...

arc

ICBM... so they say
Does it not strike you all as odd that they have had those  things since the coldwar days, and made threats to use them ...  and they say this is an ICBM test now?.   

Probability testing doesn't point to it being so.
Higher probability score is for it being a heavy-lift test
But just what is the "heavy" thing.
that's the interesting part


arc