Aether Displacement

[Mikado]

A particle of matter moves through the aether. A particle of matter is made of condensations of aether. The particle of matter is connected to the aether. The particle moves through and displaces the aether. The particle of matter is not anchored to the aether. The moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.

I said I wasn't going to post here again but what the heck.

Mass is the amount of "Condensations of the Aether"

Lead is a greater condensation than aluminum.

Mikado

[mpc755]

I said I wasn't going to post here again but what the heck.

Mass is the amount of "Condensations of the Aether"

Lead is a greater condensation than aluminum.

Mikado

Mass is that which physically occupies three dimensional space.

Aether and matter have mass.

Matter is condensations of aether.

Lead has more mass than aluminum because it contains more condensed aether per volume.

[Mikado]

Mass is that which physically occupies three dimensional space.

Aether and matter have mass.

Matter is condensations of aether.

Lead has more mass than aluminum because it contains more condensed aether per volume.

And that is what I said. Thanks for confirming.

[COSMO]

Wow!  I got GOLD!!!!  Are we working with ounces here??? lol  How do I cash in???

Hey, thanks Littleenki, so...when is you father coming back???  How DO they steer that planet??  They must signal for a turn a lllooonnnggg way off!!! lol

Mikado,

We are still talking theories right???  I prefer to think of it like this...
All matter is still quite active at the atomic and subatomic level.  Your ice boat is really made up of a whole LOT of little waves...but waves in the aether none the less, dynamic, not static.  If ice was to to water as matter is to ether, then the G force would not be exerted through the whole body of mass and gravity does not act on just the surface of an object, but on EVERY particle.  If G force is generated by aether displacement, then G force would on be felt only on the surface of your ice boat and would INCREASE as speed increased.   But in real world that clearly does not happen.  Each and every little wave is always connected to the ether.  I don't think of it as a condensation, but more like an extension of aether from the subatomic level all the way up to larger(macro) objects, such as your ice boat.  But that's just a theory.....lol   I think Tesla said that inertia was the result of micro-helices in the aether...think I read that in Bill Lyne's book.   BBBrrrrr...ice boats....cold way to sail!!!! 

Cosmo

[mpc755]

And that is what I said. Thanks for confirming.

That's not what you said.

You said, "Mass is the amount of "Condensations of the Aether""

Aether has mass. Aether does not have to be condensed in order for there to be mass.

If you understand aether itself has mass then what you were trying to say is better said as the following.

The more particles of matter, which are "condensations of the aether", which exist within a volume the greater the mass of the volume. Even if there are no particles of matter within the volume there is still mass in the volume because the volume will contain aether which has mass.

[mpc755]

Wow!  I got GOLD!!!!  Are we working with ounces here??? lol  How do I cash in???

Hey, thanks Littleenki, so...when is you father coming back???  How DO they steer that planet??  They must signal for a turn a lllooonnnggg way off!!! lol

Mikado,

We are still talking theories right???  I prefer to think of it like this...
All matter is still quite active at the atomic and subatomic level.  Your ice boat is really made up of a whole LOT of little waves...but waves in the aether none the less, dynamic, not static.  If ice was to to water as matter is to ether, then the G force would not be exerted through the whole body of mass and gravity does not act on just the surface of an object, but on EVERY particle.  If G force is generated by aether displacement, then G force would on be felt only on the surface of your ice boat and would INCREASE as speed increased.   But in real world that clearly does not happen.  Each and every little wave is always connected to the ether.  I don't think of it as a condensation, but more like an extension of aether from the subatomic level all the way up to larger(macro) objects, such as your ice boat.  But that's just a theory.....lol   I think Tesla said that inertia was the result of micro-helices in the aether...think I read that in Bill Lyne's book.   BBBrrrrr...ice boats....cold way to sail!!!! 

Cosmo

The ice boat analogy is mine.

The closer to the center of the Earth you get the more displaced aether there is pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward you.

There is more displaced aether pushing down and exerting pressure toward you at the center of the Earth than there is at the surface of the Earth. There is more displaced aether pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward the surface of the Earth than there is at the top of a mountain.

[Mikado]

That's not what you said.

You said, "Mass is the amount of "Condensations of the Aether""

Aether has mass. Aether does not have to be condensed in order for there to be mass.

If you understand aether itself has mass then what you were trying to say is better said as the following.

The more particles of matter, which are "condensations of the aether", which exist within a volume the greater the mass of the volume. Even if there are no particles of matter within the volume there is still mass in the volume because the volume will contain aether which has mass.

But that is what I said.

In physics as taught, Mass is the density of matter, therefore, speaking in just terms of matter as mass, then the greater the mass the greater the condensations.

Mikado

[mpc755]

But that is what I said.

In physics as taught, Mass is the density of matter, therefore, speaking in just terms of matter as mass, then the greater the mass the greater the condensations.

Mikado

Mass is not the density of matter.

Speaking in just terms of matter as mass is incorrect.

Aether has mass.

Even if a region of three dimensional space contains no particles of matter it still has mass because it contains aether.

[Mikado]

Mass is not the density of matter.

Speaking in just terms of matter as mass is incorrect.

Aether has mass.

Even if a region of three dimensional space contains no particles of matter it still has mass because it contains aether.

It is in classical physics and if you can't understand that then how do you expect to be taken seriously with you rationalized theory?

The density of matter is called Mass in physics.

Mikado

[mpc755]

It is in classical physics and if you can't understand that then how do you expect to be taken seriously with you rationalized theory?

The density of matter is called Mass in physics.

Mikado

One of the main points of what I am proposing is that there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter.

What is mistaken to be non-baryonic dark matter traveling with matter is the aether which matter moves through and displaces.

"Einstein's 'First Paper'"
http://www.worldscibooks.com/etextbook/4454/4454_chap1.pdf

"The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause [its] propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether moved by these forces."

The velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic forces which cause its propagation, and inversely proportional to the mass of the aether displaced by these forces.

There was a time in 'physics' when it was insisted the Earth was stationary. Must we stick with that understanding in order to be taken seriously?

In aether displacement, mass is defined as that which physically occupies three dimensional space.

Aether has mass.

Aether having mass is what allows it to physically occupy three dimensional space, be physically displaced by matter and to push back and exert inward pressure toward matter; which is gravity.

Aether having mass is what allows it to be displaced into the form of a wave by a moving particle.

Aether having mass is what allows it to be the wave of wave-particle duality.

[SarK0Y]

Amici, what about to measure real distances to the Stars? 

[mpc755]

Amici, what about to measure real distances to the Stars? 

You have to take into account the state of displacement of the aether.

Curved spacetime is displaced aether.

[SarK0Y]

You have to take into account the state of displacement of the aether.

Curved spacetime is displaced aether.

Mpc755, to measure distances 4 one object from different sites makes possible to figure out at least a little how ether runs. 4 instance, let's take points A B C, we know AB & AC distances + angle BAC is known to us too, so no trouble to calculate canonical BC. but if theoretical BC gets unpredictable delta with real one -- no doubt, Space out there has warps or dusted locations.

[mpc755]

Mpc755, to measure distances 4 one object from different sites makes possible to figure out at least a little how ether runs. 4 instance, let's take points A B C, we know AB & AC distances + angle BAC is known to us too, so no trouble to calculate canonical BC. but if theoretical BC gets unpredictable delta with real one -- no doubt, Space out there has warps or dusted locations.

The warps are the state of displacement of the aether.

[SarK0Y]

The warps are the state of displacement of the aether.

Mpc755, i no'm about to've contradicted your statement, but only did add the technique to deal with such a mystic entity like ether is