Aether Displacement

[Littleenki]

Pineapples anyone?
Lle

[Mikado]

Not fission, not pineapples.

and yes Linda, something entirely different.

Mikado

[Littleenki]

Tell us, tell us!:)
Le

[Amaterasu]

Neutralization of radioactive material, perhaps...?  Just a guess.

[Linda Brown]

correct me if I am wrong Mikado but if I were to borrow some lines from the Navigator... it would be the ability to simply convince matter.... to be ... no more.
To " forget" the bonds that make matter what it is?

"would you say that if one could remove the effects of the aether condensing matter than that matter would dissolve? My answer is yes.

Have I translated your meaning well enough?No need for explanations. A simple yes or no will do.

Thanks

Linda

[mpc755]

Therefore, if the aether condenses matter, and different types of (i.e. Aluminum @ 26.9 versus copper @63.5)matter as we know it has different mass then matter with high mass versus matter with low mass has a greater concentration of the aether.

Secondly, since you brought up the nuclear explosion, would you say that if one could remove the effects of the aether condensing matter than that matter would dissolve? My answer is yes.

Mikado

Aether condenses [into] matter. Aether and matter are different states of the same material.

A nuclear bomb explosion removes the effects of some of the condensed matter associated with the nuclear material by causing some of the nuclear material to evaporate into aether.  Or, did I not understand the question?

[mpc755]

Ouch ,mpc, threads are for discussion, anyone can discuss.
Im enjoying what youve posted, and Im sure we will all learn here!
You cant have threads of your very own.
We are a team here, buddy, lets be cool.
Cheers
Le

I am trying to be cool. However, if someone posts something to the effect of, "matter does not displace aether" when that is what this topic is about then there really is no reason for that poster to continue to post on this thread. It is obvious that poster is not going to change their mind.

If you started a thread titled "water is wet" and a poster continually responded with "no, water is dry" then after a while when you realized that poster was not going to change their mind and was just going to continually post "no, water is dry" on your "water is wet" thread then after a while isn't it okay to suggest to that poster that you are going to have to agree to disagree and that poster should start another thread if they want to discuss "water is dry"?

[zorgon]

If you started a thread titled "water is wet" and a poster continually responded with "no, water is dry" then after a while when you realized that poster was not going to change their mind and was just going to continually post "no, water is dry" on your "water is wet" thread then after a while isn't it okay to suggest to that poster that you are going to have to agree to disagree and that poster should start another thread if they want to discuss "water is dry"?

Well the problem that I see is that a lot of people with great minds have different theories on whether or not the aether exists or not and what exactly its properties are. As far as I can tell, no one yet has come up with proof as to which theory is correct.

Until that happens your ideas are as sound as anyone else's.  This is a free discussion forum and as such you will find disagreements

Now as to water being wet or dry. it is like the three questions we have in the registration;
1. What color is the sun
2. What color is the grass
3. what color is the sky

All those that joined gae the accepted answer but we all know there are several answers, all true

Is water Dry?

There Is Such Thing As Dry Water

Don't ask me what voodoo they used but scientists have created dry water. Well, they originally invented it back in 1968 but they've recently re-discovered it and this time, found an actual use for it.

First, dry water, how does that even make sense? Ben Carter, Ph.D, the researcher, explains:

    [It's] known as "dry water" because it consists of 95 percent water and yet is a dry powder. Each powder particle contains a water droplet surrounded by modified silica, the stuff that makes up ordinary beach sand. The silica coating prevents the water droplets from combining and turning back into a liquid. The result is a fine powder that can slurp up gases, which chemically combine with the water molecules to form what chemists term a hydrate.

http://gizmodo.com/5624936/there-is-such-thing-as-dry-water

So both answers are correct Water is wet and water is dry

[hobbit]

We are going to have to agree to disagree. This thread is titled 'Aether Displacement', which means particles of matter which are condensations of aether exist in and displace the aether.

Now, of course, you do not have to agree with this. However, this is what this thread is about.

As far as I know, you are capable of starting your own thread to discuss your ideas. Please do so. Thanks.

If a thread was titled,
Only those who agree with this theory are allowed to reply??
You would then have a cult.

It's how religions operate, they only allow those who agree, and have the same belief.

The beauty of a site such as pegasus is the variety of different comprehensions that are seeking correct answers together.

You present Your comprehension as of mass displacing the aether, and that the aether is pushing back against the mass.

With respect, that is the illusion , and an apparent consequence.
I am not disagreeing with the statement that mass arises from a TRANSMUTATION from one state to another which a seemingly none existant aether facilitates.
What I am trying to suggest is that very transmutation process is similer to steam transmuting to water, in that on this planet, that is in a near constant state and the net result is the formation of mass...a growing alive planet...and that a further consequence is a net inrush we call gravity.
Excellent thread OP.
hobbit

[Tromprenard]

Hello LE, I just thought you might need me to toss a pinapple in this thread
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a286609.pdf

[Littleenki]

Aha, Raymond, well tossed my friend! And caught...I was thinking they were talking something completely different...

And some math...Im seeing it differently every day, buddy!

Thinking of you, and tell Dc hi!

Le

[Mikado]

correct me if I am wrong Mikado but if I were to borrow some lines from the Navigator... it would be the ability to simply convince matter.... to be ... no more.
To " forget" the bonds that make matter what it is?

"would you say that if one could remove the effects of the aether condensing matter than that matter would dissolve? My answer is yes.

Have I translated your meaning well enough?No need for explanations. A simple yes or no will do.

Thanks

Linda

yes

[Linda Brown]

Sadly........ thankyou...............Linda

[deuem]

From Zorgon

What color is the sun?

I kept putting in white. "xxx", maybe I misspelled it, white "xxx"
Maybe this was a trick question! "xxx"

OK, "Yellow", yea your in....Silly deuem!

[mpc755]

Well the problem that I see is that a lot of people with great minds have different theories on whether or not the aether exists or not and what exactly its properties are. As far as I can tell, no one yet has come up with proof as to which theory is correct.

Until that happens your ideas are as sound as anyone else's.  This is a free discussion forum and as such you will find disagreements

Now as to water being wet or dry. it is like the three questions we have in the registration;
1. What color is the sun
2. What color is the grass
3. what color is the sky

All those that joined gae the accepted answer but we all know there are several answers, all true

Is water Dry?

There Is Such Thing As Dry Water

http://gizmodo.com/5624936/there-is-such-thing-as-dry-water

So both answers are correct Water is wet and water is dry

Matter can't displace and not displace aether at the same time.

In aether displacement, aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether IS physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward the matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter IS gravity.

I think there should be a limit to the number of times I have to respond to a "no it doesn't" post.