Aether Displacement

[mpc755]

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid; a supersolid.

You are unable to understand the difference between a superfluid/supersolid exerting pressure toward an object and friction.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow 'Shock' Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'"While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we're finding that our Sun's interaction doesn't reach the critical threshold to form a shock," said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, "so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what's happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water."'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black%20hole%20kicked%20out%20of%20home%20galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

[zorgon]

Aether Displacement

[Pimander]

What occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors in a double slit experiment may still be a mystery to you. It isn't to me.

Lets call your ether wave a gravity wave.  Now what causes the gravity wave?  You're just saying it is the ether but don't really know.

Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

If it "pushes back" or causes inward pressure and has structure and position IT WOULD CAUSE FRICTION TO ANY BODY IN MOTION.

I will try to explain one more time.  Do you think that it is the ether that causes friction of a ball flying through the air?  No, you think it is the air I imagine and not the ether.

Do you think it is ether that causes gravity or something else?  Why can't gravity be caused by something else (i.e. not by a frictionless medium)?

What if gravity is caused by interaction with matter in a neighbouring parallel universe?  This is not a working model but simply an idea I'm toying with.







This idea ties in with some attempts to explain dark matter and energy. It also ties in with a theory I have about consciousness and Psi (ESP etc)

[mpc755]

Very cool.

More aether displacement.

[mpc755]

Lets call your ether wave a gravity wave.  Now what causes the gravity wave?  You're just saying it is the ether but don't really know.

A gravity wave is an aether displacement wave analogous to the bow wave of a boat. A boat moving through the water displaces the water. A moving boat has an associated water displacement wave which is called a bow wave.

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Matter moving through the aether displaces the aether.

The ripple created when galaxy clusters collide is an aether displacement wave.

The ripple created when galaxy clusters collide is a gravitational wave.

If it "pushes back" or causes inward pressure and has structure and position IT WOULD CAUSE FRICTION TO ANY BODY IN MOTION.

Please learn the difference between friction and the ability of a superfluid/supersolid to push back and exert inward pressure toward an object which exists in it.

Frictionless means no loss of energy in the interaction of an object and a superfluid/supersolid. It does not mean no interaction.

I will try to explain one more time.  Do you think that it is the ether that causes friction of a ball flying through the air?  No, you think it is the air I imagine and not the ether.

Do you think it is ether that causes gravity or something else?  Why can't gravity be caused by something else (i.e. not by a frictionless medium)?

What if gravity is caused by interaction with matter in a neighbouring parallel universe?  This is not a working model but simply an idea I'm toying with.

This thread is titled 'Aether Displacement'. In aether displacement, displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

This idea ties in with some attempts to explain dark matter and energy. It also ties in with a theory I have about consciousness and Psi (ESP etc)

What is mistaken for non-baryonic dark matter which travels with matter is the aether matter moves through and displaces.

The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; a larger version of a black hole polar jet.

The following image is analogous to the polar jet we exist in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CMB_Timeline300_no_WMAP.jpg

Dark energy is aether emitted into the Universal jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

[Tromprenard]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics_of_general_relativity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_tensor_%28general_relativity%29

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

>:(You know what MPC755, You are a stubborn individual who seeks to avoid quoting any reality.... I was not asking about all the text you quoted here. you are not telling me anything new.
In fact you are telling me that you simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND the dimensions of Quantity or Quality.... These are ordinary engineering terms to build machines that you are using now...
Tell me.. have you used anything that makes use of a DeBoglie wave lately?  I don't care about your complete misunderstanding of physics but hey.... be serious about reality. I don't care that you are cutting and pasting stuff all over.  But why are you avoiding a direct question as simple as.:  What is the Quantitative description unit for MASS!
This is my last appeal for you to prove that you are not just an amateur collectionist of modern day physics theorem that have no practical application thus far.
If you cannot answer that simple " mass"  question, - then perhaps.... just perhaps you are a miserable failure (God-forbid) who is unable to resolve the most basic notions of reality and machines that work using this reality.  Don't you ever have to turn a screw driver, or a torque wrench...What is the "Mass"/ force you are using... how is it defined?

Raymond

[mpc755]

>:(You know what MPC755, You are a stubborn individual who seeks to avoid quoting any reality.... I was not asking about all the text you quoted here. you are not telling me anything new.
In fact you are telling me that you simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND the dimensions of Quantity or Quality.... These are ordinary engineering terms to build machines that you are using now...
Tell me.. have you used anything that makes use of a DeBoglie wave lately?  I don't care about your complete misunderstanding of physics but hey.... be serious about reality. I don't care that you are cutting and pasting stuff all over.  But why are you avoiding a direct question as simple as.:  What is the Quantitative description unit for MASS!
This is my last appeal for you to prove that you are not just an amateur collectionist of modern day physics theorem that have no practical application thus far.
If you cannot answer that simple " mass"  question, - then perhaps.... just perhaps you are a miserable failure (God-forbid) who is unable to resolve the most basic notions of reality and machines that work using this reality.  Don't you ever have to turn a screw driver, or a torque wrench...What is the "Mass"/ force you are using... how is it defined?

Raymond

Why do you insist on not understanding I have figured out the relationship between general relativity and quantum physics?

Why do you insist on not understanding Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave?

Why do you insist on not understanding they are both aether displacement waves?

Why do you insist on not understanding displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity?

Why do you insist on not understanding there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter?

Why do you insist on not understanding matter moves through and displaces the aether?

Why do you insist on not understanding the following?

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"If a hidden sub-quantum medium is assumed, knowledge of its nature would seem desirable. It certainly is of quite complex character. It could not serve as a universal reference medium, as this would be contrary to relativity theory."

de Broglie is referring to a relativistic aether. The same aether as Einstein.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"As to the mechanical nature of the Lorentzian ether, it may be said of it, in a somewhat playful spirit, that immobility is the only mechanical property of which it has not been deprived by H. A. Lorentz. It may be added that the whole change in the conception of the ether which the special theory of relativity brought about, consisted in taking away from the ether its last mechanical quality, namely, its immobility."

An immobile aether is a universal reference medium. Both de Broglie and Einstein are stating the aether is not an immobile universal reference medium.

"It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University

This is my last appeal to you to explain why you can not understand any of the above.

[Pimander]

Why do you insist on not understanding I have figured out the relationship between general relativity and quantum physics?

There's already a theory about this.  It's called String Theory.

My ideas, that I have gently tried to introduce you to, are an attempt to integrate string theory with modern Psi research and consciousness research.  It also related to something called "A fields", which are a scientific interpretation of the Akashic record - called by some Aether.

I know that your opinion is that I don't understand you.  Your opinion is wrong.  I do think you have missed something.  I suspect you are possibly only interested in your own ideas so I am probably wasting my time here.  If that changes, we can discuss.

All the best

[hobbit]

Mpc wrote,
"Why do You insist in not understanding"...blah blah blah.

The common comprehension of the word UNDERSTAND is to actually comprehend what is been said.
It can also mean to bow down to...to accept ...to comply with....whatever blah , blah , blah is.

You have expressed a theory.
You are not backing this up with any currently accepted science or factums.
You have repeated the self same explanation ad nauseum.

Other posters are asking for confirmations, if You can't provide such then say IMHO.....that is fairy snuff.
But You cannot say what You just have , and so many times.
You cannot insist that others must understand

You are alienating other posters by repeating parrot fashion the self same sentences, then demanding to know why they dont understand.

With Tromprenard You have the most brilliant of the brilliant  trying to assist You, He has probably forgotten more than You will ever know.

IMHO You are spouting absolute twaddle, but there are consequences relative to what You are saying that can be debated and quantified.
hobbit

[mpc755]

There's already a theory about this.  It's called String Theory.

This thread is titled 'Aether Displacement'. In aether displacement Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave; both are aether displacement waves. In aether displacement, displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. In aether displacement, in a double slit experiment, the moving particle travels a well defined trajectory which takes it through one slit while the associated aether wave passes through both.

My ideas, that I have gently tried to introduce you to, are an attempt to integrate string theory with modern Psi research and consciousness research.  It also related to something called "A fields", which are a scientific interpretation of the Akashic record - called by some Aether.

I know that your opinion is that I don't understand you.  Your opinion is wrong.  I do think you have missed something.  I suspect you are possibly only interested in your own ideas so I am probably wasting my time here.  If that changes, we can discuss.

All the best

Aether displacement is the most correct theory which unites relativity and quantum physics.

[mpc755]

Mpc wrote,
"Why do You insist in not understanding"...blah blah blah.

The common comprehension of the word UNDERSTAND is to actually comprehend what is been said.
It can also mean to bow down to...to accept ...to comply with....whatever blah , blah , blah is.

You have expressed a theory.
You are not backing this up with any currently accepted science or factums.
You have repeated the self same explanation ad nauseum.

Other posters are asking for confirmations, if You can't provide such then say IMHO.....that is fairy snuff.
But You cannot say what You just have , and so many times.
You cannot insist that others must understand

You are alienating other posters by repeating parrot fashion the self same sentences, then demanding to know why they dont understand.

With Tromprenard You have the most brilliant of the brilliant  trying to assist You, He has probably forgotten more than You will ever know.

IMHO You are spouting absolute twaddle, but there are consequences relative to what You are saying that can be debated and quantified.
hobbit

I have figured out what unites relativity with quantum physics. If you, and other posters, choose not to understand this then that is your choice.

The following is evidence of aether displacement. If you choose not to understand the following is evidence of aether displacement then that is your choice.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow 'Shock' Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'"While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we're finding that our Sun's interaction doesn't reach the critical threshold to form a shock," said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, "so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what's happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water."'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black%20hole%20kicked%20out%20of%20home%20galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

[hobbit]

Anyone got a white flag?
hobbit

[mpc755]

Anyone got a white flag?
hobbit

You could choose to correctly understand the following is evidence of aether displacement.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow 'Shock' Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'"While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we're finding that our Sun's interaction doesn't reach the critical threshold to form a shock," said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, "so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what's happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water."'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black%20hole%20kicked%20out%20of%20home%20galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.

[Littleenki]

Oh dear, its getting maniacal, Hobbit!



Le

[mpc755]

Oh dear, its getting maniacal, Hobbit!
Le

The following is evidence of aether displacement. If you choose not to understand this then that is your choice.


'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow 'Shock' Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'"While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we're finding that our Sun's interaction doesn't reach the critical threshold to form a shock," said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, "so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what's happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water."'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image '
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a "dark core," containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. "This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/News/2012/06/Giant%20black%20hole%20kicked%20out%20of%20home%20galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

They are both aether displacement waves.