Richard Hoagland just released this zuggeraut

[Littleenki]

I too, noticed that defined line, ArMaP!

I hate to think Richard is pulling wool, but you guys with the photoshop experience are way more accomplished at sorting these things out than I.

Does that line mean copy and paste?
Or something that has risen from under the Moon surface, showing itself in recent decades?

I have an idea...off to look for a clue!:D
Cheers!

[Amaterasu]

Or, as I posed to Richard a while back, is the Moon really a moon at all, and is it possible it was placed there, or constructed, or brought from somewhere else to serve a defined purpose?(He really liked that one BTW!)

According to The Terra Papers...the moon is an AR ship.  It most definitely is artificial and was placed in orbit by the ASA-RRR.

[exuberant1]

It is photoshopped. I am familiar with the area and have indicated the area he manipulated:



Note:

The manipulator rotated the image once to the right and is working from or recreated a very poor copy.

[Littleenki]

Well, ArMaP and all, what Ive discovered on a simple quick google image search is nearly 70 percent of photos taken of Ziggurats are aligned with this outlay...



The view aspect of these photos are all from the same camera angle, and have the same general appearance...a crumbled center with little definition and a more defined outer wall.

Far be it from I accusing Hoagland of any misdeeds or sneaky pete photoshopping, but the camera angle of all the photos Ive looked at is nearly indentical to the angle if his picture.

Ok Dueum, make room on that fence, Im bringin a pillow and a fence cocktail table for chips and dips, and scotch glasses...we may be here a while!

Cheers!

[Amaterasu]

Interesting. It reminds me of a photo zorgon once posted that has something looking like a lozenge, and the angles are more or less the same as those in this photo (from what I remember), but there's something on this one that doesn't look right, pointed by the red arrow below.



Doesn't the separation from the darker to less dark area look too well defined when compared with all other shadows in the photo? And why does the photo have so much noise in it? I always suspect noisy images because that's a good way of hiding tampering, I know because that's what I used when I changed a photo to see if anyone was able to find what was changed.

I don't know about the origins of the photo, but if that was constructed, using lighter colored rock, One might expect a clean line - though in looking at it, the line is not as clean as it first appears, suggesting it is an illusion of "straightness..."

[Amaterasu]

It is photoshopped. I am familiar with the area and have indicated the area he manipulated:

Good catch, EX1!

[Littleenki]

And theres the glaring reality...well done Exuberant1!

Pho-to-shop! Shame on you Richard!:(

Le

[Lunica]

Good catch, EX1!

Maybe I missed it in plaine sight. But where to see or read about this release first hand? I dont see it on his website?

[exuberant1]

Hoagland's website isn't really useful for anything other than its entertainment value.

[Pimander]

Doesn't the separation from the darker to less dark area look too well defined when compared with all other shadows in the photo? And why does the photo have so much noise in it? I always suspect noisy images because that's a good way of hiding tampering

Is that image from Hoagland?  If so, isn't there more information on sources for the image?

[ArMaP]

I don't know about the origins of the photo, but if that was constructed, using lighter colored rock, One might expect a clean line - though in looking at it, the line is not as clean as it first appears, suggesting it is an illusion of "straightness..."

But I wouldn't expect such a clean difference from one colour to the other at the bottom, where the supposed wall meats the ground, specially when it looks like that line has a better resolution (looks sharper) than all other lines in the image.

But thanks to exuberant1 we now know it's a fake.

[Pimander]

Hoagland's website isn't really useful for anything other than its entertainment value.

Sorry mate, I missed your earlier post.

[deuem]

C'mon now, Dueum, you know you cant resist running that one:D

Off that fence my friend!
Le

This is the hi res photo link. You must rotate it CW 90 degrees to get his view.

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/38/5564.jpg

Back on the fence, deuem

[Littleenki]

I have Richard as a facebook friend and cant find anything on his fb page about this.
If it was from him, he would have posted it there...somethings fishy.

Le

[Lunica]

But @Gigas must have seen it somewhere since he presents the image in the OP?

If this is photoshopped as it is...  Then I like to see where Richard Hoagland released this fraud. 

Maybe @Gigas can help....