Chemtrail plane busted Bluebird Cargo

[Amaterasu]

Information about what They're doing is NOT doom porn.  If We watch with a solution in mind, focusing on the solution, We can inform Ourselves and put positive energies against the negative.

[ArMaP]

How can that plane go back instantly, as we see in the video? It's not turning back, it jumps back to north-south line.

Also, how does he know that the plane is "spraying"?

It looks more like a glitch in the software or the data sent to the site.

[Amaterasu]

I think it's on a loop, ArMaP.  It is just showing most recently reported movement.  It is not THAT activity that is in question.  The flight path is defined above the segment, in blue.

[Fruitbat]

"They aren't just joyriding up there". Those jets cost a mind bending amount of money to run, and every trip is meticulously costed (sometimes to the detriment of safety).

That BLUE trace is like no other flight path I have seen, including my own when I HAVE been joyriding in the sky. But imaging MIGHT be another explanation of such a flight path. Trouble is, there are so MANY examples of hideous lying and mass nastyiness out there, that when you understand this it's easy to miss the other side of the coin, that sometimes there may be an innocent expanation, which may be true or not, but you can guess the other side will be using it as an excuse...

Aluminium eh? Wonder if it's supposed to make a focussing for the haarp RF signal? That pattern looks like some sort of lensing or antenna array, it would be interesting to see what form the aluminium is in before it enters the water supply. MY guess would be extremely thin lengths which break up in the atmosphere before they get to ground level...

But that's only my wild off the cuff speculations, designed to win me kudos later, if I happen to be right...
I'm on much safer grounds talking about the radiation that I have been measuring recently...

Cheers, Steve C.

[Pimander]

I'm on much safer grounds talking about the radiation that I have been measuring recently...

Well I don't see a thread on it yet..... 

[ArMaP]

I think it's on a loop, ArMaP.

What is on a loop, the video, what we see on the screen or the plane?
The video is not on a loop, what we see on the screen doesn't appear to be on a loop, the place jumps from place to place, so it's either some alien ship or that's a glitch.

It is just showing most recently reported movement.

No, it's showing last known position.

It is not THAT activity that is in question.

So what is the activity in question, the YouTube poster throwing a "spraying" accusation just because he finds it will give him more views? (See, I can throw accusations as easily as he does )

The flight path is defined above the segment, in blue.

Yes, and is being painted on the screen while the plane is moving, don't you see it? It's impossible for the plane to be doing that.

Now, as I don't accept any stupid video as gospel (I don't even accept the gospels as gospel), I went looking for it, and that site (the only positive thing coming from this video, that looks like an interesting site) keeps a record for, apparently, a month, of all the flights they were following, so we can have a playback of what happened with the plane, but, unfortunately, not at real speed, as the slowest speed possible with the playback is 24x, so it's not possible to see it as the guy was seeing it.

But what we can see is that if he kept on following that plane then he surely noticed that it magically jumped to England (maybe it was Harry Potter) then back to France, and then to Ghana.

That's a lot of spraying in just one night.

The link for the playback is this, I hope it works.

PS: you can see that the plane first appeared over North Africa, moved quickly to Spain and then jumped to France.

[Amaterasu]

Well...  It looked to me like the piece of the plane flying a short distance was looped.  It did that over and over.  Maybe We need to watch the planes in real time...?

[ArMaP]

Well...  It looked to me like the piece of the plane flying a short distance was looped.  It did that over and over.

If you look a the line being made by plane and the place on the map you will see that is not looped, the plane is moving in a southwest-northeast line, then it jumps back to the nort-south line, a little to the south of the previous position on that line, then it starts a new diagonal, before repeating the pattern.

[Amaterasu]

I'll look again.  Thanks for the input.


EDIT to add:  You're right.  So...  Is it possible that the path is plotted based on last known data?  Like it squawks and the screen estimates its position for a duration, and then it squawks again, and the map is corrected...?

I don't know much about how those things get the data they get.

And still, the previous path is highly suspect, regardless of what it is doing on the screen as We watch.

[robomont]

i think the particles are nano size.the sun ionizes them which causes them to rise in the air and stay aloft.they probly bond with moisture and eventually fall with the rain.

[ArMaP]

And still, the previous path is highly suspect, regardless of what it is doing on the screen as We watch.

One comment on YouTube says that this happens sometimes in that site (I saw it happen yesterday) when two flights have the same callsign. The software doesn't now which is which and jumps from place to place while attempting to update the information on the screen.

[Amaterasu]

Ah.  Did not read the comments, I admit.  But...  WHY would two planes have the SAME callsign!?!  I thought the whole PURPOSE of callsigns was to distinguish the planes in the air.

Maybe it's a disinformant who posted this trying to get People to write it off?

[ArMaP]

Maybe it's a disinformant who posted this trying to get People to write it off?

It's possible, as that explanation doesn't explain all. If it was a case of two planes with the same callsign and the software got confused then it would move only between those two flights, so we end up with two paths connected by many lines going from one to the other and vice-versa.

But it really looks like they have some bug on their software, as I saw that happening yesterday.

[Amaterasu]

It may be a bug...  Or it may be more or less what planes are actually doing.  (I just can't buy the "callsign" explanation.)

But if it is not a bug and the planes are really doing that...  Well, something is mighty fishy.

[ArMaP]

But if it is not a bug and the planes are really doing that...  Well, something is mighty fishy.

How can any plane do that, jumping some 9 km (if my measurements are correct) in less than one second?