UFO Fleet 2013 Starting From Alien Moon Base ?

[Edward]

You decide. It looks good.  I pasted the youtube information below on it and what was used.

Edward



------------------
Youtube comment/show more on what was posted.

Published on Sep 15, 2012

What the hell is going on up there?
Watch in full hd fullscreen 1080p.
Must read description as well:

While filming the moon on september the 15th 2012 with my telescope and Canon EOS 600D i spotted 13 orbs probably starting from a secret alien moonbase.
I edited the raw footage and used dirrentent color to get a better look of these objects.
The original raw footage you can see here:

If you think it's fake just search on YouTube for "UFO starting from moon" or "UFO landing on moon".
There are a lot of more proof videos similar to this one. UFO Fleet 2013
-------------------------

[thorfourwinds]

Greetings Member Edward:

Welcome to PRC.

Although this video (and others) have been discussed in the past, it is always good to bring up material that may have been overlooked or trampled to death by "debunkers" - IMHO.

For your first effort here at PRC, thank you and we are pleased to award your first GOLD.


We are pleased to provide a few screenshots that other members may feel free to comment on.

IMHO, it certainly appears that "craft" are emanating from that 'crater.'

BTW, ArMaP, Zorgon, et al, which 'crater' is that?

Peace Love Light

Liberty & Equality or Revolution

[thorfourwinds]

For your consideration:














Aristarchus Crater - Blue Gem or Fusion Reactor










preview - YouTube






emitter - YouTube


Tons of Ufo's Going by Moon - Video


Fastwalking Moon Shadows - Video

[Edward]

Thanks for the welcome Thorfourwinds.

Actually that was my 3rd post here     , my first post is here:  http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=166.msg54196#msg54196


Thanks for showing the craters and images.  It's all fascinating stuff.

Edward

Greetings Member Edward:

Welcome to PRC.

Although this video (and others) have been discussed in the past, it is always good to bring up material that may have been overlooked or trampled to death by "debunkers" - IMHO.

For your first effort here at PRC, thank you and we are pleased to award your first GOLD.


We are pleased to provide a few screenshots that other members may feel free to comment on.

IMHO, it certainly appears that "craft" are emanating from that 'crater.'

BTW, ArMaP, Zorgon, et al, which 'crater' is that?

Peace Love Light

Liberty & Equality or Revolution

[Sinny]

Ohh a new one for me, excellent pics 

[Edward]

Ohh a new one for me, excellent pics 

Check out the video I posted, that the pic's are from.


Edward

[ShotInTheDark]

The Great John Lear has theorized that Aristarchus was a 24 mile round Fission Reactor That's what it looks like just like the ones at 3 mile island up the road but far bigger. The blue color was is thought to be from radiation from the moon mixing with oxygen when you mix the 2 they turn blue.
I believe 00% in the Hollow Earth Theory and have always thought the moon was hollow. What if Aristarchus is a Giant entrance and exit just as we have on our polar regions and other places on earth. To me this looks like intelligently controlled craft coming out of the moon. 

[Pimander]

I believe 00% in the Hollow Earth Theory and have always thought the moon was hollow.

00% 

I'm glad you have so much confidence in the theory. LOL

If the Moon was hollow, I understand it would either be orbiting much slower OR be further away (or similar).

We know the Moon's mass from its orbital dynamics and it can't really be completely hollow with the dynamics it has unless the equations of motion on which engineering are based are completely wrong.  If they were wrong the rockets, planes and machines our civilisation rely on would not work.

[ShotInTheDark]

LOL 00% well that not to good you know I met 100% think you could change it or I might be able to Funny!!! Great video though if real amazing!!

[ShotInTheDark]

00% 

I'm glad you have so much confidence in the theory. LOL

If the Moon was hollow, I understand it would either be orbiting much slower OR be further away (or similar).

We know the Moon's mass from its orbital dynamics and it can't really be completely hollow with the dynamics it has unless the equations of motion on which engineering are based are completely wrong.  If they were wrong the rockets, planes and machines our civilization rely on would not work.

Yes agreed I don't mean hollow as in the sense that its the crust then the rest is empty. I believe that there's many layers and different places to go within the planet that are beautiful I have a picture saved somewhere of the Hollow Earth and how i personally believe it is check this out:



Now I think this could be why Aristarchus is so bright because it also has an inner Sun it would have to have some type of energy to grow food survival just a theory.

[Amaterasu]

00% 

I'm glad you have so much confidence in the theory. LOL

If the Moon was hollow, I understand it would either be orbiting much slower OR be further away (or similar).

We know the Moon's mass from its orbital dynamics and it can't really be completely hollow with the dynamics it has unless the equations of motion on which engineering are based are completely wrong.  If they were wrong the rockets, planes and machines our civilisation rely on would not work.

OR... It can be hollow if some gadgetry on the moon is gravitationally holding it to its present position...  Without that consideration, which several have reported is the case, then the calculations of mass would be incorrect if that is indeed the case.

And frankly...  *I* think there is some mechanism(s) in place that do hold the moon in its place around Our planet.

[ShotInTheDark]

There are bases on the moon and i agree it could be held in place by something we couldn't possibly understand it can still be a spaceship for all we know. We are so primitive its not even funny if we don't all kill each other imagine how far we will be in just 1000 yrs from now?? The physics currently as we know them may be completely different with one discovery.

There is definitely something going on the moon I think Zorgon and John Lear have proven that beyond any reasonable doubt. Im starting to think there is life in almost every planet on the inside of the planets like Lear has said all along at first i thought no that cant be right but when i started to really look into the hollow earth theory it made total sense. The Hollow Earth Theory may explain many mysteries UFOs,Bigfoot,Monsters in general. The Aurora Borealis could be light leaking out from the central energy source some call it the central sun. Have a look:


The Southern Lights are coming from the black hole and are shooting upward.

[Anynonmouses]

The moon is hollow and IS a spaceship, similar to Nibiru, but obviously much smaller, parked where it is to hold our eco systems together. We had two natural moons, which were destroyed eons ago, according to Pleiadeans who have been so kind as to inform us of this.

As Zorgon says...you can Google it.

Peace and Love,
JD

[Pimander]

There is definitely something going on the moon I think Zorgon and John Lear have proven that beyond any reasonable doubt.

Its definitely true that there are some massive mysteries associated with the Moon including lights which have been observed for centuries right up to recently.  Mysteries about what appear to be inconceivably unlikely coincidences numerically and geometrically (see Who Built the Moon by Chris Knight and Alan Butler.

Some of the Apollo footage also looks faked to me, and I have looked at it long and hard and seen all kinds of appeal to the sceptic in me.  It looks faked in some instances almost certainly.  That's how I see it.

The hollow Moon theory does not stack up as far as I'm concerned.  The mass of the Moon looks known.  The orbital dynamics looked correct when I checked this out, in line with the equations of motion.  There is no need to invoke some mysterious force holding it "where it is" because the accepted "laws" of physics and equations of motion mean it makes sense that it is in orbit as we observe it.

The Moon is light, possibly lighter than might be expected.  It may well contain caverns where it is possible to have bases. I doubt it is completely hollow, it isn't light enough.

I am also sceptical that NASA's last Apollo mission was the end of the matter regarding our contact with the Moon.  The military had plans in place to go and set up a base on Luna.  Zorgon has lots of info on this.  We, the public, are expected to believe that the plans were shelved.  I say bollocks were they. If the military (or black projects) have not done more regarding missions to the Moon and building outposts in space in secret then they are complete idiots. With those resources to risk another power getting there first is something only arrogant cretins would do..... Unless we were warned off.

The idea that the Moon might be a space ship towed into orbit?  In the absence of any evidence that it is or not, I'd say why would you think it is in the first place?  I don't accept it just because someone who you guys may think is an authority says so. No evidence for this theory says to me you have to be gullible to accept it.  Sorry if that offends anyone but I'm way too smart for that nonsense.

So yes, John and Z are right in that there is something amiss regarding what is assumed to be common knowledge about the Moon.   Proof is not easy to come by.  What John and Zorgon have proven is open to debate.  Luna is a mystery, hence the name of the site. That doesn't mean we should all turn off our BS radars.

As far as the Hollow Earth Theory goes.  Sorry again, but I don't buy that either.  The Auroras at the North and South pole can be explained by The Solar Wind interacting with the Earth's magnetic field causing ionisation.  The effect on that NASA clip is Magnetic South (more accurately it is Magnetically North there and the South of the compass points there).  I'll bet if you look into it Geographical south is not where the dark dot is.

If you have no evidence that the Earth is Hollow other than a picture that might be faked then look for more evidence.  If you find none there is probably a reason for that.


IMAGE COURTESY OF: http://www.physics.sjsu.edu/becker/physics51/mag_field.htm


I have to say, I tire of certain types of bias I see on the web.  I see it from people classed as "hardcore believers" and others classed as "hardcore sceptics".  Both "sides" hold fast to certain ideas they hold dear.  On this site there is a tendency to hang our coats on the whole lot when it comes to alternative ideas.  In the same way that "hardcore sceptics" are wrong to be biased always in favour of mainstream scientific ideas, by the same token it is also wrong for so many members here to always lean in favour of ideas that are are alternative to the mainstream.  Not all members all of the time.  But too often that is what I see.

As long as that remains the case the real scientists posting here will not post in their real name and there is almost no chance more "real scientists" will show up.  There are at least two scientists here (on and off) that I know of for sure and am fairly certain there are three.  None of them post on their own field very often at all as there is no point whatsoever.

[Amaterasu]

The hollow Moon theory does not stack up as far as I'm concerned.  The mass of the Moon looks known.  The orbital dynamics looked correct when I checked this out, in line with the equations of motion.  There is no need to invoke some mysterious force holding it "where it is" because the accepted "laws" of physics and equations of motion mean it makes sense that it is in orbit as we observe it.

Or...  The Ones who placed it there are clever and had influence in offering a "mass" number, and/or had a good idea what it would be calculated to be - and then designed Their efforts to LOOK like it all works out.  It is likely very important that Humans not see a problem with its mechanics.

Also...  Mass has much to do with materials.  A layer of soil on top of...lead, say, as a casing, would yield more mass than an equal volume of silica and such.  If We do not have data beyond the surface and a few feet down, how can We accurately measure the moon's mass?

Just saying that there are other explanations that would allow the calculations to work out...