Non-existant off world hardware

[The Seeker]

Z.that carrier looks close to what I saw...


seeker

[1Worldwatcher]

Well 'Z', there are definitely three seemingly circular lights located on wing Tips/Aft edge and there seems to be another on the underside of the Nose, err go "Triangular Craft Lights" which have been reported for sometime now. Another thing that sticks out strangely enough is the gentlemen standing on the wing, tells me this is not the materials used for the F-114 Mfg.



On another note, there was one image that was remarkably close to artists rendering's of what was being denied as the existence of "Tassette Blue Program".

The Fox news report I seen when it was released, was watching the news and was amazed when it aired as open MSM report. When I first seen it, I was thinking of Scram Jet technologies, of course by this time, the French were all excited about being in the Top Ranks for aeronautical prowess with Scram Jet, so was a bit caught off guard to hear the the interviewee say it "WASN'T" ScramJet technology, and for this I considered Plasma Pulse engine too achieve such high velocity in short period of time.

Probably the same technology that they are going to use for "CubeSats" being ready for use in 2014. As far as I can tell.

I do have one Question 'Z' "Was this aeronautical skin the development of the reverse engineering at A51 when BL was there?" And if so "Is it safe too say this is the Roswell crash results of said materials researched and deciphered?" Just curious.

1WW

[robomont]

zorgon .your breakin my heart .what evidence do you have that the paris vid is fake? if it is then its one of the best fake vids i have ever seen.

on another note.my physics friend from nasa worked on the maglev.he once told me about burning up a large bank of capacitors.
he had two sons .one worked for nsa and the other worked for usgs.
he was one of the nicest people i ever met .he never spilled the beans but i think he was trying to hint to me about maglev.he also worked on    the that black dart thing that the lower tail broke off of right before landing.he was the instrument tech.
he just past away this spring.i will miss him.

[Anthra]

I am doubting the name of the carrier though. The naming of ships follows an age old tradition and they have followed that since sailing ships. The Never name one after a live president.

Indeed. So what happened with: USS George H. W. Bush (CVN-77)? If memory serves, he yet lives.

The TR3B was the end of an era. It was actually a viable technology that didn't quite make it due to insufficient supporting technology. There was a rather long time when many of the serious space technology couldn't be developed because you lacked the control and or power system required. That is changing rapidly now, computing and power densities are increasing nicely.

The new "space technologies" will change the face of technology in general, much the same as the microprocessor did 40 years ago. With these new technologies will come a new science and physics.

[Anthra]

Nice Anthra!!

I don't know anything about remote viewing, but heard it is all the rage. I have seen some very disturbing things from remote viewer's, but more the horror stories than anything visual.

At times I wish I didn't know much about remote viewing either, don't necessarily "want" to see some things. Didn't know it was "all the rage" though; I started playing around with it in the early 70's, found it kind of easy, but not very useful. Recently though, I can look at spacecraft near the asteroid belt, and if I watch the reports carefully, I might just see confirmation (it actually happens a lot).

Good job none the less, will be watching for one of those 'USS B. Obam's' in the future!!
Thanks for sharing.

1WW

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

After watching the videos of the 'triangle' I was thinking the same thi g as Z. This guy must see these everyday and it was old hat to him. Or more likely a friend was operating the Rov like he does in his backyard. Lol

[starwarp2000]

Back several years... when that DIA/AF Spook came to 'visit' John and I he brought a flash drive with some pictures on it. One in particular is very interesting. This was on my harddrive about a year before it got out to the internet.

Now it is labeled as a Boeing X45C that was discontinued when the X47 (aptly named Pegasus by the guys at palmdale )  But look at this image closely...

If that is the X47A or B, then it is probably the Technology Mockup and not a production aircraft?

X47A:



X47B:



Anyone noticed a passing resemblance to that UFO from England earlier this year?

[stealthyaroura]

it blinked out and reappeared farther away. It basically disappeared when it accelerated.

THIS has been on my mind ever since i read about the supposed craft being tested.
what do you think the propulsion is or what effect would cause the observed "blink out leapfrog" effect? sounds incredibly exotic and this was 1985
FTL? bending space time?
cloaking maybe? oh i just want to see it all and touch it!!!I WANT TO SEE IT ALL
The only way this may be possible is to work in that field of study.we need more whistle blowers.
it's just not fair.we get shown stuff that is "state of the art" yeah for 50 years ago

[1Worldwatcher]

THIS has been on my mind ever since i read about the supposed craft being tested.
what do you think the propulsion is or what effect would cause the observed "blink out leapfrog" effect? sounds incredibly exotic and this was 1985
FTL? bending space time?
cloaking maybe? oh i just want to see it all and touch it!!!I WANT TO SEE IT ALL
The only way this may be possible is to work in that field of study.we need more whistle blowers.
it's just not fair.we get shown stuff that is "state of the art" yeah for 50 years ago

One has to remember with due diligence of the 'Assumption' of FTL acclimated speeds, that the model set forth by Einstein may have been flawed with out true testing capabilities, there by leaving the topic of FTL open too debate.

Ben Rich and Boyd Bushman have confessed we have these type so of technologies, and if they are using these types of propulsion systems "Who's too say that time doesn't get effected when doing such FTL traversing?" Everything happens in a blink of an eye and the event isn't recorded as anything "Time Consuming/Altered Related?"

I have too believe my hunch is "Yes" we do have these technologies, but then am frustrated as you are Stealthyaroura, because they will never let us civilian's in on the know how to do it. Bummer but true, none the less.

1WW

[The Seeker]

the problem with having more whistle blowers is that either A) they suddenly die immediately after coming forward or B) they just tease us with enough to make us salivate for more and to also keep their neck out of the noose...

Do I believe that we have this tech? Yep. Do I have any hard proof other than my own viewing of such in operation? Nope.

Are any hard core pseudo-skeptics/debunkers going to accept my testimony? Ya think? 


seeker

[stealthyaroura]

What really annoys me is 99% of the population just don't give a toss about these technologies they don't even know who Ben Rich Boyd Bushman or even Kelly Johnson are let alone what they did who they worked for etc.
all people seem to care about is have i seen Rianna's tit$ out this week or who kim kardashian is shagging. jesus christ! like I give a crap about that garbage, kill me please.!

When you get the like's of Rich and Bushman saying whatever you can imagine it's already been done and it would take an act of god to get these projects into the public eye you have to take that as FACT (well i do) that we have made HUGE leaps in technology and it also may not of all been HUMAN.

the average joe just does not care is not even bothered.
@seeker I agree the risks and the tidbits of info are frustrating as hell But I have to believe like 1WW these technologies exist.
Look at Z's latest thread on that antimatter engine infact ALL the PDF files from NIAC like teleportation to name just one who has even bothered to look?

Like the old saying you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink.
some aren't even getting to the water! sad. so much effort put into this site.

what we need is a small elite group,our own millenium group if you will who can handle the truth and promise to keep it just between ourselves.

[deuem]

THIS has been on my mind ever since i read about the supposed craft being tested.
what do you think the propulsion is or what effect would cause the observed "blink out leapfrog" effect? sounds incredibly exotic and this was 1985
FTL? bending space time?
cloaking maybe? oh i just want to see it all and touch it!!!I WANT TO SEE IT ALL
The only way this may be possible is to work in that field of study.we need more whistle blowers.
it's just not fair.we get shown stuff that is "state of the art" yeah for 50 years ago

IMHO, the verbage for these craft FTL never made any sence to me. FTES " Faster than Eye sight OK. If a craft went into FTL it would be how far away in the blink of an eye. For it to be here one moment and over there the next, I think could be done a lot slower, just too fast for us or our equipment. Go into FTL for 1.5 sec and your on the Moon. FTL within a solar syatem can get one in trouble very quick. I think we need a better term. IMHO

[Elvis Hendrix]

Deuem, that's good.

There is great big area between faster than sound and faster than light.

I like that. Have a bit of the old gold.

[robomont]

i think ftl may be possible but the traction to go ftl is tricky.
in the world we live in.first nobody could go faster than a horse.then we got cars and people said we couldnt go faster than fifty.then we got planes but nobody could go faster than sound.then we got jets.then we couldnt go ftl.in each case we had to improve tech.
if we start with cars.we grab dirt molecules to get traction.then with planes we grab air molecules.smaller than dirt.then with jets with after burners we grab air and add fuel.ie energy.with rockets its almost all energy.then there is my idea of the thing.which grabs ions.ie smaller particles and energy.thats why i believe to go even faster we have to get traction using the higgs.in each case efficientcy increases but traction is achieved with smaller masses and higher energies.ie voltage.the higgs can be grabbed with a billion volts.but to sustain billions of volts the apparatus must be very big to prevent arching of the hv.thats why i believe ftl will be a very large ship.

[zorgon]

Even Star Trek used impulse drive when in the solar system But even Light Speed drive would take 4.5 years to get to the closest star