A Living Species On Mars

[ArMaP]

I finally found the "floating" rock photo.

Here it is, first in the non-adjusted version (all channels from 0 to 255).
(Click for full size PNG version)



This is the "stretched" version, in which the values for red, green and blue are taken and stretched through the available range of 0 to 255.
(Click for full size PNG version)


In both images is visible that the "floating" rock is in contact with the ground and has a shadow. That was also visible in the image posted in the opening post, but not as clearl.

[rdunk]

ArMaP, all I can say is, I see a lot of rocks in these pics, and none of what I see as "rocks, have a shadow under them like this one does, that matches its general shape.  We see different things here obviously.

But of course, your eyes/brain never sees anomalies as anything but rocks, irregardless of its "pose and resolution" to the camera photo!! ~~~~~don't mean that in a disrespectful way, just stating the fact of my experience with you here and at ATS. I do appreciate your "polite approach" to skeptical contribution but....................your eyesight is soooooooooooooooo bad, according to what you say you see!!!

[ArMaP]

ArMaP, all I can say is, I see a lot of rocks in these pics, and none of what I see as "rocks, have a shadow under them like this one does, that matches its general shape.

A shadow is not supposed to match the general shape of the object projecting it, the shadow is supposed to be a projection of the object on the surface where the shadow is cast. That's why you can look at a cylinder from the side, seeing a rectangle, and the shadow, being projected from top to bottom, looking like a circle.

We see different things here obviously.

Obviously, but I noticed you didn't mention the shadow visible under the rock you say is floating or flying, as pointed in the image below. What do you have to say about it?

But of course, your eyes/brain never sees anomalies as anything but rocks, irregardless of its "pose and resolution" to the camera photo!!

Or maybe it's because I like rocks and I am used to look at rocks. Or because I am used to look at and work with digital images and have a well calibrated monitor. Or because I am used to work with perspective and projections.

~~~~~don't mean that in a disrespectful way, just stating the fact of my experience with you here and at ATS.

Your experience is a fact, your opinion about me is not, it's just an opinion.

I do appreciate your "polite approach" to skeptical contribution but....................your eyesight is soooooooooooooooo bad, according to what you say you see!!!

Well, I don't think that your approach in this post is polite, implying that those that do not see things as you do have some problem.

It looks like you may end like those people that see faces and buildings in all photos from Mars, the Moon or even of their lawn (I know two cases of people like this, one even saw some buildings in a photo of a fried slice of bread). 

[rdunk]

Thanks ArMaP! You make my point better than did I!

[deuem]

If it is floating then the shadow arrow would be shade and add another arrow for shadow.

If you blink your eyes fast it floats, If I stare with wide open eyes it turns to a rock.

It depends on how the image is entering the old brain, one or the other sticks.

In the large photo I can see a large turtle from this rock about 10 O'clock. Head, flippers and shell head on. I can also make out 2 shark heads on the right and a baby shark in the middle. One of them on the lower right can also be a statue with a face.

There are 2 strange out of place rocks in this photo. The one that sort of looks like it is an old tree trunk just standing straight up and another lower middle that is rounded well. Are they petrified optical illussions or what? One can see a photo very different from another, Again it depends on a lot of things. Sometimes training, sometimes opinions.

On Earth there are fish that look just like rocks, they do this to blend in otherwise they are food or can't catch food. With out a lot of places to hide on that surface I would think that after a million years, all creatures would look like rocks or they would be food quick.

Researchers need to find a rock/creature that has moved from 1 frame to another to prove their point of actual life. Until then it is an opinion on both sides as to what it really is. It is easy to defend a rock, it is very difficult to prove it is not. The burden of proof is not equal. So it is an uphill fight on one side only.

Besides the real question to me is "Where did all of these come from? There are no cliffs near by to roll down"  Say the tree stump came from an impact then why is it just sitting there like a prop on a stage. It is not buried in the soil. Just resting on it. Look at that large rock right under the tree trunk. How did that get there, roll, I see no tracks or paths. Maybe filled in but then I see no filled in paths. It also has a hole in it in the face. I don't know how deep the hole is.

SO, Where did they come from?  How close is the nearest cliff or mountain ? Stream Bottom, run off trash, lagoon dried up? The how is more important to me.



In this photo, any thing that is 100% black is getting Zero light.

Can anyone see the blue flow on the right hand frame top to bottom ending up or starting in the camp fire area, the horse shoe of stones looks like it was a small pool and flowed out or in towards the top. It also looks like some sort of shallow bay on the top or a sandy beach area. No rocks there!
Why? On Earth, Ice likes to move rocks, did the ice stop there?

Deuem

[Sinny]

I can't believe there's a two page discussion happening on a 'floating' rock.

Rocks don't float 

ArMap - You've done a fine job in your last response.

[WarToad]

 ArMaP has more than proven beyond any reasonable doubt these rocks are just rocks.   

[ArMaP]

Thanks ArMaP! You make my point better than did I!

I don't see how, but I see you still didn't made any comment about the image I posted.

[deuem]

ArMaP has more than proven beyond any reasonable doubt these rocks are just rocks.

And now I know the how he does it.  lol ArMap



Whats with the mickey mouse button?

D

[Elvis Hendrix]

Ha ha wikid deuem

[deuem]

I can't believe there's a two page discussion happening on a 'floating' rock.

Rocks don't float 

ArMap - You've done a fine job in your last response.

Hey we all once did 3 pages on flying pigs..And to be fair to Rdunk he origionaly wrote it was an un-known flying living species [bird?]
Wikid Deuem on the loose......

[Sinny]

Hey we all once did 3 pages on flying pigs..And to be fair to Rdunk he origionaly wrote it was an un-known flying living species [bird?]
Wikid Deuem on the loose......

And I thought PRC was the place to be........... Lmafo!

Yea - Wicked post Deuem 

[Somamech]

As much as I pick on Nasa for being stoopid you all have to remember that most of us use Nasa for Fact's or lack of Fact's right ?

There is no need to pick on someone who hold's some view's which everone feel's derogortory towards MSM Peggy views, who is also a member here which is respected as much as anyone else. 

If you were to actually read or know Armap from the previous place you will know he doe's infact hold mystery, and also like's to find out where it come's from. 

We could all be spending our time searching for free energy without smelling the solar panel's out in our mind's, along with being being ignorant.

Yep that would be really cool if NOT for the fact that having someone like Armap "who would love to be able to afford Such Luxury's! as most of us can through gov grant's" feel's stagnant.

It's easy to be green, but it's harder to be an individual....

[Elvis Hendrix]

Hey Som, Im with you 100%. We need Armap and i dig him.
D's picture was just funny thats all mate. 

[zorgon]

Rocks don't float 

OH YE DOUBTERS!!!!