Einstein and Newton debunked

[johnlear]

I have written a shorter and hopefully a more understandable  short essay on Pari Spolter's findings in her book, The Gravitational Force of the Sun, debunking both Einsteins theories, both general and special, of relativity and Newton's second law.

I asked Pari to check it for any errors and here is her response.

Hello John,

I really appreciate your support of my work. I think your Short Essay is very good and should be disseminated.

As you know, I am working on my own. I have no boss. No one can tell me to stop. If I had a job at a university, and wrote a book like mine, I would have gotten fired.

You are also independent, and you have the courage to support and promote the truth.

Regards,
Pari Spolter
orbpublishing@msn.com


Short Essay by John Lear about Pari Spolter's book "Gravitational Force of the Sun" (Orb Publishing 1993 Grenada Hills, CA.


In 1993, Pari Spolter, Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of Wisconsin Madison, self published a book titled "Gravitation Force of the Sun".

Spolters findings regarding the physics of our solar system, including major errors in density of matter, the gravitational  force, Einstein's theories both general and special and Newton's second law will toss mainstream science, mainstream scientists and the scientific community itself on their collective ear's for many years to come.

It took Spolter, a native of Iran, to say, "Hold on just a minute..... there seems to be an error here".  A talented and accomplished mathematician, she got down the basics of mainstream science, started asking questions, and found herself rearranging if not totally rebuilding our understanding of orbital and planetary physics.

Now, 18 years after she published her book, Gravitational Force of the Sun, (Orb Publishing, Grenada Hill, CA), CERN, who has spent billions of dollars chasing the non-existent large Hadron, have found that neutrinos travel in excess of the speed of light, thus validating her findings.

Her findings will change just about everything.


The two biggest hoaxes in modern mainstream science are (were) Einstein's Theories of Relativity both General and Special, and Newton's Second Law.

Einstein's Theories have recently  been invalidated due to the CERN statements that neutrinos have exceeded the speed of light contradicting Einstein's theory that nothing can exceed the speed of light.

In his equation E=mc2, for which Einstein became world famous, he proposed that E (energy) is equal to m(mass) times c2 (the velocity of light squared) wherein c plays the part of a limiting velocity, which can neither be reached nor exceeded by any real body.

4 examples of particles that exceed the speed of light are:

(1) Cerenkov radiation
(2) antimesons,
(3) superluminals, and
(4) neutrinos

Einstein understood mass to be inert matter, the quantity and density of which was proportional to gravitational force.

But mass, (the quantity and density of,) cannot be proportional to gravitational force  because:

(1) The sun dos not dole out a specific amount of its attractive force depending on the particular body that orbits it so what is constant for all planets, is the gravitational force of the sun.

(2) Using Newton's equation* the gravitational force of the sun is not constant.

(3) Using Kepler's third law, 'The periodic times of any two planets are to each other exactly as cubes of the square roots of their mean distances' so the gravitational force of a planet is a.A or acceleration times Area.

(4) The mass and the density of  celestial bodies are unknown.

(5) The gravitational force is independent of the mass and chemical composition of the attracted  body.

(6) Gravitational attraction of a central body that causes a secondary body to orbit is a centripetal force; it is not just a linear pull'.

Spolter does not accept the notion of inert mass causing gravitational attraction and rejects the notion that mass and energy are one and the same. She states that although the mass of a body remains constant, its weight increases when accelerated.

The enormity of the collapse of Einstein's theories and Newton's second law will take probably 20 years, at least, to be noticed by mainstream science. And the reason is practically all other sciences, on earth and in space, almost all equations, will have to be changed including the alleged densities and gravitational force of every planet and moon.

Einstein also accepted Newton's proposal that the size and density of inert matter (mass) was directly proportional to gravitational force.
In "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein states:

"For velocities greater than that of light our deliberations become meaningless."

and:

"Velocities greater than that of light...no possibility of existence".

I agree.

* Orbital velocity semi major         (v) times Semi major axis of revolution (r)

John Lear, Las Vegas
January 21, 2011

[Pimander]

John,

I have seen this material before, of course, but I love this sort of stuff.  Anyone with the guts to challenge convention without blinking like this gets a thumbs up from me.

You might be interested in this thread too by our newest member.

The Rings of Saturn and a New Theory of how the Universe works

[Amaterasu]

John,

Awesome. 

I have always wondered why We must take on faith that matter "bends" space-time.  Einstein never explains how or why this is.  Doesn't even seem to TRY to.

And any model that, a priori, stipulates something upon which the rest is built, rather makes Me dubious.

I prefer Dr. Paul LaViolette's subquantum kinetics...  The model requires nothing be taken on faith, presumes an aether, predicts the lensing of light and the perceived time dilation (and all the other things Einstein manages to predict) AND it predicts the Biefeld-Brown Effect.

Now I'm champing at the bit to read Pari's work!

[InfraRedMan]

Now, 18 years after she published her book, Gravitational Force of the Sun, (Orb Publishing, Grenada Hill, CA), CERN, who has spent billions of dollars chasing the non-existent large Hadron, have found that neutrinos travel in excess of the speed of light, thus validating her findings.

Hmmm... Maybe not John

Faster-than-light neutrinos: was a faulty connection to blame?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/23/faster-light-neutrinos-faulty-connection

Regards,
IRM 

[guerande]

Now, 18 years after she published her book, Gravitational Force of the Sun, (Orb Publishing, Grenada Hill, CA), CERN, who has spent billions of dollars chasing the non-existent large Hadron, have found that neutrinos travel in excess of the speed of light, thus validating her findings.

Infraredman is right : faulty connection seem to be reality, for now ... here in
Europe.
But who knows ? ...

[zerocd]

Neutrino Speed blamed on cable

[Ivalen]

Cerenkov radiation doesn't travel faster the c through a vacuum.

[zorgon]

Hmmm... Maybe not John

Faster-than-light neutrinos: was a faulty connection to blame?

So don't you find it fascinating that every time there is some new announcement of something extraordinary,  there is always "a faulty connection to blame"

Like NASA ans their arsenic based life forms, Cold Fusion ( yet the NAVY takes it seriously)

There is ALWAYS an accident, wrong data, incorrect readings, etc, etc....

Scientist these days must be really stupid to be making all these errors

[johnlear]

There is no quantitative property of the speed of light that would make it the limiting speed
of Cerenkov radiation in or out of a vacuum, or the limiting speed of neutrinos.

The main problem is that the ET's who we have allied ourselves with want to keep
earth in a state of no scientific advancement and have given TPTB a number of advanced
technologies in return for their help in keeping that information from benefiting the publlc.

Another group of ET's want to see scientific advancement for earth at a quicker rate but they,
unfortunately, are not in conntrol.

The ET's who want the scientific advancement for earth will probably take over in the
next 25 years or so.

Mainstream science is doing triple back flips to keep the masses from finding out the truth:
that Einstein was wrong in both of his Theories, General and Special. Newton's Law of
gravitation and Einsteins theories have been shredded by Pari Spolter. Her book, "Gravitational
Force of the Sun", which was published in 1993 does an excellent job of exposing the errors
of Einstein and Newton.

[hobbit]

There is no quantitative property of the speed of light that would make it the limiting speed
of Cerenkov radiation in or out of a vacuum, or the limiting speed of neutrinos.

The main problem is that the ET's who we have allied ourselves with want to keep
earth in a state of no scientific advancement and have given TPTB a number of advanced
technologies in return for their help in keeping that information from benefiting the publlc.

Another group of ET's want to see scientific advancement for earth at a quicker rate but they,
unfortunately, are not in conntrol.

The ET's who want the scientific advancement for earth will probably take over in the
next 25 years or so.

Mainstream science is doing triple back flips to keep the masses from finding out the truth:
that Einstein was wrong in both of his Theories, General and Special. Newton's Law of
gravitation and Einsteins theories have been shredded by Pari Spolter. Her book, "Gravitational
Force of the Sun", which was published in 1993 does an excellent job of exposing the errors
of Einstein and Newton.

The apple that fell and hit Newtons head.

Was previously within the memory field of the tree.
When the apples polarity was changed until it became attracted into the dominant memory field of the planet, it then displaced in space relative to that field it became attracted towards( towards the heart centre )
Newton was positioned upon the mass within His own memory field, this allowed His physical body to have a degree of free will within the dominant heart centred field it was within.
His head offered a resistance to the displacement trajectory of the apple.

I have respect and a high regard for Pari Spolters theories, but I would offer up an alternative  over and above that which She rightly states.

It has to do with the dual whorl heart centred method of universe, and how far more enlightened beings utilise this very simple universal method to operate in universe.

I am a very simple person, and therefore observe nature from such a perspective, I have little or no garbage indoctrination over riding what I observe.
The geometry at all scale of a fixed universal substance is that which enables the magnetic based resonance to operate in a descending scalar manner wher the duality confined within its own unique whorl of memory is subjected to the next up in scale field.

The field polarity of whatever...say the apple... can be though locally reorientated if sufficient quantities of the dual magnetic resonances are directed so as to alter their attraction towards whichever dominant field is chosen.

If the apples memory field therefore was reorientated towards the moon....that is what the apple would hit, the apple would fall towards the heart centred attraction of the moon.

Nature demonstrates this constantly, but We are easily persuaded by the consequences because we only see in 3D.
hobbit

[micjer]

Had to throw this in.

[Shasta56]

I was having a cordial and interesting exchange with Matrix Traveller a while back.  He became upset about something and withdrew.

Shasta

[johnlear]

The government sponsored counter-neutrino story sure got the majority of this thread believing it.

Too bad.

Remember that any physical theory or law is only good for this solar system. Beyond is a completely different story.

The Gravitational Force of the Sun Lives!

[Linda Brown]

Well John,

After the government spent MILLIONS of dollars on the DUMAND project and then they discovered that a mild mannered scientist and his other friends had come up with a sensor that could do the same thing.... more accurately..... you have to debunk everything that even mentions the name.....

People laughed at your Dad for mentioning that he had seen certain things in a lab.... and some have had a pretty good time with the things that you have said in the past... I happen to believe both you and your Dad....

So can you teach me more?

Linda

[Littleenki]

The government sponsored counter-neutrino story sure got the majority of this thread believing it.

Too bad.

Remember that any physical theory or law is only good for this solar system. Beyond is a completely different story.

The Gravitational Force of the Sun Lives!

Great point, John, it does go way beyond our level of observation!
And BTW, Gravitational Force of the Sun is on the way from Amazon as we post!
Cant wait to check our Pari's hard work..thanks for the bump!

Le