Holographic Planes & Blue Beam

[Sinny]

Frame by Frame Comparison of
a DC9 and a Flying Triangle

....See Special Agent 707.... On other occasions he had seen flying triangles in the valley that mimicked the navigation lights and sounds of conventional aircraft.  See Mimicry may be the Objective of ETI Triangular and Diamnond-shape Probes.  Frequently upon close examination and analysis of the data collected, significant anomalies arose that confirmed what his eyes saw (or didn't see).  For the skeptic, however, anecdotal data is insufficient, because observers can be mistaken; they can see things that are filtered/modified by the observers brain and made to conform with expectations, and they can be deceived by sounds and unexpected tricks of lighting - especially at night.

Data Comparison

The graphics and images presented below compare captured frames from two videos.  In both cases the path of the aircraft was similar, and the position of the cameraperson was similar relative to the flight paths.  Consequently, relatively similar images can be compared and analyzed.

(Sinny: Follow link for full pik comparisons)

* The "wingtip" lights on the FT (white) are larger and/or brighter than the analogous lights on the DC9 (yellow). This can be explained in part by resizing of the image for the overlay (FT image had to be enlarged), but that also means the FT was smaller than the DC9 (see below).

* The lights in front of the two tail-mounted engines on the DC9 (yellow, reflections) are positioned further towards the rear (where the engines are located). The mismatch of analogous lights for the FT is consistent with it not having a tail section, requiring that mimic lights (white) be attached on the deltoid-shaped fuselage. In addition, the two rear central lights on the FT are not equal in size/brightness, as they are for the DC9 (except where partially blocked/obscured by the fuselage). This is most evident when both aircraft are viewed from the rear. The smaller light on the FT actually disappears, while both lights are still visible on the DC9, even though one is partially obscured (less bright).

* Faint reflections off the leading edge of the FT deltoid-shaped wing (indicated by two paralleling lines) can be seen to extent to the central paired lights, indicating that there is no room for a conventional aircraft fuselage extending forward of the wings.





* The two smaller lights that initially appeared to the left of the larger paired central lights on the FT have reflections in front of them, like the two lights on the DC9. Unexplainable is how the light that is producing the reflection on the near side disappears in subsequent frames (see sequence below), even though its reflection does not disappear. This is not the case for the DC9, where a light is always associated with each reflection.



*The smaller far side light (#3 arrows above) actually slides towards the rear on the FT, indicating that it is not comprised of two separate lights as on the DC9. As orientation changes on the DC9 the forward light is visible, then the rear light (#2 arrow above). Because the two lights on the forward fuselage of the DC9 are not in line with one another, they cannot merge with one another. Each light on the far side is paired (opposite) with a light on the near side on the DC9. This is not the case for the FT.

*The sizes of the aircraft are different. Even though the exact altitudes are not known, the DC9 was descending from the overhead cloud ceiling on a glide path to the runway. It appeared to be descending below 1,500 feet in altitude when it passed over the observers. The FT (AOP #1), on the other hand, was not much higher than 1,000 feet when it began its approach.

(Continues in link:)

Sound

The sound made by the FT was not typical for a conventional jetliner.  No sound was picked up by the camcorder until the FT was almost directly over the observers (at 8 second mark on frequency spectrogram below). This is usually not the case for conventional jetliners, which often can be heard approaching from at least a quarter mile away.  In addition, there is significantly less white noise (blue above 2 kHz) evident in the frequency spectrogram for the FT than for that of most jetliners.

Spectrogram of FT recorded on 25 January 1997.


Spectrogram of jetliner (DC9) recorded on 27 June 1997.


The sound produced by the jetliner rumbles and breaks up into louder and softer segments, while that of the FT is brief and punctuated by distinct frequency bands.

(Follow Link for further discussion)

http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/DC-FT/dc9comp.htm

The Landings
by Dr. Bruce Cornet, Ph.D.
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/Landings/landing.htm

Related Links:

Estimate of the Situation 2000: The Black Triangles
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/EstimateoftheSituation/estimate.htm

Mystery C-5 from Stewart AFB
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/mystryc5/main.htm

Evidence for Plasma Light Sources
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/SOW/plasma.htm

A link of Links: Including:
The Manta Ray sightings
Reversed Doppler
Plasma Orbs
Reports of Westchester Wing sightings in 1984-1985 as it passed 150 feet above witnesses!
Special Agent 707
Spectacular Pictures of an American Airlines Jetliner Making an Erroneous Landing Attempt in a Farmers Field
The 6 August '92 mini-Flap over Orange County, New York
The Ascent
The Escort
The Experiment
The Illusion
The Laser Beam AOP Encounter
The Pine Bush Boomerang
The Signal
The Transformation
Unusual Phenomena Recorded at Jewish Cemetery
Power Point Presentations - Unconventional Aircraft and Their Performances
Cydnia Erath MArs Connection - Cornet 
Evidence For An Underground Magnetic Focusing System
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/SOW/aop_toc.htm
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/SOW/sow.htm
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/AOP/SOW/news.htm
http://userpages.monmouth.com/~bcornet/

BTW the History Channel did a shoot with me at Pine Bush.  They brought various magnetometers and a ground penetrating radar.  We confirmed the existence of an alien robotic probe entombed in Ordovician rock (430 million years old - a time when primitive sea life was evolving) that has been reactivated and beaming out signals into space.  It is only seven to ten feet below the surface.  The probe apparently landed on an island - part of an ancient archepelago of islands in a shallow sea - and was buried within marine muds, which later turned to black shales and siltstone.  Erosion has nearly exposed the probe.

There are two feet of glacial stratified drift just below the surface (5-8 feet of Ordovician rocks are on top of the probe).  A tree next to one of the probe's magnetic controlers is highly magnetized - 17 times higher than the background magnetic field.  The signals from the probe are apparently attracting other robotic probes to the area, which is why Pine Bush is such a hot spot for UFO activity.

The History Channel will be showing this documentary in February 2008.

Yours truly,
Bruce Corbet

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SarfattiScienceSeminars/conversations/topics/10689?var=1

[Sinny]

Former Pilot Witnessed Airplane Changed Shape And Then Disappeared : MUFON Report

Shape Shifting Airplane - Former Pilot Witnessed Airplane Changed Shape And Then Disappeared : MUFON Report

According former pilot eyewitnesses testimonial on MUFON website case - 27684 :

I live on a mountain (3K+ feet OSL) east of Asheville NC. On February 5th, 2011 at 5:23 pm I casually standing out on my deck observing 3 hawks circling to the south of me. Then I noticed what at first I thought was a jet liner in the distance behind the hawks, moving east to west at a lower-than-normal rate of speed.

But it seemed different in shape (as the wings were not discernible) and speed and was south of me maybe 5 miles.

I quickly got my binoculars and observed what appeared to be a craft changing from an airliner (with a solid red tail, and that may be important) to a long cigar-shaped and bright silver craft. For maybe 5 seconds the craft disappeared behind some branches of trees in my view and after that the craft was nowhere to be seen in its ongoing trajectory/flight path.

It had literally disappeared. I'm a former pilot (with over 25K hours of flight time in ALL kinds of weather conditions) and I know all kinds of aircraft. This craft, again, changed into something else completely and then disappeared! That was a first for me, as I've seen many UFO's in my personal and flying career.

(Wit's name deleted--CMS/sg)
Asheville NC

http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/02/shape-shifting-plane-former-pilot.html

[Sinny]

John and Sue Mann's Photographic experience - Over 500 pictures!

Residents of Newburgh, NY, John and Sue Mann play an intricate part in the story of the Pine Bush phenomenon! Meeting John and Sue Mann in 1991, it was a relationship that would develop with more experiences together then one could imagine! We met as John and his wife Sue pulled up alongside my car near the old Jewish cemetery on Route 52 in Montgomery county. We all looked at each other and said "Where are the UFOs"? Some years later we found "them" in what is known as the most active UFO hotbed on the east coast, Pine Bush, NY! To this day we still spend time together on the roads of Pine Bush watching the skies! Throughout the 1990s and to this day they are still highly active in the UFO community, and also play a big part in the United Friends Observers Society better known by the locals as U.F.O.S.

Follow link for images:  http://www.pinebushufo.com/pinebushpage31.htm

 

[Sinny]

I guess I will go find a burning building and join the others you decide to insult.
This is something I don't need in my life at all!

Goodbye!

No thank you Deuem, your staying put! 

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Wait a minute, Deuem please calm down,

What i think Robo means, is that if anyone outside pegasus thinks you are a scam, then they have to call us out, meaning the group as a whole.
i'm quite sure he was defending you, it just came out differently, read his post again, please.............
And Robo, please try to word it better next time.
It is not always a good idea to keep calling peeps out, for one thing you might get swatted, and for another, peeps will be reluctant to rally to your side, in case THEY get called out too....

I hope that clears things up

[Sinny]

Well, I thought robo was referring to Sander...

Back to work please folks!

[undo11]

deuem

robo was complimenting you and letting you know that pegasus has your back. 

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Yes that's the way i read it Beth, thanks

OK so Robo can be as subtle as a pitbull terrier, but we love him really

[undo11]

Yes that's the way i read it Beth, thanks

OK so Robo can be as subtle as a pitbull terrier, but we love him really

robo, lord love him, is stream of consciousness 24/7/365 and that's good. it's better to know what someone is thinking up front then you have a chance to defend yourself if need be lol

deuem's work is phenomenal.  he must realize by now, how the pegasus team feels about it.  a51watcher was beaming ear to ear for a month at least, over deuem's results on his area 51 video

[Amaterasu]

Deuem, I don't see what You are seeing in robo's posts.  He said He believes You have a great process, and is calling for Those who say otherwise to show Their stuff.  NOT that YOU are a scammer.

Please, Deuem, contemplate this a bit more.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

deuem not only spent a lot of time with me, developing some of our gadgets but has done amazing work for many peeps, also off this forum.

I for one, whish his speedy return, we need more like him

[undo11]

deuem not only spent a lot of time with me, developing some of our gadgets but has done amazing work for many peeps, also off this forum.

I for one, whish his speedy return, we need more like him

agreed. he also did a fantastic job on the peg radio show with that living moon advert. he's probably just so busy with real life work, that having people expecting him to be constantly on top of things here, is too much.

deuem, you only have to do what you have time for.   even that will be better than most of us can do anyway.

[Sinny]

So in regards to Holographic Planes and the such -

Anyone here know anything about sound recordings? Doppler? Reversed Doppler?

And most importantly, has anyone found any other work based on the subject?

Anyone got comment about plane wings 'disappearing' during 9/11...?

(will insert vids asap)

Any one here got any comment on morphing birds? lmafo!

[Gigas]

Ya know, that planes wings melting into the second tower seemed really holographic. Just the way an orb would produce a dream factory object into the physical realm of temporal observations. Your mind understand that and makes a limited scenario to fit.

I, on the other hand, seen it the same way but in my mind that plane should of folded up and the wings broke off with the tail twisting rather then follow itself in like melted butter. The B-25 that hit the empire state building didn't go through the building and some of it fell to the street below.

Hitting the tower should have created a shock wave back through the plane and from the video, we should see the fuselage distort from the shock wave. We didn't see that.

[PLAYSWITHMACHINES]

Well i won't comment on the birds, i trust both Deuem & Sander for the analysis...it was just a freak camera angle, IMO.

Now, analysing the sound of the recordings is, (again IMO) very relevant, and you may have touched upon a new area for research

As it is, most of these craft are completely silent, again My personal opinion, there is not much more to be gained from analysing this, unless it is the debunking of fakes.

That last one is still a problem, you MUST be your own worst critic, if this is to work.
Again, just my opinion...................

Just in case y'all Missed it, we were here..