News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

ZP Final Cut

Started by COSMO, March 04, 2014, 03:32:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

COSMO

#15
Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on March 04, 2014, 08:40:22 PM
About right, i was figuring ONLY 22 gigawatts per cc at the time i made this;





Finally got to that.  Very nice Luke!  Nothing like a little techno while the sparks fly huh?   :)

Yes, ZP, all the energy of the ETHER!  Visible in the patterns of nature...









Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

#16
OOoo nice pictures 8)

You can clearly see the 'counter' vortex in the water :D

Well i made that vid 3 years ago (or longer) to try & sell my CD, thought i would put some ideas in there LOL

But it's still true, how can you have an 'energy crisis' when you, the planet, everything, is nothing BUT energy? Even the space in between the atoms is seething with it :P

Anyway back to the spaceship.

The FTL aspect is of course kind of true, the less mass (= more grav distortion) the less energy it takes to move it, and you are not affected by relatavistic mass theory. Cool

Only there would still be the matter of Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction to deal with, that could give some pretty strange experiences when approaching lightspeed :D

Even the ST movie made use of that to fill 5 minutes with a kind of LSD trip for Kirk & his crew ;D

COSMO

#17
OOoo nice pictures 8)

Yeah...I like nice pictures!  lol

Here's a great example of nature doing something that we can hope to mimic...

TORSION!



This monster black hole rotates at roughly half the speed of light twisting space as it turns.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2014/03/monster-black-formed-near-beginning-of-universe-found-twisting-space-at-half-the-speed-of-light-.html

Proving.
A: That  space/time is malleable
B. That TORSION can be accomplished
C. That nature already does everything we can dream of doing



hello kitty...


ha ha

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

robomont

My own basic point of view on the subject of black holes is a high enough energy level would cause an object to escape said blackhole.
We are not currently wise to the effects at high current and high voltage except on the atomic scale.on the macro scale.is where these anomolies should be more understandable.due to us having a real visual and hands on effect.
One thing that seems interesting is where on the quantum scale .particles are seen to pop in and out of this dimension we exist in.so by the macro scale.we should be able to pop in and out.
If a craft is energised to the right voltage and current.maybe magnetic field.
Somewhere along that emf scale should be gravity nullification.
ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

robomont

Oh also deuem and maybe flux have triangulation software.they could tell us a general length of the two points.which would give us the voltage of that craft.

ive never been much for rules.
being me has its priviledges.

Dumbledore

COSMO

Nice interview with Mark McCandish...





Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

BUMP
...Let's not forget the Flux-Liner, we need to know more about the core....

COSMO

The core...

Most likely dense, highly charged plasma, making up the central core/shaft of the Faraday generator.   I imagine the amount of TORSION it is able to create is pretty substantial and the amount of energy that it is able to generate is quite high.  The whole craft, is, in essence, a flying Faraday generator.  The coil configuration could be energized by the Tesla effect,  plasma is conductive I've heard...induction, creating localized frame drag, a space/time/ETHER vortex, just like mother nature.  A plumber would understand...

I guess... lol



Movement of ETHER is superluminal...

LaViolette said that also in Subquantum Kinetics...

so for star travel, we MUST move ETHER!

Cosmo

And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

The Seeker

Luke, it appears to me that the flux liner might also be the onion drive...

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=352.msg2868#msg2868

then again I might be hallucinating  8)


seeker
Look closely: See clearly: Think deeply; and Choose wisely...
Trolls are crunchy and good with ketchup...
Seekers Domain

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

Hm yes i forgot this, silly of me..
Rotating EM fields are nothing new, they use them in industry al the time, and i think it's just a question of time before more companies have cracked it...yes, it is basically the same principle as the flux-liner, maybe we can do something with those plans, thanks for reminding me i must be getting old.

COSMO

#25
Quote from: the seeker on April 20, 2014, 02:22:34 PM
Luke, it appears to me that the flux liner might also be the onion drive...

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=352.msg2868#msg2868

then again I might be hallucinating  8)


seeker

I think the general concept is similar, but in the ARV we can see the actual construction, the shaft, the coil, the faraday generator.  It's an induction craft...a Faraday generator with a plasma shaft, inside a coil, a BIG coil,  generating TORSION...creating an ETHER vortex that will create an extension of ETHER aka space/time and the craft will be moved in the direction of the extension, just like water going down the drain...or a black hole or a tornado or a hurricane...it's natures model.  It's everywhere around us. 

In the interview with McCandlish, he talks about a 1966 UFO sighting with photos that is supposed to be one of these craft, or very similar.

Here it is...



1966 - Provo, Utah. The pilot of a twin engine C-47 "Skytrain" transport aircraft of the USAF captured this red object on photograph in July, 1966, at 11:00 AM.
The aircraft was flying over the Rocky Mountains, at about 40 kilometers southwest of Provo, Utah.

The Condon commission, which concluded that UFOs are not worthy of scientific investigations, did analyze the negative at the time and concluded that the photograph shows an ordinary object thrown in the air.

Exhaustive investigation of the photograph concluded the UFO in the photograph is a real object.


http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures2.html

There are other versions of the pics out there.  Maybe someone more experienced with photo analysis can take a look at them and give us some feedback?   ;)

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

COSMO

And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

#27
Hi again 8)
Hey that red one is THE classic flux-liner shape, complete with oversized observation / camera domes. Eyewitnesses did say it looked like it had been around for a lond time, all dented & scratched. That was one of the things that really rang true about these stories.
But why paint one red?
Hardly 'stealth' is it? ;D

Even the RAF painted their planes sky blue underneath & military cammo on top ;)

I now have details of no less than 3 different systems which would render a craft invisible :P

COSMO

Quote from: PlaysWithMachines on April 25, 2014, 09:59:31 PM
Hi again 8)
Hey that red one is THE classic flux-liner shape, complete with oversized observation / camera domes. Eyewitnesses did say it looked like it had been around for a lond time, all dented & scratched. That was one of the things that really rang true about these stories.
But why paint one red?
Hardly 'stealth' is it? ;D

Even the RAF painted their planes sky blue underneath & military cammo on top ;)

I now have details of no less than 3 different systems which would render a craft invisible :P

When I was in the Navy, I was on a decommissioning crew on a carrier.  We used a type of paint called red lead, because it had lead in it and would preserve the spots we had removed rust from.  Would that be something they might use?  It would go on in thick strokes, leaving brush marks, a rough finish...not pretty, kinda sounded like the paint job on the ARV.  Would that serve a logical purpose, a paint with lead in it?  Just random thoughts...

Cosmo
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?

PLAYSWITHMACHINES

Yes, i was thinking 'red oxide' paint that you apply to metal to stop it rusting, it also acts as a base coat. kind of like a 1976 Ford Cortina in the UK :D

Remember Beau Kitselman's notes? Lead Oxide has 3 dorms, the one i need is yellow, not the red one, BUT lead (II) oxide is one of the better dielectrics when mixed with glycerine.
I even set up a small lab to make various dielectric compounds for the TTB stuff, so there could be a connection, especially since a lead coating would help to protect the passengers from radiation......it all adds up.
But at least paint over the red lead, unless they needed it bare for the aforementioned EG application??
Hmm good one ??? ::) :D