News:

Forum is currently set to Admin Approval for New Members
Pegasus Gofundme website



Main Menu

Malaysia flight 370 Where is it?

Started by spacemaverick, March 11, 2014, 05:14:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Seeker

Look closely: See clearly: Think deeply; and Choose wisely...
Trolls are crunchy and good with ketchup...
Seekers Domain

spacemaverick

From the past into the future any way I can...Educating...informing....guiding.

fansongecho

#1142
And WOW! at how many times the topic has been read!
:o

And off topic but do any of you gals and guys know of anyone who worked for Howard Hughes in his Glomar Explorer days ? I always thought his death was engineered and I don't believe that the Glomar Explorer project was his last black project - I wonder if Bigalow will end up the same as Hughes did -  :-\

Cheers!

Fans'  :)

BadHairDay

Heard two interesting theories on it.

1/. Remotely landed in China, to remove a single person. That person was a living 'key' and gate keeper of a sensitive place on the planet. Likely in China. No-one was killed, rather they were re-tasked  and are living somewhere else as someone else.

2/. A South African particle accelerator created a very small and short tear in space/time resulting in the aircraft rematerialising in an abandoned gold mine in South Africa. All passengers were killed, bar one woman, who was dug out and is still surviving today. Rock encruseted wreckage was sent via rail to the coat, shipped up to Tanzania, and dumped at sea.

spacemaverick

Well now, a new theory has come up with some new calculations.  I still think this is a possibility.  This theory is done by a mathematician, Professor Martin Kristensen, an engineer at Aarhaus University in Denmark.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09315

The above link explains briefly that some of the data from Inmarsat were not factored into their possible solutions.

The news search area should be near Christmas Island and this area has not been searched.

Those arcs extended over land and populated areas — also covered by civilian and commercial radars. MH370 hadn't been detected along any of these paths.

Which is why investigators plotted possible tracks that took the Boeing 777 out to sea.

But the 'handshakes' held one more clue.

It's called 'Doppler shift'.

It's the minuscule 'stretching' of a signal as its source moves towards or away from the receiver.  Having dealt with the doppler radar in my earlier years, I understand the doppler shift.

There's a broad range of relative velocities that can be produced by an aircraft flying at different angles, at different speeds.

But it does offer another set of boundaries within which MH370 must have followed.

It all comes down to probabilities.

And that's where Kristensen comes in.

He built a mathematical model that takes into account all of these limiting elements.

His argument is that MH370 can only have gone down where the boundaries of speed, fuel, 'handshake' signals and doppler shift all 'overlap'.

"We find four independent solutions with the final part of the flight following a great circle," his research paper declares.

(above information is taken from the article.)

Here is the link for the entire explanation from the math guy.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/mh370-theory-data-analysis-points-to-new-probable-crash-site/news-story/a53b708ee8e88402b1c905df89351180#.gkk27

Tell me what you think.


From the past into the future any way I can...Educating...informing....guiding.

Sgt.Rocknroll

Did you happen to watch the video series I posted previously?
Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini Tuo da gloriam

spacemaverick

I sure did.  I still have it on my computer.
From the past into the future any way I can...Educating...informing....guiding.

spacemaverick

Published by Australia 60 minutes, 3 weeks ago.



Where is it?  Still unknown.
From the past into the future any way I can...Educating...informing....guiding.

Sgt.Rocknroll

#1148
Sorry but supposition, innuendo, guessing doesn't prove anything. It's a puff piece that doesn't say anything new.  IMO... 8)
Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini Tuo da gloriam

spacemaverick

Sarge, you're right  If they ever find the black boxes ( and they probably won't) then they MAY know.....the mystery continues.
From the past into the future any way I can...Educating...informing....guiding.

fansongecho


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_recorder

Just looking at the Flight Recorder hardware battery life and sonar / beacon life information post-crash.

"snip from Wiki link above"

After Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
On March 12, 2014, in response to the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, David Price re-introduced the SAFE Act in the US House of Representatives.[55]

The disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 demonstrated the limits of the contemporary flight recorder technology, namely how physical possession of the flight recorder device is necessary to help investigate the cause of an aircraft incident. Considering the advances of modern communication, technology commentators called for flight recorders to be supplemented or replaced by a system that provides "live streaming" of data from the aircraft to the ground.[56][57][58] Furthermore, commentators called for the underwater locator beacon's range and battery life to be extended, as well as the outfitting of civil aircraft with the deployable flight recorders typically used in military aircraft. Previous to MH370, the investigators of the 2009 Air France Flight 447 urged to extend the battery life as "rapidly as possible" after the crash's flight recorders went unrecovered for over a year.[59]

Live flight data streaming like on the Boeing 777F EcoDemonstrator, plus 20 min of data before and after a triggering event, could have removed the uncertainty before the Boeing 737 MAX groundings following the March 2019 Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crash.[60]

After Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501
On December 28, 2014, Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501, en route from Surabaya, Indonesia, to Singapore, crashed in bad weather, killing all 155 passengers and seven crew on board.[61]

On January 12 and 13, 2015, following the recovery of the flight recorders, an anonymous ICAO representative said: "The time has come that deployable recorders are going to get a serious look."[citation needed] Unlike military recorders, which jettison away from an aircraft, signaling their location to search and rescue bodies, recorders on commercial aircraft remain inside the fuselage. A second ICAO official said that public attention had "galvanized momentum in favour of ejectable recorders on commercial aircraft".[62]

"Snip"

I was curious about the battery and sonar/beacon life regarding the 370.

Cheers,

Fans'

thorfourwinds



The Vanishing of Flight 370

LEMMiNO
Published on Apr 14, 2019

On the 8th of March, 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 vanished during a routine flight between Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Beijing, China. The case has since grown into one of the most puzzling mysteries in aviation history. In this video, I examine the findings of the official investigation and explore some of the leading theories.
EARTH AID is dedicated to the creation of an interactive multimedia worldwide event to raise awareness about the challenges and solutions of nuclear energy.