The ETHER is a Superfluid

[COSMO]

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers working at the University of Hawaii using data from the Kepler space telescope, has found that the oscillations made by a star conform closely to the golden mean—further study showed that it also behaves in a fractal pattern. In their paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters, the team describes their analysis of data from the pulsating star KIC 5520878, captured over a period of several years, and why what they found is cause for excitement.

n studying the Kepler data, the team was able to track the pulses that emanated from the star over a period of four years—taken at 30 minute intervals. They found that two of star KIC 5520878's pulsating frequencies occurred at 4.05 and a 6.41 hour cycles—which the team noted had a ratio of 1.58, which is close to 1.618, aka the Golden Ratio—famously found in nature and sometimes artistic renderings. Intrigued, they looked deeper and found that the frequencies conformed to fractal patterns—separating the oscillations into their constituent parts revealed additional weaker frequencies, similar to the way, the team points out, that images of shorelines display craggy lines regardless of how close or far away they are viewed from.

Counting bumps on converted plots which had heights greater than a certain threshold revealed a power law dependence—one of the accepted signs of fractal behavior. The difference here of course is that with traditional fractal systems, the behavior is seen visually—here it was seen as factor of time. The group suggests that their finding appears to be the first example of a "strange nonchaotic attractor" which is a system that displays a fractal structure but does not have the sensitivity to beginning conditions of other known chaotic systems, such as the weather.
The team looked at five other pulsating stars to see if they could spot a pattern and found mixed results, three of them had near golden ratios and fractal patterns, while two others had neither. What is still unclear at this point is whether the behavior of the stars that do show fractal structure is something that happens for a reason, which could perhaps offer new clues about stellar physics, or if the ratios found by the team are merely coincidence.



Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-evidence-fractal-behavior-pulsating-stars.html#jCp

Does it happen for a reason?  Consider the invisible, fractal, suprfluid ETHER, the primary medium, the primary ingredient,  the foundation of creation, the source of all matter and energy, it's responsible for the rate at which time passes and produces gravity...and everything is connected in that ocean.  It's the realm of skyfishes.  lol

Cosmo

[COSMO]

In physical terms, the model describes the universe as being filled with a quantum fluid. The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitons—hypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html#jCp



A quantum superfluid, the universal ocean of creation...
A universe created by torsion and sustained by ETHER flow from the subatomic to the cosmic.  Gravity is a flow of ETHER into subatomic black holes.  It's nature's model and it's all around us. 




Cosmo

[COSMO]

I noticed some similarities between an old theory and a new theory...

Physicists offer a solution to the puzzle of the origin of matter in the universe

Most of the laws of nature treat particles and antiparticles equally, but stars and planets are made of particles, or matter, and not antiparticles, or antimatter. That asymmetry, which favors matter to a very small degree, has puzzled scientists for many years.

Specifically, the UCLA researchers write, the asymmetry may have been produced as a result of the motion of the Higgs field, which is associated with the Higgs boson, and which could have made the masses of particles and antiparticles in the universe temporarily unequal, allowing for a small excess of matter particles over antiparticles.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-physicists-solution-puzzle-universe.html#jCp

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

* That the luminiferous ether fills all space

* That the ether is acted upon by the life-giving creative force

* That the ether is thrown into "infinitesimal whirls" ("micro helices") at near the speed of light, becoming ponderable matter

* That when the force subsides and motion ceases, matter reverts to the ether (a form of "atomic decay")

http://netowne.com/technology/important/



Gravity is a flow OF ETHER, Inertia is a wave in the ETHER, Matter is a vortex in the ETHER.  The ETHER is a superfluid.


Cosmo

[COSMO]

Higgs Discovery Rehabilitating Despised Einstein Ether

Why is the Higgs boson and its associated Higgs field such bad news for many? In a nutshell: Orthodoxy about Einstein's general relativity has for about a whole century now academically lynched anybody for mentioning the evil ether. The ether, also "Einstein-Aether", is the idea that relativity emerges inside a fluid like space-substance that lives through time. This is very much disliked by all those who almost religiously believe in the dogma of abstract geometrical space-time. The Higgs boson is an excitation of the Higgs field, and that Higgs field is what gives some of the more fundamental particles like electrons their mass. This is why the Higgs field is also called Higgs-ether!


As I pointed out before (but you still cannot publish such if not already famous), the ether has long been back with a vengeance in all of modern physics. It does not imply that Einstein was wrong, although orthodoxy still often holds that the Michelson-Morley Ether-drift experiments supposedly disproved the ether and therefore proved Einstein correct. Now with firm evidence for the Higgs ether, perhaps one can finally come out of the closet and say the forbidden taboo word again?


Let me quote what I wrote before [1] in order to explain some more:


Abstract: Modern physics, via standard model with Higgs and string theory for example, has supplied ether-like models and emergent gravity scenarios that substantially weaken the usual defense of orthodox relativity and abstract, relational space-time in general ...

Mass in general relativity (GR) is simply inertia. Gravity is not a force but curvature of space-time. On the other hand, the Higgs mechanism derives the rest mass of some of the standard model's fundamental particles as an interaction with a 'sticky' background Higgs field through which the particles move. Orthodox relativity almost vilifies such ether-like concepts, while modern physics reintroduced them for about half a century now. In GR, space-time is 'dynamic', which means that it interacts with the energy-momentum distribution. Nevertheless, orthodox GR can be described as a "relativity is kinematics" position (Janssen 2009; Padmanabhan 2008) , i.e. an abstract-view (relationism, structuralism) where the dynamics emerges from symmetries (consistency) rather than from any concrete mechanism. The idea that relativistic kinematics arises from the dynamics of objects interacting with their background space is disfavored by orthodox GR, because such an interpretation treats the background as too "substantiated"; ...

GR's geodesics through curved space-time had abolished gravitational forces. Rest mass in the standard model, that includes even pure inertia against gravitational acceleration, is described as a permanently ongoing interaction with a Higgs background. ..., the dynamics leading to kinematics concept is deeply rooted in modern physics, so deeply that Richard Feynman abandoned his catchiest motto: "The vacuum is empty" (Wilczek 1999) .

http://www.science20.com/alpha_meme/higgs_discovery_rehabilitating_despised_einstein_ether-85497

Yes, the Higgs Boson is validation for the Higgs ETHER.  It gives particles their mass.  It is also more than that.  The ETHER is the universal ocean of creation with all energy and matter arising from it.  All points in space and time are connected in it.  Flow of ETHER into subatomic vortices creates gravity.  We are rooted in it, never separate, always connected for all of time.  It IS the energetic dimension of time and a direct experience of it is Samadhi.

Cosmo

[COSMO]

Non particle?  A fluid?    

Is dark matter a FLUID? Mystery 'particles' are mapped in galaxy clusters - but results suggest they may not be particles at all

Researchers have mapped dark matter in several colliding galaxy clusters more than a billion light-years away.

And one outcome of the research is that dark matter might not actually be composed of particles, as previously thought.

Instead, a number of theories ranging from it being a fluid, to not existing at all, have been presented by researchers - who also say it is likely 'weirder than we first thought.'


Researchers in Switzerland and the UK mapped dark matter in clusters (shown in blue), and discovered that dark matter might be 'weirder than we thought'. Clockwise from top left, the galaxy clusters are: MACS J0416.1+2403, MACS J0152.5+2852, MACS J0717.5+3745, ZwCl 1358+62, Abell 2744 and Abell 370

The research was carried out by scientists from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland, the University of Edinburgh and Durham University.

They used data from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory to measure galaxy clusters - collections of hundreds of galaxies.

Surprisingly, the study discovered that dark matter 'particles' may simply pass through each other when galaxy clusters collide.


The fascinating conclusion was that dark matter does not interact with itself - or, perhaps, even other matter - in ways we would think possible. Shown is the galaxy cluster MACS J0416.1+2403 and its dark matter distribution, shown in blue, based on its gravitational interactions

Although it accounts for 90 per cent of all matter in the universe and more than a quarter of its energy, scientists still know very little about dark matter.

WILL THE LHC FIND DARK MATTER?
After a two-year shutdown and upgrade, the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is about to ramp up for its second three-year run.

Scientists are promising nearly twice the energy and far more violent particle crashes this time around - and hope to get a glimpse of dark matter.

The team at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research, or Cern, say if nature cooperates, the more powerful beam crashes will give them a peek into the unseen dark universe.

Beams should start running through the giant machine later this month, with the first high energy crashes probably coming in May, accelerator director Frederick Bordry said in a news conference in Geneva.

Scientists hope to see all sorts of new physics, including a first ever glimpse of dark matter, one of the chief focuses of the experiment.

'I want to see the first light in the dark universe,' said Cern General Director Rolf Heuer.

'If I see that, then nature is kind to me.'

One major idea among astronomers is that dark matter consists of a new subatomic particle that we haven't discovered yet.

More exotic theories want dark matter to be a quantum defect from the birth of the universe, extra-dimensional mass, or even a modified form of gravity.

What we do know is that dark matter interacts with cosmic structures through gravity, shaping and molding them.

For example, dark matter bends light that passes through it, distorting images of distant space objects.

In addition, dark matter speeds up the motion of galaxies inside galaxy clusters, which are collections of hundreds of galaxies, containing literally astronomical amounts of stars, planets, and gases.

Galaxy clusters are also 90 per cent dark matter, which makes them ideal for studying it, especially when they collide into each other and force their respective dark matters to interact.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3013284/Is-dark-matter-FLUID-Mystery-particles-mapped-galaxy-clusters-results-suggest-not-particles-all.html

A fluid?  We can only observe it's gravitational influence?  Maybe it's a super fluid.  Maybe it's the primary medium, the foundation of creation, the ETHER.



Cosmo

[COSMO]

Seeing is Believing: Constructing the Higgs Boson

The Higgs Boson Is an Invisible Field

On the press preview day of the Collider exhibition in the Science Museum London, a journalist asked Peter Higgs about how he himself visualizes the Higgs boson. Higgs responded that he doesn't visualize it at all.

That's because the Higgs boson isn't really a 'thing' in the way that a non-particle physicist might understand the term. Rather, it is a perturbation, a ripple in an energy field. In 1964, Peter Higgs proposed that fundamental particles get their mass by interacting with an ever-present energy field. To prove the existence of the Higgs field, it has to be excited to create detectable ripples. If the Higgs field is an invisible sea, the Higgs boson is a wave on the surface that requires very expensive equipment to be able to 'see'.

It took almost fifty years and many billions of dollars to prove that this field and this mass-giving mechanism exist, because it's extremely difficult to produce these ripples—the Higgs boson—inside the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). And once it appears, it decays immediately, so particle physicists can only record the footprint of the collision. By analyzing the decay of this footprint, the physicists were able to infer that the Higgs field exists.



http://www.methodquarterly.com/2015/02/seeing-is-believing-constructing-the-image-of-the-higgs-boson/#ixzz3VxH0aOzh

A ripple on an invisible sea.  Yes.  A super fluidic sea.  All matter and energy are perturbations in that field.  It is the ETHER, the universal ocean of creation.

Cosmo 

[COSMO]

Here's some good stuff on space time as a super fluid. 

Is Space-Time Actually a Super Fluid?

It's a radical suggestion, but it would certainly solve one of cosmology's greatest mysteries - the problem of establishing a universal time.

LOOK up at the sky. Almost everything out there is spinning around: stars, galaxies, planets, moons - they are all rotating. Yet physicists believe that the universe itself is not revolving. Why?

It's a question that Pawel Mazur can't answer. Mazur, a physicist at the University of South Carolina in Columbia, is one of a number who think it is entirely possible that our universe is spinning on an axis. If these people are right, it could make understanding the universe a whole lot simpler. You could stop worrying about the big problems in cosmology: the origin of the big bang, the nature of dark energy and maybe dark matter too. You could get rid of the strange idea that the universe went through a superfast period of expansion known as inflation. You might even be able to halt the attempt to find a theory that marries together quantum theory ...

The way time breaks down around a rotating cosmic string has given Mazur and Chapline a clue to resolving this issue. The CTCs form in regions close to the cosmic string's axis, which means relativity breaks down in the cores of tiny "gravitational vortices" while continuing to apply everywhere else. "This is very suggestive of a vortex in a superfluid," says Mazur.

Superfluids, such as ultra-cold liquid helium, have very strange properties. They can flow uphill, for example, and without friction. One crucial property of superfluids is that they cannot be made to rotate in the way a bucketful of water will swirl around when stirred. Stir a vat of superfluid and you'll produce an array of vortices: the superfluidity breaks down within each vortex, but everywhere else the fluid remains still - and superfluid.

Mazur published the analogy between vortices in superfluid helium and the way time breaks down near rotating cosmic strings 20 years ago in Physical Review Letters (vol 57, p 929). Ever since then he has been thinking about what it might mean.

Now Mazur and Chapline think they might have the answer: what if this similarity between space-time and superfluids is no accident? What if space-time actually is a superfluid?

Mazur says the superfluid universe idea makes inflation redundant because one object, the collapsing star, contained all of space-time.

That means all the matter within the gravastar had already been in contact for a significant length of time.
"In our picture, there is a long pre-big-bang period - there is plenty of time for everything to come to the same temperature," he says.
This explanation of our universe seems radical - implausible, even - but Mazur thinks it makes a lot of sense: the recipe, a small amount of matter and a whole lot of energy, fits the observed facts.
"Only 4 per cent of the mass-energy of the universe is in the form of the ordinary, light-emitting matter, and 73 per cent is dark energy," he says.
It's worth pointing out that the remaining 23 per cent of unaccounted-for matter in our universe - what cosmologists refer to as dark matter - is also unaccounted for in the superfluid universe scenario. However, Mazur and Chapline think it curious that dark matter is always found near ordinary matter.

Perhaps, they say, the dark matter may not be matter at all, but the result of some interaction of ordinary matter with dark energy.


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/time_travel/esp_ciencia_timetravel12.htm

Gravity is the flow of space-time/ETHER into the vortices of subatomic particles.  Inertia is a wave in the primary medium, the super fluidic ETHER.  All matter and energy are distortions in the all pervasive field and our very consciousness springs from it.  Everything is connected. 



oohhh nice pic!

Cosmo

[Gigas]

When I ping the dream like realm with quantum brain waves, the reply is, this is not real. It's a waking state of dream like reality where the quantum matrix projection becomes fluid, like a dream, where it goes in many illusive directions. Something has our consciousness and holds us prisoner as it feeds a state of being.

[COSMO]

When I ping the dream like realm with quantum brain waves, the reply is, this is not real. It's a waking state of dream like reality where the quantum matrix projection becomes fluid, like a dream, where it goes in many illusive directions. Something has our consciousness and holds us prisoner as it feeds a state of being.

What we observe is an instant removed from the act of physical creation, the quantum wave collapse into particles, into atoms, into molecules and so on.  The instant of "observation" and wave collapse is faster than light and we cannot perceive it with our mental machinery that is all in a post collapse state, crystallized in time, always an instant in the past, downstream from the moment of creation.  Maya. 

Halt the mental machinery, rein in the horses of the five senses and experience the state of being that precedes the material universe, Brahman, the source of all.

Vortex Physics - The Superfluid Universe

Vortex physics as a model for the nature of reality, by Hakan Egne. The father of 19th century atomic vortex theory is Sir William Thomson a.k.a. Lord Kelvin. Vortex atomism was not adopted by mainstream science because the aether was apparently disproved at the beginning of the 20th century. This however was a mistake due to a wrong understanding of the relationship between aether and physical matter. Einstein later in 1920 reaffirmed the existence of aether, but his aether-free theories had already a following, so that until now the aether is a medium of spacetime, yet to be rediscovered again.



Very nice video.  Namaste!

Cosmo

[COSMO]

Stumbled across this...

Sheldon and Leonard co-author a paper on superfluid vacuum theory
In the latest episode of The Big Bang Theory, Leonard Hofstadter had an interesting idea while he was talking to Penny: the spacetime is a surface of the superfluid. The surface tension could even explain the negative pressure of the positive cosmological constant which is a constant positive contribution to the vacuum energy density (they incorrectly talk about the negative energy). Sheldon completed the maths and wrote their joint paper quickly. It was a source of pride for much of the episode.

http://motls.blogspot.com/2015/02/sheldon-and-leonard-co-author-paper-on.html

So funny.  But I hope the writers understand that a superfluid theory of space time invalidates the big bang theory!!!  As explained in this thread and here:

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=6829.0

And if the BIG BANG THEORY is wrong(which it most definitely is!)...then the title of the show is invalid also!  haha

And now we all know why I can't watch the show!  It's based on a false premise.  I know, I know....  lol 



haha

There was NO big bang.  It was the big space time extension into another universe via TORSION!  The big flow!!!  It IS a superfluid afterall! 

Cosmo

[COSMO]

Gravity's Most Extreme Effects Can Now Be Tested In A Laboratory

This analogy between gravity and fluids with varying speed is much more than a simple metaphor; it can be made mathematically precise.
In the area of analogue gravity, theory has long been ahead of experiment, but recently experimentalists have caught up, and they are now able to also test quantum behavior. For the fluid-gravity analogy, one uses an approximation for fluids of low viscosity, which means that superfluids with near-zero viscosity are ideal systems test quantum effects. For the superfluids, physicists use condensates of a few billion atoms that are trapped and put in motion by lasers. But the technology is still experimentally challenging. It has only been in the last few years that physicists have been able to use superfluid condensates to investigate the most interesting case of analogue gravity: black hole evaporation.
It is intriguing that this relation between gravity and fluid dynamics can be made mathematically precise. It seems to suggest that gravity itself might arise from the interaction of many constituents. Perhaps space-time isn't as immaterial as we thought.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/12/gravitys-most-extreme-effects-can-now-be-tested-in-a-laboratory/



The ETHER is a superfluid and gravity is a flow.  If it looks like a supfluid and sounds like a superfluid then it must be a duck.  lol

Cosmo

[COSMO]

Space time is a fluid...not a "rubber sheet".  doh!!!

QUANTUM WEIRDNESS REPLACED BY CLASSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS

Couder and Fort demonstrate in a simple experiment that fluid dynamics may be the classical underlying mechanism of quantum particles apparent strange behaviors without resorting to the need for a mysterious and seemingly magical interpretation of modern quantum theory.


http://resonance.is/news/quantum-weirdness-replaced-by-classical-fluid-dynamics/

Bubble Universe...fractal...it's also fractal in nature...that is natures way...



The linkage of gravity and inertia are demonstrated in this super fluid. 

Cosmo

[COSMO]

Liquid-like graphene could be the key to understanding black holes


Scientists at Harvard and Raytheon BBN Technology have made a breakthrough in our understanding of graphene's basic properties, observing for the first time electrons in a metal behaving like a fluid (Credit: Peter Allen/Harvard SEAS)

Researchers at Harvard University and Raytheon BBN Technology have discovered that the charged particles inside high-purity graphene behave as a fluid with relativistic properties. This find could lead to devices that efficiently convert heat into electricity, as well as graphene-based chips that can accurately model the behavior of faraway celestial objects like supernovas and black holes.

Kim and colleagues first isolated a sample of pure graphene by protecting it between layers of hexagonal boron nitride, an insulating, transparent crystal also known as "white graphene" for its similar properties and atomic structure. The scientists then covered the (still exposed) ends of the graphene sheet with charged particles and observed how charge flowed as they applied both thermal and electric currents.

When most materials are subjected to an electric field, their negatively charged electrons and positively charged "electron holes" are driven in opposite directions; by contrast, a difference in temperature causes both types of charges to move in the same direction. In either case, the charged particles hardly ever interact with each other.

As Kim and colleagues found out, however, things are very different inside high-purity graphene. The two-dimensional nature and honeycomb structure of the material forces the charged particles to travel along the same paths and collide very often, forming a strongly interacting, quasi-relativistic plasma known as a Dirac fluid.

"Physics we discovered by studying black holes and string theory, we're seeing in graphene," said Andrew Lucas, co-author of the study. "This is the first model system of relativistic hydrodynamics in a metal."

I think that graphene's 2 dimensional structure mirrors the basic unit of space time.

I've posted in a thread elsewhere that space time is 2 dimensional.  That is why graphene has the amazing properties it does. 

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/420717/why-spacetime-on-the-tiniest-scale-may-be-two-dimensional/



Cosmo 

[COSMO]

The ETHER is a superfluid...

Superfluid Black Holes

We present what we believe is the first example of a "
?-line" phase transition in black hole thermodynamics. This is a line of (continuous) second order phase transitions which in the case of liquid 4He
marks the onset of superfluidity. T

http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.021301

The ETHER pervades the entire universe at varying densities and states of motion...and gravity is the result of it's motion...

C

[Martyn Stubbs]

That orange print is hard to read! The Etheric is all around the solar system. It exists & is a threat to NASA because it has it's own science. That is demonstrated by the UFOs easy movement of UFOs in low earth orbit, all the way down to the ground. This Etheric energy represents an invisible biosphere in which living creatures openly thrive! The more I fly in space with each mission, the more I am certain that other living creatures are out there!