Scientists think there may be a wormhole in the center of our galaxy

[robomont]

gravity and ftl are both done the same way.
as magnetism can go at speed of light and electrons can move at speed of light but neither can max out past that point.
but when you apply both is when magic happens.

thats why the spooky talk about exact frequency.

[space otter]

now that makes sense to me..  that a specific frequency would increase or decrease gravity

going with the so above so below or that we as humans are mini microcosms  (no that isn't meant as a double negative)

if you have a basic understanding of energy lines in the body  a motion (either on or above the meridian line or muscle) in one direction would increase the strength of that muscle or energy line while the opposite motion would decrease the strength  the motion of your hand creates a frequency between your energy and the others...
not all lines  have the same direction of motion for increase/decrease
I know this to be true as I have used it and can verify it's truth

and also music or lyric notes can do the same thing..one of bachs  pieces is supposed to show  (via meditation) how the stones for the pyramid were floated into place...a frequency

ah maybe I'm not as non tech as  I thought...it was the terms used

thank you 51 and sky fish ..big hugs    this has always been one of those 'I-get-it-but-can't-explain-it kind of things and now I have words (language)

[robomont]

they use to talk about mass going up at ftl but when its shielded by mhd.the mass is converted to energy that just makes it more efficient at travel.imho.

as far as blackholes.they are neutron stars.per whitesands.
i got hawkings interns to get hawkings to say no blackholes.
then nasa? put the squeeze on him and he regurgitated.
its on yt.hawkings no blackholes.

[astr0144]

This was a PM reply from Robo with ref to my questions below...

yea two clocks with 12 hours on each.exactly sincronized.the top charge plate fires atc12 then magnet fires at 3.then plate dies at 9 and magnet dies at 12

no on the sign wave except when settingsstill.thats ac.thats what transformers do.
think ignition coil.thats dc.thats the type of pulses and voltage you need.

so the electrode system clock ionises the air..for a 9 hr time period AFTER the magnetetic clock had gone off..

is this a 12 hr  or 24 hr eg... I assume 12 hr..

if so ..then the magnet clock then comes on again 3 hrs after the electrode clock finished...for 9 hrs until 12 midnight.

when it does it..the magnet reacts to the ionised air creating pulses..

you then look to speed the processes up so you get  faster reactions..

and theres a gap in time between the two to allow the magnet field to go on and off to allow movement within  the ionised surroundings..

I am still not clear about the 90 degrees out of phase ! or why 90 degrees...if it does not relate to a sinewave..

or does it refer to 90 degrees as being 25% of a 360 degree rotation .. ie being 90 degrees or 25 % out of phase in terms of a rotation of a motor shaft  ? or between the electrodes and magnet solenoid operations..

Pulse the solenoid as fast as you can with as high a voltage and current as you can,
have the electrodes and magnetic solenoid 90 °s out of phase of each other.with electrodes firing first.

The polarity of solenoid depends on what part of planet you are on.north of equator or south of equator.the toilet draining is best way to explain it.

[COSMO]

Sure. And yes the wave guides he said were similar to microwave technology.

Robo has experience in that area.

Bob has also mentioned that gravity does indeed have a specific frequency, which can be determined by measuring the length of the wave guides.

He didn't mention the exact frequency he said because he has a few patents pending regarding that frequency.

It would be easy to approximate the wave guides using the dimensions of the craft.  Any takers???

It would be interesting to see what ballpark it falls in.  Seems to me it would not be an extremely short wavelength given that the wave guides have to be at least several feet in length.

Very interesting work Robo. 

Hi Otter! You are welcome.

Cosmo 

[A51Watcher]

Hawking: Gravitational Waves Could Revolutionize Astronomy

As is becoming clear, the direct detection of these ripples in spacetime not only confirm Einstein's famous theory of general relativity, they open our eyes to a previously "dark" universe. Astronomy uses the electromagnetic spectrum (such as visible light, X-rays, infrared) to study the universe, but objects that do not radiate in the electromagnetic spectrum will go unnoticed. But now we know how to detect gravitational waves, there could be a paradigm shift in how we detect and study some of the most energetic cosmic phenomena.

"Gravitational waves provide a completely new way of looking at the universe," said Hawking. "The ability to detect them has the potential to revolutionize astronomy."

"This discovery also presents a puzzle for astrophysicists," said Hawking. "The mass of each of the black holes are larger than expected for those formed by the gravitational collapse of a star — so how did both of these black holes become so massive?"

Yes we currently combine visible light, X-ray, and infrared images of the same nebula to get a wider understanding of the forces and processes at work.

Now we have the option of making gravity images with gravity telescopes.

The results promise to be astounding.

[robomont]

oh wow,they cant define gravity but they know how to pick it up electronically?
maybe its an ant in a space suit bouncing inside a sensor laden ball.
now to find out who made the miniture space suit.😁

[A51Watcher]

It would be easy to approximate the wave guides using the dimensions of the craft.  Any takers???

It would be interesting to see what ballpark it falls in.  Seems to me it would not be an extremely short wavelength given that the wave guides have to be at least several feet in length.

I think the dimensions can be found by reading though both links -


http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Anti-Matter_Reactor.htm

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=2135.msg29259#msg29259

And yes there was talk of it being a low frequency.

[astr0144]

A five-dimensional black hole could break the laws of physics as we know them.



f you thought regular black holes were about as weird and mysterious as space gets, think again, because for the first time, physicists have successfully simulated what would happen to black holes in a five-dimensional world, and the way they behave could threaten our fundamental understanding of how the Universe works.
The simulation has suggested that if our Universe is made up of five or more dimensions — something that scientists have struggled to confirm or disprove — Einstein's general theory of relativity, the foundation of modern physics, would be wrong.



In other words, five-dimensional black holes would contain gravity so intense, the laws of physics as we know them would fall apart.

There's a lot to wrap your head around here, so let's start with the black holes themselves.

In a five-dimensional universe, physicists have hypothesized that black holes are more like very thin rings rather than holes, and as they evolve, they can give rise to a series of 'bulges' that become thinner and thinner over time, and eventually break off to form mini black holes elsewhere.

These ring-shaped black holes (or 'black rings') were first proposed in 2002, but until now, no one's been able to successfully simulate their evolution. This has been made possible thanks to the COSMOS supercomputer at the University of Cambridge in the UK — the largest shared-memory computer in Europe that can perform 38.6 trillion calculations per second.

See Video / Image in Article..

University of Cambridge
The problem with five-dimensional black holes is that they're thought to consist of 'ultragravity rings', where gravity is so intense, it gives rise to a state known as naked singularity. Naked singularity is an event so strange, no one really knows what would occur, except that the laws of general relativity would no longer apply.

Einstein's general theory of relativity is based on how we think gravity governs the behavior of the Universe. We know that matter in the Universe warps the surrounding fabric of space-time, and this warping effect is what we refer to as gravity. Since it was first proposed 100 years ago, general relativity has passed every test — everything we observe in the Universe follows its stipulations, but singularity can pose some problems.

In a four-dimensional universe (where the fourth dimension is time), singularity is thought to be the point of a black hole where gravity is at its most intense — the center — and this is surrounded by the event horizon at the black hole's edge.

"As long as singularities stay hidden behind an event horizon, they do not cause trouble and general relativity holds — the 'cosmic censorship conjecture' says that this is always the case," says theoretical physicist Markus Kunesch from the University of Cambridge. "As long as the cosmic censorship conjecture is valid, we can safely predict the future outside of black holes."

But what if singularity could exist outside a black hole's event horizon? When Physicists have hypothesized that in five or more dimensions, if an object that has collapsed to an infinite density — singularity — is not bound by an event horizon, it becomes naked singularity, and things would get so crazy in and around that object, we'd need to completely rethink our understanding of how physics works. The whole thing just makes me really nervous.

"If naked singularities exist, general relativity breaks down," said one of the team, Saran Tunyasuvunakool. "And if general relativity breaks down, it would throw everything upside down, because it would no longer have any predictive power — it could no longer be considered as a standalone theory to explain the Universe."

If our Universe only has four dimensions, everything is cool, and ring-shaped black holes and naked singularity are not a thing. But physicists have proposed that our Universe could be made up of as many as 11 dimensions. The problem is that because humans can only perceive three, the only way we can possibly confirm the existence of more dimensions is through high-energy experiments such as the Large Hadron Collider.

Kunesch and his team say they've just about hit the limits of what their supercomputer can simulate, but would like to figure out what it is about four-dimensional universes that make naked singularity impossible, and general relativity correct. "If cosmic censorship doesn't hold in higher dimensions, then maybe we need to look at what's so special about a four-dimensional universe that means it does hold," says Tunyasuvunakool.

The study has been published in Physical Review Letters, and for more on those 11 dimensions, here's theoretical physicist, Michio Kaku:


http://uk.businessinsider.com/a-five-dimensional-black-hole-could-break-general-relativity-2016-2?r=US&IR=T

[COSMO]

I think the dimensions can be found by reading though both links -


http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Anti-Matter_Reactor.htm

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=2135.msg29259#msg29259

And yes there was talk of it being a low frequency.

I didn't see it, but if it is 3.5 ft, 280 megahertz is 3.51 feet...

https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/compendium/0225.00-0328.60_01MAR14.pdf

225-328.6 MHz
1. Band Introduction
The band 225-328.6 MHz is used for a diverse array of land-based, airborne, maritime,
and satellite radio communications services by the military forces, National Guard units,
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Coast Guard (CG), National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA), Department of Energy (DOE), and other Federal
agencies. Tactical and non-tactical mobile communications, mobile-satellite
communications, and air traffic control communications are the most prevalent uses.
The most extensive use of the band is for aeronautical communications systems by
military and National Guard forces to provide tactical and non-tactical ground-to-ground,
air-to-air, air-ground-air, and air-ship-air communications; and the band is used for AirTraffic
Control (ATC) at military air bases and aircraft carriers, and by the FAA at
civilian airports used by military aircraft. The Coast Guard uses the band on its ships and
aircraft to carry out its maritime search and rescue mission and for homeland security;
and NASA uses the band for ATC communications on various aircraft.
The band 225-328.6 MHz is reserved for military uses by North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), its member nations, and other U.S. allies. The band is
harmonized among NATO-member nations for secure communications


Hmmm...doesn't seem likely that it is near that frequency...or it it? 

Cosmo

[A51Watcher]

I didn't see it, but if it is 3.5 ft, 280 megahertz is 3.51 feet...

Sorry, the 1rst link shows the wave guide location and position in an image and it's positional length is described.

The 2nd link gives pretty detailed measurements of the reactor.

So by extrapolation we should be able to get a pretty good ballpark approximation.

[robomont]

a tube full of mercury plasma can be called a waveguide.
i prefer tube.its easier to say and type.

[A51Watcher]

Ok I finally found the gravity frequency in a 2007 post by John over at the sheep pen. 


"Bob told us many things we had not heard about.

S-4. 9 saucers there.

Small antimatter reactors the size of half a basketball.

The Gravity A and B waves. The frequency of those waves, 7.46 Hz, SMU's (singular mass units) Chargons and many other things."

link here

John and Zorgon posted a ton of valuable info there, only to be later banned.

Not a smart move on the forum's part, nor a justified one.


Sound familiar?

It should.

[Littleenki]

Seems to me you guys are putting the many pieces together to "discover " the science of gravity...

Dr Morgan in his quote on the thread shared by A51 says it all in a nutshell, creation versus annihilation....

Cymatics shows you the "waves" sought to define gravity, densities with desire to become and unbecome...patterns to teach us.

Walter Russell defined the geometry gravity resides upon and within...

as did Bucky, with his balls..

its all there, the definition of gravity, but it will take folks like are here, pondering the science within human range, to ever mimic or duplicate gravity and it's actuality on Earth, which of course is relative to all other methods for duplicating gravity across the universe.

Our own little gravitational understanding will be the result.

Different in every way from the efforts of others in our universe, but with exactingly similar results in the end.

[COSMO]

Black hole in a 'bathtub'

http://www.astronomy.com/news/2017/06/black-hole-bath

Have you ever wondered what things are like near a black hole? To find out, consider getting in the bath. Researchers at the University of Nottingham have recently done essentially just that, studying the effects of waves in an experimental water bath to simulate an effect called superradiance, which is theorized to occur around black holes.




Another example of space/time/ether behaving as a fluid.  Leonard Susskind would approve.  Like water going down a drain.  Space time is not a "rubber sheet" or a bendable fabric. it is a dynamic fluid and it's signature is spread across the universe!  The next question is...how does a fluidic medium create gravity?  Clue: it does it by MOVEMENT

Vortices are archetypal objects that recur in the universe across the scale of complexity, from subatomic particles to galaxies and black holes.

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/11/e1500807.full

COSMO