My Favorite Conspiracy Theory

[Wrabbit2000]

It is Me, yes.  I plan on posting it but have an agreement with the editor there, who asked Me to write the article, that I will let Him have the exclusive for a few days.

Fair enough and I was simply curious on that point. I'm no stranger to the idea of embargoed stories by agreement, and that describes damn near everything I do for serious lengthy writing in college. I can't release or publish it myself until it's served it's academic purpose for a course.

.....People who have studied it for 20 years have said it's very non-aggressive.  It needs a very direct path through contact.

Okay, and I believe that is flat out, 100% incorrect and inaccurate. I base that on outbreak case summaries from Stanford dating back to 1976, the handbook produced by the US Army through USAMRIID as well as the academic and older (Pre-outbreak) material carried by the Centers for Disease Control. I further cite the Canadian Ministry of Health and Canadian Material Safety Data Sheet index for contradictory facts. All of which are among links I've shared in this and the other Ebola thread active here.

If what you have directly contradicts those primary sources as authorities to this topic, please post your own primary source material which supports your side of the argument. My opinion and your opinion are worth about as much as a wooden nickle without direct sourcing we can both read on each others points from people FAR more expert in the field than either of us.  Thus far, I haven't seen a link to support what you're saying that leads above a blog, a quoted set of 2nd or 3rd hand opinion or conspiracy theory?

Now it is possible We will be sprayed with stuff - chemicals, most likely -that will give Us a good "outbreak."

Sprayed with..Ebola? Okay. How precisely will Ebola live in a form to use aerial spraying as an effective vector to cause an outbreak? The Japanese tried biological warfare and they documented it. We can read those documents and learn from real world use meant to kill entire populated areas with the agent in question. Ebola did not exist to man's knowledge at that point, but Ebola shares basic traits which draw comparison from what was used. (Unit 731 Summary 1928-1945)  I can add volumes more to that, if interested. That is merely a summary from FAS.

What I AM saying is that this is VERY deliberately manufactured.  That it is money/power driven, and has been in the works likely for decades.

That is what I am waiting to see you produce more than blogs and theories to link and support? What primary source material shows Ebola was fabricated by man in a laboratory? There must be some, or perhaps material from the documented biological warfare days of both Soviet and American programs which show creation of anything remotely similar in pure fabrication for use this way? Precedent....to do something technology DID NOT EXIST TO DO in the 1970s is what I'd very much like to see. Until then, that is wild speculation and opinion, to my thinking.

And that They are aiming to kill many, round up the rest, and reset the planet with Them as "Gods" with Their slaves.  It won't matter who is right about the immediate mode of death.

Why would the "Gods" want a lonely little planet with a fraction of the population? Kingdoms are little more than delusional mental constructs without subjects to hold reign over. If they've gone and killed them all, then they can achieve the same end result by buying a small island in the Pacific and pretending nothing else exists. Not very fulfilling..huh? So what is the upside and tangible benefit to mass murdering who they'd need to "keep the trains running on time" and making the goods the rich 'gods' will consider necessary to their godly living? Dead citizens don't even make a hamburger...let alone the endless variety of 'stuff' the Rich demand as basic needs in life.

It's not logical...on even a basic level. Help me and others with the same hangup, understand how that is supposed to work?

[ArMaP]

Thus far, I haven't seen a link to support what you're saying that leads above a blog, a quoted set of 2nd or 3rd hand opinion or conspiracy theory?

You forgot YouTube videos, that world-wide recognised source of scientific knowledge.

[Amaterasu]

Sprayed with..Ebola? Okay. How precisely will Ebola live in a form to use aerial spraying as an effective vector to cause an outbreak? The Japanese tried biological warfare and they documented it. We can read those documents and learn from real world use meant to kill entire populated areas with the agent in question. Ebola did not exist to man's knowledge at that point, but Ebola shares basic traits which draw comparison from what was used. (Unit 731 Summary 1928-1945)  I can add volumes more to that, if interested. That is merely a summary from FAS.

No.  Not sprayed with ebola per se.  Strayed with chemicals that cause bleeding, fatigue, fever, and all the other "ebola" symptoms - and They will cry "Ebola outbreak!  Get Your vaccine NOW!"  And some will have death, and others merely RFID.  Who lives and who dies is Their choice.

Why would the "Gods" want a lonely little planet with a fraction of the population? Kingdoms are little more than delusional mental constructs without subjects to hold reign over. If they've gone and killed them all, then they can achieve the same end result by buying a small island in the Pacific and pretending nothing else exists. Not very fulfilling..huh? So what is the upside and tangible benefit to mass murdering who they'd need to "keep the trains running on time" and making the goods the rich 'gods' will consider necessary to their godly living? Dead citizens don't even make a hamburger...let alone the endless variety of 'stuff' the Rich demand as basic needs in life.

Because We are too many to effectively control.  They will keep the number (under 500 million, no doubt) such that They can much more readily control Us.

[ArMaP]

Because We are too many to effectively control.

Considering the present situation I think "they" can really control us. 

[zorgon]

If they've gone and killed them all, then they can achieve the same end result by buying a small island in the Pacific and pretending nothing else exists. Not very fulfilling..huh? So what is the upside and tangible benefit to mass murdering who they'd need to "keep the trains running on time" and making the goods the rich 'gods' will consider necessary to their godly living? Dead citizens don't even make a hamburger...let alone the endless variety of 'stuff' the Rich demand as basic needs in life.

It's not logical...on even a basic level. Help me and others with the same hangup, understand how that is supposed to work?

I have been asking this same question for years. Seems I cannot get a straight answer...  and with all the myriad ways that the Elites have concocted to wipe us out, population world wide is ever increasing

Your right  it is NOT logical.  You cannot control that which you kill. You cannot fleece a dead sheep to make your new coat.  You cannot tap the mental energy of minions to do your bidding if they are 6 feet under.

The Secret Societies have ALWAYS used the Secret... the more minds you can sway to your cause the stronger you become. This has always been why secrets of power have been closely guarded.  The biggest threat to 'them' today is that the knowledge has gotten out and other groups (such as cults) are collecting their portion of the minds... thus competing for 'a piece of the action'

No one is wanting to wipe out humanity... if there was even ONE person with that goal in mind, we would already have seen the Cobalt Bomb dropped

[ArMaP]

The Secret Societies have ALWAYS used the Secret... the more minds you can sway to your cause the stronger you become.

And sometimes that swaying is not even to their cause but to some other cause/topic that keeps the people busy with something else. During the Portuguese fascist regime two of those were religion (with the Fátima apparitions) and football/soccer.

[Pimander]

Sinny, this is the first time I have been in 100% agreement with you.  It all boils down to one thing....and one question...Is the administration of Obama the biggest lie that Americans have encountered?

What difference does it make if the President has a black boy sucking him off?  If he does keep that secret then surely it is just a reflection of the fact that an out gay man could never be president in the USA?  It certainly would not effect his ability to do the job of spokesperson for the establishment.

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence out there that it is....my gut says yes....but alas I am but a mere serf who does not have the influence nor the money to help prove any of this.  The powers that be have installed him and him (her)...whatever.  What is a citizen to do.  I have been looking at the various videos and it sure makes me wonder....

For me "they" have never in recent Presidencies allowed any person to hold the POTUS office who does not have serious skeletons in their closet so they can be dispensed with when required.


I agree with ArMaP, most humans are easy to control.

[Wrabbit2000]

What difference does it make if the President has a black boy sucking him off?

I agree with ArMaP, most humans are easy to control.

On point one..You do have a way of painting a colorful mental image..lol

Anyway..... I think it matters enormously if that is happening. In fact, it could have a direct bearing upon our nation as a whole and the future of it. It all comes down to the second part of that.

As anyone who has been through a real security clearance investigation will know, you can be honest and outright tell the investigators things that some would assume a clearance would be killed by. Not so..if one is honest and 100%, totally, up front in every way. Why? Well...If you have nothing to hide, and the issue wasn't one to compromise your character outright (sex isn't), then it's a minor embarrassment at worst. If you're NOT honest? People ARE easy to control, and fear of disclosure can work itself into a mountain to avoid, even if the original thing wasn't a 'thing' until someone tried to hide it.

"Mr President...You *WILL* help my buddy here get a job at the DOD in personnel....or CNN will be running your sexploits for the evening's breaking news" is an example...and how something he'd not care that much about otherwise, could become a lever to compromise security in ways even Obama wouldn't otherwise do a thing to help with. Blackmail is golden or toxic, depending on which side of the mail you're on. 

....and yeah, we have other Presidents like Kennedy who had indiscretions ...but then, look how that leak was plugged, too. First her, then him. 100% sealed. Monroe was a leaky faucet, even if Kennedy's later demise was on something entirely different, IMO.

[Pimander]

SO ultimately the POTUS is easier to control than most of us especially if Michael is sucking his cock.   

Kennedy?  Hit by the Mafia IMO.

[Wrabbit2000]

Kennedy?  Hit by the Mafia IMO.

Was it? I sometimes wonder if the Cubans, the CIA and the Italians didn't all stumble over each other working to do the same thing, at around the same time, and just throw in for different parts in the end. He really managed to piss off all the wrong people at once.

[zorgon]

And sometimes that swaying is not even to their cause but to some other cause/topic that keeps the people busy with something else. During the Portuguese fascist regime two of those were religion (with the Fátima apparitions) and football/soccer.

Quite true!!!  If you cannot sway the people to YOUR cause give them an opiate  like football

I mean have you ever studied football fans?   



I mean talk about MIND CONTROL



And nothing is Sacred  World Cup 2014 (she is cute though  )



So yeah people are easy to control   

[zorgon]

Kennedy?  Hit by the Mafia IMO.

History Channel did an interview with LBJ's butler... seems according to that interview LBJ was heard at dinner after the assassination as saying 'Good the job is done'  I would like to find that program on youtube

Actually it might be THIS;

The Men Who Killed Kennedy is a United Kingdom ITV video documentary series that depicts the assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Originally broadcast in 1988 in two parts (with a subsequent studio discussion), it was rebroadcast in 1991 re-edited to three parts with additional material, and a fourth episode added in 1995. The addition of three further episodes in 2003 caused great controversy, particularly in the final episode implicating Lyndon B. Johnson and the withdrawal of these additional episodes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Men_Who_Killed_Kennedy

[Pimander]

Now in reference to the -down and to the right- origin of Kennedy's head shot resulting in his -back and to the left- response, as well as the upward spray of red, consider this evidence -

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/forum/index.php?topic=3439.msg49046#msg49046



Tony Gambino said,

Gambino set the record straight about the JFK assassination, saying he was in Dallas when Kennedy was shot and the fatal bullet came from a shooter located in an underground storm drain.

"I was there when he was shot and I know for a fact Rosselli was in the storm drain doing the shooting and Frank Sturgiss was also part of the hit team," said Gambino. "The same group of guys we have talked about in the Vatican and U.S. government gave the orders and asked the Mafia families for help in taking down Kennedy."

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/26-Sept-2007.html

[spacemaverick]

What difference does it make if the President has a black boy sucking him off?  If he does keep that secret then surely it is just a reflection of the fact that an out gay man could never be president in the USA?  It certainly would not effect his ability to do the job of spokesperson for the establishment.
For me "they" have never in recent Presidencies allowed any person to hold the POTUS office who does not have serious skeletons in their closet so they can be dispensed with when required.


I agree with ArMaP, most humans are easy to control.

Pimander, I'll say this...you really get to the point sometimes and have a knack for painting the vivid picture.  This is not criticism from me...just an observation.  I would be surprised if I found an honest politician anywhere.

[ArMaP]

Quite true!!!  If you cannot sway the people to YOUR cause give them an opiate  like football

I mean have you ever studied football fans?   

I'm not interested in (most) football fans, I see enough of them here.