Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation is Wrong

[johnlear]

Newton's Universal Law of Gravity is Wrong

Thanks to the brilliance of Pari Spolter, (author: The Gravitational Force of the Sun, Orb Publishing, Grenada Hills, CA 1993) we now know that Isaac Newton's theory of the Universal Law of Gravitation is wrong. Gravity is not the product of a planets density or size. In fact the gravitational force of an orbiting body is equal to the area of a circle whose radius is the semi-major axis of revolution times the acceleration.

Spolter says, "Using Kepler's Third Law of Motion, the ratio of the cube of the mean distance of each planet from the sun to the square of its sidereal period of revolution shows what is constant for all planets and that constant is the gravitational force of the sun."

If we were to accept Newton's Universal Law of Gravity we would have to assume that the sun somehow recognizes each body around it and doles out a specific amount of its attractive force depending on the particular body that orbits it. The gravity of the sun calculated from Newton's equation would not be constant and would vary from 4.16 x 10 to the 23 Newton's for Jupiter to only 0.31 Newton's for Pioneer 5.

To determine the true gravitational force of a planet using Spolters equations we must have at least one satellite. For the equation and gravitational force of several planets in our solar system please refer to  "The Gravitational Force of the Sun", Chapter 7.

We must realize that every book, publication or paper regarding gravity published since Isaac Newton published Principia, (Newton's three books comprising mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy published in July 1687) the information contained therein is wrong. Since Einstein based his theories on relativity both general and special on Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation we must conclude that Einstein's theories on relativity are wrong.

Every schoolbook, reference manual, Atlas, geography book, chart containing information about gravity published since the 17th Century, has gravitational information that is wrong.

The information published by NASA or anyone else containing the facts that the moon's gravity is one sixth that of Earth is wrong also. These figures account for the abnormal amount of failures of the first missions to the moon.

In fact, the gravitation force of the moon, worked as an inverse square and 3 body (Earth, Moon, Sun) problem for July 20, 1969, for the landing of Apollo 11 was 68.71% that of Earth's. This gravitation force would have made a moon trip impossible because of the vast increase of fuel that would have been required considering that even with a gravitational force of one sixth that of Earth's, the alleged Apollo 11 landed with less than one minute of fuel remaining.

Pari Spolter does not believe that the Apollo missions to the moon were faked simply because she believes that the one sixth gravitational force of the moon published by NASA are correct. She also believes that the gravity measurements made by the Apollo 15 mission crew were correct. Spolter has asked me to include these statements about her belief in the Moon's gravity to firmly set her beliefs against mine which are that the Moon's gravity is 68.71% that of Earth's. So here it is once more, Pari Spolter believes that the Moon's gravity is one sixth that of Earth's and that the Apollo 15 crews measurements of gravity and the NASA published figures for the orbit of satellites orbiting the moon are correct.

But, again, I believe that the Inverse Square equations of the Moon's gravity relative to Earth's are correct and that information published by NASA regarding the Apollo missions and lunar gravity is false.

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

Good to see you John, welcome back!

Rock

[thorfourwinds]

As most may know, Pari Spolter, Pegasus Alternate Energy Team,
is a treasured member here, however has not clocked in since 2012.   

Zorgon reminded us a while back about her splendid work.   

Pari Spolter - Gravitational Force of the Sun

[Sgt.Rocknroll]

But she had since changed her mind on the Apollo mission and the gravitational forces stated earlier, right?

[zorgon]

Yeah Peer Pressure

I had to print a disclaimer for her

[hoss58]

  What ?  Spolter changed her belief in the Apollo missions? how the heck did they get to her ?

I wonder if it has something to do with trying to discredit  you John ,since you frequently quote her  in your  interviews?

[johnlear]

Good to see you John, welcome back!

Rock


Thanks Rock. It was really nice having you as a guest at my place.  You showed the proper
respect.

I really appreciated all of the WOW! WOW! WOWS!

[johnlear]

But she had since changed her mind on the Apollo mission and the gravitational forces stated earlier, right?




Negatory on the 'changed her mind'. Pari never believed that the Apolllo missions were a hoax. God only
knows how much material I sent to her.

It is still a mystery to me how someone so brilliant could not see through the hoax of Mercury, Gemeni and
Apollo missions.

I tried to gloss over her beliefs about the missions but for some unknown reason she just won't buy it.

She has asked both Zorgon and myself to make it clear what exactly her beliefs are. Unfortunately it came at a time that Zorgon wasn't doing any posting. Pari felt that we were intentionally avoiding the issue which was not the case.

I think everything will be OK as long as we continue to show that Pari doesn't believe that the missions wwere a hoax.

I believe that there is something we don't know about Pari which is the reason she believes as she does.

We should all understand that to come to the realization that our 'government' pulled off one of the greatest hoaxes in the history of mankind.

The other great hoax was the Isaac Newton belief that the Universal Law of Gravitation holds water.

So before I croak I want a few more people to understand what a hoax that one is.

[RUSSO]

The other great hoax was the Isaac Newton belief that the Universal Law of Gravitation holds water.

If gravity has not passed the test of time as proven by relativity, why the physicists of today are stuck on to an incorrect idea? Is it because they are unable of thinking outside the 'box' made by Newton? Or they are just impotent face other "hidden forces" physics did not found because the answer is not in its field?

[zorgon]

passed the test of time as proven by relativity,

Well relativity is starting to break down. There have been many scientists over recent years saying "Einstein is wrong"

In fact Einstein himself said "Reality is merely and illusion, albeit a very persistent one"

So I just did a new search just now as I usually do when bringing up and old topic and find this right off the bat. Now these are not conspiracy sites but Live Science and Scientific American

Proving Einstein Wrong with 'Spooky' Quantum Experiment
http://www.livescience.com/50262-spooky-action-is-real.html

Was Einstein Wrong?: A Quantum Threat to Special Relativity
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/was-einstein-wrong-about-relativity/

Sorry, Albert: Physics that challenges Einstein
http://www.newscientist.com/special/challenging-einstein

Why Einstein was wrong about relativity
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026801.500-why-einstein-was-wrong-about-relativity.html

Breaking relativity: Celestial signals defy Einstein
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22129500.700-breaking-relativity-celestial-signals-defy-einstein.html

[zorgon]

Challenging Einstein
Time Lord.... Louis Essen D.Sc., F.R.S.
Essen was referred to as a "Time Lord" by Guardian Newspapers in Sept. 1997


http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/Time_Lord_Louis_Essen.html

[johnlear]

"If gravity has not passed the test of time as proven by relativity"   Huh?

[RUSSO]

"If gravity has not passed the test of time as proven by relativity"   Huh?

It resisted until now (Einstein's theory as opposed Newton's theory). (in the same sense the quote below)

Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the Royal Astronomical Society.

to illustrate more:

The theory explained

When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater the effect.

Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time - a phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball.

Thus the planets orbiting the Sun are not being pulled by the Sun; they are following the curved space-time deformation caused by the Sun. The reason the planets never fall into the Sun is because of the speed at which they are travelling.

According to the theory, matter and energy distort space-time, curving it around themselves. 'Frame dragging' theoretically occurs when the rotation of a large body 'twists' nearby space and time. It is this second part of Einstein's theory that the Nasa mission has yet to corroborate.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2007/apr/15/spaceexploration.universe

Nice to see you here again John, and...

So before I croak I want a few more people to understand what a hoax that one is.

Im really looking forward about what you have to say.

[zorgon]

So to simplify

Einstien says "Newton was Wrong"

Pari's book challenges Newton's idea

Modern Physics says "Einstein is wrong"

Ergo  John is right

[SerpUkhovian]

Hello John Lear,

Nice to see new posts from you.  Welcome back.