SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: Will an Asteroid Impact Earth in September 2015?

[astr0144]

No I am not really worrying about it..

I am just suggesting a possibility if it or Nemesis did exist and had some form of 3600 yr or maybe say for eg..a 6000 yr or more orbit..

Maybe there is other suggestions to this other theory than just "Z Sitchens " book or theory...

I am not sure what may have occurred back in around 1585 BC...

what if it was a similar theory but with a longer term orbit...say for eg a 4000 to 6000 yr orbit..

Is there any evidence that some destruction took place on Earth...back in 1585 BC..I am not sure..

I think there may have been destruction however some time maybe within 1000 yrs before..

I cant recall how long a period the bible may cover...
in terms of Human History. I don't just mean since creation of the Heavens and Earth..although some facts may suggest other possible events..

but The Bible may suggest some more recent egs..

Such as Noah's Ark as a type of example...was there real facts that may have occurred that Earth destruction took place..I believe I recall something was  suggested there was some evidence to suggest it may have occurred..

You can only go back so far to find written records..
not that far at all if i recall..maybe only 10 to 20,000 yrs...

Drawings admittedly since stone age man.

there is various geological records that do show times when some form of destruction took place on Earth... are there any that suggest long term Consistent cycles.. may be the question we would need to initially consider ..


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recorded_history

As you can see from Table 1, the year in which the Flood came was 1656 AM1 (Anno Mundi – "year of the world"). From the rest of the Old Testament and other well-documented historical events we understand that creation, as calculated by Ussher, was about 4004 BC. So with a little more math we can calculate the second date.

Calculated BC date for creation:   4004
Calculated AM date for the Flood:   - 1656
Calculated BC date for the Flood:   2348
Current Year (minus one2):   + 2011
Number of years since beginning of Flood:

https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/timeline-for-the-flood/

[thorfourwinds]

Published on Jun 28, 2013

[ArMaP]

Published on Jun 28, 2013

Still no answer to my question... 

[thorfourwinds]

Would you please repeat the exact question?

[astr0144]

Some questions to try to recheck or research and confirm...

I am sure they have been answered on PRC somewhere.

How Long has man been on Earth ?

This suggest not very long in terms of Earths History !

Maybe 2 million yrs or so.

More modern man only 50,000 to 100,000 yrs ago

There would not be that many 3600 or  6000 yr cycles in this 100K yr period..

100,000 / 3600 = only about 28 times

More advanced man may have only been less than 10000 yrs ago....so relatively few records recorded.

It seems even cave paintings only go back 40,000 yrs..

40,000 / 3600 cycle = only 11 times its occurred since then...

so NO recordings are likely to be indicated before then in terms of actual human recordings..

Only Science can suggest when other events occurred by geological records..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_painting

in say the last  6000 to 10,000 yrs...since record may have began  there would only be 2 to 3 cycles of 3600 yrs.. one maybe Noahs Ark !

so there may be very few records of it having occurred..

by coincidence... in the last hour a TV program just came on about Noah's Ark.

There was some various versions discussed...

one version suggested a longer past historical period when it occurred with a  Flood event that was 5000 yrs BC...

Thats about 7000 yrs ago.

7200 yrs would be 2 x 3600....

2 Cycles of 3600 yrs.

if we did see something that occurred say 3600 yrs ago... that may suggest a cycle period that one would be looking for...

Homo erectus and Homo ergaster were also the first of the hominin line to leave Africa, and these species spread through Africa, Asia, and Europe between 1.3 to 1.8 million years ago.
According to the recent African origin of modern humans theory, modern humans evolved in Africa possibly from Homo heidelbergensis, Homo rhodesiensis or Homo antecessor and migrated out of the continent some 50,000 to 100,000 years ago,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

How long ago since man started to record things ?

How Long have written record been available ?

Not sure if this article is correct or not... but I seem to recall trying to research this last time the Nibiru story came about in 2009.

I think it was hard to find any records prior to 5000 to 10,000 yrs ago..

so very few records would be available to indicate any past planet destruction other than Bible stories or drawings..


this suggests when record began on a google search.

it was the top search for .

"how far back do written records go"

HOW FAR BACK DO THE RECORDS GO? 2

If mankind has been on earth over a million years, as the evolutionists tell us, then why do the records of their activity only go back a few thousand years. The evidence agrees with the Bible account, not with the evolutionists. Evolutionary theory is a myth. God created everything; the evidence clearly points to it. Nothing else can explain the mountain of evidence. This is science vs. evolution—a Creation-Evolution Encyclopedia, brought to you by Creation Science Facts.

CONTENT: How Far Back do the Records Go? 2

Languages: Ancient languages never back beyond c. 3000 B.C., and radiate outward from Mesopotamia
Ancient Historical Records: The oldest dates go back to about 3000 B.C.
The Oldest People: They do not go back before c. 3000 B.C., and were located in Mesopotamia
Conclusion: Man, whom the evolutionists claim to have come into existence over a million years ago, is said to have "stopped evolving" 100,000 years ago. Why then do we not have at least 100,000 years of civilizations, cities, and human remains?

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/05agee6.htm

[ArMaP]

Would you please repeat the exact question?

Back on reply #51 you wrote:

That's the whole point of the conversation: why is not the object in the original photo and why did ngchunter post that he had found the missing piece, which has now been disproven by non other than Google?

and I asked "what was disproved by Google?" on reply #57.

[thorfourwinds]

If the object is not in the original photo then it wasn't there when the photo was taken, or are you implying that the negative was altered?

And what was disproved by Google? ?

The coordinates posted for the "winged planet" are wrong when talking about that missing area of the sky that was the topic of that thread.

Greetings World:

So, BP EARTHWATCH was hoodwinked by Google Earth.

And, as we have not been led astray by BPE in the past, we passed the information along so others might comment.

Thank you for your comments.

Now, the question is: WHY?

Why the apparent deception by GoogleEarth coming to light at this particular time in our lives?

And why did my Peggy experience just turn to white...completely destroying all the previous colored type...

UPDATE:
Thank you Zorgon. We understand and are standing by.

[astr0144]

I also wondered why !

thought that it was just my computer..

And why did my Peggy experience just turn to white...completely destroying all the previous colored type...

[ArMaP]

So, BP EARTHWATCH was hoodwinked by Google Earth.

How was he/she/it hoodwinked?

Thank you for your comments.

I would prefer a clear answer to my question. 

Why the apparent deception by GoogleEarth coming to light at this particular time in our lives?

What apparent deception?

[ArMaP]

Still no clear answer to my questions, as usual.

It looks like posting videos and misleading information is easy, but giving clear answers is hard. 

[zorgon]

It looks like posting videos and misleading information is easy, but giving clear answers is hard. 

Quite true   You see it at NASA, you see it in Religions and you see it in main stream media.

Sensationalism, false flag news and news embellished with photos not relevant to the article...

But TRUTH and HARD INFO?

"Never let truth get in the way of a good story" ~ Mark Twain

[ngchunter]

That's the whole point of the conversation: why is not the object in the original photo and why did ngchunter post that he had found the missing piece, which has now been disproven by non other than Google?

It has not been disproven by google.  Read the damn coordinates.  The coordinates of the "winged star" are not a match for the missing section of google sky.  It's in a completely different region of the sky over 28 degrees away from the missing section.  I told this to you on the other forum, but you have chosen to ignore me and instead spread lies and false information about what I proved.  Big mistake.  Here I am!  By your own claim, the coordinates of the winged object are 5 h 42m 21.0s 22° 36' 45.7".  The coordinates of the missing section however are 5h 53m 27s, -6d 10' 56".  And yes, it's still missing!

Here, ngchunter emphatically states that the black box is still there.

And states that the coordinates are wrong.

WTF? These are coordinates not discussed previously. What's going here?

Yes, those ARE the coordinates discussed previously in my video, yes those ARE the coordinates of the missing section, no those are NOT the coordinates of the "winged star" which has ALWAYS been visible on Google sky.

It's just a T Tauri star and reflection nebula GN 05.39.2.  It's not new, it's not unique, it's not unexplained.

Well, yeah, when you intentionally attempt to bamboozle peeps with your misleading coordinates just to protect your previous point.   

That's rich coming from a liar like you.

We invited Gill to join the conversation.

Yet strangely he remains in hiding.

[ngchunter]

ngchunter is a moron in my books   Much worse than Phage ever was. I did find it satisfying when an amateur astronomer nee satellite watcher spotted the then secret X37 space plane forcing NASA to release it on Space Weather LOL

Oh really moron?  I was the amateur astronomer nee satellite tracker who spotted the then secret X37 space plane, "forcing" NASA to release it on space weather!  I was the first to characterize its ability to produce bright visual flares!
"X-37B FLARE: On May 25th, amateur astronomer Scott Ferguson witnessed an "X-37B flare." As the US Air Force space plane glided across the night sky of Bradenton, Florida, "it brightened to magnitude -0.8, about twice the brightness of Arcturis," he reports. Sunlight must be glinting from a flat surface, perhaps the space plane's solar panels or the interior of the payload bay. Readers, turn your cell phone into a space plane tracker and be alert for flares."
http://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=28&month=05&year=2010
That was ME you moron!

Seeing him say "secret space plane" in posts as if it has ALWAYS been there was hilarious... after the grief he gave me an John in the secret spaceship thread LMAO

Yes, where are those "secret space stations" that John claimed the shuttle was docking to?  After all, you just admitted that amateur astronomers, specifically me, are capable of seeing secret spacecraft.  So why didn't I see the shuttle docking to space stations other than ISS (and Mir before it)?

As for Google sky, Moon, Mars etc... They are the worst thing you can use. Always better to find their SOURCE photos because google stuff is so big it adds artifacts and looses data

Which is exactly what I said in my video that you clearly didn't watch.

[ngchunter]

And, as we have not been led astray by BPE in the past, we passed the information along so others might comment.

Bahahaha!  That's hilarious!  One of my favorite BPE "episodes:"

The truth:

[ngchunter]

Bahahaha!  That's hilarious!  One of my favorite BPE "episodes:"

The truth:

And another more recent BPE screw-up if you prefer: