At no time during the Apollo missions were the astronaughts alone in their journeys to the lunar surface.
Lets face it, if you were an advanced civilisation would you not fear mans ability to destroy?
They were followed there, watched and eventually escorted off of the moon and told never to return or face the concequences. No man or woman has set foot on the moon since, our destiny to the stars on hold as humanity has been quarantined, our capabilities stifled and incaserated in Low Earth Orbit.
Here are a couple of videos showing the aliens following man to the moon, their craft can be seen through the CSM windows.
Alan shows us while pretending it's all about the hotdogs...
https://youtu.be/Gf6jXo0ZSL0
Apollo 14, they are swarming like flies. They must have been concearned that we were on our way the their base of operations.
https://youtu.be/C1OJvCY4vnU
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 15, 2017, 04:09:09 PM
Lets face it, if you were an advanced civilisation would you not fear mans ability to destroy?
No, I wouldn't, I would if I was a less advanced civilisation. :)
Interesting videos, anyway. Do we know at what time during the mission were they filmed?
Quote from: ArMaP on July 15, 2017, 04:25:38 PM
No, I wouldn't, I would if I was a less advanced civilisation. :)
Interesting videos, anyway. Do we know at what time during the mission were they filmed?
This from the flight journal, NASA said it was a water dump! Paaaaahahaha!
Alan Shepard in the cabin of Command Service Module 'Kitty Hawk' at 211:31:30 GET. Bright objects, probably from a water dump, can be seen passing outside the window. 00:32 Edgar Mitchell in the CSM cabin. 00:49 Stu Roosa in the Lower Equipment Bay (LEB) of the CSM, working at the optics panel. 01:16 Mitchell in the CSM cabin. 01:27 Underexposed footage of astronaut, probably Roosa in the LEB. These internal shots appear to have been shot at 12 frames per second. This video is presented at 24 frames per second, regardless of the original shooting speed.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 15, 2017, 04:36:45 PM
This from the flight journal, NASA said it was a water dump! Paaaaahahaha!
They even say "probably". :P
But it could be true, I have seen videos of water dumps that create hundreds of small bright objects near the craft.
A couple of other water dumps.
Apollo 12 although have limited info on it.
https://youtu.be/PEPilUeMCRc
Apollo 11
https://youtu.be/V25U_C3A31Q
Apollo 10
https://youtu.be/f48yuip08So
Quote from: ArMaP on July 15, 2017, 04:42:44 PM
They even say "probably". :P
But it could be true, I have seen videos of water dumps that create hundreds of small bright objects near the craft.
Going in different directions at different luminocities? I really doubt it.
Like the pulsating Ice from the tether incident.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 15, 2017, 04:44:27 PM
Apollo 10
https://youtu.be/f48yuip08So
I didn't see anything unusual in this video. ???
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 15, 2017, 04:46:24 PM
Going in different directions at different luminocities? I really doubt it.
But it's possible, at least as possible as those being extraterrestrial craft. :)
QuoteLike the pulsating Ice from the tether incident.
Exactly, I don't think those were far away alien craft but close up small out of focus objects.
Quote from: ArMaP on July 15, 2017, 04:52:18 PM
But it's possible, at least as possible as those being extraterrestrial craft. :)
Exactly, I don't think those were far away alien craft but close up small out of focus objects.
Fair enough.
Quote from: ArMaP on July 15, 2017, 04:49:32 PM
I didn't see anything unusual in this video. ???
Not flying but on the surface.
Here is the Apollo 10 ufo I though I posted.
https://youtu.be/gg6qpmx4MpI
That's the one I was expecting to see when I saw the lunar command module. :)
Quote from: ArMaP on July 15, 2017, 04:52:18 PM
But it's possible, at least as possible as those being extraterrestrial craft. :)
Exactly, I don't think those were far away alien craft but close up small out of focus objects.
I do not think they were out of focus close up objects. Out of focus objects do not pulse from the center outwards like they were. Those objects have a life to them that chunks of ice do not display.
https://youtu.be/MLRj98CHW3U
I get you are a sceptic and why not? I'm in no way a sceptic. I am an ardent believer, part of the reason is because of what I saw in 2006, it was as bright as the sun, hung in the air for a good 5 minutes or so, was silent and shot straight up .like nothing man has produced which is in the public domain. It did have a profound affect on me because from that point on I knew that we are not that special, there are other intelligent life forms out there in the universe and the ufo phenomenon was very real. My convictions are even stronger now especially now research proves intelligently controlled craft have and are visiting the earth and use the moon as a springboard they are also on other planets and moons within our solar system.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 16, 2017, 11:28:34 PM
Out of focus objects do not pulse from the center outwards like they were.
I
think that a spinning reflective object could act like that, but I haven't tried to replicate it, yet. :)
QuoteThose objects have a life to them that chunks of ice do not display.
I don't see the repetition of a simple pattern as a sign of life.
QuoteI get you are a sceptic and why not?
Yes, I am, in all topics, why should I accept what anyone says? :)
QuoteI am an ardent believer, part of the reason is because of what I saw in 2006, it was as bright as the sun, hung in the air for a good 5 minutes or so, was silent and shot straight up .like nothing man has produced which is in the public domain. It did have a profound affect on me because from that point on I knew that we are not that special, there are other intelligent life forms out there in the universe and the ufo phenomenon was very real.
I never saw an UFO, but even if I did that wouldn't make me think that all other things I cannot explain would be the same thing, as that doesn't make sense.
QuoteMy convictions are even stronger now especially now research proves intelligently controlled craft have and are visiting the earth and use the moon as a springboard they are also on other planets and moons within our solar system.
I'm yet to see any proof of that, so I will keep my scepticism. :)
If this is not proof then god knows what is.....
https://flic.kr/p/WPEe3D
Obvious alien architecture. The greys with a hint of reptoid no doubt.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 17, 2017, 03:12:52 PM
Obvious alien architecture. The greys with a hint of reptoid no doubt.
In any specific place?
Quote from: ArMaP on July 17, 2017, 09:34:37 PM
In any specific place?
All overit.
If you cant see anything do not worry. I have been doing this for a very long time so I have trained my eyes so I now know what I am looking at. Telescopic doo dah whatsits are all over the place I could not even begin to imagine what any of it is but there are lots of telescopicly extended pipe type structures and other strange anomalies. I will try and break down some of the images but I must admit I'm surprised you are at the level you hold on this forum but you give off the vibe you cant see anything. No big deal I'm happy to be here showing people that I have found some interesting photos which show things I would not expect to see because they do not occur in nature and prove that we are being lied to. There are a lot of disinfo agents around pedling pictures of rocks and calling it aliens. A lot of the researchers you see on TV are censored so they plant the tinyest of seeds. NASA are government stooges so they will never release anything because the vested interests of the military weaponising space etc. We will never set foot on the moon again.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 17, 2017, 10:05:20 PM
All overit.
OK, some specific cases would help.
QuoteIf you cant see anything do not worry.
I'm not worried, I have been looking at photos of the Moon and Mars for the last 14 years and I only saw a few unusual things. :)
QuoteI have been doing this for a very long time so I have trained my eyes so I now know what I am looking at.
That may be a problem.
QuoteI will try and break down some of the images but I must admit I'm surprised you are at the level you hold on this forum but you give off the vibe you cant see anything.
That would be good. And you shouldn't be surprised, each person has their own way of seeing things that are not completely obvious, both by nature and by training.
It's a lot of work for a zero return :D
What I might be seeing on my 28" 4K monitor might not be the same as what someone looking at it on a 17" monitor or a laptop screen. Also might look different on someone else's 50" plasma tv. Specifics are a good thing.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 17, 2017, 11:21:41 PM
It's a lot of work for a zero return :D
Then why do you post? ???
I like sticking itvto ghe man lol....
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 12:32:07 AM
I like sticking itvto ghe man lol....
Posting photos that nobody understands hardly do that...
Quote from: ArMaP on July 18, 2017, 12:56:45 AM
Posting photos that nobody understands hardly do that...
The structures are way beyond our understanding for sure. I dont think it is important to know what they are. The importance lies in recognising that they are there and the history we've been sold is all built on a deception.
There are anomalies on the moon, NASA have been keeping it a secret. That is the story.
https://flic.kr/p/WLXxvA
This is the biggest secret in the history of mankind why is it being hidden?
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 02:37:47 AM
The structures are way beyond our understanding for sure.
What structures?
QuoteI dont think it is important to know what they are.
That's the most important part, knowing if they are natural, artificial or just misinterpretation.
QuoteThere are anomalies on the moon, NASA have been keeping it a secret. That is the story.
That's the problem, it's only a story if you don't show proof of what you say.
Quote from: ArMaP on July 18, 2017, 09:20:45 AM
What structures?
That's the most important part, knowing if they are natural, artificial or just misinterpretation.
That's the problem, it's only a story if you don't show proof of what you say.
How do you look at an image? Try zooming to compare the back of the moon images I posted with the fake LROC ones.
You wont do that because you'll say it is JPEG artefacts :p
Look at how LROC shows craters filled in and no structures at any level. Zoom in, can you see any perfect circles or 90 degree lines. Are there anythings resembling pipes or boxes or sqare openings. Are there any humanoid head structures etc. Does it look like the dead barren landscape that old hack Buzz Aldrin keeps banging on about., Wondered why he kept going on about Mars, to deflect attention away from the moon.
How comes the pictures they post of the lunar landing sites are worse quality than from Apollo itself?
How long have you been working for them ? :)
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mare_Crisium_4191_h3.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://flic.kr/p/Vz34qW
https://flic.kr/p/Vz2uwj
https://flic.kr/p/WA9cs9
This looks like what you'd expect to see on the surface of the moon ?
https://flic.kr/p/WDtY7H
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 11:07:35 AM
How do you look at an image?
With the right tool, my eyes. ;)
QuoteTry zooming to compare the back of the moon images I posted with the fake LROC ones.
That's one problem, you start by stating that LROC images are fake. Why are they fake? Can you prove they are fake or it's just your opinion?
QuoteYou wont do that because you'll say it is JPEG artefacts :p
I will look if you give me an example, I'm not going to choose a few photos from the thousands available without knowing what you want me to look at.
QuoteLook at how LROC shows craters filled in and no structures at any level.
Craters filled in? An example, please.
QuoteZoom in, can you see any perfect circles or 90 degree lines. Are there anythings resembling pipes or boxes or sqare openings. Are there any humanoid head structures etc. Does it look like the dead barren landscape that old hack Buzz Aldrin keeps banging on about., Wondered why he kept going on about Mars, to deflect attention away from the moon.
Sorry, I don't understand which of those are questions (if any) and which aren't. Could you be more specific?
QuoteHow comes the pictures they post of the lunar landing sites are worse quality than from Apollo itself?
What pictures? LROC pictures compared with Apollo pictures? It's hard to know what you're talking about if you don't say more.
QuoteHow long have you been working for them ? :)
Never, I work for a Portuguese software company, have been looking at Moon photos for the last 14 years and have been involved in digital imagery for around 30 years.
Quote
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mare_Crisium_4191_h3.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://flic.kr/p/Vz34qW
https://flic.kr/p/Vz2uwj
https://flic.kr/p/WA9cs9
You talk about LROC photos and post photos from Apollo 16 and Lunar Orbiter 4? I don't understand it, just posting images meanings nothing, I don't understand what you want me to do, if anything. ???
QuoteThis looks like what you'd expect to see on the surface of the moon ?
https://flic.kr/p/WDtY7H
That highly altered image, making it useless? No.
Only contrast and brightness change does not make billions of years old alien artefacts materialise?
https://www.flickr.com/gp/150974590@N04/DVdPV7
Uncovring that which does not want to be uncovered is not easy.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/150974590@N04/DVdPV7
This video might help.
https://youtu.be/xjRam33WVts
Lroc lo4 same sort of fakes anyway.
The aliens are so powerful they even frightened the Ruskies off of the moon. I know what my eyes see and I am stiking with it so does every one else I know youd have to be a mental case to deny it. Any way time to move on.
It's all swamp gas and wether ballons. Crash test dummies and want to believery.
Nothing to see here.
As you weren't
Obviously you cannot see past your passion 8)
The Living Moon website and a good part of Pegasus is devoted to Lunar Anomalies, hence the name "Living Moon" and has roughly 10 years worth of research, several thousand web pages, devoted to the moon, Apollo, et al
perhaps you would be better served in your research if you took time to read a bit
Seeker
I dont think there is anymore for me to learn here. The moon is crawling with aliens, NASA learned it in the 1960's and have spent the past 60 years covering it up...... Roswell was real. And we have no defence against the super powerful aliens that have brought us in to being. What more could I learn about it?
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 07:15:24 PM
I dont think there is anymore for me to learn here. The moon is crawling with aliens, NASA learned it in the 1960's and have spent the past 60 years covering it up...... Roswell was real. And we have no defence against the super powerful aliens that have brought us in to being. What more could I learn about it?
In your case, with your statements, I would say absolutely nothing ::)
The majority of us here realize that we aren't young enough to know everything...
Seeker
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 02:48:28 PM
Only contrast and brightness change does not make billions of years old alien artefacts materialise?
No, but they may make enough changes in the images to make things appear, things that, to some people, look like artificial structures.
QuoteUncovring that which does not want to be uncovered is not easy.
Does that mean that structures themselves don't
want to be uncovered? Strange.
QuoteThis video might help.
https://youtu.be/xjRam33WVts
It didn't, it was just a badly converted video, highly processed video. Also, with no reference to what we are supposed to look at.
Useless.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 07:15:24 PM
I dont think there is anymore for me to learn here.
There are many things you could learn, but to learn any thing you need intent, and it looks like you don't want to learn any thing.
You could learn how to process images without removing too much data, you could learn how to process videos without destroying most of the information, you could learn how to grab images from videos without having a watermark spoiling the image.
You could also learn how to present your ideas to other people.
And you could learn a little humility and start by thinking that you may be wrong and look for evidences instead of looking for confirmation.
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 07:15:24 PM
I dont think there is anymore for me to learn here.
Here is a lot of material to research. Much about moon anomalies. Or this "mcMoon" story in an old defunced McDonalds. i've read it here on Pegasus. :)
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 18, 2017, 07:15:24 PM
I dont think there is anymore for me to learn here. The moon is crawling with aliens, NASA learned it in the 1960's and have spent the past 60 years covering it up...... Roswell was real. And we have no defence against the super powerful aliens that have brought us in to being. What more could I learn about it?
Pegasus is the mother lode for interesting data. I encourage you to take a look at the whole site before making a judgment about what you can learn here.
Irene :)
Quote from: ArMaP on July 18, 2017, 09:38:24 PM
There are many things you could learn, but to learn any thing you need intent, and it looks like you don't want to learn any thing.
You could learn how to process images without removing too much data, you could learn how to process videos without destroying most of the information, you could learn how to grab images from videos without having a watermark spoiling the image.
You could also learn how to present your ideas to other people.
And you could learn a little humility and start by thinking that you may be wrong and look for evidences instead of looking for confirmation.
I'm not wrong, dont want to do any puppy walking. Removing water marks means spending money that I just dont have.
As I have said most of the stuff I am working with is already not very good quality. Again rubbish in means rubbish out. Even the tiffs are not very good. 10gb of garbage is still 10gb of garbage. Anyone want to do a better job than me on a video that is already fried? A lot of the material that has anomalies in is bad quality on purpose because of the military industrial complex keeping the good stuff for bad deeds. You cant polish a turd but as you have seen you can varnish them.......😀
Quote from: Lunarstation on July 19, 2017, 12:18:28 AM
I'm not wrong, dont want to do any puppy walking.
That's the worst error you can make, but I guess it's too late for you to change.
QuoteRemoving water marks means spending money that I just dont have.
Not really, you just have to use different software. The software I use mostly is free, so I can explain how I did whatever I did and anyone interested can download the software and try for themselves.
QuoteAs I have said most of the stuff I am working with is already not very good quality. Again rubbish in means rubbish out.
I agree, but I have yet to see you using the best photos, it looks like you only use the useless ones.
QuoteEven the tiffs are not very good.
They are good, they just have little contrast, but that doesn't mean worse quality.
QuoteA lot of the material that has anomalies in is bad quality on purpose because of the military industrial complex keeping the good stuff for bad deeds. You cant polish a turd but as you have seen you can varnish them.......😀
I only saw you using the worst material, so if you use garbage you cannot get gold.